The influence of selection modality, display dynamics and error feedback on patterns of human foraging

References

• Bachmann, D., Weichert, F., & Rinkenauer, G. (2015). Evaluation of the leap motion controller as a new contact-free pointing device. Sensors, 15(1), 214–233. https://doi.org/10.3390/s150100214
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bond, A. B. (1983). Visual search and selection of natural stimuli in the pigeon: The attention threshold hypothesis. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 9(3), 292–306.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Brainard, D. H. (1997). The psychophysics toolbox. Spatial Vision, 10, 433–436. doi: 10.1163/156856897X00357
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Cain, M. S., Vul, E., Clark, K., & Mitroff, S. R. (2012). A Bayesian optimal foraging model of human visual search. Psychological Science, 23(9), 1047–1054. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797612440460
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Card, S. K., English, W. K., & Burr, B. J. (1978). Evaluation of mouse, rate-controlled isometric joystick, step keys, and text keys for text selection on a CRT. Ergonomics, 21(8), 601–613. https://doi.org/10.1080/00140137808931762
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clarke, A. D. F., Irons, J., James, W., Leber, A. B., & Hunt, A. R. (2018). Stable individual differences in strategies within, but not between, visual search tasks. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/bqa5v
   Google Scholar
• Dawkins, M. (1971). Shifts of ‘attention’ in chicks during feeding. Animal Behaviour, 19(3), 575–582. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0003-3472(71)80114-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de’Sperati, C., & Thornton, I. M. (2019). Motion prediction at low contrast. Vision Research, 154, 85–96. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.visres.2018.11.004
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dukas, R. (2002). Behavioural and ecological consequences of limited attention. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences, 357(1427), 1539–1547. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2002.1063
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dukas, R., & Ellner, S. (1993). Information processing and prey detection. Ecology, 74(5), 1337–1346. doi: 10.2307/1940064
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Faul, F., Erdfelder, E., Lang, A.-G., & Buchner, A. (2007). G*power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behavior Research Methods, 39(2), 175–191. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03193146
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fitts, P. M. (1954). The information capacity of the human motor system in controlling the amplitude of movement. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 47(6), 381–391. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0055392
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Fougnie, D., Cormiea, S. M., Zhang, J., Alvarez, G. A., & Wolfe, J. M. (2015). Winter is coming: How humans forage in a temporally structured environment. Journal of Vision, 15(11), 1. doi: 10.1167/15.11.1
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gilchrist, I. D., North, A., & Hood, B. (2001). Is visual search really like foraging? Perception, 30(12), 1459–1464. doi: 10.1068/p3249
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heinrich, B., Mudge, P. R., & Deringis, P. G. (1977). Laboratory analysis of flower constancy in foraging bumblebees: Bombus ternarius and B. Terricola. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 2(3), 247–265. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00299738
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hills, T. T., Jones, M. N., & Todd, P. M. (2012). Optimal foraging in semantic memory. Psychological Review, 119(2), 431–440. doi: 10.1037/a0027373
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hills, T. T., Kalff, C., & Wiener, J. M. (2013). Adaptive Lévy processes and area-restricted search in human foraging. PLoS One, 8(4), e60488. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0060488
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hulleman, J., & Olivers, C. N. (2017). On the brink: The demise of the item in visual search moves closer. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 40, e163. doi: 10.1017/S0140525X16000364
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jackson, R. R., & Li, D. (2004). One-encounter search-image formation by araneophagic spiders. Animal Cognition, 7(4), 247–254. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10071-004-0219-x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jeffreys, H. (1998). Theory of probability (3rd ed.). Oxford [Oxfordshire]: New York: Clarendon Press. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jóhannesson, Ó. I., Ásgeirsson, Á. G., & Kristjánsson, Á. (2012). Saccade performance in the nasal and temporal hemifields. Experimental Brain Research, 219(1), 107–120. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-012-3071-2
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jóhannesson, Ó. I., Kristjánsson, Á., & Thornton, I. M. (2017). Are foraging patterns in humans related to working memory and inhibitory control? Japanese Psychological Research, 59(2), 152–166. doi: 10.1111/jpr.12152
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jóhannesson, Ó. I., Thornton, I. M., Smith, I. J., Chetverikov, A., & Kristjánsson, Á. (2016). Visual foraging with fingers and eye gaze. I-Perception, 7(2). https://doi.org/10.1177/2041669516637279
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kamil, A. C., & Bond, A. B. (2006). Selective attention, priming, and foraging behavior. In Comparative cognition: Experimental Explorations of animal Intelligence (pp. 106–126).
   Google Scholar
• Kleiner, M., Brainard, D. H., Pelli, D. G., Ingling, A., Murray, R., & Broussard, C.. (2007). What’s new in Psychtoolbox-3. Perception, 36(14), 1–16.
   Google Scholar
• Kristjánsson, Á., & Ásgeirsson, Á. G. (2019). Attentional priming: Recent insights and current controversies. Current Opinion in Psychology, 29, 71–75. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copsyc.2018.11.013
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kristjánsson, Á., & Egeth, H. (2019). How feature integration theory integrated cognitive psychology, neurophysiology, and psychophysics. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13414-019-01803-7
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kristjánsson, Á., Jóhannesson, Ó. I., & Thornton, I. M. (2014). Common attentional constraints in visual foraging. PLoS ONE, 9(6), e100752. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0100752
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kristjánsson, T., & Kristjánsson, Á. (2018). Foraging through multiple target categories reveals the flexibility of visual working memory. Acta Psychologica, 183, 108–115. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2017.12.005
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kristjánsson, T., Thornton, I. M., Chetverikov, A., & Kristjánsson, Á. (2019). Dynamics of visual attention revealed in foraging tasks. Cognition, in press.
   Google Scholar
• Kristjánsson, T., Thornton, I. M., & Kristjánsson, Á. (2018). Time limits during visual foraging reveal flexible working memory templates. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 44(6), 827–835.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leigh, R. J., & Zee, D. S. (2015). The neurology of eye movements (5th ed.). Oxford; New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• MacKenzie, I. S. (1992). Fitts’ law as a research and design tool in human-computer interaction. Human–Computer Interaction, 7(1), 91–139. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327051hci0701_3
   Google Scholar
• Masson, M. E. (2011). A tutorial on a practical Bayesian alternative to null-hypothesis significance testing. Behavior Research Methods, 43(3), 679–690. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-010-0049-5
   Google Scholar
• Pelli, D. G. (1997). The videotoolbox software for visual psychophysics: Transforming numbers into movies. Spatial Vision, 10(4), 437–442. doi: 10.1163/156856897X00366
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Pellicano, E., Smith, A. D., Cristino, F., Hood, B. M., Briscoe, J., & Gilchrist, I. D. (2011). Children with autism are neither systematic nor optimal foragers. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 108(1), 421–426. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1014076108
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pietrewicz, A. T., & Kamil, A. C. (1979). Search image formation in the blue Jay (Cyanocitta cristata). Science, 204(4399), 1332–1333. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.204.4399.1332
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prpic, V., Kniestedt, I., Camilleri, E., Maureira, M. G., Kristjánsson, Á., & Thornton, I. M. (2019). A serious game to explore human foraging in a 3D environment. PLoS ONE 14(7), e0219827. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0219827
   Google Scholar
• Raftery, A. E. (1995). Bayesian model selection in social research. Sociological Methodology, 25, 111. https://doi.org/10.2307/271063
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thornton, I. M., Bülthoff, H. H., Horowitz, T. S., Rynning, A., & Lee, S.-W. (2014). Interactive multiple object tracking (iMOT). PloS One, 9(2), e86974. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0086974
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thornton, I. M., & Horowitz, T. S. (2004). The multi-item localization (MILO) task: Measuring the spatiotemporal context of vision for action. Perception & Psychophysics, 66(1), 38–50. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03194859
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thornton, I. M., & Horowitz, T. S. (2015). Does action disrupt multiple object tracking (MOT)? Psihologija, 48(3), 289–301. https://doi.org/10.2298/PSI1503289T
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thornton, I. M., Jóhannesson, O. I., & Kristjánsson, Á. (2015). Choice invaders: A new iPad task to explore fixed-interval target selection. Perception, 44, 285–285.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tinbergen, L. (1960). The natural control of insects in pinewoods I. Factors influencing the intensity of predation by songbirds. Archives Néerlandaises de Zoologie, 13(3), 265–343. https://doi.org/10.1163/036551660X00053
   Google Scholar
• Treisman, A. M., & Gelade, G. (1980). A feature-integration theory of attention. Cognitive Psychology, 12(1), 97–136. doi: 10.1016/0010-0285(80)90005-5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wagenmakers, E.-J., Wetzels, R., Borsboom, D., & van der Maas, H. L. J. (2011). Why psychologists must change the way they analyze their data: The case of psi: comment on Bem (2011). Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 100(3), 426–432. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0022790
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Watson, J. M., & Strayer, D. L. (2010). Supertaskers: Profiles in extraordinary multitasking ability. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 17(4), 479–485. https://doi.org/10.3758/PBR.17.4.479
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wolfe, J. M. (2010). Visual search. Current Biology, 20(8), R346–R349. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2010.02.016
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wolfe, J. M. (2013). When is it time to move to the next raspberry bush? Foraging rules in human visual search. Journal of Vision, 13(3), 10. doi: 10.1167/13.3.10
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wolfe, J. M., Aizenman, A. M., Boettcher, S. E. P., & Cain, M. S. (2016). Hybrid foraging search: Searching for multiple instances of multiple types of target. Vision Research, 119, 50–59. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.visres.2015.12.006
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wolfe, J. M., Cain, M. S., & Aizenman, A. M. (2019). Guidance and selection history in hybrid foraging visual search. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 81, 637–653. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13414-018-01649-5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wolfe, J. M., & Horowitz, T. S. (2004). Opinion: What attributes guide the deployment of visual attention and how do they do it? Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 5(6), 495–501. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrn1411
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wolfe, J. M., & Horowitz, T. S. (2017). Five factors that guide attention in visual search. Nature Human Behaviour, 1(3), 58. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-017-0058
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Woods, A. J., Göksun, T., Chatterjee, A., Zelonis, S., Mehta, A., & Smith, S. E. (2013). The development of organized visual search. Acta Psychologica, 143(2), 191–199. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2013.03.008
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar