829
Views
26
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

Attention AND mentalizing? Reframing a debate on social orienting of attention

ORCID Icon & ORCID Icon
Pages 97-105 | Received 10 Oct 2019, Accepted 22 Dec 2019, Published online: 10 Feb 2020

References

  • Alwall, N., Johansson, D., & Hansen, S. (2010). The gender difference in gaze-cueing: Associations with empathizing and systemizing. Personality and Individual Differences, 49(7), 729–732. doi: 10.1016/j.paid.2010.06.016
  • Apperly, I. A. (2018). Mindreading and psycholinguistic approaches to perspective taking: Establishing common ground. Topics in Cognitive Science, 10(1), 133–139. doi: 10.1111/tops.12308
  • Apperly, I. A., & Butterfill, S. A. (2009). Do humans have two systems to track beliefs and belief-like states? Psychological Review, 116(4), 953–970. doi: 10.1037/a0016923
  • Atkinson, M. A., Simpson, A. A., & Cole, G. G. (2018). Visual attention and action: How cueing, direct mapping, and social interactions drive orienting. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 25, 1585–1605. doi: 10.3758/s13423-017-1354-0
  • Baker, L. J., Levin, D. T., & Saylor, M. M. (2016). The extent of default visual perspective taking in complex layouts. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 42(4), 508–516. doi: 10.1037/xhp0000164
  • Bayliss, A. P., di Pellegrino, G., & Tipper, S. P. (2005). Sex differences in eye gaze and symbolic cueing of attention. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology Section A, 58(4), 631–650. doi: 10.1080/02724980443000124
  • Bayliss, A. P., Paul, M. A., Cannon, P. R., & Tipper, S. P. (2006). Gaze cuing and affective judgments of objects: I like what you look at. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 13(6), 1061–1066. doi: 10.3758/BF03213926
  • Bayliss, A. P., Schuch, S., & Tipper, S. P. (2010). Gaze cueing elicited by emotional faces is influenced by affective context. Visual Cognition, 18(8), 1214–1232. doi: 10.1080/13506285.2010.484657
  • Becker, M. W. (2010). The effectiveness of a gaze cue depends on the facial expression of emotion: Evidence from simultaneous competing cues. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 72(7), 1814–1824. doi: 10.3758/APP.72.7.1814
  • Birmingham, E., & Kingstone, A. (2009). Human social attention: A new look at past, present, and future investigations. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1156, 118–140. doi: 10.1111/j.1749-6632.2009.04468.x
  • Blakemore, S. J., Winston, J., & Frith, U. (2004). Social cognitive neuroscience: Where are we heading? Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 8(5), 216–222. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2004.03.012
  • Böckler, A., van der Wel, R. P., & Welsh, T. N. (2014). Catching eyes: Effects of social and nonsocial cues on attention capture. Psychological Science, 25(3), 720–727. doi: 10.1177/0956797613516147
  • Bukowski, H., Hietanen, J. K., & Samson, D. (2016). From gaze cueing to perspective taking: Revisiting the claim that we automatically compute where or what other people are looking at. Visual Cognition, 23(8), 1020–1042. doi: 10.1080/13506285.2015.1132804
  • Cabeza, R., Ciaramelli, E., & Moscovitch, M. (2012). Cognitive contributions of the ventral parietal cortex: An integrative theoretical account. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 16(6), 338–352. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2012.04.008
  • Callejas, A., Shulman, G. L., & Corbetta, M. (2014). Dorsal and ventral attention systems underlie social and symbolic cueing. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 26(1), 63–80. doi: 10.1162/jocn
  • Capozzi, F., Cavallo, A., Furlanetto, T., & Becchio, C. (2014). Altercentric intrusions from multiple perspectives: Beyond dyads. PLoS ONE, 9(12), e114210. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0114210
  • Capozzi, F., & Ristic, J. (2018). How attention gates social interactions. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1426(1), 179–198. doi: 10.1111/nyas.13854
  • Carlson, J. M., & Aday, J. (2018). In the presence of conflicting gaze cues, fearful expression and eye-size guide attention. Cognition and Emotion, 32(6), 1178–1188. doi: 10.1080/02699931.2017.1391065
  • Caruana, F., Cantalupo, G., Lo Russo, G., Mai, R., Sartori, I., & Avanzini, P. (2014). Human cortical activity evoked by gaze shift observation: An intracranial EEG study. Human Brain Mapping, 35(4), 1515–1528. doi: 10.1002/hbm.22270
  • Cole, G. G., Atkinson, M. A., D’Souza, A. D. C., & Smith, D. T. (2017). Spontaneous perspective taking in humans? Vision, 1(2), 17. doi: 10.3390/vision1020017
  • Cole, G. G., Atkinson, M., Le, A. T. D., & Smith, D. T. (2016). Do humans spontaneously take the perspective of others? Acta Psychologica, 164, 165–168. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2016.01.007
  • Cole, G. G., & Millett, A. C. (2019). The closing of the theory of mind: A critique of perspective-taking. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 26(6), 1787–1802. doi: 10.3758/s13423-019-01657-y
  • Cole, G. G., Smith, D. T., & Atkinson, M. A. (2015). Mental state attribution and the gaze cueing effect. Attention, Perception & Psychophysics, 77(4), 1105–1115. doi: 10.3758/s13414-014-0780-6
  • Conway, J. R., Lee, D., Ojaghi, M., Catmur, C., & Bird, G. (2017). Submentalizing or mentalizing in a level 1 perspective-taking task: A cloak and goggles test. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 43(3), 454–465.
  • Corbetta, M. (2014). Hemispatial neglect: Clinic, pathogenesis, and treatment. Seminars in Neurology, 34(5), 514–523. doi: 10.1055/s-0034-1396005
  • Corbetta, M., Patel, G., & Shulman, G. L. (2008). The reorienting system of the human brain: From environment to theory of mind. Neuron, 58(3), 306–324. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2008.04.017
  • Deen, B., Koldewyn, K., Kanwisher, N., & Saxe, R. (2015). Functional organization of social perception and cognition in the superior temporal sulcus. Cerebral Cortex, 25(11), 4596–4609. doi: 10.1093/cercor/bhv111
  • Driver, J., Davis, G., Ricciardelli, P., Kidd, P., Maxwell, E., & Baron-Cohen, S. (1999). Gaze perception triggers reflexive visuospatial orienting. Visual Cognition, 6(5), 509–540. doi: 10.1080/135062899394920
  • Dugué, L., Merriam, E. P., Heeger, D. J., & Carrasco, M. (2017). Specific visual subregions of TPJ mediate reorienting of spatial attention. Cerebral Cortex, 28(7), 2375–2390. doi: 10.1093/cercor/bhx140
  • Emery, N. J. (2000). The eyes have it: The neuroethology, function and evolution of social gaze. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews, 24(6), 581–604. doi: 10.1016/S0149-7634(00)00025-7
  • Freeman, J. B., & Johnson, K. L. (2016). More than meets the eye: Split-second social perception. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 20(5), 362–374. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2016.03.003
  • Freundlieb, M., Kovács, Á. M, & Sebanz, N. (2018). Reading your mind while you are reading: Evidence for spontaneous visuospatial perspective taking during a semantic categorization task. Psychological Science, 29(4), 614–622. doi: 10.1177/0956797617740973
  • Freundlieb, M., Sebanz, N., & Kovács, Á. M. (2017). Out of your sight, out of my mind: Knowledge about another person’ s visual access modulates spontaneous visuospatial perspective-taking. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 43(6), 1065–1072. doi: 10.1037/xhp0000379
  • Friesen, C. K., & Kingstone, A. (1998). The eyes have it! Reflexive orienting is triggered by nonpredictive gaze. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 5(3), 490–495. doi: 10.3758/BF03208827
  • Frischen, A., Bayliss, A. P., & Tipper, S. P. (2007). Gaze cueing of attention: Visual attention, social cognition, and individual differences. Psychological Bulletin, 133(4), 694–724. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.133.4.694
  • Frischen, A., & Tipper, S. P. (2004). Orienting attention via observed gaze shift evokes longer term inhibitory effects: Implications for social interactions, attention, and memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 133(4), 516–533. doi: 10.1037/0096-3445.133.4.516
  • Furlanetto, T., Becchio, C., Samson, D., & Apperly, I. A. (2016). Altercentric interference in level 1 visual perspective taking reflects the ascription of mental states, not submentalizing. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 42(2), 158–163. doi: 10.1037/xhp0000138
  • Gobel, M. S., Tufft, M. R. A., & Richardson, D. C. (2017). Social beliefs and visual attention: How the social relevance of a cue influences spatial orienting. Cognitive Science, 1, 1–25. doi: 10.1111/cogs.12529
  • Hayward, D. A., & Ristic, J. (2017). Feature and motion-based gaze cuing is linked with reduced social competence. Scientific Reports, 7, 44221. doi: 10.1038/srep44221
  • Heyes, C. (1998). Theory of mind in nonhuman primates. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 21(1998), 101–114.
  • Heyes, C. (2014). Submentalizing: I am not really reading your mind. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 9(2), 131–143. doi: 10.1177/1745691613518076
  • Igelström, K. M., & Graziano, M. S. A. (2017). The inferior parietal lobule and temporoparietal junction: A network perspective. Neuropsychologia, 105, 70–83. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2017.01.001
  • Joyce, K., Schenke, K., Bayliss, A. P., & Bach, P. (2016). Looking ahead: Anticipatory cueing of attention to objects others will look at. Cognitive Neuroscience, 7, 74–81. doi: 10.1080/17588928.2015.1053443
  • Kingstone, A., Kachkovski, G., Vasilyev, D., Kuk, M., & Welsh, T. N. (2019). Mental attribution is not sufficient or necessary to trigger attentional orienting to gaze. Cognition, 189, 35–40. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2019.03.010
  • Kuhn, T. S. (1962). The structure of scientific revolutions. American anthropologist. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
  • Kuhn, G., & Tipples, J. (2011). Increased gaze following for fearful faces. It depends on what you’re looking for! Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 18(1), 89–95. doi: 10.3758/s13423-010-0033-1
  • Kuhn, G., Vacaityte, I., D’Souza, A. D. C., Millett, A. C., & Cole, G. G. (2018). Mental states modulate gaze following, but not automatically. Cognition, 180, 1–9. doi: 10.1016/J.COGNITION.2018.05.020
  • Langton, S. R. H. (2018). I don’t see it your way: The dot perspective task does not gauge spontaneous perspective taking. Vision, 2(1), 6. doi: 10.3390/vision2010006
  • Lassalle, A., & Itier, R. J. (2015). Emotional modulation of attention orienting by gaze varies with dynamic cue sequence. Visual Cognition, 23(6), 720–735. doi: 10.1080/13506285.2015.1083067
  • Manera, V., Elena, M. R., Bayliss, A. P., & Becchio, C. (2014). When seeing is more than looking: Intentional gaze modulates object desirability. Emotion, 14(4), 824–832. doi: 10.1037/a0036258
  • Marotta, A., Lupiáñez, J., Martella, D., & Casagrande, M. (2012). Eye gaze versus arrows as spatial cues: Two qualitatively different modes of attentional selection. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 38(2), 326–335. doi: 10.1037/a0023959
  • Mathews, A., Fox, E., Yiend, J., & Calder, A. (2003). The face of fear: Effects of eye gaze and emotion on visual attention. Visual Cognition, 10(7), 823–835. doi: 10.1080/13506280344000095
  • McCrackin, S. D., & Itier, R. J. (2019). Individual differences in the emotional modulation of gaze-cuing. Cognition and Emotion, 33(4), 768–800. doi: 10.1080/02699931.2018.1495618
  • Meunier, H. (2017). Do monkeys have a theory of mind? How to answer the question? Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 82, 110–123. doi: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2016.11.007
  • Michael, J., & D’Ausilio, A. (2015). Domain-specific and domain-general processes in social perception – A complementary approach. Consciousness and Cognition, 36, 434–437. doi: 10.1016/j.concog.2014.12.009
  • Nuku, P., & Bekkering, H. (2008). Joint attention: Inferring what others perceive (and don’t perceive). Consciousness and Cognition, 17(1), 339–349. doi: 10.1016/j.concog.2007.06.014
  • Penn, D. C., & Povinelli, D. J. (2007). On the lack of evidence that non-human animals possess anything remotely resembling a ‘theory of mind’. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 362, 731–744. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2006.2023
  • Perez-Osorio, J., Müller, H. J., Wiese, E., & Wykowska, A. (2015). Gaze following is modulated by expectations regarding others’ action goals. PLoS ONE, 10(11), e0143614. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0143614
  • Pesimena, G., Wilson, C. J., Bertamini, M., & Soranzo, A. (2019). The role of perspective taking on attention: A review of the special issue on the reflexive attentional shift phenomenon. Vision, 3(4), 1–15. doi: 10.3390/vision3040052
  • Ristic, J., & Giesbrecht, B. (2011). Electrophysiological evidence for spatiotemporal flexibility in the ventrolateral attention network. PLoS ONE, 6(9), e24436. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0024436
  • Ristic, J., & Kingstone, A. (2005). Taking control of reflexive social attention. Cognition, 94(3), B55–B65. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2004.04.005
  • Ristic, J., Mottron, L., Friesen, C. K., Iarocci, G., Burack, J. A., & Kingstone, A. (2005). Eyes are special but not for everyone: The case of autism. Cognitive Brain Research, 24(3), 715–718. doi: 10.1016/j.cogbrainres.2005.02.007
  • Rogers, R. D., Bayliss, A. P., Szepietowska, A., Dale, L., Reeder, L., Pizzamiglio, G., … Tipper, S. P. (2014). I want to help you, but I am not sure why: Gaze-cuing induces altruistic giving. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 143(2), 763–777. doi: 10.1037/a0033677
  • Samson, D., Apperly, I. A., Braithwaite, J. J., Andrews, B. J., & Bodley Scott, S. E. (2010). Seeing it their way: Evidence for rapid and involuntary computation of what other people see. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 36(5), 1255–1266. doi: 10.1017/CBO9781107415324.004
  • Santiesteban, I., Catmur, C., Hopkins, S. C., Bird, G., & Heyes, C. (2014). Avatars and arrows: Implicit mentalizing or domain-general processing? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 40(3), 929–937. doi: 10.1037/a0035175
  • Santiesteban, I., Kaur, S., Bird, G., & Catmur, C. (2017). Attentional processes, not implicit mentalizing, mediate performance in a perspective-taking task: Evidence from stimulation of the temporoparietal junction. NeuroImage, 155(15), 305–311. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2017.04.055
  • Sato, W., Kochiyama, T., Uono, S., & Yoshikawa, S. (2009). Commonalities in the neural mechanisms underlying automatic attentional shifts by gaze, gestures, and symbols. NeuroImage, 45(3), 984–992. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2008.12.052
  • Schneider, D., Slaughter, V. P., & Dux, P. E. (2017). Current evidence for automatic theory of mind processing in adults. Cognition, 162, 27–31. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2017.01.018
  • Schurz, M., Kronbichler, M., Weissengruber, S., Surtees, A., & Perner, J. (2018). Measuring visual perspective taking in the brain with avatars and arrows: Which question are we asking? NeuroImage, 181(July), 814–817. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2018.07.048
  • Schurz, M., & Perner, J. (2015). An evaluation of neurocognitive models of theory of mind. Frontiers in Psychology, 6, 1610. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01610
  • Teufel, C., Alexis, D. M., Clayton, N. S., & Davis, G. (2010). Mental-state attribution drives rapid, reflexive gaze following. Attention, Perception & Psychophysics, 72(3), 695–705. doi: 10.3758/APP.72.3.695
  • Teufel, C., Fletcher, P. C., & Davis, G. (2010). Seeing other minds: Attributed mental states influence perception. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 14(8), 376–382. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2010.05.005
  • Tipples, J. (2002). Eye gaze is not unique: Automatic orienting in response to uninformative arrows. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 9(2), 314–318. doi: 10.3758/BF03196287
  • Tipples, J., Dodd, M., Grubaugh, J., & Kingstone, A. (2019). Verbal descriptions of cue direction affect object desirability. Frontiers in Psychology, 10, 471. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00471
  • Tipples, J., & Pecchinenda, A. (2019). A closer look at the size of the gaze-liking effect: A preregistered replication. Cognition and Emotion, 33(3), 623–629. doi: 10.1080/02699931.2018.1468732
  • van der Weiden, A., Veling, H., & Aarts, H. (2010). When observing gaze shifts of others enhances object desirability. Emotion, 10(6), 939–943. doi: 10.1037/a0020501
  • Wiese, E., Abubshait, A., Azarian, B., & Blumberg, E. J. (2019). Brain stimulation to left prefrontal cortex modulates attentional orienting to gaze cues. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 374(1771), 20180430. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2018.0430
  • Wiese, E., Buzzell, G., Abubshait, A., & Beatty, P. (2018). Seeing minds in others: Mind perception modulates low-level social-cognitive performance and relates to ventromedial prefrontal structures. Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience, 18(5), 837–856. doi: 10.17605/OSF.IO/AC47K
  • Wiese, E., Wykowska, A., Zwickel, J., & Müller, H. J. (2012). I see what you mean: How attentional selection is shaped by ascribing intentions to others. PLoS ONE, 7(9), e45391. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0045391

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.