Mental rotation of cubes with a snake face: The role of the human-body analogy revisited

References

• Alexander, G. M., & Evardone, M. (2008). Blocks and bodies: Sex differences in a novel version of the mental rotations test. Hormones and Behavior, 53, 177–184. doi: 10.1016/j.yhbeh.2007.09.014
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Amorim, M.-A., Isableu, B., & Jarraya, M. (2006). Embodied spatial transformations: “body analogy” for the mental rotation of objects. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 135, 327–347. doi: 10.1037/0096-3445.135.3.327
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Jong, T. (2019). A Bayesian Approach to the Correction for Multiplicity. doi: 10.31234/osf.io/s56mk
   Google Scholar
• Dienes, Z., & Mclatchie, N. (2018). Four reasons to prefer Bayesian analyses over significance testing. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 25, 207–218. doi: 10.3758/s13423-017-1266-z
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Doyle, R. A., & Voyer, D. (2018). Photographs of real human figures: Item types and persistent sex differences in mental rotation. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 71, 2411–2420. doi: 10.1177/1747021817742079
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ebersbach, M., & Krüger, M. (2016). View makes a difference: Presenting human figures from the back or front affects mental spatial transformations of children and adults. Spatial Cognition & Computation, 16, 173–191. doi: 10.1080/13875868.2015.1124109
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Faul, F., Erdfelder, E., Lang, A.-G., & Buchner, A. (2007). G*power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behavior Research Methods, 39, 175–191. doi: 10.3758/BF03193146
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gardony, A. L., Taylor, H. A., & Brunyé, T. T. (2014). What does physical rotation reveal about mental rotation? Psychological Science, 25, 605–612. doi: 10.1177/0956797613503174
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heil, M., & Jansen-Osmann, P. (2008). Sex differences in mental rotation with polygons of different complexity: Do men utilize holistic processes whereas women prefer piecemeal ones? The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 61, 683–689. doi: 10.1080/17470210701822967
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jansen, P., Lehmann, J., & Van Doren, J. (2012). Mental rotation performance in male soccer players. PLoS ONE, 7, e48620. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0048620
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• JASP Team. (2018). JASP (Version 0.9.2.0) [Computer software]. Retrieved from https://jasp-stats.org/
   Google Scholar
• Jeffreys, H. (1961). Theory of probability (3rd ed). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Just, M. A., & Carpenter, P. A. (1976). Eye fixations and cognitive processes. Cognitive Psychology, 8, 441–480. doi: 10.1016/0010-0285(76)90015-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khooshabeh, P., Hegarty, M., & Shipley, T. F. (2013). Individual differences in mental rotation: Piecemeal versus holistic processing. Experimental Psychology, 60, 164–171. doi: 10.1027/1618-3169/a000184
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krüger, M., Amorim, M. A., & Ebersbach, M. (2014). Mental rotation and the motor system: Embodiment head over heels. Acta Psychologica, 145, 104–110. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2013.11.004
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Makinae, S., & Kasai, T. (2017). Body analogy and sex differences in mental rotation. Japanese Journal of Psychology, 88, 452–459. (In Japanese). doi: 10.4992/jjpsy.88.16053
   Google Scholar
• Makinae, S., Yamazaki, K., & Kasai, T. (2015). Embodied cognition and sex differences in a mental rotation task. IEICE Technical Report. Human Communication Science, 114, 81–84. (In Japanese).
   Google Scholar
• Muto, H., Matsushita, S., & Morikawa, K. (2018). Spatial perspective taking mediated by whole-body motor simulation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 44, 337–355. doi: 10.1037/xhp0000464
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Muto, H., Matsushita, S., & Morikawa, K. (2019). Object’s symmetry alters spatial perspective-taking processes. Cognition, 191, 103987. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2019.05.024
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peirce, J. W. (2009). Generating stimuli for neuroscience using PsychoPy. Frontiers in Neuroinformatics, 2, 1–8. doi: 10.3389/neuro.11.010.2008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sayeki, Y. (1981). “Body analogy” and the cognition of rotated figures. Quarterly Newsletter of the Laboratory of Comparative Human Cognition, 3, 36–40.
   Google Scholar
• Sekiyama, K. (1982). Kinesthetic aspects of mental representations in the identification of left and right hands. Perception & Psychophysics, 32, 89–95. doi: 10.3758/BF03204268
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shepard, R. N., & Metzler, J. (1971). Mental rotation of three-dimensional objects. Science, 171, 701–703. doi: 10.1126/science.171.3972.701
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Voyer, D., & Jansen, P. (2016). Sex differences in chronometric mental rotation with human bodies. Psychological Research, 80, 974–984. doi: 10.1007/s00426-015-0701-x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wexler, M., Kosslyn, S. M., & Berthoz, A. (1998). Motor processes in mental rotation. Cognition, 68, 77–94. doi: 10.1016/S0010-0277(98)00032-8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wohlschläger, A., & Wohlschläger, A. (1998). Mental and manual rotation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 24, 397–412. doi: 10.1037/0096-1523.24.2.397
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wraga, M., Creem, S. H., & Proffitt, D. R. (2000). Updating displays after imagined object and viewer rotations. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 26, 151–168. doi: 10.1037//0278-7393.26.1.151
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zacks, J. M., & Michelon, P. (2005). Transformations of visuospatial images. Behavioral and Cognitive Neuroscience Reviews, 4, 96–118. doi: 10.1177/1534582305281085
   PubMedGoogle Scholar