References
- Anderson, B. A. (2017). Going for it: The economics of automaticity in perception and action. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 26, 140–145. doi: 10.1177/0963721416686181
- Anderson, B. A., & Britton, M. K. (2019). On the automaticity of attentional orienting to threatening stimuli. Emotion. doi: 10.1037/emo0000596
- Anderson, B. A., & Britton, M. K. (2019). Selection history in context: Evidence for the role of reinforcement learning in biasing attention. Attention, Perception, and Psychophysics, 81, 2666–2672. doi: 10.3758/s13414-019-01817-1
- Anderson, B. A., Chiu, M., DiBartolo, M. M., & Leal, S. L. (2017). On the distinction between value-driven attention and selection history: Evidence from individuals with depressive symptoms. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 24, 1636–1642. doi: 10.3758/s13423-017-1240-9
- Anderson, B. A., Folk, C. L., Garrison, R., & Rogers, L. (2016). Mechanisms of habitual approach: Failure to suppress irrelevant responses evoked by previously reward-associated stimuli. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 145, 796–805. doi: 10.1037/xge0000169
- Anderson, B. A., & Halpern, M. (2017). On the value-dependence of value-driven attentional capture. Attention, Perception, and Psychophysics, 79, 1001–1011. doi: 10.3758/s13414-017-1289-6
- Anderson, B. A., & Kim, H. (2019a). On the relationship between value-driven and stimulus-driven attentional capture. Attention, Perception, and Psychophysics, 81, 607–613. doi: 10.3758/s13414-019-01670-2
- Anderson, B. A., & Kim, H. (2019b). Test-retest reliability of value-driven attentional capture. Behavior Research Methods, 51, 720–726. doi: 10.3758/s13428-018-1079-7
- Anderson, B. A., Laurent, P. A., & Yantis, S. (2011). Value-driven attentional capture. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA, 108, 10367–10371. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1104047108
- Anderson, B. A., & Yantis, S. (2012). Value-driven attentional and oculomotor capture during goal-directed, unconstrained viewing. Attention, Perception, and Psychophysics, 74, 1644–1653. doi: 10.3758/s13414-012-0348-2
- Arita, J. T., Carlisle, N. B., & Woodman, G. F. (2012). Templates for rejection: Configuring attention to ignore task-irrelevant features. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 38, 580–584.
- Awh, E., Belopolsky, A. V., & Theeuwes, J. (2012). Top-down versus bottom-up attentional control: A failed theoretical dichotomy. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 16, 437–443. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2012.06.010
- Brainard, D. H. (1997). The Psychophysics Toolbox. Spatial Vision, 10, 433–436. doi: 10.1163/156856897X00357
- Gaspelin, N., Leonard, C. J., & Luck, S. J. (2015). Direct evidence for active suppression of salient-but-irrelevant sensory inputs. Psychological Science, 26, 1740–1750. doi: 10.1177/0956797615597913
- Gaspelin, N., Leonard, C. J., & Luck, S. J. (2017). Suppression of overt attentional capture by salient-but-irrelevant color singletons. Attention, Perception, and Psychophysics, 79, 45–62. doi: 10.3758/s13414-016-1209-1
- Gaspelin, N., & Luck, S. J. (2018). The role of inhibition in avoiding distraction by salient stimuli. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 22, 79–92. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2017.11.001
- Geng, J. J. (2014). Attentional mechanisms of distractor suppression. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 23, 147–153. doi: 10.1177/0963721414525780
- Geng, J. J., & DiQuattro, N. E. (2010). Attentional capture by a perceptually salient non-target facilitates target processing through inhibition and rapid rejection. Journal of Vision, 10(6), 5. doi: 10.1167/10.6.5
- Geng, J. J., Won, B.-Y., & Carlisle, N. B. (2019). Distractor ignoring: Strategies, learning, and passive filtering. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 28, 600–606. doi: 10.1177/0963721419867099
- Gong, M., Yang, F., & Li, S. (2016). Reward association facilitates distractor suppression in human visual search. European Journal of Neuroscience, 43, 942–953. doi: 10.1111/ejn.13174
- Grubb, M. A., & Li, Y. (2018). Assessing the role of accuracy-based feedback in value-driven attentional capture. Attention, Perception, and Psychophysics, 80, 822–828. doi: 10.3758/s13414-018-1494-y
- Hickey, C., Chelazzi, L., & Theeuwes, J. (2010). Reward changes salience in human vision via the anterior cingulate. Journal of Neuroscience, 30, 11096–11103. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1026-10.2010
- Hickey, C., van Zoest, W., & Theeuwes, J. (2010). The time course of exogenous and endogenous control of covert attention. Experimental Brain Research, 201, 789–796. doi: 10.1007/s00221-009-2094-9
- Kim, H., & Anderson, B. A. (2019a). Dissociable components of experience-driven attention. Current Biology, 29, 841–845.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2019.01.030
- Kim, H., & Anderson, B. A. (2019b). Dissociable neural mechanisms underlie value-driven and selection-driven attentional capture. Brain Research, 1708, 109–115. doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2018.11.026
- Kim, H., & Anderson, B. A. (2019c). Neural evidence for automatic value-modulated approach behavior. NeuroImage, 189, 150–158. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2018.12.050
- Munneke, J., Belopolsky, A. V., & Theeuwes, J. (2016). Distractors associated with reward break through the focus of attention. Attention, Perception, and Psychophysics, 78, 2213–2225. doi: 10.3758/s13414-016-1075-x
- Pearson, D., Osborn, R., Whitford, T. J., Failing, M., Theeuwes, J., & Le Pelley, M. E. (2016). Value-modulated oculomotor capture by task-irrelevant stimuli is a consequence of early competition on the saccade map. Attention, Perception, and Psychophysics, 78, 2226–2240. doi: 10.3758/s13414-016-1135-2
- Pearson, D., Watson, P., Cheng, P. X., & Le Pelley, M. E. (2019). Overt attentional capture by reward-related stimuli overcomes inhibitory suppression. PsyArXiv. doi:10.31234/osf.io/db9hg
- Roper, Z. J. J., & Vecera, S. P. (2016). Funny money: The attentional role of monetary feedback detached from expected value. Attention, Perception, and Psychophysics, 78, 2199–2212. doi: 10.3758/s13414-016-1147-y
- Rouder, J. N., Speckman, P. L., Sun, D., Morey, R. D., & Iverson, G. (2009). Bayesian t tests for accepting and rejecting the null hypothesis. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 16, 225–237. doi: 10.3758/PBR.16.2.225
- Sali, A. W., Anderson, B. A., & Yantis, S. (2014). The role of reward prediction in the control of attention. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 40, 1654–1664.
- Sawaki, R., & Luck, S. J. (2010). Capture versus suppression of attention by salient singletons: Electrophysiological evidence for an automatic attention-to-me signal. Attention, Perception, and Psychophysics, 72, 1455–1470. doi: 10.3758/APP.72.6.1455
- Schmidt, L. J., Belopolsky, A. V., & Theeuwes, J. (2015). Attentional capture by signals of threat. Cognition and Emotion, 29, 687–694. doi: 10.1080/02699931.2014.924484
- Sha, L. Z., & Jiang, Y. V. (2016). Components of reward-driven attentional capture. Attention, Perception, and Psychophysics, 78, 403–414. doi: 10.3758/s13414-015-1038-7
- van Zoest, W., & Donk, M. (2005). The effects of salience on saccadic target selection. Visual Cognition, 12, 353–375. doi: 10.1080/13506280444000229
- Wang, L., Yu, H., Hu, J., Theeuwes, J., Gong, X., Xiang, Y., … Zhou, X. (2015). Reward breaks through center-surround inhibition via anterior insula. Human Brain Mapping, 36, 5233–5251. doi: 10.1002/hbm.23004