349
Views
1
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

Changes in perceptual category affects serial dependence in judgements of attractiveness

&
Pages 557-580 | Received 20 Feb 2020, Accepted 20 Oct 2020, Published online: 10 Nov 2020

References

  • Alais, D., Kong, G., Palmer, C., & Clifford, C. (2018). Eye gaze direction shows a positive serial dependency. Journal of Vision, 18(4), 11–11. https://doi.org/10.1167/18.4.11
  • Alais, D., Leung, J., & Van der Burg, E. (2017). Linear summation of repulsive and attractive serial dependencies: Orientation and motion dependencies sum in motion perception. Journal of Neuroscience, 37(16), 4381–4390. https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4601-15.2017
  • Baayen, R.H, Davidson, D.J, & Bates, D.M. (2008). Mixed-effects modeling with crossed random effects for subjects and items. Journal of Memory and Language, 59(4), 390–412. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2007.12.005
  • Barr, D. J., Levy, R., Scheepers, C., & Tily, H. J. (2013). Random effects structure for confirmatory hypothesis testing: Keep it maximal. Journal of Memory and Language, 68(3), 255–278.
  • Bates, D., Mächler, M., Bolker, B., & Walker, S. (2015). Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4. Journal of Statistical Software, 67(1), 1–48. https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v067.i01
  • Bliss, D. P., Sun, J. J., & D’Esposito, M. (2017). Serial dependence is absent at the time of perception but increases in visual working memory. Scientific Reports, 7(1), 14739. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-15199-7
  • Bosch, A., Zisserman, A., & Munoz, X. (2007, July 9-10). Representing shape with a spatial pyramid kernel. In Proceedings of the 6th ACM international conference on image and video retrieval (pp. 401–408).
  • Braun, J., Amirshahi, S. A., Denzler, J., & Redies, C. (2013). Statistical image properties of print advertisements, visual artworks and images of architecture. Frontiers in Psychology, 4, 808. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00808
  • Bruce, V., & Young, A. (1986). Understanding face recognition. British Journal of Psychology, 77(3), 305–327. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8295.1986.tb02199.x
  • Campbell, F. W., & Maffei, L. (1971). The tilt after-effect: A fresh look. Vision Research, 11(8), 833–840. https://doi.org/10.1016/0042-6989(71)90005-8
  • Carbon, C. C., Faerber, S. J., Augustin, M. D., Mitterer, B., & Hutzler, F. (2018). First gender, then attractiveness: Indications of gender-specific attractiveness processing via ERP onsets. Neuroscience Letters, 686, 186–192. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neulet.2018.09.009
  • Casey, S. J., & Newell, F. N. (2007). Are representations of unfamiliar faces independent of encoding modality? Neuropsychologia, 45(3), 506–513. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2006.02.011
  • Chatterjee, A., Thomas, A., Smith, S. E., & Aguirre, G. K. (2009). The neural response to facial attractiveness. Neuropsychology, 23(2), 135–143. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0014430
  • Cicchini, G. M., Anobile, G., & Burr, D. C. (2014). Compressive mapping of number to space reflects dynamic encoding mechanisms, not static logarithmic transform. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 111(21), 7867–7872. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1402785111
  • Cicchini, G. M., & Kristjánsson, Á. (2015). Guest editorial: On the possibility of a unifying framework for serial dependencies. i. Perception, 6(6). https://doi.org/10.1177/2041669515614148
  • Cicchini, G. M., Mikellidou, K., & Burr, D. (2017). Serial dependencies act directly on perception. Journal of Vision, 17(14), 6–6. https://doi.org/10.1167/17.14.6
  • Cicchini, G. M., Mikellidou, K., & Burr, D. C. (2018). The functional role of serial dependence. Proceedings of the Royal Society B, 285(1890), 20181722. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2018.1722
  • Cogan, E., Parker, S., & Zellner, D. A. (2013). Beauty beyond compare: Effects of context extremity and categorization on hedonic contrast. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 39(1), 16–22. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0031020
  • Czoschke, S., Fischer, C., Beitner, J., Kaiser, J., & Bledowski, C. (2019). Two types of serial dependence in visual working memory. British Journal of Psychology, 110(2), 256–267. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjop.12349
  • Dalal, N., & Triggs, B. (2005). Histograms of oriented gradients for human detection. In 2005 IEEE computer society conference on computer vision and pattern recognition (CVPR'05), 20-25 June, 2005 (Vol. 1, pp. 886–893). IEEE.
  • Epstein, R. (2005). The cortical basis of visual scene processing. Visual Cognition, 12(6), 954–978. https://doi.org/10.1080/13506280444000607
  • Epstein, R. A., Higgins, J. S., & Thompson-Schill, S. L. (2005). Learning places from views: Variation in scene processing as a function of experience and navigational ability. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 17(1), 73–83. https://doi.org/10.1162/0898929052879987
  • Fei-Fei, L., Iyer, A., Koch, C., & Perona, P. (2007). What do we perceive in a glance of a real-world scene? Journal of Vision, 7(1), 10–10. https://doi.org/10.1167/7.1.10
  • Field, D. J. (1987). Relations between the statistics of natural images and the response properties of cortical cells. Journal of the Optical Society of America A, 4(12), 2379–2394. https://doi.org/10.1364/JOSAA.4.002379
  • Fink, B., & Penton-Voak, I. (2002). Evolutionary psychology of facial attractiveness. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 11(5), 154–158. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8721.00190
  • Fischer, J., & Whitney, D. (2014). Serial dependence in visual perception. Nature Neuroscience, 17(5), 738–743. https://doi.org/10.1038/nn.3689
  • Fornaciai, M., & Park, J. (2018). Attractive serial dependence in the absence of an explicit task. Psychological Science, 29(3), 437–446. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797617737385
  • Fritsche, M., Mostert, P., & de Lange, F. P. (2017). Opposite effects of recent history on perception and decision. Current Biology, 27(4), 590–595. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2017.01.006
  • Gibson, J. J., & Radner, M. (1937). Adaptation, after-effect and contrast in the perception of tilted lines. I. Quantitative studies. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 20(5), 453. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0059826
  • Grill-Spector, K., & Weiner, K. S. (2014). The functional architecture of the ventral temporal cortex and its role in categorization. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 15(8), 536–548. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrn3747
  • Harel, A., Groen, I. I., Kravitz, D. J., Deouell, L. Y., & Baker, C. I. (2016). The temporal dynamics of scene processing: A multifaceted EEG investigation. Eneuro, 3(5). https://doi.org/10.1523/ENEURO.0139-16.2016
  • Haxby, J. V., Hoffman, E. A., & Gobbini, M. I. (2000). The distributed human neural system for face perception. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 4(6), 223–233. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1364-6613(00)01482-0
  • Haxby, J. V., Hoffman, E. A., & Gobbini, M. I. (2002). Human neural systems for face recognition and social communication. Biological Psychiatry, 51(1), 59–67. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0006-3223(01)01330-0
  • Haxby, J. V., Ungerleider, L. G., Horwitz, B., Maisog, J. M., Rapoport, S. I., & Grady, C. L. (1996). Face encoding and recognition in the human brain. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 93(2), 922–927. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.93.2.922
  • Henderson, J. M., & Hollingworth, A. (1999). High-level scene perception. Annual Review of Psychology, 50(1), 243–271. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.50.1.243
  • John-Saaltink, E. S., Kok, P., Lau, H. C., & De Lange, F. P. (2016). Serial dependence in perceptual decisions is reflected in activity patterns in primary visual cortex. Journal of Neuroscience, 36(23), 6186–6192. https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4390-15.2016
  • Judd, C.M., Westfall, J., & Kenny, D.A.. (2012). Treating stimuli as a random factor in social psychology: A new and comprehensive solution to a pervasive but largely ignored problem. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 103(1), 54–69. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/a0028347
  • Kanwisher, N. (2000). Domain specificity in face perception. Nature Neuroscience, 3(8), 759–763. https://doi.org/10.1038/77664
  • Kaul, C., Rees, G., & Ishai, A. (2011). The gender of face stimuli is represented in multiple regions in the human brain. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 4, 238. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2010.00238
  • Kenrick, D. T., & Gutierres, S. E. (1980). Contrast effects and judgments of physical attractiveness: When beauty becomes a social problem. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 38(1), 131–140. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.38.1.131
  • Khaw, M. W., & Freedberg, D. (2018). Continuous aesthetic judgment of image sequences. Acta Psychologica, 188, 213–219. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2018.04.018
  • Kim, S., Burr, D., & Alais, D. (2019). Attraction to the recent past in aesthetic judgments: A positive serial dependence for rating artwork. Journal of Vision, 19(12), 19–19. https://doi.org/10.1167/19.12.19
  • Kiyonaga, A., Scimeca, J. M., Bliss, D. P., & Whitney, D. (2017). Serial dependence across perception, attention, and memory. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 21(7), 493–497. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2017.04.011
  • Knapen, T., Rolfs, M., Wexler, M., & Cavanagh, P. (2009). The reference frame of the tilt aftereffect. Journal of Vision, 10(1), 8–8. https://doi.org/10.1167/10.1.8
  • Kondo, A., Takahashi, K., & Watanabe, K. (2012). Sequential effects in face-attractiveness judgment. Perception, 41(1), 43–49. https://doi.org/10.1068/p7116
  • Kondo, A., Takahashi, K., & Watanabe, K. (2013). Influence of gender membership on sequential decisions of face attractiveness. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 75(7), 1347–1352. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13414-013-0533-y
  • Kramer, R. S., Jones, A. L., & Sharma, D. (2013). Sequential effects in judgements of attractiveness: The influences of face race and sex. PLoS One, 8(12), e82226. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0082226
  • Kristjánsson, Á, & Campana, G. (2010). Where perception meets memory: A review of repetition priming in visual search tasks. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 72(1), 5–18. https://doi.org/10.3758/APP.72.1.5
  • Kuznetsova, A., Brockhoff, P. B., & Christensen, R. H. B. (2016). Tests in linear mixed effects models. R package version, 2, 33.
  • Liberman, A., Fischer, J., & Whitney, D. (2014). Serial dependence in the perception of faces. Current Biology, 24(21), 2569–2574. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2014.09.025
  • Liberman, A., Manassi, M., & Whitney, D. (2018). Serial dependence promotes the stability of perceived emotional expression depending on face similarity. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 80(6), 1461–1473. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13414-018-1533-8
  • Liberman, A., Zhang, K., & Whitney, D. (2016). Serial dependence promotes object stability during occlusion. Journal of Vision, 16(15), 16–16. https://doi.org/10.1167/16.15.16
  • Ma, D. S., Correll, J., & Wittenbrink, B. (2015). The Chicago face database: A free stimulus set of faces and norming data. Behavior Research Methods, 47(4), 1122–1135. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-014-0532-5
  • Manassi, M., Liberman, A., Chaney, W., & Whitney, D. (2017). The perceived stability of scenes: Serial dependence in ensemble representations. Scientific Reports, 7(1), 1971. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-02201-5
  • Manassi, M., Liberman, A., Kosovicheva, A., Zhang, K., & Whitney, D. (2018). Serial dependence in position occurs at the time of perception. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 25(6), 2245–2253. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-018-1454-5
  • Menzel, C., Hayn-Leichsenring, G. U., Langner, O., Wiese, H., & Redies, C. (2015). Fourier power spectrum characteristics of face photographs: Attractiveness perception depends on low-level image properties. PLoS One, 10(4), e0122801. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0122801
  • Mouchetant-Rostaing, Y., Giard, M. H., Bentin, S., Aguera, P. E., & Pernier, J. (2000). Neurophysiological correlates of face gender processing in humans. European Journal of Neuroscience, 12(1), 303–310. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1460-9568.2000.00888.x
  • Mullin, C., Hayn-Leichsenring, G., Redies, C., & Wagemans, J. (2017). The gist of beauty: An investigation of aesthetic perception in rapidly presented images. Electronic Imaging, 2017(14), 248–256. https://doi.org/10.2352/ISSN.2470-1173.2017.14.HVEI-152
  • Oliva, A., & Schyns, P. G. (2000). Diagnostic colors mediate scene recognition. Cognitive Psychology, 41(2), 176–210. https://doi.org/10.1006/cogp.1999.0728
  • Oppermann, F., Hassler, U., Jescheniak, J. D., & Gruber, T. (2012). The rapid extraction of gist – Early neural correlates of high-level visual processing. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 24(2), 521–529. https://doi.org/10.1162/jocn_a_00100
  • Parker, S., Bascom, J., Rabinovitz, B., & Zellner, D. (2008). Positive and negative hedonic contrast with musical stimuli. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 2(3), 171–174. https://doi.org/10.1037/1931-3896.2.3.171
  • Pegors, T. K., Kable, J. W., Chatterjee, A., & Epstein, R. A. (2015). Common and unique representations in pFC for face and place attractiveness. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 27(5), 959–973. https://doi.org/10.1162/jocn_a_00777
  • Pegors, T. K., Mattar, M. G., Bryan, P. B., & Epstein, R. A. (2015). Simultaneous perceptual and response biases on sequential face attractiveness judgments. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 144(3), 664–673. https://doi.org/10.1037/xge0000069
  • Peirce, J., Gray, J. R., Simpson, S., MacAskill, M., Höchenberger, R., Sogo, H., Kastman, E., & Lindeløv, J. K. (2019). Psychopy2: Experiments in behavior made easy. Behavior Research Methods, 51(1), 195–203. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-018-01193-y
  • Perrett, D. I., Lee, K. J., Penton-Voak, I., Rowland, D., Yoshikawa, S., Burt, D. M., Henzi, S. P., Castles, D. L., & Akamatsu, S. (1998). Effects of sexual dimorphism on facial attractiveness. Nature, 394(6696), 884–887. https://doi.org/10.1038/29772
  • Reber, R., Schwarz, N., & Winkielman, P. (2004). Processing fluency and aesthetic pleasure: Is beauty in the perceiver's processing experience? Personality and Social Psychology Review, 8(4), 364–382. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327957pspr0804_3
  • Redies, C., Amirshahi, S. A., Koch, M., & Denzler, J. (2012, October 7-13). PHOG-derived aesthetic measures applied to color photographs of artworks, natural scenes and objects. In European conference on computer vision (pp. 522–531).
  • Rieke, F., & Rudd, M. E. (2009). The challenges natural images pose for visual adaptation. Neuron, 64(5), 605–616. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuron.2009.11.028
  • Schifferstein, H. N., & Frijters, J. E. (1992). Contextual and sequential effects on judgments of sweetness intensity. Perception & Psychophysics, 52(3), 243–255. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03209142
  • Srinivasan, M. V., Laughlin, S. B., & Dubs, A. (1982). Predictive coding: A fresh view of inhibition in the retina. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B. Biological Sciences, 216(1205), 427–459. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.1982.0085
  • Stewart, N., Brown, G. D., & Chater, N. (2002). Sequence effects in categorization of simple perceptual stimuli. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 28(1), 3–11. https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.28.1.3
  • Suárez-Pinilla, M., Seth, A. K., & Roseboom, W. (2018). Serial dependence in the perception of visual variance. Journal of Vision, 18(7), 4–4. https://doi.org/10.1167/18.7.4
  • Taubert, J., & Alais, D. (2016). Serial dependence in face attractiveness judgements tolerates rotations around the yaw axis but not the roll axis. Visual Cognition, 24(2), 103–114. https://doi.org/10.1080/13506285.2016.1196803
  • Taubert, J., Alais, D., & Burr, D. (2016). Different coding strategies for the perception of stable and changeable facial attributes. Scientific Reports, 6(1), 32239. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep32239
  • Taubert, J., Van der Burg, E., & Alais, D. (2016). Love at second sight: Sequential dependence of facial attractiveness in an on-line dating paradigm. Scientific Reports, 6(1), 22740. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep22740
  • Thorpe, S., Fize, D., & Marlot, C. (1996). Speed of processing in the human visual system. Nature, 381(6582), 520–522. https://doi.org/10.1038/381520a0
  • Torralba, A., & Oliva, A. (2003). Statistics of natural image categories. Network: Computation in Neural Systems, 14(3), 391–412. https://doi.org/10.1088/0954-898X_14_3_302
  • Tulving, E., & Schacter, D. L. (1990). Priming and human memory systems. Science, 247(4940), 301–306. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.2296719
  • Van Bergen, R. S., & Jehee, J. F. (2019). Probabilistic representation in human visual cortex reflects uncertainty in serial decisions. Journal of Neuroscience, 39(41), 8164–8176. https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3212-18.2019
  • Van der Burg, E., Rhodes, G., & Alais, D. (2019). Positive sequential dependency for face attractiveness perception. Journal of Vision, 19(12), 6–6. https://doi.org/10.1167/19.12.6
  • Vartanian, O., Navarrete, G., Chatterjee, A., Fich, L. B., Leder, H., Modroño, C., … Skov, M. (2013). Impact of contour on aesthetic judgments and approach-avoidance decisions in architecture. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 110(Supplement 2), 10446-10453.
  • Vorberg, D., Mattler, U., Heinecke, A., Schmidt, T., & Schwarzbach, J. (2003). Different time courses for visual perception and action priming. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 100(10), 6275–6280. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0931489100
  • Wedell, D. H., Parducci, A., & Geiselman, R. E. (1987). A formal analysis of ratings of physical attractiveness: Successive contrast and simultaneous assimilation. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 23(3), 230–249. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-1031(87)90034-5
  • Werheid, K., Schacht, A., & Sommer, W. (2007). Facial attractiveness modulates early and late event-related brain potentials. Biological Psychology, 76(1–2), 100–108. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biopsycho.2007.06.008
  • Winston, J. S., O’Doherty, J., Kilner, J. M., Perrett, D. I., & Dolan, R. J. (2007). Brain systems for assessing facial attractiveness. Neuropsychologia, 45(1), 195–206. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2006.05.009
  • Xia, Y., Leib, A. Y., & Whitney, D. (2016). Serial dependence in the perception of attractiveness. Journal of Vision, 16(15), 28–28. https://doi.org/10.1167/16.15.28
  • Young, A. W., & Bruce, V. (2011). Understanding person perception. British Journal of Psychology, 102(4), 959–974.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.