Inhibitory template for visual marking with endogenous spatial cueing

References

• Adam, K., Mance, I., Fukuda, K., & Vogel, E. (2014). Trial-by-trial fluctuations in working memory performance predict individual differences in working memory capacity. Journal of Vision, 14(10), 41. https://doi.org/10.1167/14.10.41
   Google Scholar
• Al-Aidroos, N., Emrich, S. M., Ferber, S., & Pratt, J. (2012). Visual working memory supports the inhibition of previously processed information: Evidence from preview search. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 38(3), 643–663. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0025707
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Allen, H. A., & Humphreys, G. W. (2007). Previewing distracters reduces their effective contrast. Vision Research, 47(23), 2992–3000. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.visres.2007.07.019
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arita, J. T., Carlisle, N. B., & Woodman, G. F. (2012). Templates for rejection: Configuring attention to ignore task-irrelevant features. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 38(3), 580. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0027885
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Atchley, P., Jones, S. E., & Hoffman, L. (2003). Visual marking: A convergence of goal- and stimulus-driven processes during visual search. Perception & Psychophysics, 65(5), 667–677. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03194805
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Awh, E., Belopolsky, A. V., & Theeuwes, J. (2012). Top-down versus bottom-up attentional control: A failed theoretical dichotomy. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 16(8), 437–443. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2012.06.010
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barrett, D. J., Shimozaki, S. S., Jensen, S., & Zobay, O. (2016). Visuospatial working memory mediates inhibitory and facilitatory guidance in preview search. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 42(10), 1533. https://doi.org/10.1037/xhp0000239
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brainard, D. H. (1997). The psychophysics toolbox. Spatial Vision, 10(4), 433–436. https://doi.org/10.1163/156856897X00357
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Carrasco, M. (2011). Visual attention: The past 25 years. Vision Research, 51(13), 1484–1525. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.visres.2011.04.012
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Corbetta, M., Patel, G., & Shulman, G. L. (2008). The reorienting system of the human brain: From environment to theory of mind. Neuron, 58(3), 306–324. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuron.2008.04.017
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cowan, N. (2001). The magical number 4 in short-term memory: A reconsideration of mental storage capacity. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 24(1), 87–114. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X01003922
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cowan, N., Elliott, E. M., Saults, J. S., Morey, C. C., Mattox, S., Hismjatullina, A., & Conway, A. R. (2005). On the capacity of attention: Its estimation and its role in working memory and cognitive aptitudes. Cognitive Psychology, 51(1), 42–100. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cogpsych.2004.12.001
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dark, V. J., Vochatzer, K. G., & VanVoorhis, B. A. (1996). Semantic and spatial components of selective attention. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 22(1), 63. https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-1523.22.1.63
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deubel, H., & Schneider, W. X. (1996). Saccade target selection and object recognition: Evidence for a common attentional mechanism. Vision Research, 36(12), 1827–1838. https://doi.org/10.1016/0042-6989(95)00294-4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Donk, M., & Theeuwes, J. (2003). Prioritizing selection of new elements: Bottom-up versus top-down control. Perception & Psychophysics, 65(8), 1231–1242. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03194848
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dube, B., Basciano, A., Emrich, S. M., & Al-Aidroos, N. (2016). Visual working memory simultaneously guides facilitation and inhibition during visual search. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 78(5), 1232–1244. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13414-016-1105-8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Emrich, S. M., Ruppel, J. D., Al-Aidroos, N., Pratt, J., & Ferber, S. (2008). Out with the old: Inhibition of old items in a preview search is limited. Perception & Psychophysics, 70(8), 1552–1557. https://doi.org/10.3758/PP.70.8.1552
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Eriksen, C. W., & Hoffman, J. E. (1972). Some characteristics of selective attention in visual perception determined by vocal reaction time. Perception & Psychophysics, 11(2), 169–171. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03210367
   Google Scholar
• Faul, F., Erdfelder, E., Buchner, A., & Lang, A.-G. (2009). Statistical power analyses using G*power 3.1: Tests for correlation and regression analyses. Behavior Research Methods, 41(4), 1149–1160. https://doi.org/10.3758/BRM.41.4.1149
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gottlob, L. R. (2004). Location cuing and response time distributions in visual attention. Perception & Psychophysics, 66(8), 1293–1302. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03194999
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Humphreys, Glyn W., Watson, Derrick G., & Jolicœur, Pierre. (2002). Fractionating the preview benefit in search: Dual-task decomposition of visual marking by timing and modality. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 28(3), 640–660. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0096-1523.28.3.640
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hwang, A. D., Higgins, E. C., & Pomplun, M. (2009). A model of top-down attentional control during visual search in complex scenes. Journal of Vision, 9(5), 25–25. https://doi.org/10.1167/9.5.25
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jiang, Y., Chun, M. M., & Marks, L. E. (2002). Visual marking: Selective attention to asynchronous temporal groups. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 28(3), 717–730. https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-1523.28.3.717
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jonides, J. (1980). Towards a model of the mind's eye's movement. Canadian Journal of Psychology/Revue Canadienne de Psychologie, 34(2), 103. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0081031
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jonides, J. (1981). Voluntary versus automatic control over the mind's eye's movement. In J. B. Long & A. D. Baddeley (Eds.), Attention and performance (pp. 187–203). Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Kahneman, D. (1973). Attention and effort (Vol. 1063). Prentice-Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Kleiner, M., Brainard, D. H., & Pelli, D. (2007). What’s new in psychtoolbox-3? Perception, 36(1 suppl), 14. https://doi:10.1068/v070821
   Google Scholar
• Kunar, M. A., & Humphreys, G. W. (2006). Object-based inhibitory priming in preview search: Evidence from the “top-up” procedure. Memory & Cognition, 34(3), 459–474. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03193571
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kunar, M. A., Humphreys, G. W., & Smith, K. J. (2003). History matters: The preview benefit in search is not onset capture. Psychological Science, 14(2), 181–185. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9280.t01-1-01439
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kunar, M. A., Shapiro, K. L., & Humphreys, G. W. (2006). Top-up search and the attentional blink: A two-stage account of the preview effect in search. Visual Cognition, 13(6), 677–699. https://doi.org/10.1080/13506280500463195
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kunar, M. A., Thomas, S. V., & Watson, D. G. (2017). Time-based selection in complex displays: Visual marking does not occur in multi-element asynchronous dynamic (MAD) search. Visual Cognition, 25(1–3), 215–224. https://doi.org/10.1080/13506285.2017.1306006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luck, S. J. (2008). Visual short-term memory. In S. J. Luck & A. Hollingworth (Eds.), Visual memory (pp. 43–86). Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Luck, S. J., & Vogel, E. K. (1997). The capacity of visual working memory for features and conjunctions. Nature, 390(6657), 279–281. https://doi.org/10.1038/36846
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martín-Arévalo, E., Kingstone, A., & Lupiáñez, J. (2013). Is “inhibition of return” due to the inhibition of the return of attention? The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 66(2), 347–359. https://doi.org/10.1080/17470218.2012.711844
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Müller, H. J., & Humphreys, G. W. (1991). Luminance-increment detection: Capacity-limited or not? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 17(1), 107. https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-1523.17.1.107
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Müller, H. J., & Rabbitt, P. M. (1989). Reflexive and voluntary orienting of visual attention: Time course of activation and resistance to interruption. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 15(2), 315. https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-1523.15.2.315
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nobre, A. C. (2018). Stevens’ handbook of experimental psychology and cognitive neuroscience, sensation, perception, and attention (Vol. 2, p. 241). Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Olivers, C. N. L., & Humphreys, G. W. (2002). When visual marking meets the attentional blink: More evidence for top-down, limited capacity inhibition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 28(1), 22–42. https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-1523.28.1.22
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Olivers, C. N., Humphreys, G. W., Heinke, D., & Cooper, A. C. (2002). Prioritization in visual search: Visual marking is not dependent on a mnemonic search. Perception & Psychophysics, 64(4), 540–560. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03194725
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Osugi, T., Hayashi, D., & Murakami, I. (2016). Selection of new objects by onset capture and visual marking. Vision Research, 122, 1–4. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.visres.2015.12.009
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Osugi, T., Kumada, T., & Kawahara, J. (2009). The spatial distribution of inhibition in preview search. Vision Research, 49(8), 851–861. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.visres.2009.03.002
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Osugi, T., & Murakami, I. (2014). Previewing distractors reduces efficiency of visual processing at previewed locations. Vision Research, 95, 51–60. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.visres.2013.12.006
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Osugi, T., & Murakami, I. (2015). Onset of background dynamic noise attenuates preview benefit in inefficient visual search. Vision Research, 112, 33–44. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.visres.2015.02.024
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Osugi, T., & Murakami, I. (2017). A drastic change in background luminance or motion degrades the preview benefit. Frontiers in Psychology, 8, 1252. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01252
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pelli, D. G. (1997). The VideoToolbox software for visual psychophysics: Transforming numbers into movies. Spatial Vison, 10(4), 437–442. https://doi.org/10.1163/156856897X00366
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Peterson, M. S., Belopolsky, A. V., & Kramer, A. F. (2003). Contingent visual marking by transients. Perception & Psychophysics, 65(5), 695–710. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03194807
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Pinto, Y., van der Leij, A. R., Sligte, I. G., Lamme, V. A., & Scholte, H. S. (2013). Bottom-up and top-down attention are independent. Journal of Vision, 13(3), 16–16. https://doi.org/10.1167/13.3.16
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Posner, M. I. (1978). Chronometric explorations of mind. Lawrence Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Posner, M. I. (1980). Orienting of attention. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 32(1), 3–25. https://doi.org/10.1080/00335558008248231
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Posner, M. I., Snyder, C. R., & Davidson, B. J. (1980). Attention and the detection of signals. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 109(2), 160. https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-3445.109.2.160
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sawaki, R., & Luck, S. J. (2010). Capture versus suppression of attention by salient singletons: Electrophysiological evidence for an automatic attend-to-me signal. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 72(6), 1455–1470. https://doi.org/10.3758/APP.72.6.1455
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Soto, D., Heinke, D., Humphreys, G. W., & Blanco, M. J. (2005). Early, involuntary top-down guidance of attention from working memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 31(2), 248. https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-1523.31.2.248
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tanda, T., & Kawahara, J. I. (2019). Association between cue lead time and template-for-rejection effect. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 81(6), 1880–1889. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13414-019-01761-0
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Theeuwes, J. (2014). Spatial orienting and attentional capture. In A. C. Nobre & S. Kastner (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of attention (pp. 231–252). Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Treisman, A. (1985). Preattentive processing in vision. Computer Vision, Graphics, and Image Processing, 31(2), 156–177. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0734-189X(85)80004-9
   Google Scholar
• Treisman, Anne M., & Gelade, Garry. (1980). A feature-integration theory of attention. Cognitive Psychology, 12(1), 97–136. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0010-0285(80)90005-5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Watson, D. G., & Humphreys, G. W. (1997). Visual marking: Prioritizing selection for new objects by top-down attentional inhibition of old objects. Psychological Review, 104(1), 90–122. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.104.1.90
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Watson, D. G., & Humphreys, G. W. (1998). Visual marking of moving objects: A role for top-down feature-based inhibition in selection. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 24(3), 946–962. https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-1523.24.3.946
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Watson, D. G., & Humphreys, G. W. (2000). Visual marking: Evidence for inhibition using a probe-dot detection paradigm. Perception & Psychophysics, 62(3), 471–481. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03212099
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Watson, D. G., & Humphreys, G. W. (2002). Visual marking and visual change. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 28(2), 379. https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-1523.28.2.379
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Watson, D. G., Humphreys, G. W., & Olivers, C. N. L. (2003). Visual marking: Using time in visual selection. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 7(4), 180–186. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1364-6613(03)00033-0
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Watson, D. G., & Kunar, M. A. (2010). Visual marking and change blindness: Moving occluders and transient masks neutralize shape changes to ignored objects. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 36(6), 1391–1405. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0020565
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Watson, D. G., & Kunar, M. A. (2012). Determining the capacity of time-based selection. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 38(2), 350. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0025794
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xu, Y., & Chun, M. M. (2006). Dissociable neural mechanisms supporting visual short-term memory for objects. Nature, 440(7080), 91–95. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature04262
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yamauchi, K., & Kawahara, J. I. (2019). A singleton distractor updates the inhibitory template for visual marking. Acta Psychologica, 192, 200–211. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2018.11.014
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yamauchi, K., Osugi, T., & Murakami, I. (2017). Attentional capture to a singleton distractor degrades visual marking in visual search. Frontiers in Psychology, 8, 801. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00801
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yantis, S., & Jonides, J. (1984). Abrupt visual onsets and selective attention: Evidence from visual search. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 10(5), 601. https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-1523.10.5.601
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zupan, Z., Watson, D. G., & Blagrove, E. (2015). Inhibition in time-based visual selection: Strategic or by default? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 41(5), 1442. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0039499
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar