References
- Bacon, W. F., & Egeth, H. E. (1994). Overriding stimulus-driven attentional capture. Perception & Psychophysics, 55(5), 485–496. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03205306
- Berlin, I. (1953). The hedgehog and the fox. An essay on Tolstoy’s view of history. Weidenfeld and Nicolson.
- Di Lollo, V. (2018). Attention is a sterile concept; iterative reentry is a fertile substitute. Consciousness and Cognition, 64, 45–49. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.concog.2018.02.005
- Donk, M., & van Zoest, W. (2008). Effects of salience are short-lived. Psychological Science, 19(7), 733–739. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.2008.02149.x
- Gaspelin, N., & Luck, S. J. (2018). The role of inhibition in avoiding distraction by salient stimuli. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 22(1), 79–92. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2017.11.001
- Heinke, D., & Humphreys, G. W. (2003). Attention, spatial representation, and visual neglect: Simulating emergent attention and spatial memory in the selective attention for identification model (SAIM). Psychological Review, 110(1), 29–87. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.110.1.29
- Hickey, C., Di Lollo, V., & McDonald, J. J. (2009). Electrophysiological indices of target and distractor processing in visual search. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 21(4), 760–775. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1162/jocn.2009.21039
- Hickey, C., & van Zoest, W. (2012). Reward creates oculomotor salience. Current Biology, 22(7), R219–R220. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2012.02.007
- Hochstein, S., & Ahissar, M. (2002). View from the top: Hierarchies and reverse hierarchies in the visual system. Neuron, 36(5), 791–804. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/S0896-6273(02)01091-7
- Ipata, A. E., Gee, A. L., Gottlieb, J., Bisley, J. W., & Goldberg, M. E. (2006). LIP responses to a popout stimulus are reduced if it is overtly ignored. Nature Neuroscience, 9(8), 1071–1076. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1038/nn1734
- Lamme, V. A., & Roelfsema, P. R. (2000). The distinct modes of vision offered by feedforward and recurrent processing. Trends in Neurosciences, 23(11), 571–579. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/S0166-2236(00)01657-X
- Leber, A. B., Kawahara, J.-I., & Gabari, Y. (2009). Long-term abstract learning of attentional set. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 35(5), 1385–1397. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1037/a0016470
- Luck, S. J., Gaspelin, N., Folk, C. L., Remington, R. W., & Theeuwes, J. (2021). Progress toward resolving the attentional capture debate. Visual Cognition, 29(1), 1–21. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/13506285.2020.1848949
- Sawaki, R., & Luck, S. J. (2010). Capture versus suppression of attention by salient singletons: Electrophysiological evidence for an automatic attend-to-me signal. Attention Perception & Psychophysics, 72(6), 1455–1470. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3758/APP.72.6.1455
- Serences, J. T., & Yantis, S. (2006). Selective visual attention and perceptual coherence. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 10(1), 38–45. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2005.11.008
- Tsotsos, J. K., Culhane, S. M., Kei Wai, W. Y., Lai, Y., Davis, N., & Nuflo, F. (1995). Modeling visual attention via selective tuning. Artificial Intelligence, 78(1), 507–545. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/0004-3702(95)00025-9
- van Zoest, W., Donk, M., & Theeuwes, J. (2004). The role of stimulus-driven and goal-driven control in saccadic visual selection. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 30(4), 746–759. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-1523.30.4.749
- van Zoest, W., Hunt, A. R., & Kingstone, A. (2010). Representations in visual cognition: It’s about time. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 19(2), 116–120. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/0963721410363895
- Wyble, B., Callahan-Flintoft, C., Chen, H., Marinov, T., Sarkar, A., & Bowman, H. (2020). Understanding visual attention with RAGNAROC: A reflexive attention gradient through neural AttRactOr competition. Psychological Review, 127(6), 1163–1198. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1037/rev0000245