Response to commentaries to Luck et al. (2021). Progress toward resolving the attentional capture debate

References

• Abagis, T. (2020). Understanding and mitigating internal and external attention deficits in adults with ADHD [Doctoral dissertation]. University of Michigan. ProQuest Dissertations & Theses Global.
   Google Scholar
• Adams, O. J., & Gaspelin, N. (2021). Introspective awareness of oculomotor attentional capture. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 47(3), 442–459. https://doi.org/10.1037/xhp0000898
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Al-Aidroos, M. (2021). Dividing attentional capture. Visual Cognition, (this issue).
   Google Scholar
• Anderson, B. A. (2021). Time to stop calling it attentional “capture” and embrace a mechanistic understanding of attentional priority. Visual Cognition, (this issue).
   Google Scholar
• Belopolsky, A. V., Kramer, A. F., & Theeuwes, J. (2008). The role of awareness in processing of oculomotor capture: Evidence from event-related potentials. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 20(12), 2285–2297. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1162/jocn.2008.20161
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Belopolsky, A. V., & Theeuwes, J. (2010). No capture outside the attentional window. Vision Research, 50(23), 2543–2550. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.visres.2010.08.023
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Born, S., Kerzel, D., & Theeuwes, J. (2011). Evidence for a dissociation between the control of oculomotor capture and disengagement. Experimental Brain Research, 208(4), 621–631. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-010-2510-1
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Lange, F. P., Heilbron, M., & Kok, P. (2018). How do expectations shape perception? Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 22(9), 764–779. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2018.06.002
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Desimone, R., & Duncan, J. (1995). Neural mechanisms of selective visual attention. Annual Review of Neuroscience, 18(1), 193–222. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.ne.18.030195.001205
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Donk, W. (2021). The progress revisited: How the dispute between stimulus-driven and contingent-capture advocates is hampered by a blindness for change. Visual Cognition, (this issue).
   Google Scholar
• Duncan, D., & Theeuwes, J. (2020). Statistical learning in the absence of explicit top-down attention. Cortex, 131, 54–65. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cortex.2020.07.006
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duncan, D., & Theeuwes, J. (in prep). Attentional capture is needed for statistical learning.
   Google Scholar
• Duncan, J., & Humphreys, G. W. (1989). Visual search and stimulus similarity. Psychological Review, 96(3), 433–458. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.96.3.433
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Folk, C. L., Remington, R. W., & Johnston, J. C. (1992). Involuntary covert orienting is contingent on attentional control settings. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 18(4), 1030–1044. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-1523.18.4.1030
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Friston, K. (2010). The free-energy principle: A unified brain theory? Nature Review Neuroscience, 11(2), 127–138. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrn2787
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gao, Y., & Theeuwes, J. (2020). Learning to suppress a distractor is not affected by working memory load. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 27(1), 96–104. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-019-01679-6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gao, Y., & Theeuwes, J. (2021). Independent effects of statistical learning and top-down attention. Attention, Perception Psychophysics, 82(8), 3895–3906. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3758/s13414-020-02115-x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Geng, J. J., & Diquattro, N. E. (2010). Attentional capture by a perceptually salient non-target facilitates target processing through inhibition and rapid rejection. Journal of Vision, 10(6), 5–5. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1167/10.6.5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Geng, J. J., & Duarte, S. E. (2021). Unresolved issues in distractor suppression: Similarities in proactive and reactive mechanisms, implicit learning, and naturalistic distraction. Visual Cognition, (this issue).
   Google Scholar
• Godijn, R., & Theeuwes, J. (2002). Programming of endogenous and exogenous saccades: Evidence for a competitive integration model. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 28(5), 1039–1054. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-1523.28.5.1039
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Henare, D. T., & Schubö, A. (2021). Voluntary choice tasks increase control settings and reduce capture. Visual Cognition, (this issue).
   Google Scholar
• Henderson, J. M., Weeks, P. A., Jr., & Hollingworth, A. (1999). The effects of semantic consistency on eye movements during complex scene viewing. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 25(1), 210–228. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-1523.25.1.210
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hickey, C., & van Zoest, W. (2021). Foxes, hedgehogs, and attentional capture. Visual Cognition, (this issue).
   Google Scholar
• Huang, C., Donk, W., & Theeuwes, J. (2021). Proactive enhancement and suppression elicited by statistical regularities in visual search. JEPHPP (under review).
   Google Scholar
• Itti, L., & Koch, C. (2001). Computational modelling of visual attention. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 2(3), 194–203. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1038/35058500
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ivanov, Y., Bogaerts, L., & Theeuwes, J. (in prep). The reliability of individual differences in distractor suppression driven by statistical learning.
   Google Scholar
• Kim, H., & Anderson, B. A. (2021). Combined influence of valence and statistical learning on the control of attention: Evidence for independent sources of bias. Cognition, 208, 104554. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2020.104554
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kryklywy, J. H., Manaligod, M. G. M., & Todd, R. M. (2021). Within and beyond an integrated framework of attentional capture: A perspective from cognitive-affective neuroscience. Visual Cognition, (this issue).
   Google Scholar
• Leber, A. B. (2021). Understanding of attentional suppression is incomplete without consideration of motivation and context. Visual Cognition, (this issue).
   Google Scholar
• Leonard, C. J. (2021). Consensus emerges and biased competition wins: A commentary on Luck et al. (2020). Visual Cognition, (this issue).
   Google Scholar
• Le Pelley, M., Watson, P., Theeuwes, J., & Most, S. (2020). Reward learning and statistical learning independently influence attentional priority of salient distractors in visual search. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/tzwyp
   Google Scholar
• Liesefeld, H., Liesefeld, A., & Müller, H. (2021). Attentional capture: An ameliorable side-effect of searching for salient targets. Visual Cognition, (this issue).
   Google Scholar
• Loftus, G. R., & Mackworth, N. H. (1978). Cognitive determinants of fixation location during picture viewing. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 4(4), 565–572. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-1523.4.4.565
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luck, S. J., Gaspelin, N., Folk, C. L., Remington, R. W., & Theeuwes, J. (2021). Progress toward resolving the attentional capture debate. Visual Cognition, 29(1), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1080/13506285.2020.1848949
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Most, S. B., & Curby, K. M. (2021). A bridge to progress further afield: The promise of a common framework on attentional capture. Visual Cognition, (this issue).
   Google Scholar
• Mulckhuyse, M., van der Stigchel, S., & Theeuwes, J. (2009). Early and late modulation of saccade deviations by target distractor similarity. Journal of Neurophysiology, 102(3), 1451–1458. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1152/jn.00068.2009
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Müller, H. J., Geyer, T., Zehetleitner, M., & Krummenacher, J. (2009). Attentional capture by salient color singleton distractors is modulated by top-down dimensional set. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 35(1), 1–16. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-1523.35.1.1
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Munoz, D. P., & Wurtz, R. H. (1993). Fixation cells in monkey superior colliculus. II. Reversible activation and deactivation. Journal of Neurophysiology, 70(2), 576–589. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1152/jn.1993.70.2.576
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nissens, T., Failing, M., & Theeuwes, J. (2017). People look at the object they fear: Oculomotor capture by stimuli that signal threat. Cognition and Emotion, 31(8), 1707–1714. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/02699931.2016.1248905
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nothdurft, H.-C. (1993). The role of features in preattentive vision: Comparison of orientation, motion and color cues. Vision Research, 33(14), 1937–1958. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/0042-6989(93)90020-W
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pearson, D., Watson, P., & Le Pelley, M. E. (2021). How do competing influences of selection history interact? A commentary on Luck et al. (2020). Visual Cognition, (this issue).
   Google Scholar
• Saslow, M. G. (1967). Effects of components of displacement-step stimuli upon latency for saccadic eye movement. Journal of the Optical Society of America, 57(8), 1024–1029. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1364/JOSA.57.001024
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmid, R. R., Buesel, C., & Ansorge, U. (2021). Attentional capture and its suppression viewed as skills. Visual Cognition, (this issue).
   Google Scholar
• Schmidt, L. J., Belopolsky, A. V., & Theeuwes, J. (2015). Attentional capture by signals of threat. Cognition & Emotion, 29(4), 687–694. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/02699931.2014.924484
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schreij, D., Los, S. A., Theeuwes, J., Enns, J. T., & Olivers, C. N. L. (2014). The interaction between stimulus-driven and goal-driven orienting as revealed by eye movements. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 40(1), 378–390. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1037/a0034574
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shiffrin, R. M., & Schneider, W. (1977). Controlled and automatic human information processing: II. Perceptual learning, automatic attending, and a general theory. Psychological Review, 84(3), 127–190. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.84.2.127
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Slagter, H., & van Moorselaar, D. (2021). Attention and distraction in the predictive brain. Visual Cognition, (this issue).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Theeuwes, J. (1992). Perceptual selectivity for color and form. Perception & Psychophysics, 51(6), 599–606. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03211656
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Theeuwes, J. (1994). Endogenous and exogenous control of visual selection. Perception, 23(4), 429–440. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1068/p230429
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Theeuwes, J. (2004). Top-down search strategies cannot override attentional capture. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 11(1), 65–70. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03206462
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Theeuwes, J. (2010). Top-down and bottom-up control of visual selection. Acta Psychologica, 135(2), 77–99. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2010.02.006
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Theeuwes, J. (2018). Visual selection: Usually fast and automatic; seldom slow and volitional. Journal of Cognition, 1(1), 1–15. http://doi.org/10.5334/joc.13
   Google Scholar
• Theeuwes, J. (2019). Goal-driven, stimulus-driven, and history-driven selection. Current Opinion in Psychology, 29, 97–101. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copsyc.2018.12.024
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Theeuwes, J., Atchley, P., & Kramer, A. F. (2000). On the time course of top-down and bottom-up control of visual attention. In S. Monsell & J. Driver (Eds.), Control of cognitive processes: Attention and performance XVIII (pp. 105–124). The MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Theeuwes, J., & Failing, M. (2020). Attentional selection: Top-down, bottom-up and history-based biases (elements in perception). Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Theeuwes, J., Kramer, A. F., Hahn, S., & Irwin, D. E. (1998). Our eyes do not always go where we want them to go: Capture of the eyes by new objects. Psychological Science, 9(5), 379–385. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9280.00071
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Todd, R. M., & Manaligod, M. G. M. (2018). Implicit guidance of attention: The priority state space framework. Cortex, 102, 121–138. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cortex.2017.08.001
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Turatto, M., Bonetti, F., Pascucci, D., & Chelazzi, L. (2018). Desensitizing the attention system to distraction while idling: A new latent learning phenomenon in the visual attention domain. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 147(12), 1827–1850. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1037/xge0000503
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, B., & Theeuwes, J. (2018a). How to inhibit a distractor location? Statistical learning versus active, top-down suppression. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 80(4), 860–870. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3758/s13414-018-1493-z
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, B., & Theeuwes, J. (2018b). Statistical regularities modulate attentional capture. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 44(1), 13–17. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1037/xhp0000472
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, B., & Theeuwes, J. (2020). Salience determines attentional orienting in visual selection. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 46(10), 1051–1057. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1037/xhp0000796
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, B., van Driel, J., Ort, E., & Theeuwes, J. (2019). Anticipatory distractor suppression elicited by statistical regularities in visual search. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 31(10), 1535–1548. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1162/jocn_a_01433
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Won, B. Y. (2021). Passive distractor filtering in visual search. Visual Cognition, (this issue).
   Google Scholar
• Won, B. Y., & Geng, J. J. (2020). Passive exposure attenuates distraction during visual search. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General. https://doi.org/10.1037/xge0000760
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang, H., Abagis, T. R., & Jonides, J. (2021). The malleability of attentional capture. Visual Cognition, (this issue).
   Google Scholar
• Zivony, A. (2021). Beyond guidance: It’s time to focus on the consequences of attentional capture. Visual Cognition, (this issue).
   Google Scholar
• Zivony, A., & Lamy, D. (2018). Contingent attentional engagement: Stimulus- and goal-driven capture have qualitatively different consequences. Psychological Science, 29(12), 1930–1941. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797618799302
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar