References
- Al-Aidroos, N. (2021). Dividing attentional capture. Visual Cognition, this issue.
- Anderson, B. A. (2021). Time to stop calling it attentional “capture” and embrace a mechanistic understanding of attentional priority. Visual Cognition, this issue.
- Bae, G.-Y., & Luck, S. J. (2018). Dissociable decoding of spatial attention and working memory from EEG oscillations and sustained potentials. Journal of Neuroscience, 38(2), 409–422. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2860-17.2017
- Becker, S. I. (2007). Irrelevant singletons in pop-out search: Attentional capture or filtering costs? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 33(4), 764–787. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-1523.33.4.764
- Chang, S., Niebur, E., & Egeth, H. E. (2021). Standing out in a small crowd: The role of display size in attracting attention. Visual Cognition, this issue.
- Chen, P., & Mordkoff, J. T. (2007). Contingent capture at a very short SOA: Evidence against rapid disengagement. Visual Cognition, 15(6), 637–646. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/13506280701317968
- Desimone, R., & Duncan, J. (1995). Neural mechanisms of selective visual attention. Annual Review of Neuroscience, 18(1), 193–222. psyh. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.ne.18.030195.001205
- Donk, M. (2021). The progress revisited: How the dispute between stimulus- driven and contingent-capture advocates is hampered by a blindness for change. Visual Cognition, this issue.
- Eimer, M. (2021). Why signal suppression cannot resolve the attentional capture debate. Visual Cognition, this issue.
- Fahrenfort, J. J., Grubert, A., Olivers, C. N., & Eimer, M. (2017). Multivariate EEG analyses support high-resolution tracking of feature-based attentional selection. Scientific Reports, 7(1), 1–15. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-01911-0
- Feldmann-Wüstefeld, T. (2021). Neural evidence for dynamic within-trial changes in allocation of visual attention. Visual Cognition, this issue.
- Folk, C. L., Remington, R. W., & Johnston, J. C. (1992). Involuntary covert orienting is contingent on attentional control settings. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 18(4), 1030–1044. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-1523.18.4.1030
- Foster, J. J., Bsales, E. M., & Awh, E. (2020). Covert spatial attention speeds target individuation. Journal of Neuroscience, 40(13), 2717–2726. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2962-19.2020
- Gaspar, J. M., & McDonald, J. J. (2014). Suppression of salient objects prevents distraction in visual search. The Journal of Neuroscience, 34(16), 5658–5666. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4161-13.2014
- Gaspelin, N., Gaspar, J. M., & Luck, S. J. (2019). Oculomotor inhibition of salient distractors: Voluntary inhibition cannot override selection history. Visual Cognition, 27(3–4), 227–246. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/13506285.2019.1600090
- Gaspelin, N., Leonard, C. J., & Luck, S. J. (2015). Direct evidence for active suppression of salient-but-irrelevant sensory inputs. Psychological Science, 22(11), 1740–1750. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797615597913
- Gaspelin, N., Leonard, C. J., & Luck, S. J. (2017). Suppression of overt attentional capture by salient-but-irrelevant color singletons. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 79(1), 45–62. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3758/s13414-016-1209-1
- Gaspelin, N., & Luck, S. J. (2018a). Distinguishing among potential mechanisms of singleton suppression. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 44(4), 626–644. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1037/xhp0000484
- Gaspelin, N., & Luck, S. J. (2018b). Electrophysiological and behavioral evidence of suppression of salient-but-irrelevant stimuli. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 30(9), 1265–1280. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1162/jocn_a_01279
- Gaspelin, N., & Luck, S. J. (2018c). The role of inhibition in avoiding distraction by salient stimuli. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 22(1), 79–92. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2017.11.001
- Gaspelin, N., Ruthruff, E., & Lien, M. (2016). The problem of latent attentional capture: Easy visual search conceals capture by task-irrelevant abrupt onsets. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 42(8), 1104–1120. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1037/xhp0000214
- Geng, J. J. (2014). Attentional mechanisms of distractor suppression. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 23(2), 147–153. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/0963721414525780
- Geng, J. J., & Diquattro, N. E. (2010). Attentional capture by a perceptually salient non-target facilitates target processing through inhibition and rapid rejection. Journal of Vision, 10(6), 5. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1167/10.6.5
- Geng, J. J., & Duarte, S. (2021). Unresolved issues in distractor suppression: Similarities in proactive and reactive mechanisms, implicit learning, and naturalistic distraction. Visual Cognition, this issue.
- Grubert, A., & Eimer, M. (2018). The time course of target template activation processes during preparation for visual search. The Journal of Neuroscience, 38(44), 9527–9538. psyh. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0409-18.2018
- Kerzel, D., Huynh, C., & Burras, N. (2021). Do we need attentional suppression? Visual Cognition, this issue.
- Kotseruba, I., Wloka, C., Rasouli, A., & Tsotsos, J. K. (2020). Do saliency models detect Odd-One-Out targets? New datasets and evaluations. ArXiv Preprint ArXiv, 2005, 06583.
- Lamy, D. (2021). The attentional capture debate: The long-lasting consequences of a misnomer. Visual Cognition, this issue.
- Lamy, D., Darnell, M., Levi, A., & Bublil, C. (2018). Testing the attentional dwelling hypothesis of attentional capture. Journal of Cognition, 1(1). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.5334/joc.48
- Leonard, C. J. (2021). Consensus emerges and biased competition wins: A commentary on Luck et al. (2020). Visual Cognition, this issue.
- Lien, M.-C., Ruthruff, E., Goodin, Z., & Remington, R. W. (2008). Contingent attentional capture by top-down control settings: Converging evidence from event-related potentials. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 34(3), 509–530. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-1523.34.3.509
- Liesefeld, H. R., Liesefeld, A., & Müller, H. J. (2021). Attentional capture: An ameliorable side-effect of searching for salient targets. Visual Cognition, this issue.
- Luck, S. J., Gaspelin, N., Folk, C. L., Remington, R. W., & Theeuwes, J. (2021). Progress toward resolving the attentional capture debate. Visual Cognition, 29(1), 1–21. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/13506285.2020.1848949
- Luck, S. J., & Gold, J. M. (2008). The construct of attention in schizophrenia. Biological Psychiatry, 64(1), 34–39. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biopsych.2008.02.014
- Maljkovic, V., & Nakayama, K. (1996). Priming of pop-out: II. The role of position. Perception and Psychophysics, 58(7), 977–991. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03206826
- Maxwell, J. W., Gaspelin, N., & Ruthruff, E. (2021). No identification of abrupt onsets that capture attention: Evidence against a unified model of spatial attention. Psychological Research, 85(5), 2119–2135.
- Moher, J., & Egeth, H. E. (2012). The ignoring paradox: Cueing distractor features leads first to selection, then to inhibition of to-be-ignored items. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 74(8), 1590–1605. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3758/s13414-012-0358-0
- Olmos-Solis, K., van Loon, A. M., Los, S. A., & Olivers, C. N. (2017). Oculomotor measures reveal the temporal dynamics of preparing for search. Progress in Brain Research, 236, 1–23. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/bs.pbr.2017.07.003
- Prinzmetal, W., McCool, C., & Park, S. (2005). Attention: Reaction time and accuracy reveal different mechanisms. Journal of Experimental Psychology. General, 134(1), 73–92. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-3445.134.1.73
- Ruthruff, E., Hauck, C., & Lien, M.-C. (2021). What do we know about suppression of attention capture? Visual Cognition, this issue.
- Sawaki, R., Geng, J. J., & Luck, S. J. (2012). A common neural mechanism for preventing and terminating the allocation of attention. The Journal of Neuroscience, 32(31), 10725–10736. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1864-12.2012
- Sawaki, R., & Luck, S. J. (2010). Capture versus suppression of attention by salient singletons: Electrophysiological evidence for an automatic attend-to-me signal. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 72(6), 1455–1470. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3758/APP.72.6.1455
- Slagter, H. A., & van Moorselaar, D. (2021). Attention and distraction in the predictive brain. Visual Cognition, this issue.
- Stilwell, B. T., & Gaspelin, N. (in press). Attentional suppression of highly salient color singletons. Journal of Experiment Psychology: Human Perception & Performance.
- Stilwell, B. T., & Vecera, S. P. (2020). Learned distractor rejection in the face of strong target guidance. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 46(9), 926-941. https://doi.org/10.1037/xhp0000757
- Talcott, T. N., & Gaspelin, N. (2020). Prior target locations attract overt attention during search. Cognition, 201, 104282. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2020.104282
- Theeuwes, J. (2004). Top-down search strategies cannot override attentional capture. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 11(1), 65–70. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03206462
- Theeuwes, J., Atchley, P., & Kramer, A. F. (2000). On the time course of Top-down and bottom-Up control of Visual attention. Control of Cognitive Processes: Attention and Performance XVIII, 105–124.
- Wang, B., & Theeuwes, J. (2020). Salience determines attentional orienting in visual selection. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1037/xhp0000796
- Wolfe, J. M. (2021). Guided Search 6.0: An updated model of visual search. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 1–33.
- Won, B.-Y. (2021). Passive distractor filtering in visual search. Visual Cognition, this issue.
- Zivony, A. (2021). Beyond guidance: It’s time to focus on the consequences of attentional capture. Visual Cognition, this issue.
- Zivony, A., & Lamy, D. (2018). Contingent attentional engagement: Stimulus- and goal-driven capture have qualitatively different consequences. Psychological Science, 29(12), 1930–1941. psyh. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797618799302