Found in translation: The role of response mappings for observing binding effects in localization tasks

References

• Avery, B., Cowper-Smith, C. D., & Westwood, D. A. (2015). Spatial interactions between consecutive manual responses. Experimental Brain Research, 233(11), 3283–3290. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-015-4396-4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bundesen, C. (1991). Visual selection of features and objects: Is location special? A reinterpretation of Nissen’s (1985) findings. Perception & Psychophysics, 50(1), 87–89. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03212208
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Campana, G., & Casco, C. (2009). Repetition effects of features and spatial position: Evidence for dissociable mechanisms. Spatial Vision, 22(4), 325–338. https://doi.org/10.1163/156856809788746318
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Chao, H. F., & Hsiao, F.-S. (2021). Location-response binding and inhibition of return in a detection task. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 83(5), 1992–2001. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13414-021-02283-4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chao, H. F., Kuo, C.-Y., Chen, M. S., & Hsiao, F.-S. (2020). Contextual similarity between successive targets modulates inhibition of return in the target-target paradigm. Frontiers in Psychology, 11(2052), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.02052
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Cochrane, B. A., & Milliken, B. (2020). The representational basis of positive and negative repetition effects. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 46(3), 252–263. https://doi.org/10.1037/xhp0000713
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cowper-Smith, C. D., & Westwood, D. A. (2013). Motor IOR revealed for reaching. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 75(8), 1914–1922. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13414-013-0528-8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Jong, R., Liang, C.-C., & Lauber, E. (1994). Conditional and unconditional automaticity: A dual-process model of effects of spatial stimulus-response correspondence. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 20(4), 731–750. https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-1523.20.4.731
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eng, V., Lim, A., Kwon, S., Gan, S. R., Jamaluddin, S. A., Janssen, S. M. J., & Satel, J. (2017). Stimulus-response incompatibility eliminates inhibitory cueing effects with saccadic but not manual responses. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 79(4), 1097–1106. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13414-017-1295-8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Faul, F., Erdfelder, E., Lang, A.-G., & Buchner, A. (2007). G*power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behavior Research Methods, 39(2), 175–191. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03193146
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fitousi, D. (2018). Feature binding in visual short term memory: A general recognition theory analysis. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 25(3), 1104–1113. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-017-1303-y
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fitts, P. M., & Deininger, R. L. (1954). S-R compatibility: Correspondence among paired elements within stimulus and response codes. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 48(6), 483–492. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0054967
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Fitts, P. M., & Seeger, C. M. (1953). S-R compatibility: Spatial characteristics of stimulus and response codes. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 46(3), 199–210. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0062827
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Fituousi, D. (2016). Simon and Garner effects with color and location: Evidence for two independent routes by which irrelevant location influences performance. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 78(8), 2433–2455. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13414-016-1197-1
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Found, A., & Müller, H. J. (1996). Searching for unknown feature targets on more than one dimension: Investigating a “dimension-weighting” account. Perception & Psychophysics, 58(1), 88–101. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03205479
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fournier, L. R., Wiediger, M. D., & Taddese, E. F. (2015). Action plans can interact to hinder or facilitate reach performance. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 77(8), 2755–2767. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13414-015-0959-5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fournier, L. R., Wieidiger, M. D., McMeans, R., Mattson, P. S., Kirkwood, J., & Herzog, T. (2010). Holding a manual response sequence in memory can disrupt vocal responses that share semantic features with the manual response. Psychological Research, 74(4), 359–369. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00426-009-0256-9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fox, E., & de Fockert, J.-W. (2001). Inhibitory effects of repeating color and shape: Inhibition of return or repetition blindness? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 27(4), 798–812. https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-1523.27.4.798
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frings, C. (2011). On the decay of distractor-response episodes. Experimental Psychology, 58(2), 125–131. https://doi.org/10.1027/1618-3169/a000077
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frings, C., Hommel, B., Koch, I., Rothermund, K., Dignath, D., Giesen, C., Kiesel, A., Kunde, W., Mayr, S., Moeller, B., Möller, M., Pfister, R., & Philipp, A. (2020). Binding and retrieval in action control (BRAC). Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2020.02.004
   Google Scholar
• Frings, C., Koch, I., Rothermund, K., Dignath, D., Giesen, C., Hommel, B., Kiesel, A., Kunde, W., Mayr, S., Moeller, B., Möller, M., Pfister, R., & Philipp, A. (2020). Merkmalsintegration und Abruf als wichtige Prozesse der Handlungssteuerung – eine Paradigmen-übergreifende Perspektive [Feature integration and retrieval as important processes of action control—A paradigm-overlapping perspective]. Psychologische Rundschau, 71(1), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1026/0033-3042/a000423
   Google Scholar
• Frings, C., & Moeller, B. (2012). The horserace between distractors and targets: Retrieval-based probe responding depends on distractor-target asynchrony. Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 24(5), 582–590. https://doi.org/10.1080/20445911.2012.666852
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frings, C., Rothermund, K., & Wentura, D. (2007). Distractor repetitions retrieve previous responses to targets. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 60(10), 1367–1377. https://doi.org/10.1080/17470210600955645
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Henson, R. N., Eckstein, D., Waszak, F., Frings, C., & Horner, A. J. (2014). Stimulus-response bindings in priming. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 18(7), 376–384. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2014.03.004
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hilchey, M. D., Antinucci, V., Lamy, D., & Pratt, J. (2019). Is attention really biased toward the last target location in visual search? Attention, response rules, distractors, and eye movements. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 26(2), 506–514. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-019-01569-x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hilchey, M. D., Leber, A. B., & Pratt, J. (2018). Testing the role of response repetition in spatial priming in visual search. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 80(6), 1362–1374. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13414-018-1550-7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hilchey, M. D., Pratt, J., & Lamy, D. (2019). Is attention really biased toward the last target location in visual search? The role of focal attention and stimulus-response translation rules. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 45(10), 1415–1428. https://doi.org/10.1037/xhp0000679
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hilchey, M. D., Rajsic, J., Huffman, G., Klein, R. M., & Pratt, J. (2018). Dissociating orienting biases from integration effects with eye movements. Psychological Science, 29(3), 328–339. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797617734021
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hilchey, M. D., Rajsic, J., Huffman, G., & Pratt, J. (2017). Intervening response events between identification targets do not always turn repetition benefits into repetition costs. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 79(3), 807–819. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13414-016-1262-9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hilchey, M. D., Rajsic, J., & Pratt, J. (2020). When do response-related episodic retrieval effects co-occur with inhibition of return? Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 82(6), 3013–3032. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13414-020-02020-3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hommel, B. (1998). Event files: Evidence for automatic integration of stimulus-response episodes. Visual Cognition, 5(1–2), 183–216. https://doi.org/10.1080/713756773
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hommel, B. (2004). Event files: Feature binding in and across perception and action. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 8(11), 494–500. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2004.08.007
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hommel, B. (2007). Feature integration across perception and action: Event files affect response choice. Psychological Research, 71(1), 42–63. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00426-005-0035-1
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hommel, B., & Frings, C. (2020). The disintegration of event files over time: Decay or interference? Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 27(4), 751–757. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-020-01738-3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hommel, B., Müsseler, J., Aschersleben, G., & Prinz, W. (2001). The theory of event coding (TEC): A framework for perception and action planning. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 24(5), 849–937. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X01000103
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hommel, B., Pösse, B., & Waszak, F. (2000). Contextualization in perception and action. Psycholocia Belgica, 40(4), 227–245. doi:10.5334/pb.964
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hommel, B., & Schneider, W. X. (2002). Visual attention and manual response selection: Distinct mechanisms operating on the same codes. Visual Cognition, 9(4/5), 392–420. https://doi.org/10.1080/13506280143000511
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hu, F. K., Fan, Z., Samuel, A. G., & He, S. (2013). Effects of display complexity on location and feature inhibition. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 75(8), 1619–1632. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13414-013-0509-y
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hu, F. K., Samuel, A. G., & Chan, A. S. (2011). Eliminating inhibition of return by changing salient nonspatial attributes in a complex environment. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 140(1), 35–50. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0021091
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huffman, G., Hilchey, M. D., & Pratt, J. (2018). Feature integration in basic detection and localization tasks: Insights from the attentional orienting literature. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 80(6), 1333–1341. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13414-018-1535-6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huffman, G., Hilchey, M. D., Weidler, B. J., Mills, M., & Pratt, J. (2020). Does feature-based attention play a role in the episodic retrieval of event files? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 46(3), 241–251. https://doi.org/10.1037/xhp0000709
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khatoon, S., Briand, K. A., & Sereno, A. B. (2002). The role of response in spatial attention: Direct versus indirect stimulus–response mappings. Vision Research, 42(24), 2693–2708. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0042-6989(02)00327-9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kiesel, A., Steinhauser, M., Wendt, M., Falkenstein, M., Jost, K., Philipp, A. M., & Koch, I. (2010). Control and interference in task switching - A review. Psychological Bulletin, 136(5), 849–874. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0019842
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klein, R. M. (2000). Inhibition of return. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 4(4), 138–147. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1364-6613(00)01452-2
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klein, R. M., & Hilchey, M. D. (2011). Oculomotor inhibition of return. In S. P. Liversedge, I. D. Gilchrist, & S. Everling (Eds.), The oxford handbook of eye movements (pp. 471–492). Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kornblum, S., Hasbroucq, T., & Osman, A. (1990). Dimensional overlap: Cognitive basis for stimulus-response compatability – A model and taxonomy. Psychological Review, 97(2), 253–270. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.97.2.253
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kornblum, S., & Lee, J.-W. (1995). Stimulus-response compatibility with relevant and irrelevant stimulus dimensions that do and do not overlap with the response. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 21(4), 855–875. https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-1523.21.4.855
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krummenacher, J., Müller, H. J., Zehetleitner, M., & Geyer, T. (2009). Dimension- and space-based intertrial effects in visual pop-out search: Modulation by task demands for focal-attentional processing. Psychological Research, 73(2), 186–197. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00426-008-0206-y
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Law, M. B., Pratt, J., & Abrams, R. A. (1995). Color-based inhibition of return. Perception & Psychophysics, 57(3), 402–408. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03213064
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lupiáñez, J. (2010). Inhibition of return. In A. C. Nobre, & J. T. Coull (Eds.), Attention and time (pp. 17–34). Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Maljkovic, V., & Nakayama, K. (1996). Priming of pop-out: II. The role of position. Perception & Psychophysics, 58(7), 977–991. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03206826
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Memelink, J., & Hommel, B. (2007). Tailoring perception and action to the task at hand. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 18(4), 579–592. https://doi.org/10.1080/09541440500423228
   Google Scholar
• Moeller, B., Hommel, B., & Frings, C. (2015). From hands to feet: Abstract response representations in distractor–response bindings. Acta Psychologica, 159, 69–75. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2015.05.012
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mondor, T. A., & Leboe, L. C. (2008). Stimulus and response repetition effects in the detection of sounds: Evidence of obligatory retrieval and use of a prior event. Psychological Research, 72(2), 183–191. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00426-006-0095-x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Müller, H. J., Heller, D., & Ziegler, J. (1995). Visual search for singleton feature targets within and across feature dimensions. Perception & Psychophysics, 57(1), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03211845
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Müller, H. J., & Krummenacher, J. (2006). Locus of dimension weighting: Preattentive or postselective? Visual Cognition, 14(4-8), 490–513. https://doi.org/10.1080/13506280500194154
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Müller, H. J., Reimann, B., & Krummenacher, J. (2003). Visual search for singleton feature targets across dimensions: Stimulus and expectancy-driven effects in dimensional weighting. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 29(5), 1021–1035. https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-1523.29.5.1021
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Neill, W. T. (1997). Episodic retrieval in negative priming and repetition priming. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 23(6), 1291–1305. doi:10.1037/0278-7393.23.6.1291
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Neill, W. T., & Mathis, K. M. (1998). Transfer-inappropriate processing: Negative priming and related phenomena. In D. L. Medin (Ed.), The psychology of learning and motivation: Advances in research and theory (Vol. 38, pp. 1–44). Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pashler, H. (1987). Target-distractor discriminability in visual search. Perception & Psychophysics, 41(4), 285–292. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03208228
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pashler, H. (1991). Shifting visual attention and selecting motor responses: Distinct attentional mechanisms. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 17(4), 1023–1040. doi:10.1037/0096-1523.17.4.1023
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pashler, H. (1998). The psychology of attention. MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pashler, H., & Baylis, G. (1991). Procedural learning: 2. Intertrial repetition effects in speeded-choice tasks. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 17(1), 33–48. https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.17.1.33
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pratt, J., & Castel, A. D. (2001). Responding to feature or location: A re-examination of inhibition of return and facilitation of return. Vision Research, 41(28), 3902–3908. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0042-6989(01)00238-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prinz, W. (1998). Die Reaktion als Willenshandlung [Responses considered as voluntary actions]. Psychologische Rundschau, 49(1), 10–20.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ridderinkhof, K. R. (2002). Micro- and macro-adjustments of task set: Activation and suppression in conflict tasks. Psychological Research, 66(4), 312–323. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00426-002-0104-7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sagi, D., & Julesz, B. (1985). “Where” and “what” in vision. Science, 228(4704), 1217–1219. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.4001937
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schaffer, L. H. (1965). Choice reaction with variable S-R mapping. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 70(3), 284–288. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0022207
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Schöpper, L.-M., & Frings, C. (2022). Same, but different: Binding effects in auditory, but not visual detection performance. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13414-021-02436-5
   Google Scholar
• Schöpper, L.-M., & Frings, C. (submitted). Inhibition of return (IOR) meets stimulus-response (S-R) binding: Manually responding to central arrow targets is driven by S-R binding, not IOR. Manuscript Submitted for publication.
   Google Scholar
• Schöpper, L.-M., Hilchey, M. D., Lappe, M., & Frings, C. (2020). Detection versus discrimination: The limits of binding accounts in action control. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 82(4), 2085–2097. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13414-019-01911-4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schöpper, L.-M., Lappe, M., & Frings, C. (2022). Saccadic landing positions reveal that eye movements are affected by distractor-based retrieval. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 84(7), 2219–2235. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13414-022-02538-8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schöpper, L.-M., Singh, T., & Frings, C. (2020). The official soundtrack to “five shades of grey”: Generalization in multimodal distractor-based retrieval. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 82(7), 3479–3489. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13414-020-02057-4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Singh, T., & Frings, C. (2020). The role of location in the organization of bindings within short-term episodic traces. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 46(5), 512–524. https://doi.org/10.1037/xhp0000729
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Singh, T., Moeller, B., & Frings, C. (2016). Five shades of grey: Generalization in distractor-based retrieval of S-R episodes. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 78(8), 2307–2312. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13414-016-1210-8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spadaro, A., He, C., & Milliken, B. (2012). Response to an intervening event reverses nonspatial repetition effects in 2AFC tasks: Nonspatial IOR? Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 74(2), 331–349. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13414-011-0248-x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tanaka, Y., & Shimojo, S. (1996). Location vs feature: Reaction time reveals dissociation between two visual functions. Vision Research, 36(14), 2125–2140. https://doi.org/10.1016/0042-6989(95)00272-3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tanaka, Y., & Shimojo, S. (2000). Repetition priming reveals sustained facilitation and transient inhibition in reaction time. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 26(4), 1421–1435. https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-1523.26.4.1421
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taylor, T. L., & Donnelly, M. P. W. (2002). Inhibition of return for target discriminations: The effect of repeating discriminated and irrelevant stimulus dimensions. Perception & Psychophysics, 64(2), 292–317. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03195793
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taylor, T. L., & Ivanoff, J. (2005). Inhibition of return and repetition priming effects in localization and discrimination tasks. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology/Revue Canadienne de Psychologie Expérimentale, 59(2), 75–89. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0087463
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taylor, T. L., & Klein, R. M. (1998). Inhibition of return to color: A replication and nonextension of Law, Pratt, and Abrams (1995). Perception & Psychophysics, 60(8), 1452–1456. http://doi.org/10.3758/BF03208005.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Töllner, T., Gramann, K., Müller, H. J., Kiss, M., & Eimer, M. (2008). Electrophysiological markers of visual dimension changes and response changes. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 34(3), 531–542. https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-1523.34.3.531
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Töllner, T., Rangelov, D., & Müller, H. J. (2012). How the speed of motor-response decisions, but not focal-attentional selection, differs as a function of task set and target prevalence. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 109(28), E1990–E1999. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1206382109
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Treisman, A. M., & Gelade, G. (1980). A feature-integration theory of attention. Cognitive Psychology, 12(1), 97–136. doi:10.1016/0010-0285(80)90005-5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tsal, Y., & Lavie, N. (1988). Attending to color and shape: The special role of location in selective visual processing. Perception & Psychophysics, 44(1), 15–21. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03207469
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tukey, J. (1977). Exploratory data analysis. Addison-Wesley.
   Google Scholar
• Van der Heijden, A. H. C. (1993). The role of position in object selection in vision. Psychological Research, 56(1), 44–58. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00572132
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Virzi, R. A., & Egeth, H. E. (1985). Toward a translational model of Stroop interference. Memory & Cognition, 13(4), 304–319. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03202499
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, Z., Satel, J., & Klein, R. M. (2012). Sensory and motor mechanisms of oculomotor inhibition of return. Experimental Brain Research, 218(3), 441–453. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-012-3033-8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wascher, E., Schneider, D., & Hoffmann, S. (2015). Does response selection contribute to inhibition of return? Psychophysiology, 52(7), 942–950. https://doi.org/10.1111/psyp.12420
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wiediger, M. D., & Fournier, L. R. (2008). An action sequence withheld in memory can delay execution of visually guided actions: The generalization of response compatibility interference. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 34(5), 1136–1149. https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-1523.34.5.1136
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wolfe, J. M. (1994). Guided search 2.0 A revised model of visual search. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 1(2), 202–238. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03200774
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wolfe, J. M., Cave, K. R., & Franzel, S. L. (1989). Guided search: An alternative to the feature integration model for visual search. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 15(3), 419–433. https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-1523.15.3.419
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zehetleitner, M., Rangelov, D., & Müller, H. J. (2012). Partial repetition costs persist in nonsearch compound tasks: Evidence for multiple-weighting-systems hypothesis. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 74(5), 879–890. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13414-012-0287-y
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar