Relating visual and pictorial space: Binocular disparity for distance, motion parallax for direction

References

• Alberti, L. B. (1967). On painting (J. R. Spencer, Trans). Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bebko, A. O., & Troje, N. F. (2020). BmlTUX: Design and control of experiments in virtual reality and beyond. i-Perception, 11(4), 204166952093840. https://doi.org/10.1177/2041669520938400
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Benzeroual, K., & Allison, R. S. (2013, December). Cyber (motion) sickness in active stereoscopic 3D gaming. 2013 International Conference on 3D Imaging, pp. 1–7.
   Google Scholar
• Bingham, G. P., Crowell, J. A., & Todd, J. T. (2004). Distortions of distance and shape are not produced by a single continuous transformation of reach space. Perception & Psychophysics, 66(1), 152–169. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03194869
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Cuijpers, R. H., Kappers, A. M. L., & Koenderink, J. J. (2000). Investigation of visual space using an exocentric pointing task. Perception & Psychophysics, 62(8), 1556–1571. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03212156
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Cutting, J. E. (1988). Affine distortions of pictorial space: Some predictions of Goldstein (1987) that La Gournerie (1859) might have made. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 14(2), 305–311. https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-1523.14.2.305
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cutting, J. E., & Vishton, P. M. (1995). Perceiving layout and knowing distances: The integration, relative potency, and contextual use of different information about depth. In W. Epstein & S. Rogers (Eds.), Perception of space and motion (pp. 69–117).
   Google Scholar
• Dodgson, N. A. (2004). Variation and extrema of human interpupillary distance. Stereoscopic Displays and Virtual Reality Systems XI, 5291, 36–46. doi:10.1117/12.529999
   Google Scholar
• Farber, J., & Rosinski, R. R. (1978). Geometric transformations of pictured space. Perception, 7(3), 269–282. https://doi.org/10.1068/p070269
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Foley, J. M., Ribeiro-Filho, N. P., & Silva, J. A. (2004). Visual perception of extent and the geometry of visual space. Vision Research, 44(2), 147–156. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.visres.2003.09.004
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gibson, J. J. (1986). The ecological approach to visual perception (New edition). Psychology Press.
   Google Scholar
• Goldstein, E. B. (1979). Rotation of objects in pictures viewed at an angle: Evidence for different properties of two types of pictorial space. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 5(1), 78–87. https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-1523.5.1.78
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goldstein, E. B. (1987). Spatial layout, orientation relative to the observer, and perceived projection in pictures viewed at an angle. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 13(2), 256–266. https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-1523.13.2.256
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gournerie, J. D. (1859). Traité de perspective linéare contenant les tracés pour les tableaux, plans et courbes, les bas-reliefs et les décorations théatrales, avec une théorie des effets de perspective. Dalmont et Dunod.
   Google Scholar
• Hecht, H., Boyarskaya, E., & Kitaoka, A. (2014). The Mona Lisa effect: Testing the limits of perceptual robustness vis-à-vis slanted images. Psihologija, 47(3), 287–301. https://doi.org/10.2298/PSI1403287H
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jeffress, L. A. (1937). Anomalous parallax in anaglyphs and stereograms. The Journal of Gen-Eral Psychology, 17(2), 389–394. https://doi.org/10.1080/00221309.1937.9918006
   Google Scholar
• Kelly, J. W., Loomis, J. M., & Beall, A. C. (2004). Judgments of exocentric direction in large-scale space. Perception, 33(4), 443–454. https://doi.org/10.1068/p5218
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim, J.-W., Eom, G.-M., Kim, C.-S., Kim, D.-H., Lee, J.-H., Park, B. K., & Hong, J. (2010). Sex differences in the postural sway characteristics of young and elderly subjects during quiet natural standing. Geriatrics & Gerontology International, 10(2), 191–198. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1447-0594.2009.00582.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koenderink, J. J., Doom, A. J., Kappers, A. M. L., & Todd, J. T. (2004). Pointing out of the picture. Perception, 33(5), 513–530. https://doi.org/10.1068/p3454
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koenderink, J. J., & van Doorn, A. (2008). The structure of visual spaces. Journal of Mathemati-Cal Imaging and Vision, 31(2-3), 171. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10851-008-0076-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koenderink, J. J., & van Doorn, A. (2012). Gauge fields in pictorial space. SIAM Journal on Imaging Sciences, 5(4), 1213–1233. https://doi.org/10.1137/120861151
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koenderink, J. J., & van Doorn, A. J. (1998). Exocentric pointing. Vision and Action.
   Google Scholar
• Koenderink, J. J., van Doorn, A. J., & Kappers, A. M. L. (2005). Pictorial relief. In M. Jenkins & H. R. Laurence (Eds.), Seeing spatial form (pp. 11–32). Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Koenderink, J. J., van Doorn, A. J., & Lappin, J. S. (2000). Direct measurement of the curvature of visual space. Perception, 29(1), 69–79. https://doi.org/10.1068/p2921
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koenderink, J. J., van Doorn, A. J., & Lappin, J. S. (2003). Exocentric pointing to opposite targets. Acta Psychologica, 112(1), 71–87. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0001-6918(02)00101-4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lappin, J. S. (2014). What is binocular disparity? Frontiers in Psychology, 5. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00870
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, Q., & Schonfeld, D. (2014). General stereoscopic distortion rectification due to arbitrary viewer motion in binocular stereoscopic display. In Stereoscopic displays and applications XXV (Vol. 9011, p. 90111). International Society for Optics and Photonics.
   Google Scholar
• Lind, M., Bingham, G. P., & Forsell, C. (2003). Metric 3D structure in visualizations. Information Visualization, 2(1), 51–57. https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.ivs.9500038
   Google Scholar
• Loomis, J. M., & Philbeck, J. W. (2008). Measuring spatial perception with spatial updating and action. In R. L. Klatzky, B. MacWhinney, & M. Behrman (Eds.), Embodiment, ego-space, and action (pp. 1–43). Psychology Press.
   Google Scholar
• Maruyama, K., Endo, M., & Sakurai, K. (1985). An experimental consideration on. Mona Lisa Gaze effect. Tohoku Psychologica Folia, 44(1-4), 109–121. http://hdl.handle.net/10097/62640
   Google Scholar
• Moré, J. J. (2006, August). The Levenberg-Marquardt algorithm: implementation and theory. In Numerical Analysis: Proceedings of the Biennial Conference Held at Dundee, June 28–July 1, 1977 (pp. 105–116). Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg.
   Google Scholar
• Newville, M., Stensitzki, T., Allen, D. B., Rawlik, M., Ingargiola, A., & Nelson, A. (2016). LMFIT: Non-linear least-square minimization and curve-fitting for Python. Astrophysics Source Code Library, ascl-1606.
   Google Scholar
• Nguyen, D. T., & Canny, J. (2005). Multiview: Spatially faithful group video conferencing. Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 799–808. https://doi.org/10.1145/1054972.1055084
   Google Scholar
• Nguyen, D. T., & Canny, J. (2007). Multiview: Improving trust in group video conferencing through spatial faithfulness. Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 1465–1474. https://doi.org/10.1145/1240624.1240846
   Google Scholar
• Ono, H., Rogers, B. J., Ohmi, M., & Ono, M. E. (1988). Dynamic occlusion and motion parallax in depth perception. Perception, 17(2), 255–266. https://doi.org/10.1068/p170255
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perotti, V. J., Todd, J. T., Lappin, J. S., & Phillips, F. (1998). The perception of surface curvature from optical motion. Perception & Psychophysics, 60(3), 377–388. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03206861
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Plumert, J. M., Kearney, J. K., Cremer, J. F., & Recker, K. (2005). Distance perception in real and virtual environments. ACM Transactions on Applied Perception, 2(3), 216–233. https://doi.org/10.1145/1077399.1077402
   Google Scholar
• Renner, R. S., Velichkovsky, B. M., & Helmert, J. R. (2013). The perception of egocentric distances in virtual environments - A review. ACM Computing Surveys, 46(2), 1–40. https://doi.org/10.1145/2543581.2543590
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rogers, B., Braunstein, M. L., Harris, M., Lappin, J. S., Ono, H., & Wade, N. J. (2009). Rogers and Graham’s 1979 paper. Perception, 38(6), 907–919. https://doi.org/10.1068/pmkrog
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rogers, B., & Graham, M. (1979). Motion parallax as an independent cue for depth perception. Perception, 8(2), 125–134. https://doi.org/10.1068/p080125
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rogers, S., Lunsford, M., Strother, L., & Kubovy, M. (2003). The Mona Lisa effect: Perception of gaze direction in real and pictured faces. In S. Rogers & J. Effken (Eds.), Studies in perception and action, VII, 19–24.
   Google Scholar
• Rosinski, R. R., Mulholland, T., Degelman, D., & Farber, J. (1980). Picture perception: An analysis of visual compensation. Perception & Psychophysics, 28(6), 521–526. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03198820
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Sedgwick, H. A. (1991). The effects of viewpoint on the virtual space of pictures. In S. Ellis (Ed.), Pictorial communication in virtual and real environments (pp. 460–479). Taylor & Francis.
   Google Scholar
• Tittle, J. S., Todd, J. T., Perotti, V. J., & Norman, J. F. (1995). Systematic distortion of perceived three-dimensional structure from motion and binocular stereopsis. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 21(3), 663. https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-1523.21.3.663
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Todd, J. T. (2004). The visual perception of 3D shape. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 8(3), 115–121. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2004.01.006
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Todd, J. T., Oomes, A. H. J., Koenderink, J. J., & Kappers, A. M. L. (2001). On the affine structure of perceptual space. Psychological Science, 12(3), 191–196. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9280.00335
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Todd, J. T., Tittle, J. S., & Norman, J. F. (1995). Distortions of three-dimensional space in the perceptual analysis of motion and stereo. Perception, 24(1), 75–86. https://doi.org/10.1068/p240075
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Todorović, D. (2005). Geometric and perceptual effects of the location of the observer vantage point for linear-perspective images. Perception, 34(5), 521–544. https://doi.org/10.1068/p5225
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Todorović, D. (2008). Is pictorial perception robust? The effect of the observer vantage point on the perceived depth structure of linear-perspective images. Perception, 37(1), 106–125. https://doi.org/10.1068/p5657
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Doorn, A., Koenderink, J. J., & Wagemans, J. (2013). Exocentric pointing in the visual field. i-Perception, 4(8), 532–542. https://doi.org/10.1068/i0609
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wagemans, J., van Doorn, A. J., & Koenderink, J. J. (2011). Measuring 3D point configurations in pictorial space. i-Perception, 2(1), 77–111. https://doi.org/10.1068/i0420
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wagner, M. (2006). The geometries of visual space. Psychology Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wagner, M. (2008). Comparing the psychophysical and geometric characteristics of spatial perception and cognitive maps. Cognitive Studies: Bulletin of the Japanese Cognitive Science Society, 15(1), 6–21. https://doi.org/10.11225/jcss.15.6
   Google Scholar
• Wang, X. M., Lind, M., & Bingham, G. P. (2018). Large continuous perspective change with noncoplanar points enables accurate slant perception. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 44(10), 1508. https://doi.org/10.1037/xhp0000553
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, X. M., Lind, M., & Bingham, G. P. (2020a). A stratified process for the perception of objects: From optical transformations to 3D relief structure to 3D similarity structure to slant or aspect ratio. Vision Research, 173, 77–89. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.visres.2020.04.014
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, X. M., Lind, M., & Bingham, G. P. (2020b). Symmetry mediates the bootstrapping of 3-D relief slant to metric slant. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 82(3), 1488–1503. doi:10.3758/s13414-019-01859-5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, X. M., Thaler, A., Eftekharifar, S., Bebko, A. O., & Troje, N. F. (2020). Perceptual distortions between windows and screens: Stereopsis predicts motion parallax. In 2020 IEEE Conference on Virtual Reality and 3D User Interfaces Abstracts and Workshops (VRW) (pp. 684–685). https://doi.org/10.1109/VRW50115.2020.00193
   Google Scholar
• Wollheim, R. (1998). On pictorial representation. The Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism, 56(3), 217–226. https://doi.org/10.2307/432361
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Woods, A. J., Docherty, T., & Koch, R. (1993). Image distortions in stereoscopic video systems. In J. O. Merritt & S. S. Fisher (Eds.), Stereoscopic displays and applications IV (pp. 36–48). International Society for Optics and Photonics.
   Google Scholar