Contrapposto posture captures visual attention: An online gaze tracking experiment

References

• Connor, C. E., Egeth, H. E., & Yantis, S. (2004). Visual attention: Bottom-up versus top-down. Current Biology, 14(19), R850–R852. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2004.09.041
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duncan, L. A., Park, J. H., Faulkner, J., Schaller, M., Neuberg, S. L., & Kenrick, D. T. (2007). Adaptive allocation of attention: Effects of sex and sociosexuality on visual attention to attractive opposite-sex faces. Evolution and Human Behavior, 28(5), 359–364. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2007.05.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fecteau, J. H., Enns, J. T., & Kingstone, A. (2000). Competition-induced visual field differences in search. Psychological Science, 11(5), 386–393. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9280.00275
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lassek, W. D., & Gaulin, S. J. (2019). Evidence supporting nubility and reproductive value as the key to human female physical attractiveness. Evolution and Human Behavior, 40(5), 408–419.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leder, H., Mitrovic, A., & Goller, J. (2016). How beauty determines gaze! Facial attractiveness and gaze duration in images of real world scenes. i-Perception, 7(4), 2041669516664355. https://doi.org/10.1177/2041669516664355
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leder, H., Tinio, P. P., Fuchs, I. M., & Bohrn, I. (2010). When attractiveness demands longer looks: The effects of situation and gender. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 63(9), 1858–1871. https://doi.org/10.1080/17470211003605142
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luck, S. J., Gaspelin, N., Folk, C. L., Remington, R. W., & Theeuwes, J. (2021). Progress toward resolving the attentional capture debate. Visual Cognition, 29(1), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1080/13506285.2020.1848949
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maner, J. K., Gailliot, M. T., & DeWall, C. N. (2007). Adaptive attentional attunement: Evidence for mating-related perceptual bias. Evolution and Human Behavior, 28(1), 28–36. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2006.05.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maner, J. K., Gailliot, M. T., Rouby, D. A., & Miller, S. L. (2007). Can't take my eyes off you: Attentional adhesion to mates and rivals. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 93(3), 389–401. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.93.3.389
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maner, J. K., Kenrick, D. T., Becker, D. V., Delton, A. W., Hofer, B., Wilbur, C. J., & Neuberg, S. L. (2003). Sexually selective cognition: Beauty captures the mind of the beholder. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85(6), 1107–1120. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.85.6.1107
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Milani, S., Brotto, L. A., & Kingstone, A. (2019). “I can see you”: The impact of implied social presence on visual attention to erotic and neutral stimuli in men and women. The Canadian Journal of Human Sexuality, 28(2), 105–119. https://doi.org/10.3138/cjhs.2019-0007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mitrovic, A., Tinio, P. P., & Leder, H. (2016). Consequences of beauty: Effects of rater sex and sexual orientation on the visual exploration and evaluation of attractiveness in real world scenes. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 10, 122. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2016.00122
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murali, M., & Çöltekin, A. (2021, May). Conducting eye tracking studies online. In Proceedings of the workshop on adaptable research methods for empirical research with map users, virtual workshop, 6.
   Google Scholar
• Palmer-Hague, J. L., Tsang, V., Skead, C., Wassersug, R. J., Nasiopoulos, E., & Kingstone, A. (2017). Androgen deprivation alters attention to sexually provocative visual stimuli in elderly men. Sexual Medicine, 5(4), e245–e254. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esxm.2017.10.001
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Papoutsaki, A., Sangkloy, P., Laskey, J., Daskalova, N., Huang, J., & Hays, J. (2016). Webgazer: Scalable webcam eye tracking using user interactions. Proceedings of the Twenty-Fifth IJCAI.
   Google Scholar
• Pazhoohi, F., Arantes, J., Kingstone, A., & Pinal, D. (2020). Becoming sexy: Contrapposto pose increases attractiveness ratings and modulates observers’ brain activity. Biological Psychology, 151, 107842. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biopsycho.2020.107842
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pazhoohi, F., Jacobs, O. L. E., & Kingstone, A. (2022). Contrapposto pose influences perceptions of attractiveness, masculinity, and dynamicity of male statues from antiquity. Evolutionary Psychological Science, 8(1), 46–55.
   Google Scholar
• Pazhoohi, F., Macedo, A. F., Doyle, J. F., & Arantes, J. (2020). Waist-to-hip ratio as supernormal stimuli: Effect of contrapposto pose and viewing angle. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 49(3), 837–847. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-019-01486-z
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peirce, J., Gray, J. R., Simpson, S., MacAskill, M., Höchenberger, R., Sogo, H., … Lindeløv, J. K. (2019). Psychopy2: Experiments in behavior made easy. Behavior Research Methods, 51(1), 195–203. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-018-01193-y
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Penke, L., & Asendorpf, J. B. (2008). Beyond global sociosexual orientations: A more differentiated look at sociosexuality and its effects on courtship and romantic relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 95(5), 1113–1135. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.95.5.1113
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sacco, D. F., Hugenberg, K., & Sefcek, J. A. (2009). Sociosexuality and face perception: Unrestricted sexual orientation facilitates sensitivity to female facial cues. Personality and Individual Differences, 47(7), 777–782. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2009.06.021
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Semmelmann, K., & Weigelt, S. (2018). Online webcam-based eye tracking in cognitive science: A first look. Behavior Research Methods, 50(2), 451–465. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-017-0913-7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shimojo, S., Simion, C., Shimojo, E., & Scheier, C. (2003). Gaze bias both reflects and influences preference. Nature Neuroscience, 6(12), 1317–1322. https://doi.org/10.1038/nn1150
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simpson, J. A., & Gangestad, S. W. (1992). Sociosexuality and romantic partner choice. Journal of Personality, 60(1), 31–51. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6494.1992.tb00264.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Symons, D. (1995). Beauty is in the adaptations of the beholder: The evolutionary psychology of human female sexual attractiveness. In P. R. Abramson & S. D. Pinkerton (Eds.), Sexual nature, sexual culture (pp. 80–118). University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Will, P., Merritt, E., Jenkins, R., & Kingstone, A. (2021). The Medusa effect reveals levels of mind perception in pictures. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 118(32), e2106640118. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2106640118
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang, X., & Krajbich, I. (2021). Webcam-based online eye-tracking for behavioral research. Judgment and Decision Making, 16(6), 1485–1505. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1930297500008512
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zelazniewicz, A. M., & Pawlowski, B. (2011). Female breast size attractiveness for men as a function of sociosexual orientation (restricted vs. unrestricted). Archives of Sexual Behavior, 40(6), 1129–1135. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-011-9850-1
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang, Z., & Yuan, K.-H. (eds.). (2018). Practical statistical power analysis using webpower and R granger. ISDSA Press. https://webpower.psychstat.org.
   Google Scholar