Verbal instructions as selection bias that modulates visual selection

References

• Anderson, B. A., Laurent, P. A., & Yantis, S. (2011a). Learned value magnifies salience-based attentional capture. PLoS One, 6(11), e27926–e27926. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0027926
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anderson, B. A., Laurent, P. A., & Yantis, S. (2011b). Value-driven attentional capture. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 108(25), 10367–10371. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1104047108
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anderson, B. A., & Yantis, S. (2013). Persistence of value-driven attentional capture. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 39(1), 6–9. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0030860
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Awh, E., Belopolsky, A. V., & Theeuwes, J. (2012). Top-down versus bottom-up attentional control: A failed theoretical dichotomy. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 16(8), 437–443. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2012.06.010
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blache, P. (2017). Light and deep parsing: A cognitive model of sentence processing. In (pp. 27–52). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316676974.002
   Google Scholar
• Braem, S., Liefooghe, B., De Houwer, J., Brass, M., & Abrahamse, E. (2017). There are limits to the effects of task instructions: Making the automatic effects of task instructions context-specific takes practice. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 43(3), 394–403. https://doi.org/10.1037/xlm0000310
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brass, M., Liefooghe, B., Braem, S., & De Houwer, J. (2017). Following new task instructions: Evidence for a dissociation between knowing and doing. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 81(Pt A), 16–28. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neubiorev.2017.02.012
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bravo, M. J., & Farid, H. (2004). Search for a category target in clutter. Perception, 33(6), 643–652. https://doi.org/10.1068/p5244
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bucker, B., & Theeuwes, J. (2014). The effect of reward on orienting and reorienting in exogenous cuing. Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience, 14(2), 635–646. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13415-014-0278-7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carrasco, M. (2011). Visual attention: The past 25 years. Vision Research, 51(13), 1484–1525. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.visres.2011.04.012
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, X.-j., Wang, Y., Liu, L.-l., Cui, J.-f., Gan, M.-y., Shum, D. H. K., & Chan, R. C. K. (2015). The effect of implementation intention on prospective memory: A systematic and meta-analytic review. Psychiatry Research, 226(1), 14–22. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychres.2015.01.011
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Conner, M., & Higgins, A. R. (2010). Long-term effects of implementation intentions on prevention of smoking uptake among adolescents: A cluster randomized controlled trial. Health Psychology, 29(5), 529–538. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0020317
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Damanskyy, Y., Martiny-Huenger, T., & Parks-Stamm, E. J. (2022). Unintentional response priming from verbal action–effect instructions. Psychological Research, 87, 161–175. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00426-022-01664-0
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Douglas, B., Martin, M., Ben, B., & Steve, W. (2015). Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4. Journal of Statistical Software, 67(1), 1–48. https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v067.i01
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eder, & Dignath. (2017). Influence of verbal instructions on effect-based action control. An International Journal of Perception, Attention, Memory, and Action, 81(2), 355–365. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00426-016-0745-6
   Google Scholar
• Efron, B., & Tibshirani, R. J. (1993). An introduction to the bootstrap (Vol. 57). Chapman & Hall/CRC.
   Google Scholar
• Ehinger, K. A., Hidalgo-Sotelo, B., Torralba, A., & Oliva, A. (2009). Modelling search for people in 900 scenes: A combined source model of eye guidance. Visual Cognition, 17(6-7), 945–978. https://doi.org/10.1080/13506280902834720
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elsner, B., & Hommel, B. (2001). Effect anticipation and action control. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 27(1), 229–240. https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-1523.27.1.229
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Failing, M., & Theeuwes, J. (2016). Reward alters the perception of time. Cognition, 148, 19–26. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2015.12.005
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Failing, M. F., & Theeuwes, J. (2015). Nonspatial attentional capture by previously rewarded scene semantics. Visual Cognition, 23(1-2), 82–104. https://doi.org/10.1080/13506285.2014.990546
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fletcher-Watson, S., Findlay, J. M., Leekam, S. R., & Benson, V. (2008). Rapid detection of person information in a naturalistic scene. Perception, 37(4), 571–583. https://doi.org/10.1068/p5705
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frings, C., Hommel, B., Koch, I., Rothermund, K., Dignath, D., Giesen, C., Kiesel, A., Kunde, W., Mayr, S., Moeller, B., Möller, M., Pfister, R., & Philipp, A. (2020). Binding and retrieval in action control (BRAC). Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 24(5), 375–387. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2020.02.004
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gollwitzer, P. (1999). Implementation intentions: Strong effects of simple plans. American Psychologist, 54(7), 493–503. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.54.7.493
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gollwitzer, P., & Sheeran, P. (2006). Advances in experimental social psychology. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 38, 69–119. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0065-2601(06)38002-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gollwitzer, P. M. (2014). Weakness of the will: Is a quick fix possible? Motivation and Emotion, 38(3), 305–322. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11031-014-9416-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Green, P., MacLeod, C. J., & Nakagawa, S. (2016). SIMR: An R package for power analysis of generalized linear mixed models by simulation. Methods in Ecology and Evolution, 7(4), 493–498. https://doi.org/10.1111/2041-210X.12504
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grill-Spector, K., Henson, R., & Martin, A. (2006). Repetition and the brain: Neural models of stimulus-specific effects. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 10(1), 14–23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2005.11.006
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hartstra, E., Waszak, F., & Brass, M. (2012). The implementation of verbal instructions: Dissociating motor preparation from the formation of stimulus–response associations. NeuroImage, 63(3), 1143–1153. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2012.08.003
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Henson, R. N., Eckstein, D., Waszak, F., Frings, C., & Horner, A. J. (2014). Stimulus–response bindings in priming. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 18(7), 376–384. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2014.03.004
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hommel, B. (2005). Perception in action: Multiple roles of sensory information in action control. Cognitive Processing, 6(1), 3–14. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10339-004-0040-0
   Google Scholar
• Hommel, B. (2009). Action control according to TEC (theory of event coding). Psychological Research Psychologische Forschung, 73(4), 512–526. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00426-009-0234-2
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hommel, B., & Hommel, B. (2004). Coloring an action: Intending to produce color events eliminates the stroop effect. Psychological Research, 68(2), 74–90. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00426-003-0146-5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hout, M. C., & Goldinger, S. D. (2010). Learning in repeated visual search. Attention, Perception & Psychophysics, 72(5), 1267–1282. https://doi.org/10.3758/APP.72.5.1267
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huang, T.-R., Hazy, T. E., Herd, S. A., & O'Reilly, R. C. (2013). Assembling old tricks for New tasks: A neural model of instructional learning and control. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 25(6), 843–851. https://doi.org/10.1162/jocn_a_00365
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Judd, C. M., McClelland, G. H., & Culhane, S. E. (1995). Data analysis: Continuing issues in the everyday analysis of psychological data. Annual Review of Psychology, 46(1), 433–465. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.ps.46.020195.002245
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Knapp, W. H., & Abrams, R. A. (2012). Fundamental differences in visual search with verbal and pictorial cues. Vision Research, 71, 28–36. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.visres.2012.08.015
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kristjánsson, Á, & Campana, G. (2010). Where perception meets memory: A review of repetition priming in visual search tasks. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 72(1), 5–18. https://doi.org/10.3758/APP.72.1.5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuznetsova, A., Brockhoff, P. B., & Christensen, R. H. B. (2017). Lmertest package: Tests in linear mixed effects models. Journal of Statistical Software, 82(13), 1–26. https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v082.i13
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lamy, D. F., & Kristjansson, A. (2013). Is goal-directed attentional guidance just intertrial priming? A review. Journal of Vision, 13(3), 14–14. https://doi.org/10.1167/13.3.14
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Libera, C. D., & Chelazzi, L. (2006). Visual selective attention and the effects of monetary rewards. Psychological Science, 17(3), 222–227. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.2006.01689.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liefooghe, B., Braem, S., & Meiran, N. (2018). The implications and applications of learning via instructions. Acta Psychologica, 184, 1–3. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2017.09.015
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liefooghe, B., & De Houwer, J. (2018). Automatic effects of instructions do not require the intention to execute these instructions. Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 30(1), 108–121. https://doi.org/10.1080/20445911.2017.1365871
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liefooghe, B., Wenke, D., & De Houwer, J. (2012). Instruction-based task-rule congruency effects. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 38(5), 1325–1335. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0028148
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Logan, G. D. (1990). Repetition priming and automaticity: Common underlying mechanisms? Cognitive Psychology, 22(1), 1–35. https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-0285(90)90002-L
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martiny-Huenger, T., Martiny, S. E., Parks-Stamm, E. J., Pfeiffer, E., Gollwitzer, P. M., Gauthier, I., & Cowan, N. (2017). From conscious thought to automatic action: A simulation account of action planning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 146(10), 1513–1525. https://doi.org/10.1037/xge0000344
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maurizio, C. (1998). Frontoparietal cortical networks for directing attention and the eye to visual locations: Identical, independent, or overlapping neural systems? Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 95(3), 831–838. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.95.3.831. (Colloquium Paper).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McDaniel, M. A., Howard, D. C., & Butler, K. M. (2008). Implementation intentions facilitate prospective memory under high attention demands. Memory & Cognition, 36(4), 716–724. https://doi.org/10.3758/MC.36.4.716
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meiran, N., Cole, M. W., & Braver, T. S. (2012). When planning results in loss of control: Intention-based reflexivity and working-memory. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 6(2012), https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2012.00104
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Meiran, N., Pereg, M., Kessler, Y., Cole, M., & Braver, T. (2015a). Reflexive activation of newly instructed stimulus–response rules: Evidence from lateralized readiness potentials in no-go trials. Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience, 15(2), 365–373. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13415-014-0321-8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meiran, N., Pereg, M., Kessler, Y., Cole, M. W., & Braver, T. S. (2015b). The power of instructions: Proactive configuration of stimulus–response translation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 41(3), 768–786. https://doi.org/10.1037/xlm0000063
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Memelink, J., & Hommel, B. (2013). Intentional weighting: A basic principle in cognitive control. Psychological Research, 77(3), 249–259. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00426-012-0435-y
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moore, T., & Zirnsak, M. (2017). Neural mechanisms of selective visual attention. Annual Review of Psychology, 68(1), 47–72. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-122414-033400
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Muhle - Karbe, P. S., Duncan, J., De Baene, W., Mitchell, D. J., & Brass, M. (2017). Neural coding for instruction-based task sets in human frontoparietal and visual cortex. CEREBRAL CORTEX, 27(3), https://doi.org/10.1093/cercor/bhw032
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Müsseler, J., & Hommel, B. (1997). Blindness to response-compatible stimuli. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 23(3), 861–872. https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-1523.23.3.861
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Orne, M. T. (2002). On the social psychology of the psychological experiment: With particular reference to demand characteristics and their implications. Prevention & Treatment, 5(1), No Pagination Specified-No Pagination Specified. https://doi.org/10.1037/1522-3736.5.1.535a
   Google Scholar
• Papies, E. K., Aarts, H., & de Vries, N. K. (2009). Planning is for doing: Implementation intentions go beyond the mere creation of goal-directed associations. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 45(5), 1148–1151. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2009.06.011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peirce, J., Gray, J. R., Simpson, S., MacAskill, M., Höchenberger, R., Sogo, H., Kastman, E., & Lindeløv, J. K. (2019). Psychopy2: Experiments in behavior made easy. Behavior Research Methods, 51(1), 195–203. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-018-01193-y
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perlovsky, L., & Sakai, K. L. (2014). Language and cognition. Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience, 8, 436–436. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnbeh.2014.00436
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pfeuffer, C. U., Moutsopoulou, K., Pfister, R., Waszak, F., Kiesel, A., Enns, J. T., & Gauthier, I. (2017). The power of words: On item-specific stimulus–response associations formed in the absence of action. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 43(2), 328–347. https://doi.org/10.1037/xhp0000317
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pfeuffer, C. U., Moutsopoulou, K., Waszak, F., & Kiesel, A. (2018). Multiple priming instances increase the impact of practice-based but not verbal code-based stimulus-response associations. Acta Psychologica, 184, 100–109. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2017.05.001
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Poeppel, D. (2012). The maps problem and the mapping problem: Two challenges for a cognitive neuroscience of speech and language. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 29(1-2), 34–55. https://doi.org/10.1080/02643294.2012.710600
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• R Core Team. (2021). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. https://www.R-project.org/
   Google Scholar
• Rummel, J., Einstein, G. O., & Rampey, H. (2012). Implementation-intention encoding in a prospective memory task enhances spontaneous retrieval of intentions. Memory (Hove, England), 20(8), 803–817. https://doi.org/10.1080/09658211.2012.707214
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmidt, J., & Zelinsky, G. J. (2009). Search guidance is proportional to the categorical specificity of a target cue. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 62(10), 1904–1914. https://doi.org/10.1080/17470210902853530
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sheeran, P., Webb, T. L., & Gollwitzer, P. M. (2005). The interplay between goal intentions and implementation intentions. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 31(1), 87–98. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167204271308
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shin, Y. K., Proctor, R. W., & Capaldi, E. J. (2010). A review of contemporary ideomotor theory. Psychological Bulletin, 136(6), 943–974. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0020541
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Soldan, A., Clarke, B., Colleran, C., & Kuras, Y. (2012). Priming and stimulus-response learning in perceptual classification tasks. Memory (Hove, England), 20(4), 400–413. https://doi.org/10.1080/09658211.2012.669482
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Theeuwes, J. (2013). Feature-based attention: It is all bottom-up priming. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 368(1628), 20130055–20130055. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2013.0055
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Theeuwes, J. (2018). Visual selection: Usually fast and automatic; seldom slow and volitional. Journal of Cognition, 1(1), 29–29. https://doi.org/10.5334/joc.13
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Theeuwes, J., & Failing, M. (2020). Attentional selection: Top-down, bottom-up and history-based biases. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Theeuwes, J., & Van der Burg, E. (2011). On the limits of top-down control of visual selection. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 73(7), 2092–2103. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13414-011-0176-9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Theeuwes, J., & Van der Burg, E. (2013). Priming makes a stimulus more salient. Journal of Vision, 13(3), 21–21. https://doi.org/10.1167/13.3.21
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Theeuwes, M., De Houwer, J., Eder, A., & Liefooghe, B. (2015). Congruency effects on the basis of instructed response-effect contingencies. Acta Psychologica, 158, 43–50. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2015.04.002
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Treisman, A. M., & Gelade, G. (1980). A feature-integration theory of attention. Cognitive Psychology, 12(1), 97–136. https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-0285(80)90005-5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tukey, J. W. (1977). Exploratory data analysis. Addison-Wesley.
   Google Scholar
• Van’t Wout, F., Lavric, A., & Monsell, S. (2013). Are stimulus–response rules represented phonologically for task-Set preparation and maintenance? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 39(5), 1538–1551. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0031672
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wieber, F., & Sassenberg, K. (2006). I can't take my eyes off of it – attention attraction effects of implementation intentions. Social Cognition, 24(6), 723–752. https://doi.org/10.1521/soco.2006.24.6.723
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wolfe, J. M. (1994). Guided search 2.0 A revised model of visual search. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 1(2), 202–238. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03200774
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wolfe, J. M., Horowitz, T. S., Kenner, N., Hyle, M., & Vasan, N. (2004). How fast can you change your mind? The speed of top-down guidance in visual search. Vision Research, 44(12), 1411–1426. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.visres.2003.11.024
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang, H., & Zelinsky, G. J. (2009). Visual search is guided to categorically-defined targets. Vision Research, 49(16), 2095–2103. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.visres.2009.05.017
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yantis, S., & Egeth, H. E. (1999). On the distinction between visual salience and stimulus-driven attentional capture. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 25(3), 661–676. https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-1523.25.3.661
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yarbus, A. L. (1967). Eyes movements and vision (Translated from Russian by Basil Haigh). Plenum Press.
   Google Scholar