The problem with early-modern petitions: safety valve or powder keg?

Bibliography

• Açıkgöz, B. “Approval and Disapproval of Textbooks in the Late Ottoman Empire.” History of Education 46, no. 1 (2017): 1–20. doi:10.1080/0046760X.2016.1143978.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Almbjär, M. “Mauritz Stålhandskes behov av att klaga.” Personhistorisk Tidskrift 106, no. 1 (2010): 59–74.
   Google Scholar
• Almbjär, M. The Voice of the People? Supplications Submitted to the Swedish Diet in the Age of Liberty, 1719–1772. Umeå: Umeå University, 2016.
   Google Scholar
• Bakhtin, M. Rabelais och skrattets historia: François Rabelais verk och den folkliga kulturen under medeltiden och renässansen Trans. Lars Fyhr. Gråbo: Anthropos, 1991.
   Google Scholar
• Beales, D. Joseph II. 1: In the Shadow of Maria Theresa, 1741–1780. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1987.
   Google Scholar
• Beetham, D. The Legitimation of Power. Basingstoke: Macmillan, 1991.
   Google Scholar
• Beik, W. Urban Protest in Seventeenth-Century France: The Culture of Retribution. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1997.
   Google Scholar
• Ben-Bassat, Y. Petitioning the Sultan: Protests and Justice in Late Ottoman Palestine, 1865–1908. London: I.B. Tauris, 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Bercé, Y. M. Revolt and Revolution in Early Modern Europe: An Essay on the History of Political Violence. Manchester: Manchester University Press, 1987.
   Google Scholar
• Berglund, M. Massans röst: Upplopp och gatubråk i Stockholm 1719–1848. Stockholm: Stads- och kommunhistoriska institutet, 2009.
   Google Scholar
• Bjørn, C. Bonde, herremand, konge: Bonden i 1700-tallets Danmark. Copenhagen: Gyldendal, 1981.
   Google Scholar
• Bjørn, C. “‘De danske cahiers’: Studier i bondereaktionerne på forordningen af 15. april 1768.” Landbohistorisk Tidsskrift: Bol Og By 2, no. 5 (1983): 145–170.
   Google Scholar
• Blaine, M. S. “The Power of Petitions: Women and the New Hampshire Provincial Government, 1695–1770.” International Review of Social History 46, Suppl. 9 (2001): 57–77.
   Google Scholar
• Blickle, P. “The Common People and the Process of State Formation: Some Conclusions.” In Resistance, Representation and Community, edited by P. Blickle, 325–338. Oxford: Clarendon, 1997.
   Google Scholar
• Blickle, R. “Laufen gen Hof: Die Beschwerden der Untertanen und die Entstehung des Hofrats in Bayern: Ein Beitrag zu den varianten rechtlicher Verfahren im späten Mittelalter und in der Frühen Neuzeit.” Historische Zeitschrift 265, Suppl. 25 (1998): 241–266.
   Google Scholar
• Blickle, R. “Supplikationen und Demonstrationen: Mittel und Wege der Partizipation im bayerischen Territorialstaat.” In Formen der Kommunikation in der ländlichen Gesellschaft, edited by W. Rösener, 263–317. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht, 2000.
   Google Scholar
• Blickle, R. “Peasant Protest and the Language of Womens’ Petitions.” In Gender in Early Modern German History, edited by U. Rublack, 177–199. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2002.
   Google Scholar
• Blom, P. The Vertigo Years: Europe, 1900–1914. New York: Basic Books, 2008.
   Google Scholar
• Bochel, C. “Petitions: Different Dimensions of Voice and Influence in the Scottish Parliament and the National Assembly for Wales.” Social Policy & Administration 46, no. 2 (2012): 142–160. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9515.2011.00828.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bodin, J. Six Books of the Commonwealth Trans. M. J. Tooley. Oxford: Blackwell, 1955 [1583].
   Google Scholar
• Boone, M., and M. Prak. “Rulers, Patricians and Burghers: The Great and the Little Traditions of Urban Revolt in the Low Countries.” In A Miracle Mirrored: The Dutch Republic in European Perspective, edited by C. Augustinus Davids and J. Lucassen, 99–134. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1995.
   Google Scholar
• Brakensiak, S. “Communication between Authorities and Subjects in Bohemia, Hungary and the Holy German Empire, 1650-1800: A Comparison of Three Case Studies.” In Empowering Interactions: Political Cultures and the Emergence of the State in Europe, 1300–1900, edited by W. Blockmans, A. Holenstein, and J. Mathieu, 149–162. Aldershot: Ashgate, 2009.
   Google Scholar
• Bregnsbo, M. Folk skriver til kongen: Supplikkerne og deres funktion i den dansk-norske enevælde i 1700-tallet. Copenhagen: Selskabet for udgivelse af kilder til dansk historie, 1997.
   Google Scholar
• Bundestag, D. “Petitionen” ( accessed June 6, 2016). http://epetitionen.bundestag.de
   Google Scholar
• Burke, P. Popular Culture in Early Modern Europe. Aldershot: Scolar Press, 1994.
   Google Scholar
• Burke, P. En kung blir till: Myter och propaganda kring Ludvig XIV. Transl. Lillemor Jonsson. Stockholm: Tiden/Athena, 1996.
   Google Scholar
• Carman, C. “The Process Is the Reality: Perceptions of Procedural Fairness and Participatory Democracy.” Political Studies 58, no. 4 (2010): 731–751. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9248.2010.00840.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carpenter, D. “Recruitment by Petition: American Antislavery, French Protestantism, English Suppression.” Perspectives on Politics 14, no. 3 (2016): 700–723. doi:10.1017/S1537592716001134.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohn, S. K. Creating the Florentine State: Peasants and Rebellion, 1348–1434. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1999.
   Google Scholar
• Cornell University Law School, “First Amendment” ( accessed April 1, 2016) https://www.law.cornell.edu/constitution/first_amendment
   Google Scholar
• Corteguera, L. R. “Encuentros Imaginados Entre Súbdito y Monarca: Historias de perdón y petición en La España de la edad moderna.” In Tradición y modernidad en la historia de la cultura politíca: España e hispanoamérica, siglos XVI-XX, edited by R. Forte and N. S. Prada, 23–45. Mexico City: Universidad Autónoma Metropolitana, Unidad Iztapalapa, 2009.
   Google Scholar
• Dabhoiwala, F. “Writing Petitions in Early Modern England.” In Suffering and Happiness in England 1550–1850: Narratives and Representations, a Collection to Honour Paul Slack, edited by M. J. Braddick and J. Innes, 127–148. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2017.
   Google Scholar
• Darling, Linda T. Revenue-Raising and Legitimacy: Tax Collection and Finance Administration in the Ottoman Empire, 1560–1660. Leiden: Brill, 1996.
   Google Scholar
• Dodd, G. “Writing Wrongs: The Drafting of Supplications to the Crown in Later Fourteenth-Century England.” Medium Aevum 80, no. 2 (2011): 217–246. doi:10.2307/43632872.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Doyle, W. The Oxford History of the French Revolution. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2002.
   Google Scholar
• Eibach, J., and M. Cottier. “Popular Protest in Switzerland during the 1830s: Opposing Models of Political Participation and Citation of Traditional Ritual.” European Review of History: Revue européenne d’histoire 20, no. 6 (2013): 1011–1030. doi:10.1080/13507486.2013.852519.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elliott, J. H. Imperial Spain 1469–1716. London: Penguin Books, 2002 [1963].
   Google Scholar
• Escher, T., and U. Riehm. “Petitioning the German Bundestag: Political Equality and the Role of the Internet.” Parliamentary Affairs 70, no. 1 (2017): 132–154. doi:10.1093/pa/gsw009.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• EUR-Lex. “Charter of Fundamental Rights of the EU” ( accessed February 26, 2015) http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX:12012P/TXT
   Google Scholar
• Field, D. Rebels in the Name of the Tsar. Boston: Unwin Hyman, 1989.
   Google Scholar
• Forclaz, B. “Local Conflicts and Political Authorities in the Papal State in the Second Half of the Seventeenth Century.” In Empowering Interactions: Political Cultures and the Emergence of the State in Europe, 1300–1900, edited by W. Blockmans, A. Holenstein, and J. Mathieu, 65–78. Aldershot: Ashgate, 2009.
   Google Scholar
• Foster, Elizabeth Read. “Petitions and the Petitions of Right.” Journal of British Studies 14, no. 1 (1974): 21–45. doi:10.1086/385665.
   Google Scholar
• Frohnert, P. “Administration i Sverige under Frihetstiden.” In Administrasjon i norden på 1700-talet, edited by Y. Blomstedt, 185–286. Oslo: Oslo University, 1985.
   Google Scholar
• Frohnert, P. Kronans skatter och bondens bröd: Den lokala förvaltningen och bönderna i Sverige 1719–1775. Stockholm: Institutet för rättshistorisk forskning, 1993.
   Google Scholar
• Fuhrmann, R., B. Kümin, and A. Würgler. “Supplizierende Gemeinden: Aspekte einer vergleichenden Quellenbetrachtung.” Historische Zeitschrift 265, Suppl. 25 (1998): 267–323.
   Google Scholar
• Gaposchkin, M. C. The Making of Saint Louis: Kingship, Sanctity, and Crusade in the Later Middle Ages. Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press, 2010 [2008].
   Google Scholar
• Garrioch, D. The Making of Revolutionary Paris. Berkeley: University of California Press, 2002.
   Google Scholar
• Gluckman, M. Custom and Conflict in Africa. Oxford: Blackwell, 1955.
   Google Scholar
• Griesse, M. “Aufstandsprävention in der Frühen Neuzeit: Länderübergreifende Wahrnehmungen von Revolten und Verrechtlichungsprozesse.” In Revolten und politische Verbrechen zwischen dem 12. und 19. Jahrhundert, edited by A. de Benedictis, K. Härter, and T. Hannapel, 173–212. Frankfurt am Main: Klostermann, 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Gustafsson, H. “Islands administration på 1700-talet.” In Administrasjon i norden på 1700-talet, edited by Y. Blomstedt, 145–184. Oslo: Oslo University, 1985.
   Google Scholar
• Gustafsson, H. Political Interaction in the Old Regime: Central Power and Local Society in the Eighteenth-Century Nordic States. Lund: Studentlitteratur, 1994.
   Google Scholar
• Gustafsson, H. “Att draga till Malmö och skaffa sig rätt: Undersåtar, överhet och identitetsföreställningar i skånska suppliker 1661–1699.” In Öresundsgränser: Rörelser, möten och visioner i tid och rum, edited by F. Nilsson, H. Sanders, and Y. Stubbergaard, 75–11. Göteborg: Makadam i samarbete med Centrum för Danmarksstudier vid Lunds universitet, 2007.
   Google Scholar
• Harding, A. Medieval Law and the Foundations of the State. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2002.
   Google Scholar
• Helgesen, K. “Supplikken som kvinnehistorisk kilde.” Historisk Tidsskrift (Norway) 61, no. 3 (1982): 257–264.
   Google Scholar
• Higgins, P. “The Reactions of Women, with Special Reference to Women Petitioners.” In Politics, Religion and the English Civil War, edited by B. Manning, 179–224. London: Edward Arnold, 1973.
   Google Scholar
• Hinnemo, E. Inför Högsta Instans: Samspelet mellan kvinnors handlingsutrymme och rättslig reglering i justitierevisionen 1760–1860. Uppsala: Acta Universitatis Upsaliensis, 2016.
   Google Scholar
• Hirst, D. “Making Contact: Petitions and the English Republic.” Journal of British Studies 45, no. 1 (2006): 26–50. doi:10.1086/497054.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holenstein, A. “Bittgesuche, Gesetze und Verwaltung: Zur Praxis ‘Guter Policey’ in Gemeinde und Staat des Ancien Régime am Beispiel der Markgrafschaft Baden(-Durlach).” Historische Zeitschrift 265, Suppl. 25 (1998): 325–357.
   Google Scholar
• Holenstein, A. “Gute Policey” und lokale Gesellschaft im Staat des Ancien Régime: Das Fallbeispiel der Markgrafschaft Baden(-Durlach). Vol. 2. Tübingen: Bibliotheca Academica, 2003.
   Google Scholar
• Houston, R. A. Peasant Petitions: Social Relations and Economic Life on Landed Estates, 1600–1850. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Hoyle, R. W. “Petitioning as Popular Politics in Early Sixteenth–Century England.” Historical Research 75, no. 190 (2002): 365–389. doi:10.1111/hisr.2002.75.issue-190.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jonsson, A. De norrländska landshövdingarna och statsbildningen 1634–1769. Umeå: Umeå University, 2005.
   Google Scholar
• Karonen, P. “Coping with Peace after a Debacle: The Crisis of the Transition to Peace in Sweden after the Great Northern War (1700–1721).” Scandinavian Journal of History 33, no. 3 (2008): 203–225. doi:10.1080/03468750802038785.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Katajala, A. “The Changing Face of Peasant Unrest in Early Modern Finland.” In Northern Revolts: Medieval and Early Modern Peasant Unrest in the Nordic Countries, edited by K. Katajala, 149–187. Helsinki: Finnish Literature Society, 2004.
   Google Scholar
• Katajala, K. “Conclusions.” In Northern Revolts: Medieval and Early Modern Peasant Unrest in the Nordic Countries, edited by K. Katajala, 258–269. Helsinki: Finnish Literature Society, 2004.
   Google Scholar
• Kesselring, K. J. Mercy and Authority in the Tudor State. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2007.
   Google Scholar
• Knights, M. “London’s `Monster’ Petition of 1680.” Historical Journal 36, no. 1 (1993): 39–67. doi:10.1017/S0018246X00016101.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Knights, M. “Participation and Representation before Democracy: Petitions and Addresses in Premodern Britain.” In Political Representation, edited by I. Shapiro, S. C. Stokes, E. J. Wood, and A. S. Kirshner, 35–58. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2010.
   Google Scholar
• Kubiska-Scharl, I., and P. Michael. Die Karrieren des wiener Hofpersonals 1711–1765: Eine Darstellung anhand der Hofkalender und Hofparteienprotokolle. Innsbruck: Studienverlag, 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Kümin, B., and A. Würgler. “Petitions, Gravamina and the Early Modern State: Local Influence on Central Legislation in England and Germany (Hesse).” Parliaments Estates and Representation 17, no. 1 (1997): 39–60. doi:10.1080/02606755.1997.9627013.
   Google Scholar
• Landwehr, A. “‘Normdurchsetzung’ in der Frühen Neuzeit?: Kritik eines Begriffs.” Zeitschrift für Geschichtswissenschaft 48 (2000): 146–162.
   Google Scholar
• Landwehr, A. Policey Im Alltag: Die Implementation frühneuzeitlicher Policeyordnungen in Leonberg. Frankfurt am Main: Vittorio Klostermann, 2000.
   Google Scholar
• Lennersand, M. Rättvisans och allmogens beskyddare: Den absoluta staten, kommissionerna och tjänstemännen, ca 1680–1730. Uppsala: Acta Universitatis Upsaliensis, 1999.
   Google Scholar
• Lerbom, J. Mellan två riken: Integration, politisk kultur och förnationella identiteter på Gotland 1500–1700. Lund: Nordic Academic Press, 2003.
   Google Scholar
• Leys, C. “Petitioning in the Nineteenth and Twentieth Centuries.” Political Studies 33, no. 1 (1955): 45–64. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9248.1955.tb01105.x.
   Google Scholar
• Liliequist, J., and M. Almbjär. “Early Modern Court Records and Petitions in Sweden (C. 1400–1809): Overview and Research Trends.” Frühneuzeit-Info 2, nos. 1 & 2 (2012): 7–23.
   Google Scholar
• Lindberg, E., and S. Ling. “‘Spanska’ citroner till Salu: Om kvinnors handlingsutrymme på fruktmarknaden i 1700-talets Stockholm.” Historisk Tidskrift 134, no. 1 (2014): 3–30.
   Google Scholar
• Lindblad, S. “Riksdagsbesvär och suppliker: Studier i ålderomliga kommunikationssystem, kap 2.” Text presented at the historic seminar at the University of Uppsala, 1979.
   Google Scholar
• Ling, S. Konsten att försörja sig: Kvinnors arbete i stockholm 1650–1750. Stockholm: Stockholma, 2016.
   Google Scholar
• Loft, P. “Involving the Public: Parliament, Petitioning, and the Language of Interest, 1688–1720.” Journal of British Studies 55, no. 1 (2016): 1–23. doi:10.1017/jbr.2015.176.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luebke, D. M. “Naïve Monarchism and Marian Veneration in Early Modern Germany.” Past & Present 154, no. 2 (1997): 71–106. doi:10.1093/past/154.1.71.
   Google Scholar
• Luebke, D. M. His Majesty’s Rebels: Communities, Factions, and Rural Revolt in the Black Forest, 1725–1745. Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press, 1997.
   Google Scholar
• Luebke, D. M. “Frederick the Great and the Celebrated Case of the Millers Arnold (1770–1779): A Reappraisal.” Central European History 32, no. 4 (1999): 379–408. doi:10.1017/S0008938900021750.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luebke, D. M. “Signatures and Political Culture in Eighteenth‐Century Germany.” The Journal of Modern History 76, no. 3 (2004): 497–530. doi:10.1086/425439.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luebke, D. M. “How to Become a Loyalist: Petitions, Self-Fashioning, and the Repression of Unrest (East Frisia, 1725–1727).” Central European History 38, no. 3 (2005): 353–383. doi:10.1163/156916105775563607.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lunn, K., and A. Day. “Deference and Defiance: The Changing Nature of Petitioning in British Naval Dockyards.” International Review of Social History 46, suppl. 9 (2001): 131–150. doi:10.1017/S0020859001000359.
   Google Scholar
• Madsen, D. “Political Self-Efficacy Tested.” The American Political Science Review 81, no. 2 (1987): 571–581. doi:10.2307/1961970.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Markoff, J. The Abolition of Feudalism: Peasants, Lords, and Legislators in the French Revolution. University Park: Pennsylvania State University Press, 1996.
   Google Scholar
• Miller, H. “Popular Petitioning and the Corn Laws, 1833–46.” The English Historical Review 127, no. 527 (2012): 882–919. doi:10.1093/ehr/ces073.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Muller, H. W. “From Requete to Petition: Petitioning the Monarch between Empires.” Historical Journal 60, no. 3 (2017): 659–686. doi:10.1017/S0018246X16000297.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Munck, T. The Peasantry and the Early Absolute Monarchy in Denmark, 1660–1708. Copenhagen: Landbohistorisk selskab, 1979.
   Google Scholar
• Myers, A. R. “Parliamentary Petitions in the Fifteenth Century: Part I: Petitions from Individuals or Groups.” The English Historical Review 52, no. 207 (1937): 590–613. doi:10.1093/ehr/LII.CCVIII.590.
   Google Scholar
• Neuhaus, H. “Supplikationen als landesgeschichtliche Quellen: Das Beispiel der Landgrafschaft Hessen im 16. Jahrhundert.” Hessiches Jahrbuch für Landesgeschichte 28 (1978): 110–190.
   Google Scholar
• Neuhaus, H. “‘Supplizieren und Wassertrinken sind jedem gestattet’: Über den Zugang des Einzelnen Zum Frühneuzeitlichen Ständestaat.” In Staat-Souveränität-Verfassung: Festschrift für Helmut Quaritsch zum 70. Geburtstag, edited by D. Murswiek, U. Storost, and H. A. Wolff, 475–492. Berlin: Duncker & Humblot, 2000.
   Google Scholar
• Nicholls, D. “Addressing God as Ruler: Prayer and Petition.” The British Journal of Sociology 44, no. 1 (1993): 125–141. doi:10.2307/591684.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nierop, H. V. “Popular Participation in Politics in the Dutch Republic.” In Resistance, Representation and Community, edited by P. Blickle, 272–290. Oxford: Clarendon, 1997.
   Google Scholar
• Nierop, H. V. “Private Interests, Public Policies: Petitions in the Dutch Republic.” In The Public and Private in Dutch Culture of the Golden Age, edited by A. K. Wheelock and A. F. Seef, 33–39. Newark: University of Delaware Press, 2000.
   Google Scholar
• Nubola, C. “Supplications between Politics and Justice: The Northern and Central Italian States in the Early Modern Age.” International Review of Social History 46, suppl. 9 (2001): 35–56. doi:10.1017/S0020859001000323.
   Google Scholar
• Oddens, J. “The Greatest Right of Them All: The Debate on the Right to Petition in the Netherlands from the Dutch Republic to the Kingdom (c.1750–1830).” European History Quarterly 47, no. 4 (2017): 634–656. doi:10.1177/0265691417720597.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Orth, K. “Voices from the Lower Deck: Petitions on the Conduct of Naval Officers during the 1797 Mutinies.” In The Naval Mutinies of 1797: Unity and Perseverance, edited by P. MacDougall and A. V. Coats, 98–106. Woodbridge: Boydell Press, 2011.
   Google Scholar
• Peterson, C. “‘En god ämbetsman är bättre än en god lag’: Frågan om justitiekanslern som en allmogens besvärsinstans i klagomål över kronobetjänternas ämbetsutövning (1747–1752).” In Administrasjon i norden på 1700-talet, edited by Y. Blomstedt, 307–338. Oslo: Oslo University, 1985.
   Google Scholar
• Prak, M. The Dutch Republic in the Seventeenth Century: The Golden Age Trans. Diane Webb. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2005.
   Google Scholar
• Rigaudière, A. “Issues at Stake in the Development of the State: Devising and Drafting the Law in Fourteenth Century France.” In Legislation and Justice, edited by A. Padoa Schioppa, 73–102. Oxford: Clarendon, 1997.
   Google Scholar
• Roberts, L. S. “The Petition Box in Eighteenth-Century Tosa.” Journal of Japanese Studies 20, no. 2 (1994): 423–458. doi:10.2307/133199.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robisheaux, T. “Peasant Unrest and the Moral Economy in the German Southwest 1560–1620.” Archiv für Reformationsgeschichte: Internationale Zeitschrift zur Erforschung der Reformation und ihrer Weltwirkungen 78 (1987): 174–186.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rönnqvist, M. “Smittande oro? Revoltenerfahrung som katalysator för den svenska överhetens retorik och taktik i mötet med uppror underifrån under 1600-talet.” In Eneveldet før undergangen: Politisk kultur i Norge 1660–1814, edited by T. Bjerkås and K. Dørum, 113–152. Oslo: Scandinavian Academic Press, 2017.
   Google Scholar
• Sandvik, H. “Politiske kvinner på 1700-tallet i Norge.” In Kvinnor och politik i det tidigmoderna norden: Rapport til 26: ENordiska Historikermötet i Reykjavík Den 8–12 Augusti 2007, edited by Å. Karlsson-Sjögren, 73–93. Reykjavik: Háskólaútgáfan, 2007.
   Google Scholar
• Schmugge, L. “Female Petitioners in the Papal Penitentiary.” Gender & History 12, no. 3 (2000): 685–703. doi:10.1111/1468-0424.00206.
   Google Scholar
• Schulze, W. Bäuerlicher Widerstand und feudale Herrschaft in Der Frühen Neuzeit. Stuttgart-Bad Cannstatt: Frommann-Holzboog, 1980.
   Google Scholar
• Schulze, W. “‘Geben Aufruhr und Aufstand Anlaß zu neuen heilsamen Gesetzen’: Beobachtungen über die Wirkungen bäuerlichen Widerstands in der Frühen Neuzeit.” In Aufstände, Revolten, Prozesse, edited by W. Schulze, 261–285. Stuttgart: Klett-Cotta, 1983.
   Google Scholar
• Scott, J. C. Domination and the Arts of Resistance: Hidden Transcripts. London: Yale University Press, 1991.
   Google Scholar
• Shaw, J. E. “Writing to the Prince: Supplications, Equity and Absolutism in Sixteenth-Century Tuscany.” Past & Present 215, no. 1 (2012): 51–83. doi:10.1093/pastj/gts005.
   Google Scholar
• Sogner, S. Aschehougs Norgeshistorie. Bd 6, Krig og fred: 1660–1780. Oslo: Aschehoug, 1996.
   Google Scholar
• Supphellen, S. “Supplikken som institusjon i norsk historie: Framvokster og bruk saerlag forst pa 1700-tallet.” Historisk Tidsskrift (Norway) 57, no. 1 (1978): 81–108.
   Google Scholar
• Taswell-Langmead, T. P. English Constitutional History from the Teutonic Conquest to the Present Time. London: Sweet & Maxwell, 1946.
   Google Scholar
• Teuscher, S. “Threats from above on Request from Below: Dynamics of the Territorial Administration of Berne, 1420–1450.” In Empowering Interactions: Political Cultures and the Emergence of the State in Europe, 1300–1900, edited by W. Blockmans, A. Holenstein, and J. Mathieu, 101–114. Aldershot: Ashgate, 2009.
   Google Scholar
• Tilly, C. Coercion, Capital, and European States, AD 990–1992. Oxford: Blackwell, 1992.
   Google Scholar
• UK Government and Parliament, “Petitions” ( accessed November 13, 2012) http://epetitions.direct.gov.uk/
   Google Scholar
• Ulbricht, O. “Supplikationen als Ego-Dokumente: Bittschriften von Leibeigenen aus der ersten Hälfte des 17. Jahrhunderts als Beispiel.” In Ego-Dokumente: Annäherung an den Menschen in der Geschichte, edited by W. Schulze, 149–174. Berlin: Akademie Verlag, 1996.
   Google Scholar
• Underdown, D. Revel, Riot, and Rebellion: Popular Politics and Culture in England 1603–1660. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1987 [1985].
   Google Scholar
• Underdown, D. Start of Play: Cricket and Culture in Eighteenth-Century England. London: Allen Lane, 2000.
   Google Scholar
• van Voss, L. H. “Introduction.” International Review of Social History 46, suppl. 9 (2001): 1–10.
   Google Scholar
• Whiting, A. “Some Women Can Shift It Well Enough: A Legal Context for Understanding the Women Petitioners of the Seventeenth-Century English Revolution.” Australian Feminist Law Journal 21, no. 12 (2004): 77–100. doi:10.1080/13200968.2004.10854332.
   Google Scholar
• Würgler, A. “Desideria und Landesordnungen: Kommunaler und landständischer Einfluß auf die fürstliche Gesetzgebung in Hessen-Kassel 1650–1800.” Historische Zeitschrift 265, no. Suppl. 25 (1998): 149–207.
   Google Scholar
• Würgler, A. “Voices from among the ‘Silent Masses’: Humble Petitions and Social Conflicts in Early Modern Central Europe.” International Review of Social History 46, suppl. 9 (2001): 11–34. doi:10.1017/S0020859001000311.
   Google Scholar
• Zaret, D. “Petitions and the ‘Invention’ of Public Opinion in the English Revolution.” American Journal of Sociology 101, no. 6 (1996): 1497–1555. doi:10.1086/230866.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar