Mapping deviant democracy

Bibliography

• Acemoglu, Daron, Robinson, James (2006). Economic Origins of Dictatorship and Democracy, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Alesina, Alberto, Devleschawuer, Arnaud, Easterly, William, Kurlat, Sergio, Wacziarg, Romain (2003). Fractionalization. Journal of Economic Growth, 8(2), 155–194. doi: 10.1023/A:1024471506938
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alvarez, Michael, Cheibub, José, Limongi, Fernando, Przeworski, Adam (1996). Classifying Political Regimes. Studies in Comparative International Development, 31(2), 529–546. doi: 10.1007/BF02719326
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anckar, Dag (2008). Microstate Democracy: Majority or Consensus; Diffusion or Problem-Solving?. Democratization, 15(1), 67–85. doi: 10.1080/13510340701768158
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barro, Robert (1999). Determinants of Democracy. Journal of Political Economy, 107(6), 158–183. doi: 10.1086/250107
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bernhard, Michael, Reenock, Christopher, Nordstrom, Timothy (2004). The Legacy of Western Overseas Colonialism on Democratic Survival. International Studies Quarterly, 48(1), 225–250. doi: 10.1111/j.0020-8833.2004.00298.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boix, Carles (2003). Democracy and Redistribution, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Boix, Carles, Stokes, Susan (2003). Endogenous Democratization. World Politics, 55(4), 517–549. doi: 10.1353/wp.2003.0019
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bollen, Kenneth World System Position, Dependency and Democracy: The Cross-National Evidence. American Sociological Review 48, no. 4 (1983): 468–479
   Google Scholar
• Brady, Henry, Collier, David, Seawright, Jason (2006). Toward a Pluralistic Vision of Methodology. Political Analysis, 14(4), 353–368. doi: 10.1093/pan/mpj021
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brinks, Daniel, Coppedge, Michael (2006). Diffusion Is No Illusion: Neighbor Emulation in the Third Wave of Democracy. Comparative Political Studies, 39, 463–489. doi: 10.1177/0010414005276666
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brownlee, Jason (2009). Portents of Pluralism: How Hybrid Regimes Affect Democratic Transitions. American Journal of Political Science, 53(3), 515–532. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-5907.2009.00384.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bunce, Valerie (2000). Comparative Democratization: Big and Bounded Generalizations. Comparative Political Studies, 33, 6–7. doi: 10.1177/001041400003300602
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burnell, Peter, Calvert, Peter (1999). The Resilience of Democracy: An Introduction. Democratization, 6(1), 1–32. doi: 10.1080/13510349908403594
   Google Scholar
• Carothers, Thomas (2007). The ‘Sequencing’ Fallacy. Journal of Democracy, 18(1), 12–27. doi: 10.1353/jod.2007.0002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheibub, José, Gandhi, Jennifer, Vreeland, James (2009). Democracy and Dictatorship Revisited. Public Choice, 143, nos (1–2), 67–101. doi: 10.1007/s11127-009-9491-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clague, Christopher, Gleason, Suzanne, Knack, Stephen (2001). Determinants of Lasting Democracy in Poor Countries: Culture, Development, and Institutions. Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 573, 16–41. doi: 10.1177/0002716201573001002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Collier, David, Mahoney, James (1996). Insights and Pitfalls: Selection Bias in Qualitative Research. World Politics, 49(1), 56–91. doi: 10.1353/wp.1996.0023
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dahl, Robert A. (1971). Polyarchy. Participation and Opposition, New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dahl, Robert A. (1989). Democracy and its Critics. New Haven, CT and London: Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Diamond, Larry (1992). Economic Development and Democracy Reconsidered. In DiamondLarryMarksGary (Ed.), Reexamining Democracy: Essays in Honor of Seymour Martin Lipset, (pp. 93–139). Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Diamond, Larry, Plattner, Marc (Eds.). (1994). Nationalism, Ethnic Conflict, and Democracy, Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Doorenspleet, Renske (2000). Reassessing the Three Waves of Democratization. World Politics, 52, 384–406. doi: 10.1017/S0043887100016580
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Doorenspleet, Renske (2005). Democratic Transitions – Exploring the Structural Sources of the Fourth Wave, Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Doorenspleet, Renske (2012). Deviant Democracies. In HaynesJeffrey (Ed.), Routledge Handbook of Democratization, (pp. 190–206). New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Doorenspleet, Renske, Kopecký, Peter (2008). Against the Odds: Deviant Cases of Democratization. Democratization, 15(4), 697–713. doi: 10.1080/13510340802191045
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Doorenspleet, Renske, Mudde, Cas (2008). Upping the Odds: Deviant Democracies and Theories of Democratization. Democratization, 15(4), 815–832. doi: 10.1080/13510340802191102
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elkins, Zachary, Simmons, Beth (2005). On Waves, Clusters, and Diffusion: A Conceptual Framework. The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 598(1), 33–51. doi: 10.1177/0002716204272516
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Epstein, David, Bates, Robert, Goldstone, Jack, Kristensen, Ida, O'Halloran, Sharyn (2006). Democratic Transitions. American Journal of Political Science, 50(3), 551–569. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-5907.2006.00201.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fish, M. Steven (2002). Islam and Authoritarianism. World Politics, 55(1), 4–37. doi: 10.1353/wp.2003.0004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Geddes, Barbara (1990). How the Cases You Choose Affect the Answers You Get: Selection Bias in Comparative Politics. Political Analysis, 2(1), 131–150. doi: 10.1093/pan/2.1.131
   Google Scholar
• George, Alexander, Bennett, Andrew (2005). Case Studies and Theory Development in the Social Sciences, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gerring, John (2007). Case Study Research. Principles and Practices, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gleditsch, Kristian, Ward, Michael (2006). Diffusion and the International Context of Democratization. International Organization, 60(4), 911–933.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hayo, Bernd, Voigt, Stefan (2005/07). Explaining De Facto Judicial Independence.” Working Paper No.. , Philipps-Universität Marburg
   Google Scholar
• Huntington, Samuel (1991). The Third Wave. Democratization in the Late Twentieth Century, Norman and London: University of Oklahoma Press.
   Google Scholar
• Huntington, Samuel (1996). Democracy for the Long Haul. Journal of Democracy, 7(2), 3–13. doi: 10.1353/jod.1996.0028
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Inglehart Ronald, Christian Welzel (2005). Modernization, Cultural Change, and Democracy: The Human Development Sequence, New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• International Monetary Fund (2007). Guide on Resource Revenue Transparency., http://www.imf.org/external/np/pp/2007/eng/051507g.pdf (accessed 11 April 2011)
   Google Scholar
• Kapstein, Ethan, Converse, Nathan (2008). Why Democracies Fail. Journal of Democracy, 19(4), 57–68. doi: 10.1353/jod.0.0031
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karl, Terry (1997). The Paradox of Plenty. Oil Booms and Petro-States, Berkeley, LA and London: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Levitsky, Steven, Way, Lucan (2002). The Rise of Competitive Authoritarianism. Journal of Democracy, 13(2), 51–65. doi: 10.1353/jod.2002.0026
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levitsky, Steven, Way, Lucan (2010). Competitive Authoritarianism: Hybrid Regimes After the Cold War, New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lewis, Bernard. Islam and Liberal Democracy. The Atlantic Monthly, February, 1993, ,
   Google Scholar
• Lieberman, Evan (2005). Nested Analysis as a Mixed-Method Strategy for Comparative Research. American Political Science Review, 99(3), 435–442. doi: 10.1017/S0003055405051762
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lipset, Seymour M. (1959). Some Social Requisites of Democracy. American Political Science Review, 53(1), 69–105. doi: 10.2307/1951731
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lipset, Seymour M., Seong, Kyoung-Ryung, Torres, John (1993). A Comparative Analysis of the Social Requisites of Democracy. International Sociological Scientific Journal, 45, 155–175.
   Google Scholar
• Mainwaring, Scott, Shugart, Matthew (1997). Juan Linz, Presidentialism, and Democracy: A Critical Appraisal. Comparative Politics, 29(4), 449–471. doi: 10.2307/422014
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mill, John Stuart (Eds.). (1996 [1861]). Consideration on Representative Government. Utilitarianism, On Liberty, Considerations on Representative Government, Remarks on Bentham's Philosophy, (pp. 188–428). London: Dent.
   Google Scholar
• Møller, Jørgen, Skaaning, Svend-Erik, Seeberg, Michael. Asymmetrical Constraints on Democratic Regime Types? A Comparative Study.” Paper prepared for the American Political Science Association Annual Meeting, Seattle, 2011. ,
   Google Scholar
• Munck, Gerardo, Snyder, Richard (2007). Visions of Comparative Politics: A Reply to Mahoney and Wibbels. Comparative Political Studies, 40(1), 45–47. doi: 10.1177/0010414006296337
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O'Donnell, Guillermo. On the State, Democratization and Some Conceptual Problems.” Working Paper No. 192, Kellogg Institute, 1993. ,
   Google Scholar
• O'Donnell, Guillermo (2001). Democracy, Law, and Comparative Politics. Studies in Comparative International Development, 36(1), 7–36. doi: 10.1007/BF02687583
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paldam, Martin (2001). Corruption and Religion: Adding to the Economic Model. KYKLOS, 54, nos. (2–3), 383–414. doi: 10.1111/j.0023-5962.2001.00160.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Przeworski, Adam (1991). Democracy and the Market: Political and Economic Reforms in Eastern Europe and Latin America, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Przeworski, Adam, Alvarez, Michael, Cheibub, José, Limongi, Fernando (1996). What Makes Democracies Endure?. Journal of Democracy, 7(1), 39–55.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ross, Michael (2001). Does Oil Hinder Democracy?. World Politics, 53(3), 325–361. doi: 10.1353/wp.2001.0011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ross, Michael. Oil and Democracy Revisited.”. , Unpublished paper, 2009. UCLA. Accessed January 30, 2013. http://www.sscnet.ucla.edu/polisci/faculty/ross/Oil%20and%20Democracy%20Revisited.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Rowen, Henry (1995). The Tide Underneath the ‘Third Wave.’. Journal of Democracy, 6(1), 52–64. doi: 10.1353/jod.1995.0018
   Google Scholar
• Rustow, Dankwart (1970). Transitions to Democracy: Toward a Dynamic Model. Comparative Politics, 2(3), 337–363. doi: 10.2307/421307
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schumpeter, Joseph (1974 [1943]). Capitalism, Socialism and Democracy, London: Unwin University Books.
   Google Scholar
• Teorell, Jan (2010). Determinants of Democratization: Explaining Regime Change in the World, 1972–2006, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Teorell, Jan, Hadenius, Axel (2007). Determinants of Democratization: Taking Stock of the Large-N Evidence. In Berg-SchlosserDirk (Ed.), Democratization: The State of the Art, (pp. 69–96). Opladen: Barbara Budrich Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Varshney, Ashutosh (1998). Why Democracy Survives. Journal of Democracy, 9(3), 36–50. doi: 10.1353/jod.1998.0053
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weiner, Myron (1987). Empirical Democratic Theory and the Transition from Authoritarianism to Democracy. PS: Political Science, and Politics, 20(4), 861–866. doi: 10.2307/419247
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weingast, Barry (1997). The Political Foundations of Democracy and the Rule of Law. American Political Science Review, 91(2), 245–263. doi: 10.2307/2952354
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wright, Joseph (2008). Political Competition and Democratic Stability in New Democracies. British Journal of Political Science, 38, 221–245. doi: 10.1017/S0007123408000124
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar