Promoting competition or cooperation? The impact of EU funding on Czech advocacy organizations

Bibliography

• Aksartova, Sada. “Why NGOs? How American Donors Embrace Civil Society after the Cold War.” The International Journal of Non-for-Profit Law 8, no. 3 (2006): 15–20. http://www.icnl.org/research/journal/vol8iss3/special_4.htm
   Google Scholar
• Andrews, Kenneth T., and Bob Edwards. “Advocacy Organizations in the U.S. Political Process.” Annual Review of Sociology 30 (2004): 479–506. doi:10.1146/annurev.soc.30.012703.110542.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baker, Susan, and Petr Jehlička, eds. Dilemmas of Transition: The Environment, Democracy and Economic Reform in East Central Europe. London: Frank Cass, 1998.
   Google Scholar
• Baldassarri, Delia, and Mario Diani. “The Integrative Power of Civic Networks.” American Journal of Sociology 113, no. 3 (2007): 735–780. doi:10.1086/521839.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bernhagen, Patrick, and Michael Marsh. “Voting and Protesting: Explaining Citizen Participation in Old and New European Democracies.” Democratization 14, no. 1 (2007): 44–72. doi:10.1080/13510340601024298.
   Google Scholar
• Bonacich, Phillip. “Some Unique Properties of Eigenvector Centrality.” Social Networks 29, no. 4 (2007): 555–564. doi:10.1016/j.socnet.2007.04.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Borgatti, Stephen P., and Martin G. Everett. “A Graph-Theoretic Perspective on Centrality.” Social Networks 28, no. 4 (2006): 466–484. doi:10.1016/j.socnet.2005.11.005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Borgatti, Stephen P., Martin G. Everett, and Linton C. Freeman. Ucinet for Windows: Software for Social Network Analysis. Harvard, MA: Analytic Technologies, 2002.
   Google Scholar
• Brooks Arthur, C. “Is there a Dark Side to Government Support for Nonprofits?” Public Administration Review 60, no. 3 (2000): 211–218. doi:10.1111/0033-3352.00081.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown Laura K., and Elizabeth Troutt. “Funding Relations between Nonprofits and Governments: A Positive Example.” Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly 33, no. 5 (2004): 5–27. doi:10.1177/0899764003260601.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bruszt, Lászlo, and Balázs Vedrés. “Associating, Mobilizing, Politicizing: Local Developmental Agency from Without.” Theory and Society 42, no. 13 (2013): 1–23. doi:10.1007/s11186-012-9183-7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carothers, Thomas. Aiding Democracy Abroad: The Learning Curve. Washington, DC Carnegie Endowment for International Peace, 1999.
   Google Scholar
• Carroll, William K., and R. S. Ratner. “Master Framing and Cross-Movement Networking in Contemporary Social Movements.” The Sociological Quarterly 37, no. 4 (1996): 601–625. doi:10.2307/4121407. doi: 10.1111/j.1533-8525.1996.tb01755.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Císař, Ondřej. “Externally Sponsored Contention: The Channelling of Environmental Movement Organizations in the Czech Republic after the Fall of Communism.” Environmental Politics 19, no. 5 (2010): 736–755. doi:10.1080/09644016.2010.508305.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Císař, Ondřej, and Kateřina Vráblíková. “The Europeanization of Social Movements in the Czech Republic: The EU and Local Women's Groups.” Communist and Post-Communist Studies 43, no. 2 (2010): 209–219. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.postcomstud.2010.03.003 doi: 10.1016/j.postcomstud.2010.03.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Císař, Ondřej, and Kateřina Vráblíková. “Transnational Activism of Social Movement Organizations: The Effect of European Union Funding on Local Groups in the Czech Republic.” European Union Politics 14, no. 1 (2013): 140–160. doi:10.1177/1465116512456311.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chavesc, Mark, Laura Stephens, and Joseph Galaskiewicz. “Does Government Funding Suppress Nonprofits’ Political Activity?” American Sociological Review 69, no. 2 (2004): 292–316. doi:10.1177/000312240406900207.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheval, s. r. o. Hodnocení dopadu globálních grantů na kapacity příjemců podpory z Evropského sociálního fondu – první zpráva [Assessment of Impact of Global Grants on the Capacity of European Social Fund Beneficiaries – The First Report]. Prague, 2007. www.nros.cz/download.php?id=35&lang=cs. Retrieved February 15, 2013.
   Google Scholar
• De Nooy, Andrej Mrvar Wouter, and Vladimir Batagelj. Exploratory Network Analysis with Pajek. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2005.
   Google Scholar
• Diani, Mario. “Leaders or Brokers? Positions and Influence in Social Movement Networks.” In Social Movements and Networks, edited by Mario Diani and Doug McAdam, 105–122. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2003.
   Google Scholar
• Diani, Mario. “Social Movements and Collective Action.” In The Sage Handbook of Social Network Analysis, edited by Peter Carrington and John Scott, 223–235. London: Sage, 2011.
   Google Scholar
• Dimitrova, Antoaneta, and Geoffrey Pridham. “International Actors and Democracy Promotion in Central and Eastern Europe: The Integration Model and Its Limits.” Democratization 11, no. 5 (2007): 91–112. doi:10.1080/13510340412331304606.
   Google Scholar
• Ekiert, Grzegorz, and Jan Kubik. “Civil Society From Abroad: The Role of Foreign Assistance in the Democratization of Poland.” Paper No. 00-01. Harvard University, Weatherhead Center for International Affairs, 2000.
   Google Scholar
• Fagan, Adam. Environment and Democracy in the Czech Republic. The Environmental Movement in the Transition Process. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, 2004.
   Google Scholar
• Fagan, Adam. “Taking Stock of Civil-Society Development in Post-Communist Europe: Evidence from the Czech Republic.” Democratization 12, no. 4 (2005): 528–547. doi:10.1080/13510340500226077.
   Google Scholar
• Fagan, Adam, and JoAnn Carmin, eds. Green Activism in Post-Socialist Europe and the Former Soviet Union. London: Routledge, 2011.
   Google Scholar
• Foster, Mary K., and Agnes G. Meinhard. “A Regression Model Explaining Predisposition to Collaborate.” Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 31, no. 4 (2002): 549–564. doi:10.1177/0899764002238100.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Freeman, Linton C. “Centrality in Social Networks. Conceptual Clarification.” Social Networks 1, no. 3 (1979): 215–239. doi:10.1016/0378-8733(78)90021-7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frič, Pavol, Rochdi Goulli, Stefan Toepler, and Lester Salamon. “The Czech Republic.” In Global Civil Society: Dimensions of the Nonprofit Sector, edited by Lester Salamon, Regina List, Stefan Toepler, Wojciech Sokolowski, and Associates, 285–303. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins Center for Civil Society Studies, 1999.
   Google Scholar
• Froelich, Karen A. “Diversification of Revenue Strategies: Evolving Resource Dependence in Nonprofit Organizations.” Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly 28, no. 3 (1999): 246–268. doi:10.1177/0899764099283002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gazley Beth, and Jefrey L. Brudney. “The Purpose (and Perils) of Government-Nonprofit Partnership.” Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly 36, no. 3 (2007): 389–415. doi:10.1177/0899764006295997.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greenwood, Justin. Interest Representation in the European Union. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2011.
   Google Scholar
• Guenther, Katja M. “The Possibilities and Pitfalls of NGO Feminism: Insights from Postsocialist Eastern Europe.” Signs 36, no. 4 (2011): 863–887. http://www.jstor.org/stable/10.1086/658504 doi: 10.1086/658504
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hadler, Markus, and Patrick Wohlkonig. “Environmental Behaviours in the Czech Republic, Austria and Germany between 1993 and 2010: Macro-Level Trends and Individual-Level Determinants Compared.” Sociologický časopis/Czech Sociological Review 48, no. 3 (2012): 667–692. http://sreview.soc.cas.cz/cs/issue/121-sociologicky-casopis-czech-sociological-review-3-2012/2183
   Google Scholar
• Hanneman, Robert A., and Mark Riddle. Introduction to Social Networks Methods. Riverside, CA: University of California, 2005.
   Google Scholar
• Henderson, Sarah. “Selling Civil Society: Western Aid and the Nongovernmental Organization Sector in Russia.” Comparative Political Studies 35, no. 2 (2002): 139–167. doi:10.1177/0010414002035002001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Henderson, Sarah. Building Democracy in Contemporary Russia. Western Support for Grassroots Organizations. Ithaca, NY and London: Cornell University Press, 2003.
   Google Scholar
• Howard, Marc Morje. The Weakness of Civil Society in Post-Communist Europe. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2003.
   Google Scholar
• Imig, Doug, and Sidney Tarrow. Contentious Europeans. Protest and Politics in an Emerging Polity. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield, 2001.
   Google Scholar
• Jacobsson, Kerstin. “Fragmentation of the Collective Action Space: The Animals Rights Movement in Poland.” East European Politics 28, no. 4 (2012): 353–370. doi:10.1080/21599165.2012.720570.
   Google Scholar
• Jacobsson, Kerstin, and Steven Saxonberg, eds. Beyond NGO-ization: The Development of Social Movements in Central and Eastern Europe. Aldershot: Ashgate Publishing, 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Jenkins, Craig J. “Channeling Social Protest: Foundation Patronage of Contemporary Social Movements.” In Private Action and the Public Good, edited by Walter W. Powell and Elisabeth Clemens, 206–216. New Haven, CT and London: Yale University Press, 1998.
   Google Scholar
• Knoke, David, and Song Yang. Social Network Analysis. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, 2008.
   Google Scholar
• Koschützki, Dirk, Katharina A. Lehmann, Leon Peeters, Stefan Richter, Dagmar Tenfelde-Podehl, and Oliver Zlotowski. “Centrality Indices.” In Network Analysis, edited by Ulrik Brandes and Thomas Erlebach, 16–61. Berlin: Springer, 2005.
   Google Scholar
• Laumann, Edward O., Peter V. Marsden, and David Prensky. “The Boundary Specification Problem in Network Analysis.” In Research Methods in Social Network Analysis, edited by Linton C. Freeman, Douglas R. White and A. Kimball Romney, 61–87. New Jersey: Transaction Publishers, 1992.
   Google Scholar
• Lavenex, Sandra, and Frank Schimmelfennig. “EU Democracy Promotion in the Neighborhood: From Leverage to Governance?” Democratization 18, no. 4 (2011): 885–909. doi:10.1080/13510347.2011.584730.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lewis, Kevin, Kaufman Jason, Gonzalez Marco, Wimmer Andreas, and Nicholas Christakis. “Tastes, Ties, and Time: A New Social Network Dataset Using Facebook.com.” Social Networks 30, no. 4 (2008): 330–342. doi:10.1016/j.socnet.2008.07.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mahoney, Christine, and Michael J. Beckstrand. “Following the Money: European Union Funding of Civil Society Organizations.” Journal of Common Market Studies 49, no. 6 (2011): 1339–1361. doi:10.1111/j.1468-5965.2011.02197.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marquart-Pyatt, Sandra T. “Environmental Concerns in Cross-National Context: How Do Mass Publics in Central and Eastern Europe Compare with Other Regions of the World.” Sociologický časopis/Czech Sociological Review 48, no. 3 (2012): 641–666. http://sreview.soc.cas.cz/cs/issue/121-sociologicky-casopis-czech-sociological-review-3-2012/2182
   Google Scholar
• McCarthy, John D. “Pro-Life and Pro-Choice Mobilization: Infrastructure Deficits and New Technologies.” In Social Movements in an Organizational Society, edited by M. N. Zald and J. D. McCarthy, 49–66. New Jersey: Transaction Publishers, 1987.
   Google Scholar
• McMahon, Patrice. “Building Civil Societies in East Central Europe: The Effects of American Non-Governmental Organizations on Women's Groups.” Democratization 8, no. 2 (2001): 45–68. doi:10.1080/714000196.
   Google Scholar
• Mendelson, Sarah E., and John K. Glenn. The Power and Limits of NGOs: A Critical Look at Building Democracy in Eastern Europe and Eurasia. New York: Columbia University Press, 2002.
   Google Scholar
• Ministry of Regional Development of the Czech Republic. SROP Manual. Prague, 2004.
   Google Scholar
• Narozhna, Tanya. “Foreign Aid for a Post-Euphoric Eastern Europe: The Limitations of Western Assistance in Developing Civil Society.” Journal of International Relations and Development 7, no. 3 (2004): 243–266. doi:10.1057/palgrave.jird.1800024.
   Google Scholar
• Navrátil, Jiří. “Between the Spillover and the Spillout: Tracing the Evolution of the Czech Global Justice Movement.” Sociologický časopis/Czech Sociological Review 46, no. 6 (2010): 913–944. http://dlib.lib.cas.cz/6647/
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pridham, Geoffrey. Designing Democracy: EU Enlargement and Regime Change in Post-Communist Europe. Basingstoke and New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2005.
   Google Scholar
• Škarabelová Simona, Miroslava Janoušková, and Michal Veselý. Dopady čerpání fondů Evropské unie na změny v organizační struktuře nestátních neziskových organizací [Impacts of the Usage of EU Funds on the Transformation of the Organizational Structure of Non-state Non-profit Organizations]. Brno: SSNS, 2008.
   Google Scholar
• Stark, David, Balazs Vedres, and Laszló Bruszt. “Rooted Transnational Publics: Integrating Foreign Ties and Civic Activism.” Theory and Society 35, no. 3 (2006): 323–349. doi:10.1007/s11186-006-9007-8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tarrow, Sidney, and Tsveta Petrova. “Transactional and Participatory Activism in the Emerging European Polity: The Puzzle of East Central Europe.” Comparative Political Studies 40, no. 1 (2007): 74–94. doi:10.1177/0010414006291189.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Dyke, Nella. “Crossing Movement Boundaries: Factors that Facilitates Coalition Protest by American College Students, 1930-1990.” Social Problems 50, no. 2 (2003): 226–250. doi: 10.1525/sp.2003.50.2.226
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vermeersch, Peter. The Romani Movement. Minority Politics and Ethnic Mobilization in Contemporary Central Europe. Oxford: Berghahn Books.
   Google Scholar
• Wasserman, Stanley, and Catherine Faust. Social Network Analysis. Methods and Applications. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1994.
   Google Scholar