What is democracy? A reconceptualization of the quality of democracy

Bibliography

• Adcock, Robert N., and David Collier. “Measurement Validity: A Shared Standard for Qualitative and Quantitative Research.” American Political Science Review 95, no. 3 (2001): 529–546. doi: 10.1017/S0003055401003100
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Altman, David, and Aníbal Pérez-Liñán. “Assessing the Quality of Democracy: Freedom, Competitiveness and Participation in Eighteen Latin American Countries.” Democratization 9, no. 2 (2002): 85–100. doi: 10.1080/714000256
   Google Scholar
• Beetham, David, Edzia Carvalho, Todd Landman and Stuart Weir. Assessing the Quality of Democracy. A Practical Guide. Stockholm: International Institute for Democracy and Electoral Assistance, 2008.
   Google Scholar
• Bellamy, Richard. Political Constitutionalism: A Republican Defense of the Constitutionality of Democracy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2007.
   Google Scholar
• Bobbio, Norberto. Teoría General de la Política. Madrid: Editorial Trotta, 2003.
   Google Scholar
• Bobbio, Norberto. The Future of Democracy: A Defense of the Rules of the Game. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1987.
   Google Scholar
• Bühlmann, Marc, Wolfgang Merkel, Lisa Müller and Bernhard Wessels. “The Democracy Barometer: A New Instrument to Measure the Quality of Democracy and its Potential for Comparative Research.” European Political Science 11, no. 4 (2012): 519–536. doi: 10.1057/eps.2011.46
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bunge, Mario. Finding Philosophy in Social Science. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 1996.
   Google Scholar
• Collier, David, and John Gerring, eds. Concepts and Method in Social Science: The Tradition of Giovanni Sartori. New York: Routledge, 2009.
   Google Scholar
• Dahl, Robert A. A Preface to Democratic Theory. Chicago, IL. University of Chicago Press, 1956.
   Google Scholar
• Dahl, Robert A. “Democracy.” Encyclopædia Britannica Ultimate Reference Suite. Chicago: Encyclopædia Britannica, 2004.
   Google Scholar
• Dahl, Robert A. Democracy and its Critics. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 1989.
   Google Scholar
• Dahl, Robert A. How Democratic is the American Constitution? New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 2003.
   Google Scholar
• Dahl, Robert A. On Political Equality. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 2006.
   Google Scholar
• Dahl, Robert A. Polyarchy: Participation and Opposition. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 1971.
   Google Scholar
• Dworkin, Ronald. Freedom's Law. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1996.
   Google Scholar
• Dworkin, Ronald. Is Democracy Possible Here? Principles for a New Political Debate. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2006.
   Google Scholar
• Ferrajoli, Luigi. Principia Iuris: Teoría del Derecho y de la Democracia. Vol. 2. Teoría de la Democracia. Madrid: Trotta, 2011.
   Google Scholar
• Ferrajoli, Luigi. “The Normative Paradigm of Constitutional Democracy.” Res Publica 17, no. 4 (2011): 355–367. doi: 10.1007/s11158-011-9169-8
   Google Scholar
• Kelsen, Hans. General Theory of Law and State. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1945.
   Google Scholar
• Kelsen, Hans. “On the Essence and Value of Democracy.” In Weimar: A Jurisprudence of Crisis, edited by Arthur Jacobson and Bernard Schlink, 84–109. Berkeley: University of California Press, 2000 [1929].
   Google Scholar
• Kelsen, Hans. L. “Foundations of Democracy.” Ethics 66, no. 1 (1955): 1–101. doi: 10.1086/291036
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lauth, Hans-Joachim. Demokratie und Demokratiemessung: Eine konzeptionelle Grundlegung für den interkulturellen Vergleich. Wiesbaden: VS Verlag, 2004.
   Google Scholar
• Lauth, Hans-Joachim. “The Matrix of Democracy. A Three-Dimensional Approach to Measuring,” Paper prepared for the IPSA Workshop on “Measuring Democracy,” University of Frankfurt/Main, September 29–October 1, 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Lauth, Hans-Joachim. “Quality Criteria for Democracy. Why Responsiveness is not the Key.” In Regression of Democracy?, edited by Gero Erdmann and Marianne Kneuer, 59–80. Wiesbaden: VS Verlag, 2011.
   Google Scholar
• Levine, Daniel H., and José E. Molina. “Evaluating the Quality of Democracy in Latin America.” In The Quality of Democracy in Latin America, edited by Daniel Levine and José Enrique Molina, 1–19. Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner Publishers, 2011.
   Google Scholar
• Levine, Daniel H., and José E. Molina. “Measuring the Quality of Democracy.” In The Quality of Democracy in Latin America, edited by Daniel Levine and José Enrique Molina, 21–37. Boulder: Lynne Rienner Publishers, 2011.
   Google Scholar
• Lijphart, Arend. “Democratic Quality in Stable Democracies.” Society 48, no. 1 (2011): 17–18. doi: 10.1007/s12115-010-9389-0
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lijphart, Arend. Patterns of Democracy. Government Forms and Performance in Thirty-Six Countries. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 1999.
   Google Scholar
• Maravall, José María, and Adam Przeworski. “Introduction.” In Democracy and the Rule of Law, edited by José María Maravall and Adam Przeworski, 1–14. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2003.
   Google Scholar
• May, Kenneth O. “A Set of Independent Necessary and Sufficient Conditions for Simple Majority Decision.” Econometrica 20, no. 4 (1952): 680–684. doi: 10.2307/1907651
   Google Scholar
• Mazzuca, Sebastián. “Access to Power Versus Exercise of Power: Reconceptualizing the Quality of Democracy in Latin America.” Studies in Comparative International Development 45, no. 3 (2010): 334–357. doi: 10.1007/s12116-010-9069-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McGann, Anthony J. The Logic of Democracy: Reconciling Equality, Deliberation, and Minority Protection. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 2006.
   Google Scholar
• Morlino, Leonardo. Changes for Democracy. Actors, Structures, Processes. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2011.
   Google Scholar
• Morlino, Leonardo. “What is a ‘Good’ Democracy?” Democratization 11, no. 5 (2004): 10–32. doi: 10.1080/13510340412331304589
   Google Scholar
• Munck, Gerardo L. Measuring Democracy: A Bridge Between Scholarship and Politics. Baltimore, MD. The Johns Hopkins University Press, 2009.
   Google Scholar
• Murphy, Walter F. Constitutional Democracy: Creating and Maintaining a Just Political Order. Baltimore, MD: The Johns Hopkins University Press, 2007.
   Google Scholar
• O'Donnell, Guillermo. Democracy, Agency, and the State: Theory with Comparative Intent. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2010.
   Google Scholar
• O'Donnell, Guillermo. “Horizontal Accountability in New Polyarchies.” Journal of Democracy 9, no. 3 (1998): 112–126. doi: 10.1353/jod.1998.0051
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O'Donnell, Guillermo. “Why the Rule of Law Matters.” Journal of Democracy 15, no. 4 (2004): 32–46. doi: 10.1353/jod.2004.0076
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Przeworski, Adam. Democracy and the Limits of Self-Government. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2010.
   Google Scholar
• Rae, Douglas W. “Decision Rules and Individual Values in Constitutional Choice.” American Political Science Review 63, no. 1 (1969): 40–56. doi: 10.2307/1954283
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ringen, Stein. What Democracy is For: On Freedom and Moral Government. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2007.
   Google Scholar
• Roberts, Andrew. The Quality of Democracy in Eastern Europe: Public Preferences and Policy Reforms. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2009.
   Google Scholar
• Rousseau, Jean-Jacques. The Social Contract. In Jean-Jacques Rousseau, The Social Contract; and, The First and Second Discourses. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 2002 [1762].
   Google Scholar
• Schumpeter, Joseph A. Capitalism, Socialism, and Democracy. New York: Harper and Brothers, 1942.
   Google Scholar
• Sen, Amartya. Development as Freedom. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1999.
   Google Scholar
• Tilly, Charles. Democracy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2007.
   Google Scholar
• Touraine, Alain. What is Democracy? Boulder, CO: Westview Press, 1997.
   Google Scholar