Trials, lustration, and clean elections: the uneven effects of transitional justice mechanisms on electoral manipulation

Bibliography

• Bačinský, Štefan. 1991. “Speech to the Federal Assembly of the CSFR.” Accessed February 8, 2017. http://www.psp.cz/eknih/1990fs/slsn/stenprot/017schuz/s017077.htm.
   Google Scholar
• Bakiner, Onur. “Truth Commission Impact: An Assessment of How Commissions Influence Politics and Society.” International Journal of Transitional Justice 8, no. 1 (2014): 6–30. doi:10.1093/ijtj/ijt025.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Birch, Sarah. “Electoral Systems and Electoral Misconduct.” Comparative Political Studies 40, no. 12 (2007): 1533–1556. doi:10.1177/0010414006292886.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Birch, Sarah. Electoral Malpractice. New York: Oxford University Press, 2011.
   Google Scholar
• Blakeley, Georgina. “Digging Up Spain’s Past: Consequences of Truth and Reconciliation.” Democratization 12, no. 1 (2005): 44–59. doi: 10.1080/1351034042000317952
   Google Scholar
• Calingaert, Daniel. “Election Rigging and How to Fight It.” Journal of Democracy 17, no. 3 (2006): 138–151. doi:10.1353/jod.2006.0043.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cruz, Cesi, Philip Keefer, and Carlos Scartascini. Database of Political Institutions Codebook, 2015 Update (DPI2015). Inter-American Development Bank. Accessed November 21, 2016. http://www.iadb.org/en/research-and-data/publication-details,3169.html?pub_id=IDB%2DDB%2D121.
   Google Scholar
• Dancy, Geoff, and Eric Wiebelhaus-Brahm. “Timing, Sequencing, and Transitional Justice Impact: A Qualitative Comparative Analysis of Latin America.” Human Rights Review 16, no. 4 (2015): 321–342. doi:10.1007/s12142-015-0374-2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dancy, Geoff, Francesca Lessa, Bridget Marchesi, Leigh A. Payne, Gabriel Pereira, and Kathryn Sikkink. 2014. “The Transitional Justice Research Collaborative: Bridging the Qualitative-quantitative Divide with New Data.” www.transitionaljusticedata.com.
   Google Scholar
• David, Roman. “Lustration Laws in Action: The Motives and Evaluation of Lustration in the Czech Republic and Poland (1989–2001).” Law & Social Inquiry 28, no. 2 (2003): 387–439. doi:10.1111/j.1747-4469.2003.tb00197.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• David, Roman. “From Prague to Baghdad: Lustration Systems and their Political Effects1.” Government and Opposition 41, no. 3 (2006): 347–372. doi:10.1111/j.1477-7053.2006.00183.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Donno, Daniela, and Nasos Roussias, “Does Cheating Pay? The Effect of Electoral Misconduct on Party Systems.” Comparative Political Studies 45, no. 5 (2012): 575–605. doi:10.1177/0010414011427130.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dukalskis, Alexander. “Interactions in Transition: How Truth Commissions and Trials Complement or Constrain Each Other.” International Studies Review 13, no. 3 (2011): 432–451. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2486.2011.01014.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fletcher, Laurel E., Harvey M. Weinstein, and Jamie Rowen. “Context, Timing and the Dynamics of Transitional Justice: A Historical Perspective.” Human Rights Quarterly 31, no. 1 (2009): 163–220. doi: 10.1353/hrq.0.0058
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frye, Timothy, Ora John Reuter, and David Szakonyi. “Political Machines at Work: Voter Mobilization and Electoral Subversion in the Workplace.” World Politics 66, no. 2 (2014): 195–228. doi: 10.1017/S004388711400001X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Geddes, Barbara, Joseph Wright, and Erica Frantz. “Autocratic Breakdown and Regime Transitions.” Perspectives on Politics 12, no. 2 (2014): 313–331. doi: 10.1017/S1537592714000851
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greene, Kenneth F. Why Dominant Parties Lose: Mexico’s Democratization in Comparative Perspective. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2007.
   Google Scholar
• de Greiff, Pablo. “Transitional Justice and Development.” In International Development: Ideas, Experience, and Prospects, edited by Bruce Currie-Alder, et al., 412–427. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press, 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Grigorescu, Alexandru. “The Corruption Eruption in East-Central Europe: The Increased Salience of Corruption and the Role of Intergovernmental Organizations.” East European Politics & Societies 20, no. 3 (2006): 516–549. doi: 10.1177/0888325405276655
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harvey, Cole J. “Changes in the Menu of Manipulation: Electoral Fraud, Ballot Stuffing, and Voter Pressure in the 2011 Russian Election.” Electoral Studies 41 (2016): 105–117. doi:10.1016/j.electstud.2015.11.004.
   Google Scholar
• Helmke, Gretchen, and Frances Rosenbluth. “Regimes and the Rule of Law: Judicial Independence in Comparative Perspective.” Annual Review of Political Science 12 (2009): 345–366. doi:10.1146/annurev.polisci.12.040907.121521.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holley, David. 1996. “Ex-Leader of S. Korea Defends Slush Fund.” Los Angeles Times, April 16. http://articles.latimes.com/1996-04-16/news/mn-59142_1_slush-fund.
   Google Scholar
• Horne, Cynthia M. “Late Lustration Programmes in Romania and Poland: Supporting or Undermining Democratic Transitions?” Democratization 16, no. 2 (2009): 344–376. doi: 10.1080/13510340902732581
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Horne, Cynthia M. “Assessing the Impact of Lustration on Trust in Public Institutions and National Government in Central and Eastern Europe.” Comparative Political Studies 45, no. 4 (2012): 412–446. doi:10.1177/0010414011421766.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Horne, Cynthia M. “The Impact of Lustration on Democratization in Postcommunist Countries.” International Journal of Transitional Justice 8, no. 3 (2014): 496–521. doi:10.1093/ijtj/iju011.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Howard, Marc Morjé, and Philip G. Roessler. “Liberalizing Electoral Outcomes in Competitive Authoritarian Regimes.” American Journal of Political Science 50, no. 2 (2006): 365–381. doi:10.1111/j.1540-5907.2006.00189.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huntington, Samuel P. The Third Wave: Democratization in the Late 20th Century. University of Oklahoma Press, 1991.
   Google Scholar
• Hyde, Susan D. “Catch Us If You Can: Election Monitoring and International Norm Diffusion.” American Journal of Political Science 55, no. 2 (2011): 356–369. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-5907.2011.00508.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jeffery, Renée. “Amnesty and Accountability: The Price of Peace in Aceh, Indonesia.” International Journal of Transitional Justice 6, no. 1 (2012): 60–82. doi:10.1093/ijtj/ijr027.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kelley, Judith. Monitoring Democracy: When International Election Observation Works, and Why It Often Fails. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2012.
   Google Scholar
• Kim, Hun Joon. “Structural Determinants of Human Rights Prosecutions after Democratic Transition.” Journal of Peace Research 49, no. 2 (2012): 305–320. doi:10.1177/0022343311431600.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim, Hunjoon, and Kathryn Sikkink. “Explaining the Deterrence Effect of Human Rights Prosecutions for Transitional Countries1.” International Studies Quarterly 54, no. 4 (2010): 939–963. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2478.2010.00621.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim, Hun Joon, and Kathryn Sikkink. “How Do Human Rights Prosecutions Improve Human Rights after Transition?” Interdisciplinary Journal of Human Rights Law 7, no. 1 (2012–2013): 69–90.
   Google Scholar
• Kitschelt, Herbert, and Steven I. Wilkinson. Patrons, Clients and Policies: Patterns of Democratic Accountability and Political Competition. Cambridge University Press, 2007.
   Google Scholar
• Larreguy, Horacio, John Marshall, and Pablo Querubín. “Parties, Brokers, and Voter Mobilization: How Turnout Buying Depends Upon the Party’s Capacity to Monitor Brokers.” American Political Science Review 110, no. 1 (2016): 160–179. doi:10.1017/S0003055415000593.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lehoucq, Fabrice. “Electoral Fraud: Causes, Types, and Consequences.” Annual Review of Political Science 18, no. 6 (2003): 387–439. doi:10.1146/annurev.polisci.6.121901.085655.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lehoucq, Fabrice Edouard, and Jiménez Iván Molina. Stuffing the Ballot Box: Fraud, Electoral Reform, and Democratization in Costa Rica. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2002.
   Google Scholar
• Letki, Natalia. “Lustration and Democratisation in East-Central Europe.” Europe-Asia Studies 54, no. 4 (2002): 529–552. doi:10.1080/09668130220139154.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lev, Michael A. 1996. “South Koreans View Trials as a Cleansing Moment.” Chicago Tribune, March 9. http://articles.chicagotribune.com/1996-03-09/news/9603090047_1_chun-and-roh-president-kim-young-sam-roh-tae-woo.
   Google Scholar
• Lie, Tove Grete, Helga Malmin Binningsbø, and Scott Gates. “Postconflict Justice and Sustainable Peace, World Bank Policy Research Working Paper 4191.” Postconflict Transition Working Paper 5, 2007.
   Google Scholar
• Linzer, D. A., and Staton, J. K. “A Global Measure of Judicial Independence, 1948–2012.” Journal of Law and Courts 3, no. 2 (2015): 223–256. doi:10.1086/682150.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Magaloni, Beatriz. Voting for Autocracy: Hegemonic Party Survival and Its Demise in Mexico. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2006.
   Google Scholar
• Magaloni, Beatriz. “The Game of Electoral Fraud and the Ousting of Authoritarian Rule.” American Journal of Political Science 54, no. 3 (2010): 751–765. doi:10.1111/j.1540-5907.2010.00458.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mallinder, Louise. “Can Amnesties and International Justice be Reconciled?” International Journal of Transitional Justice 1, no. 2 (2007): 208–230. doi:10.1093/ijtj/ijm020.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Matsueda, Ross L., Derek A. Kreager, and David Huizinga. “Deterring Delinquents: A Rational Choice Model of Theft and Violence.” American Sociological Review 71, no. 1 (2006): 95–122. doi: 10.1177/000312240607100105
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meernik, James D., Angela Nichols, and Kimi L. King. “The Impact of International Tribunals and Domestic Trials on Peace and Human Rights after Civil War.” International Studies Perspectives 11, no. 4 (2010): 309–334. doi:10.1111/j.1528-3585.2010.00414.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moltz, Ryan. “Dealing with Comuunist Legacies: The Politics of Lustration in Eastern Europe.” PhD diss., University of Minnesota, 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Norris, Pippa. Why Electoral Integrity Matters. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Olsen, Tricia D., Leigh A. Payne, and Andrew G. Reiter. “The Justice Balance: When Transitional Justice Improves Human Rights and Democracy.” Human Rights Quarterly 32, no. 4 (2010): 980–1007. doi:10.1353/hrq.2010.0021.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Olsen, Tricia D., Leigh A. Payne, and Andrew G. Reiter. “Transitional Justice in the World, 1970–2007: Insights from a New Dataset.” Journal of Peace Research 47, no. 6 (2010): 803–809. doi:10.1177/0022343310382205.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Olvera, Alberto J. “The Elusive Democracy: Political Parties, Democratic Institutions, and Civil Society in Mexico.” Latin American Research Review 45, no. 4 (2010): 78–107. doi: 10.1353/lar.2010.0037
   Google Scholar
• Popova, Maria. “Watchdogs or Attack Dogs? The Role of the Russian Courts and the Central Election Commission in the Resolution of Electoral Disputes.” Europe-Asia Studies 58, no. 3 (2006): 391–414. doi:10.1080/09668130600601800.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roht-Arriaza, Naomi. “After Amnesties are Gone: Latin American National Courts and the new Contours of the Fight Against Impunity.” Human Rights Quarterly 37, no. 2 (2015): 341–382. doi:10.1353/hrq.2015.0032.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rundlett, Ashley, and Milan W. Svolik. “Deliver the Vote! Micromotives and Macrobehavior in Electoral Fraud.” American Political Science Review 110, no. 1 (2016): 180–197. doi:10.1017/S0003055415000635.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sartori, Giovanni. “Concept Misformation in Comparative Politics.” American Political Science Review 64, no. 4 (1970): 1033–1053. doi:10.1146/annurev.polisci.7.012003.104755.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schedler, Andreas. “The Menu of Manipulation.” Journal of Democracy 13, no. 2 (2002): 36–50. doi:10.1353/jod.2002.0031.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schedler, Andreas. “The Nested Game of Democratization by Elections.” International Political Science Review 23, no. 1 (2002): 103–122. doi: 10.1177/0192512102023001006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sikkink, Kathryn. The Justice Cascade: How Human Rights Prosecutions Are Changing World Politics. New York: W.W. Norton & Company, 2011.
   Google Scholar
• Sikkink, Kathryn, and Carrie Booth Walling. “The Impact of Human Rights Trials in Latin America.” Journal of Peace Research 44, no. 4 (2007): 427–445. doi:10.1177/0022343307078953.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simpser, Alberto. Why Governments and Parties Manipulate Elections: Theory, Practice, and Implications. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Simpser, Alberto, and Daniela Donno. “Can International Election Monitoring Harm Governance?” The Journal of Politics 74, no. 2 (2012): 501–513. doi:10.1017/s002238161100168x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sjoberg, Fredrik M. “Autocratic Adaptation: The Strategic Use of Transparency and the Persistence of Election Fraud.” Electoral Studies 33 (2014): 233–245. doi:10.1016/j.electstud.2013.08.004.
   Google Scholar
• Snyder, Jack L., and Leslie Vinjamuri. “Trials and Errors: Principle and Pragmatism in Strategies of International Justice.” International Security 28, no. 3 (2004): 5–44. doi: 10.1162/016228803773100066
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stan, Lavinia. “Witch-hunt or Moral Rebirth?: Romanian Parliamentary Debates on Lustration.” East European Politics and Societies 26, no. 2 (2012): 274–295. doi:10.1177/0888325411403922.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stensrud, Ellen Emilie. “New Dilemmas in Transitional Justice: Lessons from the Mixed Courts in Sierra Leone and Cambodia.” Journal of Peace Research 46, no. 1 (2009): 5–15. doi: 10.1177/0022343308096152
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stokes Susan C., Thad Dunning, Marcelo Nazareno, and Valeria Brusco. Brokers, Voters, and Clientelism: The Puzzle of Distributive Politics. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2013.
   Google Scholar
• The International Center for Transitional Justice. Focus: Truth Commissions: Truth Commissions II. New York: The International Center for Transitional Justice, 2008. https://www.ictj.org/sites/default/files/ICTJ-Global-Truth-Commissions-2008-English2.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Thoms, Oskar N. T., James Ron, and Roland Paris. “State-Level Effects of Transitional Justice: What Do We Know?” International Journal of Transitional Justice 4, no. 3 (2010): 329–354. doi:10.1093/ijtj/ijq012.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vachudova, Milada. Europe Undivided. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2005.
   Google Scholar
• Vinjamuri, Leslie. “Deterrence, Democracy, and the Pursuit of International Justice.” Ethics & International Affairs 24, no. 2 (2010): 191–211. doi:10.1111/j.1747-7093.2010.00256.x.
   Google Scholar
• Vinjamuri, Leslie, and Jack Snyder. “Advocacy and Scholarship in the Study of International War Crime Tribunals and Transitional Justice.” Annual Review of Political Science 7 (2004): 345–362. doi:10.1146/annurev.polisci.7.012003.104755.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ziblatt, Daniel. “Shaping Democratic Practice and the Causes of Electoral Fraud: The Case of Nineteenth-century Germany.” American Political Science Review 103, no. 1 (2009): 1–21. doi:10.1017/S0003055409090042.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar