When do electoral institutions trigger electoral misconduct?

Bibliography

• Alesina, Alberto, Arnaud Devlesschauwer, William Easterly, Sergio Kurlat, and Romain Wacziarg. “Fractionalization.” Journal of Economic Growth 8, no. 2 (2003): 155–194. doi: 10.1023/A:1024471506938
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anderson, Christopher J., Andre Blais, Shaun Bowler, Todd Donovan, and Ola Listhaug. Losers’ Consent: Elections and Democratic Legitimacy. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2005.
   Google Scholar
• Anderson, Christopher J., and Christine A. Guillory. “Political Institutions and Satisfaction with Democracy: A Cross-National Anaylsis of Consensus and Majoritarian Systems.” American Political Science Review 91, no. 1 (1997): 66–81. doi: 10.2307/2952259
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Birch, Sarah. “Electoral Systems and Electoral Misconduct.” Comparative Political Studies 40, no. 12 (2007): 1533–1556. doi: 10.1177/0010414006292886
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Birch, Sarah. “Perceptions of Electoral Fairness and Voter Turnout.” Comparative Political Studies 43, no. 12 (2010): 1601–1622. doi: 10.1177/0010414010374021
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Birch, Sarah. Electoral Malpractice. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2011.
   Google Scholar
• Boix, Carles. “Setting the Rules of the Game: The Choice of Electoral Systems in Advanced Democracies.” American Political Science Review 93, no. 3 (1999): 609–624. doi: 10.2307/2585577
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bormann, Nils-Christian, and Matt Golder. “Democratic Electoral Systems Around the World, 1946–2011.” Electoral Studies 32, no. 2 (2013): 360–369. doi: 10.1016/j.electstud.2013.01.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brambor, Thomas, William Roberts Clark, and Matt Golder. “Understanding Interaction Models: Improving Empirical Analyses.” Political Analysis 14 (2006): 63–82. doi: 10.1093/pan/mpi014
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brancati, Dawn. Peace by Design: Managing Intrastate Conflict Through Decentralization. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2009.
   Google Scholar
• Calvo, Ernesto. “The Competitive Road to Proportional Representation. Partisan Biases and Electoral Regime Change under Increasing Party Competition.” World Politics 61, no. 2 (2009): 254–295. doi: 10.1017/S0043887109000100
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carey, J. M., and M. S. Shugart. “Incentives to Cultivate a Personal Vote: A Rank Ordering of Electoral Formulas.” Electoral Studies 14, no. 4 (1995): 417–439. doi: 10.1016/0261-3794(94)00035-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chang, Eric C. C., and Miriam A. Golden. “Electoral Systems, District Magnitude and Corruption.” British Journal of Political Science 37, no. 1 (2007): 115–137. doi: 10.1017/S0007123407000063
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheeseman, Nic. “The Kenyan Elections of 2007: An Introduction.” Journal of Eastern African Studies 2, no. 2 (2008): 166–184. doi: 10.1080/17531050802058286
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheibub, Jose Antonio, Jennifer Gandhi, and James R. Vreeland. “Democracy and Dictatorship Revisited.” Public Choice 143, no. 1–2 (2010): 67–101. doi: 10.1007/s11127-009-9491-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Donno, Daniela, and Nasos Roussias. “Does Cheating Pay? The Effect of Electoral Misconduct on Party Systems.” Comparative Political Studies 45, no. 5 (2012): 575–605. doi: 10.1177/0010414011427130
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elklit, Jørgen, and Andrew Reynolds. “The Impact of Election Administration on the Legitimacy of Emerging Democracies: A New Comparative Politics Research Agenda.” Commonwealth and Comparative Politics 40, no. 2 (2002): 86–119. doi: 10.1080/713999584
   Google Scholar
• Flores, Thomas E., and Irfan Nooruddin. Elections in Hard Times: Building Stronger Democracies in the 21st Century. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2016.
   Google Scholar
• Fortin-Rittberger, Jessica. “The Role of Infrastructural and Coercive State Capacity in Explaining Different Types of Electoral Fraud.” Democratization 21, no. 1 (2014): 95–117. doi: 10.1080/13510347.2012.724064
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hafner-Burton, Emilie M., Susan D. Hyde, and Ryan S. Jablonski. “When Do Governments Resort to Election Violence?” British Journal of Political Science 44, no. 1 (2014): 149–179. doi: 10.1017/S0007123412000671
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hartlyn, Jonathan, Jennifer McCoy, and Thomas M. Mustillo. “Electoral Governance Matters Explaining the Quality of Elections in Contemporary Latin America.” Comparative Political Studies 41, no. 1 (2008): 73–98. doi: 10.1177/0010414007301701
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hyde, Susan D. The Pseudo-Democrat's Dilemma: Why Election Observation Became an International Norm. Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 2011.
   Google Scholar
• Hyde, Susan D., and Nikolay Marinov. “Which Elections Can Be Lost?” Political Analysis 20, no. 2 (2012): 191–210. doi: 10.1093/pan/mpr040
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hyde, Susan D., and Kevin Pallister. “Election Administration: Election Observation and Election Quality.” In Routledge Handbook of Comparative Political Institutions, edited by Jennifer Gandhi and Rubén Ruiz-Rufino, 241–257. Oxon: Routledge, 2015.
   Google Scholar
• Kelley, Judith G. “Election Observers and Their Biases.” Journal of Democracy 21, no. 3 (2010): 158–172. doi: 10.1353/jod.0.0173
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kelley, Judith G. Monitoring Democracy: When International Election Observation Works, and Why It Often Fails. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2012.
   Google Scholar
• Kolev, Kiril. “The Contingent Effect of Institutions: Electoral Formulas, Ethnic Polarization, and Election Quality.” Electoral Studies 35 (2014): 200–214. doi: 10.1016/j.electstud.2014.01.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kunicova, Jana, and Susan Rose-Ackerman. “Electoral Rules and Constitutional Structures as Constraints on Corruption.” British Journal of Political Science 35, no. 4 (2005): 573–606. doi: 10.1017/S0007123405000311
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lehoucq, Fabrice. “Electoral Fraud: Causes, Types and Consequences.” Annual Review of Political Science 6, no. 1 (2003): 233–256. doi: 10.1146/annurev.polisci.6.121901.085655
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lehoucq, Fabrice, and Kiril Kolev. “Varying the Un-Variable: Social Structure, Electoral Formulae, and Election Quality.” Political Research Quarterly 68, no. 2 (2015): 240–252. doi: 10.1177/1065912915578176
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lehoucq, Fabrice, and Ivan Molina. Stuffing the Ballot Box: Fraud, Electoral Reform, and Democratization in Costa Rica. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2002.
   Google Scholar
• Lijphart, Arend. Democracy in Plural Societies. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1977.
   Google Scholar
• Lijphart, Arend. Electoral Systems and Party Systems: A Study of Twenty-Seven Democracies, 1945–1990. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1994.
   Google Scholar
• Lijphart, Arend. Patterns of Democracy: Government Forms and Performance in Thirty-Six Countries. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1999.
   Google Scholar
• Lindberg, Staffan I., ed. Democratization by Elections: A New Mode of Transition. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 2009.
   Google Scholar
• Magaloni, Beatriz. “Credible Power-Sharing and the Longevity of Authoritarian Rule.” Comparative Political Studies 41, no. 4–5 (2008): 715–741. doi: 10.1177/0010414007313124
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Magaloni, Beatriz. “The Game of Electoral Fraud and the Ousting of Authoritarian Rule.” American Journal of Political Science 54, no. 3 (2010): 751–765. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-5907.2010.00458.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mares, Isabela. From Open Secrets to Secret Voting: Democratic Electoral Reforms and Voter Autonomy. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2015.
   Google Scholar
• Marshall, Monty G, and Keith Jaggers. “Polity IV Project: Political Regime Characteristics and Transitions, 1800–2002.” (2002).
   Google Scholar
• Mozaffar, Shaheen, and Andreas Schedler. “The Comparative Study of Electoral Governance: Introduction.” International Political Science Review / Revue internationale de science politique 23, no. 1 (2002): 5–27.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nohlen, Dieter. Elections in the Americas: South America. New York: Oxford University Press, 2005.
   Google Scholar
• Nohlen, Dieter, Florian Grotz, and Christof Hartman. Elections in Asia and the Pacific: A Data Handbook Vol. 1. The Middle East, Central Asia and South Asia. New York: Oxford University Press, 2001.
   Google Scholar
• Norris, Pippa. Why Electoral Integrity Matters. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2014.
   Google Scholar
• North, Douglass C. “Institutions and Credible Commitment.” Journal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics 149, no. 1 (1993): 11–23.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• North, Douglass C., and Barry R. Weingast. “Constitutions and Commitment: The Evolution of Institutional Governing Public Choice in Seventeenth-Century England.” The Journal of Economic History 49, no. 4 (1989): 803–832. doi: 10.1017/S0022050700009451
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pemstein, Daniel, Kyle L Marquardt, Eitan Tzelgov, Yi-ting Wang, and Farhad Miri. “The V-Dem Measurement Model: Latent Variable Analysis for Cross-National and Cross-Temporal Expert-Coded Data.” V-Dem Working Paper Series 21 (2015).
   Google Scholar
• Perez-Liñán, Anibal, and Laura Wills-Otero. “La Evolución De Los Regímenes Políticos Y El Sistema Electoral En Latinoamérica, 1903–2004.” Elecciones 8, no. 9 (2009): 237–263.
   Google Scholar
• Persson, Torsten, Guido Tabellini, and Francesco Trebbi. “Electoral Rules and Corruption.” Journal of the European Economic Association 1, no. 4 (2003): 958–989. doi: 10.1162/154247603322493203
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pryce, Paul, and Raphael Oidtmann. “The 2012 General Election in Ghana.” Electoral Studies 34 (2014): 330–334. doi: 10.1016/j.electstud.2013.08.018
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Przeworski, Adam. “Conquered or Granted? A History of Suffrage Extensions.” British Journal of Political Science 39, no. 2 (2009): 291–321. doi: 10.1017/S0007123408000434
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Przeworski, Adam. “Acquiring the Habit of Changing Governments Through Elections.” Comparative Political Studies 48, no. 1 (2015): 101–129. doi: 10.1177/0010414014543614
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rae, Douglas. The Political Consequences of Electoral Law. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1967.
   Google Scholar
• Rokkan, Stein. Citizens, Elections, Parties: Approaches to the Comparative Study of the Process of Development. Oslo: Universitetsforlaget, 1970.
   Google Scholar
• Ruiz-Rufino, Rubén. “Characterizing Electoral Systems. An Empirical Application of Aggregated Threshold Functions.” West European Politics 34, no. 2 (2011): 256–281. doi: 10.1080/01402382.2011.546570
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schaffer, Frederic Charles. The Hidden Costs of Clean Election Reform. Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 2008.
   Google Scholar
• Simpser, Alberto. “Does Electoral Manipulation Discourage Voter Turnout? Evidence From Mexico.” The Journal of Politics 74, no. 3 (2012): 782–795. doi: 10.1017/S0022381612000333
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simpser, Alberto. Why Governments and Parties Manipulate Elections: Theory, Practice, and Implications. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Stokes, Susan C, Thad Dunning, Marcelo Nazareno, and Valeria Brusco. Brokers, Voters, and Clientelism: The Puzzle of Distributive Politics. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Svolik, Milan W. “Equilibrium Analysis of Political Institutions.” In Routledge Handbook of Comparative Political Institutions, edited by Jennifer Gandhi and Rubén Ruiz-Rufino, 70–83. Oxon: Routledge, 2015.
   Google Scholar
• Taagepera, Rein, and Matthew S. Shugart. Seats and Votes. Yale: Yale University Press, 1989.
   Google Scholar
• Varela-Ortega, J., ed. El Poder De La Influencia: Geografia Del Caciquismo En España. Madrid: Marcial Pons / CEPC, 2001.
   Google Scholar
• Wooldridge, Jeffrey M. Econometric Analysis of Cross Section and Panel Data. Cambridge: MIT Press, 2002.
   Google Scholar
• Ziblatt, Daniel. “Shaping Democratic Practice and the Causes of Electoral Fraud: The Case of Nineteenth-Century Germany.” American Political Science Review 103, no. 1 (2009): 1–21. doi: 10.1017/S0003055409090042
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar