Democratic innovation beyond deliberative reflection: the plebiscitary rebound and the advent of action-oriented democracy

Bibliography

• Altman, D. Direct Democracy Worldwide. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2010.
   Google Scholar
• Ansell, C., and A. Gash. “Collaborative Governance in Theory and Practice.” Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 18, no. 4 (2008): 543–571.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Atlee, T. Empowering Public Wisdom: A Practical Vision of Citizen-led Politics. Berkely: North Atlantic Books, 2012.
   Google Scholar
• Bächtiger, A., S. Niemeyer, M. Neblo, M. R. Steenbergen, and J. Steiner. “Disentangling Diversity in Deliberative Democracy: Competing Theories, Their Empirical Blind-spots, and Complementarities.” Journal of Political Philosophy 18, no. 1 (2010): 32–63.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baiocchi, G., and E. Ganuza. Popular Democracy: The Paradox of Participation. Stanford: Stanford University Press, 2016.
   Google Scholar
• Brugué, Q., and R. Gallego. “A Democratic Public Administration?” Public Management Review 5, no. 3 (2010): 425–447.
   Google Scholar
• Cain, B.E., R.J. Dalton, and S.E. Scarrow, eds. Democracy Transformed: Expanding Political Opportunities in Advanced Industrial Democracies. Oxford: Oxford UP, 2008.
   Google Scholar
• Caluwaerts, D., and M. Reuchamps. “Strengthening Democracy Through Bottom-up Deliberation: An Assessment of the Internal Legitimacy of the G1000 Project.” Acta Politica 50, no. 2 (2015): 151–170.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chambers, S. “Rhetoric and the Public Sphere: Has Deliberative Democracy Abandoned Mass Democracy?” Political Theory 2, no. 3 (2009): 323–350.
   Google Scholar
• Chappel, Z. Deliberative Democracy: A Critical Introduction. Basingstoke: Palgrave, 2012.
   Google Scholar
• Chwalisz, C. The Populist Signal: Why Politics and Democracy Need to Change. London: Rowman & Littlefield, 2015.
   Google Scholar
• Dryzek, J. S. “Democratization as Deliberative Capacity Building.” Comparative Political Studies 42, no. 11 (2009): 1379–1402.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dryzek, J. S. Deliberative Democracy and Beyond: Liberals, Critics, Contestations. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2000.
   Google Scholar
• Ellis, R. J. Democratic Delusions: The Initiative Process in America. Lawrence: University of Kansas Press, 2002.
   Google Scholar
• Elster, J. “Introduction.” In Deliberative Democracy, edited by J. Elster, 1–18. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Elstub, S. “Mini-publics: Issues and Cases.” In Deliberative Democracy: Issues and Cases, edited by S. Elstub and P. MacLaverty, 166–188. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Escobar, O. “Scripting Deliberative Policy-making: Dramaturgic Policy Analysis and Engagement Know-how.” Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis: Research and Practice 17, no. 3 (2015): 269–285.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fishkin, J. Democracy When the People are Thinking. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2018.
   Google Scholar
• Fishkin, J. When the People Speak: Deliberative Democracy and Public Consultation. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2009.
   Google Scholar
• Flyvbjerg, B. Making Social Science Matter. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2001.
   Google Scholar
• Fung, A. Empowered Participation: Reinventing Urban Democracy. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2004.
   Google Scholar
• Gastil, J. Democracy in Small Groups: Participation, Decision Making, and Communication. State College, PA: Efficacy Press, 2014. (2nd edit, orig 1993).
   Google Scholar
• Gastil, J., and P. Levine, eds. The Deliberative Democracy Handbook. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 2005.
   Google Scholar
• Gastil, J., and R. Richards. “Making Direct Democracy Deliberative Through Random Assemblies.” Politics & Society 41, no. 2 (2013): 253–281.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Geissel, B., and K. Kenneth Newton, eds. Evaluating Democratic Innovations: Curing the Democratic Malaise? Abingdon: Routledge, 2012.
   Google Scholar
• George, A. L., and A. Bennett. Case Studies and Theory Development in the Social Sciences. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2005.
   Google Scholar
• Goodin, R. Innovating Democracy: Democratic Theory and Practice after the Deliberative Turn. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2010.
   Google Scholar
• Green, J. E. “Analysing Legislative Performance: a Plebeian Perspective.” Democratization 20, no. 3 (2013): 417–437.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Green, J. E. The Eyes of the People: Democracy in an Age of Spectatorship. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2010.
   Google Scholar
• Gutmann, A., and D. Thompson. Why Deliberative Democracy?, Princeton University Press, 2003.
   Google Scholar
• Habermas, J. Theorie des kommunikativen Handelns. Frankfurt: Suhrkamp Verlag, 1981.
   Google Scholar
• Halupka, M. “Clicktivism: A Systematic Heuristic.” Policy & Internet 6, no. 2 (2014): 115–132.
   Google Scholar
• Heijstek-Ziemann, K. “Exploring the Impact of Mass Cultural Changes on the Patterns of Democratic Reform.” Democratization 21, no. 5 (2014): 888–911.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Helms, L. “Democracy and Innovation: From Institutions to Agency and Leadership.” Democratization 23, no. 3 (2015): 459–477.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hendriks, C. M. “Coupling Citizens and Elites in Deliberative Systems.” European Journal of Political Research 55 (2016): 43–60.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hendriks, F. “Democratic Reform between the Extreme Makeover and the Reinvention of Tradition: The Case of the Netherlands.” Democratization 16, no. 2 (2009): 243–268.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hendriks, F. Vital Democracy: A Theory of Democracy in Action. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2010.
   Google Scholar
• Hendriks, F., and P. W. Tops. “Everyday Fixers as Local Heroes.” Local Government Studies 31, no. 4 (2005): 475–491.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hendriks, F., K. van der Krieken, and C. Wagenaar. Democratische zegen of vloek? Aantekeningen bij het referendum. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press, 2017.
   Google Scholar
• Hibbing, J. R., and E. Theiss-Morse. Stealth Democracy: Americans’ Beliefs About How Government Should Work. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2012.
   Google Scholar
• Hill, S. Digital Revolutions: Activism in the Internet Age. Oxford: New Internationalist Publications, 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Holtkamp, L., ed. Direktdemokratische Hochburgen in Deutschland. Wiesbaden: Springer, 2016.
   Google Scholar
• Hornblower, S. “Creation and Development of Democratic Institutions in Ancient Greece.” In Democracy: the Unfinished Journey 508 BC to AD 1993, edited by J. Dunn, 1–16. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1992.
   Google Scholar
• Lee, C. W. Do-it-yourself Democracy: The Rise of the Public Engagement Industry. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2015.
   Google Scholar
• Lijphart, A. “The Evolution of Consociational Theory and Consociational Practices, 1965–2000.” Acta Politica 37 (Spring/Summer, 2002): 7–140.
   Google Scholar
• Lodge, M. “The Public Management of Risk: The Case for Deliberating among Worldviews.” Review of Policy Research 26, no. 4 (2009): 395–408.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lucardie, P. Democratic Extremism in Theory and Practice. London: Routledge, 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Mansbridge, J. Beyond Adversary Democracy. New York: Basic Books, 1980.
   Google Scholar
• Mansbridge, J., J. Bohman, S. Chambers, T. Christiano, A. Fung, J. Parkinson, D.F. Thompson, and M.E. Warren. “A Systemic Approach to Deliberative Democracy.” In Deliberative Systems: Deliberative Democracy ast the Large Scale, editied by J. Parkinson and J. Mansbridge, 1–26. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2012.
   Google Scholar
• Meijer, A., R. van der Veer, A. Faber, and J. Penning de Vries. “Political Innovation as Ideal and Strategy: the Case of Aleatoric Democracy in the City of Utrecht.” Public Management Review, 19, no. 1 (2017): 20–36.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mutz, D. C. Hearing the Other Side: Deliberative Versus Participatory Democracy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2006.
   Google Scholar
• Ney, S., and M. Verweij. “Exploring the Contributions of Cultural Theory for Improving Public Deliberation about Complex Policy Problems.” The Policy Studies Journal 42, no. 4 (2014): 620–643.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Noveck, B. Wiki Government: How Technology Can Make Government Better, Democracy Stronger, and Citizens More Powerful. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press, 2009.
   Google Scholar
• Olsen, E. D. H., and H.-J. Trenz. “From Citizens’ Deliberation to Popular Will Formation? Generating Democratic Legitimacy in Transnational Deliberative Polling.” Political Studies 62, no. 1 (2014): 117–133.
   Google Scholar
• Owen, D., and G. Smith. “Survey Article: Deliberation, Democracy, and the Systemic Turn.” Journal of Political Philosophy 23, no. 2 (2015): 213–234.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parkinson, J. “Legitimacy Problems in Deliberative Democracy.” Political Studies 51, no. 1 (2003): 180–196.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parkinson, J. “Why Deliberate? The Encounter Between Deliberation and New Public Managers.” Public Administration 82, no. 2 (2004): 377–395.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peters, B. G. Strategies for Comnparative Research in Political Science. London: Palgrave Macmillan, 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Qvortrup, M. “Referendums in Western Europe.” In Referendums Around the World, edited by M. Qvortrup, 19–45. London: Palgrave, 2017.
   Google Scholar
• Reinisch, C., and J. Parkinson. Swiss Landsgemeinden: A Deliberative Democratic Evaluation of Two Outdoor Parliaments. Helskinki: ECPR Joint Sessions, 2007.
   Google Scholar
• Ringen, S. Nation of Devils: Democratic Leadership and the of Obedience. New Haven: Yale University Press, 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Rosanvallon, P. Counter-democracy: Politics in an Age of Distrust. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2008.
   Google Scholar
• Ryan, M., and G. Smith. “Defining Mini-publics.” In Deliberative Mini-publics, edited by K. Grönlund, A. Bächtiger, and M. Setälä, 9–26. London: ECPR Press, 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Saward, M. “Making Democratic Connections: Political Equality, Deliberation and Direct Democracy.” Acta Politica 36 (2001): 361–379.
   Google Scholar
• Schaap, L., and J. van Ostaaijen. “Good Multi-level Governance: Brainport-Eindhoven.” In The Quest for Good Urban Governance, edited by L. van den Dool, F. Hendriks, A. Gianoli, and L. Schaap, 147–164. Wiesbaden: Springer VS, 2015.
   Google Scholar
• Setälä, M., Grönlund, K., K. Herne. “Citizen Deliberation on Nuclear Power: A Comparison of Two Decision-making Methods.” Political Studies, 58, no. 4 (2010): 688–714.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shapiro, I. “Enough of Deliberation: Politics is about Interests and Power.” In Deliberative Politics, edited by S. Macedo, 28–38. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1999.
   Google Scholar
• Sintomer, Y. “Random Selection, Republican Self-Government, and Deliberative Democracy.” Constellations (Oxford, England) 17, no. 3 (2010): 472–487.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, G. Democratic Innovation: Designing Institutions for Citizen Participation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2009.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, G. “Review of ‘When the People Speak’.” Perspectives on Politics 8, no. 3 (2010): 908–909.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steiner, J., and T. Ertman. “Consociationalism and Corporatism in Western Europe: Still the Politics of Accomodation?” Acta Politica 37 (Spring/Summer, 2002): 7–140.
   Google Scholar
• Stoker, G. “Regime Theory and Urban Politics.” In Theories of Urban Politics, edited by D. Judge, G. Stoker, and H. Wolman. London: Sage, 1995.
   Google Scholar
• Stone, C. N. “Regime Politics: Governing Atlanta 1946–1988.” Lawrence: University Press of Kansas (1989).
   Google Scholar
• Stone, C. N. “Power, Reform and Urban Regime Analysis.” City & Community 5, no. 1 (2006): 23–38.
   Google Scholar
• Sunstein, C. “The Law of Group Polarization.” Journal of Political Philosophy 10, no. 2 (2002): 175–195.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• The Economist. “Referendumania: Plebiscites in Europe.,” May 21st, 2016.
   Google Scholar
• Thomas, G. “A Typology for the Case Study in Social Science.” Qualitative Inquiry 17, no. 6 (2011): 511–521.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tormey, S. The End of Representative Politics. Cambridge: Polity Press, 2015.
   Google Scholar
• van de Wijdeven, T. “Bewonerscoöperatie Biest-Houtakker: ‘Iedereen kan iets’.” In Kernkracht: over doe-democratie in het landelijk gebied, edited by T. van de Wijdeven and L. de Graaf, 121–140. Tilburg: Tilburg University Reports, 2014.
   Google Scholar
• van de Wijdeven, T., and F. Hendriks. “A Little Less Conversation, a Little More Action: Real-life Expressions of Vital Citizenship.” In City in Sight, edited by J.W. Duyvendak, F. Hendriks, and M. van Niekerk, 121–141. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press, 2009.
   Google Scholar
• van der Kolk, H. Kiezen voor een nieuw kiessstelsel. Enschede: Universiteit Twente, 2008.
   Google Scholar
• van der Lans, J., and P. Hilhorst. Sociaal doe-het-zelven. Amsterdam: Atlas Contact, 2013.
   Google Scholar
• van Hulst, M. J., L. de Graaf, and G. van den Brink. “The Work of Exemplary Practitioners in Neighborhood Governance.” Critical Policy Studies 6, no. 4 (2012): 433–450.
   Google Scholar
• van Reybrouck, D. Against Elections: The Case for Democracy. London: Penguin Random House, 2013.
   Google Scholar
• van Vree, W. Meetings, Manners and Civilization. Leicester: Leicester University Press, 1999.
   Google Scholar
• Warren, M. E. “A Problem-based Approach to Democratic Theory.” American Political Science Review 111, no. 1 (2017): 39–53.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yin, R. K. Applications of Case Study Research. Los Angeles: Sage, 2012.
   Google Scholar
• Young, I. Inclusion and Democracy. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2000.
   Google Scholar
• Zimmerman, J. F. The New England Town Meeting: Democracy in Action. Westport: Praeger, 1999.
   Google Scholar