Guns for hire and enduring machines: clientelism beyond parties in Indonesia and the Philippines

Bibliography

• Anderson, Benedict. “Cacique Democracy in the Philippines: Origins and Dreams.” New Left Review 169 (1998): 3–33.
   Google Scholar
• Aspinall, Edward. “When Brokers Betray: Clientelism, Social Networks, and Electoral Politics in Indonesia.” Critical Asian Studies 46, no. 4 (2014): 545–570. doi: 10.1080/14672715.2014.960706
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aspinall, Edward, and Muhammad Uhaib As’ad. “The Patronage Patchwork.” Bijdragen tot de Taal-, Land- en Volkenkunde / Journal of the Humanities and Social Sciences of Southeast Asia 171, no. 2–3 (2015): 165–195. doi: 10.1163/22134379-17102004
   Google Scholar
• Aspinall, Edward, and Ward Berenschot. Democracy for Sale: Clientelism, Elections and the State in Indonesia. Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 2019.
   Google Scholar
• Aspinall, Edward, Michael Davidson, Allen Hicken, and Meredith Weiss. “Inducement or Entry Ticket? Broker Networks and Vote Buying in Indonesia.” Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Political Science Association, San Francisco, September 3–6, 2015.
   Google Scholar
• Crouch, Harold. “Patrimonialism and Military Rule in Indonesia.” World Politics 31, no. 4 (1979): 571–587. doi: 10.2307/2009910
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Erb, Maribeth, and Priyambudi Sulistiyanto, eds. Deepening Democracy in Indonesia?: Direct Elections for Local Leaders (Pilkada). Singapore: Institute of Southeast Asian Studies, 2009.
   Google Scholar
• Gans-Morse, Jordan, Sebastián Mazzuca, and Simeon Nichter. “Varieties of Clientelism: Machine Politics during Elections.” American Journal of Political Science 58, no. 2 (2014): 415–432. doi: 10.1111/ajps.12058
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hawes, Gary. “Marcos, his Cronies and the Philippines Failure to Develop.” In Southeast Asian Capitalists, edited by Ruth McVey, 145–160. Ithaca: Cornell Southeast Asia Program, 1992.
   Google Scholar
• Hicken, Allen. “Clientelism.” Annual Review of Political Science 14, no. 1 (2011): 289–310. doi: 10.1146/annurev.polisci.031908.220508
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hicken, Allen. “Electoral Design: Why it Matters for Development Outcomes.” Unpublished paper presented at workshop, “Electoral System Redesign for Development, Manila, July 13–14, 2016.
   Google Scholar
• Hicken, Allen. “Party and Party System Institutionalization in the Philippines.” In Party System Institutionalization in Asia: Democracies, Autocracies and the Shadows of the Past, edited by Allen Hicken, and Erik Martinez Kuhonta, 307–327. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Hicken, Allen, Paul D. Hutchcroft, Meredith Weiss, and Edward Aspinall. “Introduction.” In Electoral Dynamics in the Philippines: Money, Patronage and Clientelism at the Grassroots, edited by Allen Hicken, Edward Aspinall, and Meredith Weiss, 1–43. Singapore: National University of Singapore Press, 2019.
   Google Scholar
• Holmes, Ronald D. “The Myth of the Machine.” In Electoral Dynamics in the Philippines: Money, Patronage and Clientelism at the Grassroots, edited by Allen Hicken, Edward Aspinall, and Meredith Weiss, 44–61. Singapore: National University of Singapore Press, 2019.
   Google Scholar
• Hutchcroft, Paul. Booty Capitalism: The Politics of Banking. Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1998.
   Google Scholar
• Hutchcroft, Paul. “Colonial Masters, National Politicos, and Provincial Lords: Central Authority and Local Autonomy in the American Philippines, 1900-1913.” The Journal of Asian Studies 59, no. 2 (2000): 277–306. doi: 10.2307/2658657
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hutchcroft, Paul, and Joel Rocamora. “Strong Demands and Weak Institutions: The Origins and Evolution of the Democratic Deficit in the Philippines.” Journal of East Asian Studies 3, no. 2 (2003): 259–292. doi: 10.1017/S1598240800001363
   Google Scholar
• Landé, Carl H. Leaders, Factions, and Parties: The Structure of Philippine Politics. New Haven: Southeast Asia Studies, Yale University, 1965.
   Google Scholar
• Mietzner, Marcus. “Indonesia’s Direct Elections: Empowering the Electorate or Entrenching the New Order Oligarchy?” In Soeharto’s New Order and its Legacy, edited by Edward Aspinall, and Greg Fealy, 173–192. Canberra: ANU E Press, 2010.
   Google Scholar
• Mietzner, Marcus. Money, Power, and Ideology: Political Parties in Post-Authoritarian Indonesia. Singapore: NUS press, 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Muhtadi, Burhanuddin. “Buying Votes in Indonesia: Partisans, Personal Networks, and Winning Margins.” PhD dissertation, Australian National University, 2018.
   Google Scholar
• Nichter, Simeon. “Electoral Clientelism or Relational Clientelism? Healthcare and Sterilization in Brazil.” Paper presented at Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association, 2011.
   Google Scholar
• Robison, Richard, and Vedi R. Hadiz. Reorganising Power in Indonesia: The Politics of Oligarchy in an Age of Markets. London: Routledge, 2004.
   Google Scholar
• Schiller, James. Developing Jepara: State and Society in New Order Indonesia. Monash: Monash Asia Institute, 1996.
   Google Scholar
• Schneider, Mark. “Do Brokers Know their Voters? A Test of Guessability in India.” SSRN Working Paper, 2017.
   Google Scholar
• Scott, James C. “The Erosion of Patron-Client Bonds and Social Change in Rural Southeast Asia.” The Journal of Asian Studies 32, no. 1 (1972): 5–37. doi: 10.2307/2053176
   Google Scholar
• Shefter, Martin. Political Parties and the State: The American Historical Experience. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1994.
   Google Scholar
• Stokes, Susan C., Thad Dunning, Marcelo Nazareno, and Valeria Brusco. Brokers, Voters, and Clientelism: The Puzzle of Distributive Politics. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Tancangco, Luzviminda. The Anatomy of Electoral Fraud. Manila: MLAGM, 1992.
   Google Scholar
• Ufen, Andreas. “Parties in Post-Suharto Indonesia: Between Politik Aliran and ‘Philippinisation.’” GIGA Working Papers 37. Hamburg: German Institute of Global and Area Studies, 2006.
   Google Scholar
• Wurfel, David. Filipino Politics: Development and Decay. Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1988.
   Google Scholar