The legislature and agenda politics of social welfare: a comparative analysis of authoritarian and democratic regimes in South Korea

Bibliography

• Acemoglu, D., and J. A. Robinson. Economic Origins of Democracy and Dictatorship. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2009.
   Google Scholar
• Alemán, Eduardo, and Ernesto Calvo. “Explaining Policy Ties in Presidential Congresses: A Network Analysis of Bill Initiation Data.” Political Studies 61, no. 2 (2013): 356–377. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9248.2012.00964.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ansell, B. W., and D. J. Samuels. Inequality and Democratization. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2011.
   Google Scholar
• Bonvecchi, A., and E. Simison. “Legislative Institutions and Performance in Authoritarian Regimes.” Comparative Politics 49, no. 4 (2017): 521–544. doi: 10.5129/001041517821273099
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carroll, Susan J. The Impact of Women in Public Office. Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 2001.
   Google Scholar
• De Mesquita, B. B., A. Smith, J. D. Morrow, and R. M. Siverson. The Logic of Political Survival. Cambridge, Mass: MIT press, 2005.
   Google Scholar
• Downs, A. “An Economic Theory of Political Action in a Democracy.” Journal of Political Economy 65, no. 2 (1957): 135–150. doi: 10.1086/257897
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duverger, M. Political Parties: Their Organization and Activity in the Modern State. London: Methuen, 1959.
   Google Scholar
• Eaton, Kent. “Parliamentarism Versus Presidentialism in the Policy Arena.” Comparative Politics 32, no. 3 (2000): 355–376. doi: 10.2307/422371
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Esping-Andersen, G. The Three Worlds of Welfare Capitalism. Cambridge: Polity Press, 1990.
   Google Scholar
• Estévez-Abe, M. Welfare and Capitalism in Postwar Japan: Party, Bureaucracy, and Business. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2008.
   Google Scholar
• Ezrow, N. M., and E. Frantz. Dictators and Dictatorships: Understanding Authoritarian Regimes and their Leaders. London: Bloomsbury Publishing, 2011.
   Google Scholar
• Gamm, G., and T. Kousser. “Broad Bills or Particularistic Policy? Historical Patterns in American State Legislatures.” American Political Science Review 104, no. 1 (2010): 151–170. doi: 10.1017/S000305540999030X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gandhi, J. Political Institutions Under Dictatorship. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2008.
   Google Scholar
• Gingrich, J. “Visibility, Values, and Voters: The Informational Role of the Welfare State.” The Journal of Politics 76, no. 02 (2014): 565–580. doi: 10.1017/S0022381613001540
   Google Scholar
• Haggard, S., and R. R. Kaufman. Development, Democracy, and Welfare States: Latin America, East Asia, and Eastern Europe. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2008.
   Google Scholar
• Huber, John, and Ronald Inglehart. “Expert Interpretations of Party Space and Party Locations in 42 Societies.” Party Politics 1, no. 1 (1995): 73–111. doi: 10.1177/1354068895001001004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huber, E., and J. D. Stephens. Development and Crisis of the Welfare State: Parties and Policies in Global Markets. Princeton: University of Chicago Press, 2010.
   Google Scholar
• Elmelund-Præstekær, C., and M. B. Klitgaard. “Policy or Institution? The Political Choice of Retrenchment Strategy.” Journal of European Public Policy 19, no. 7 (2012): 1089–1107. doi: 10.1080/13501763.2012.672112
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim, Hee Min, Jun Young Choi, and Jinman Cho. “Changing Cleavage Structure in new Democracies: An Empirical Analysis of Political Cleavages in Korea.” Electoral Studies 27, no. 1 (2008): 136–150. doi: 10.1016/j.electstud.2007.10.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Knutsen, C. H., and M. Rasmussen. “The Autocratic Welfare State: old-age Pensions, Credible Commitments, and Regime Survival.” Comparative Political Studies 51, no. 5 (2018): 659–695. doi: 10.1177/0010414017710265
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kornai, J. The Socialist System: The Political Economy of Communism: The Political Economy of Communism. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1992.
   Google Scholar
• Kwon, H. J. The Welfare State in Korea: the Politics of Legitimization. Oxford: Springer, 1998.
   Google Scholar
• Kwon, H. J. “Transforming the Developmental Welfare State in East Asia.” Development and Change 36, no. 3 (2005): 477–497. doi: 10.1111/j.0012-155X.2005.00420.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levitsky, S., and M. V. Murillo. “Variation in Institutional Strength.” Annual Review of Political Science 12 (2009): 115–133. doi: 10.1146/annurev.polisci.11.091106.121756
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levitsky, S., and L. A. Way. Competitive Authoritarianism: Hybrid Regimes After the Cold War. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2010.
   Google Scholar
• Levitsky, S., and L. Way. “The Rise of Competitive Authoritarianism.” Journal of Democracy 13, no. 2 (2002): 51–65. doi: 10.1353/jod.2002.0026
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lijphart, A., and M. M. Crepaz. “Corporatism and Consensus Democracy in Eighteen Countries: Conceptual and Empirical Linkages.” British Journal of Political Science 21, no. 02 (1991): 235–246. doi: 10.1017/S0007123400006128
   Google Scholar
• Lindert, P. H. Growing Public: Social Spending and Economic Growth Since the Eighteenth Century. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2004.
   Google Scholar
• Malesky, E., and P. Schuler. “Nodding or Needling: Analyzing Delegate Responsiveness in an Authoritarian Parliament.” American Political Science Review 104, no. 3 (2010): 482–502. doi: 10.1017/S0003055410000250
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Magaloni, B. “Credible Power-Sharing and the Longevity of Authoritarian Rule.” Comparative Political Studies 41, no. 4–5 (2008): 715–741. doi: 10.1177/0010414007313124
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Magaloni, B., and R. Kricheli. “Political Order and one-Party Rule.” Annual Review of Political Science 13 (2010): 123–143. doi: 10.1146/annurev.polisci.031908.220529
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mares, I., and M. E. Carnes. “Social Policy in Developing Countries.” Annual Review of Political Science 12 (2009): 93–113. doi: 10.1146/annurev.polisci.12.071207.093504
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marshall, T. H. Citizenship and Social Class (Vol. 2). London: Pluto Press, 1992.
   Google Scholar
• Mayhew, D. R. Congress: The Electoral Connection (Vol. 26). New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 1974.
   Google Scholar
• Meltzer, Allan H., and Scott F. Richard. “A Rational Theory of the Size of Government.” Journal of Political Economy 89, no. 5 (1981): 914–927. doi: 10.1086/261013
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Olson, D. M., and M. L. Mezey, eds. Legislatures in the Policy Process: The Dilemmas of Economic Policy (Vol. 8). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1991
   Google Scholar
• Peng, I., and J. Wong. “East Asia.” In The Oxford Handbook of the Welfare State, edited by Francis G. Castles, Stephan Leibfried, Jane Lewis, Herbert Obinger, and Christopher Pierson, 657–671. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2010.
   Google Scholar
• Persson, Torsten, Gerard Roland, and Guido Tabellini. “Comparative Politics and Public Finance.” Journal of Political Economy 108, no. 6 (2000): 1121–1161. doi: 10.1086/317686
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rimlinger, Gaston V. Welfare Policy and Industrialization in Europe, America, and Russia. New York: John Wiley & Sons, 1971.
   Google Scholar
• Svolik, M. W. “Power Sharing and Leadership Dynamics in Authoritarian Regimes.” American Journal of Political Science 53, no. 2 (2009): 477–494. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-5907.2009.00382.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Talbert, Jeffery C., and Matthew Potoski. “Setting the Legislative Agenda: The Dimensional Structure of Bill Cosponsoring and Floor Voting.” Journal of Politics 64, no. 3 (2002): 864–891. doi: 10.1111/0022-3816.00150
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wong, J. Healthy Democracies: Welfare Politics in Taiwan and South Korea. New York: Cornell University Press, 2006.
   Google Scholar
• Wright, J. “Do Authoritarian Institutions Constrain? How Legislatures Affect Economic Growth and Investment.” American Journal of Political Science 52, no. 2 (2008): 322–343. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-5907.2008.00315.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar