Analytical perspectives on varieties of clientelism

Bibliography

• Aspinall, Edward, and Ward Berenschot. Democracy for Sale: Elections, Clientelism, and the State in Indonesia. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 2019.
   Google Scholar
• Auyero, Javier. Poor People’s Politics: Peronist Survival Networks and the Legacy of Evita. Durham, NC: Duke University Press, 2000.
   Google Scholar
• Baldwin, Kate, and John D Huber. “Economic Versus Cultural Differences: Forms of Ethnic Diversity and Public Goods Provision.” American Political Science Review 104, no. 4 (2010): 644–662. doi: 10.1017/S0003055410000419
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berenschot, Ward. “The Political Economy of Clientelism: A Comparative Study of Indonesia’s Patronage Democracy.” Comparative Political Studies 51, no. 12 (2018): 1563–1593. doi: 10.1177/0010414018758756
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berenschot, Ward, and Edward Aspinall. “How Clientelism Varies: Comparing Patronage Democracies.” Democratization, Published Online Before Print, 2019.
   Google Scholar
• Calvo, Ernesto, and Maria Victoria Murillo. “When Parties Meet Voters: Assessing Political Linkages Through Partisan Networks and Distributive in Argentina and Chile.” Comparative Political Studies 46, no. 7 (2013): 851–882. doi: 10.1177/0010414012463882
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Calvo, Ernesto, and Maria Victoria Murillo. Non-policy Politics: Richer Voters, Poorer Voters, and the Diversification of Electoral Strategies. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2019.
   Google Scholar
• Dahlström, Carl, and Victor Lapuente. Organizing Leviathan: Politicians, Bureaucrats, and the Making of Good Government. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2017.
   Google Scholar
• Diaz-Cayeros, Alberto, Federico Estévez, and Beatriz Magaloni. The Political Logic of Poverty Relief: Electoral Strategies and Social Policy in Mexico. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2016.
   Google Scholar
• Driscoll, Barry. “Why Political Competition Can Increase Patronage.” Studies in Comparative International Development 53, no. 4 (2018): 404–427. doi: 10.1007/s12116-017-9238-x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duarte, Raúl, Frederico Finan, Horacio Larreguy, and Laura Schechter. “Networks, Information, and Vote Buying.” Working Paper Presented at Frontiers of Clientelism: Linking the Micro and the Macro Workshop, Cambridge, MA, 2019 .
   Google Scholar
• Finan, Frederico, and Laura Schechter. “Vote-buying and Reciprocity.” Econometrica 80, no. 2 (2012): 863–881. doi: 10.3982/ECTA9035
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gans-Morse, Jordan, Sebastian Mazzuca, and Simeon Nichter. “Varieties of Clientelism: Machine Politics During Elections.” American Journal of Political Science 58, no. 2 (2014): 415–432. doi: 10.1111/ajps.12058
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gay, Robert. Popular Organization and Democracy in Rio de Janeiro: A Tale of Two Favelas. Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press, 1994.
   Google Scholar
• Gerring, John, Philip Bond, William T Barndt, and Carola Moreno. “Democracy and Economic Growth: A Historical Perspective.” World Politics 57, no. 3 (2005): 323–364. doi: 10.1353/wp.2006.0002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gottlieb, Jessica. “Explaining Variation in Broker Strategies: A Lab-in-the-field Experiment in Senegal.” Comparative Political Studies 50, no. 11 (2017): 1556–1592. doi: 10.1177/0010414017695336
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hale, Henry. “Correlates of Clientelism: Political Economy, Politicized Ethnicity, and Post-communist Transition.” In Patrons, Clients, and Policies: Patterns of Democratic Accountability and Political Competition, edited by Herbert Kitschelt and Steven Wilkinson, 227–250. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2007.
   Google Scholar
• Hall, Peter A, and David W Soskice. Varieties of Capitalism: The Institutional Foundations of Comparative Advantage. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2001.
   Google Scholar
• Heath, Oliver, and Louise Tillin. “Institutional Performance and Vote Buying in India.” Studies in Comparative International Development 53, no. 1 (2018): 90–110. doi: 10.1007/s12116-017-9254-x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hicken, Allen. “Clientelism.” Annual Review of Political Science 14 (2011): 289–310. doi: 10.1146/annurev.polisci.031908.220508
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hicken, Allen, and Noah L. Nathan. “Clientelism’s Red Herrings: Dead Ends and New Directions in the Study of Non-programmatic Politics.” Working Paper Presented at Frontiers of Clientelism: Linking the Micro and the Macro Workshop, Cambridge, MA 2019 .
   Google Scholar
• Holland, Alisha C. “Forbearance.” American Political Science Review 110, no. 2 (2016): 232–246. doi: 10.1017/S0003055416000083
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holland, Alisha C, and Brian Palmer-Rubin. “Beyond the Machine: Clientelist Brokers and Interest Organizations in Latin America.” Comparative Political Studies 48, no. 9 (2015): 1186–1223. doi: 10.1177/0010414015574883
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kam, Christopher. “The Secret Ballot and the Market for Votes at 19th-century British Elections.” Comparative Political Studies 50, no. 5 (2017): 594–635. doi: 10.1177/0010414015626451
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kao, Kristen, Ellen Lust, and Lise Rakner. Money Machine: Do the Poor Demand Clientelism? University of Gothenburg, The Program on Governance and Local Development, Working Paper No. 14, 2017.
   Google Scholar
• Kasara, Kimuli, and Isabela Mares. “Unfinished Business: The Democratization of Electoral Practices in Britain and Germany.” Comparative Political Studies 50, no. 5 (2017): 636–664. doi: 10.1177/0010414016666856
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keefer, Philip. “Clientelism, Credibility, and the Policy Choices of Young Democracies.” American Journal of Political Science 51, no. 4 (2007): 804–821. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-5907.2007.00282.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kenny, Paul D. Populism and Patronage: Why Populists Win Elections in India, Asia, and Beyond. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2017.
   Google Scholar
• Kitschelt, Herbert. “Social Policy, Democratic Linkages, and Political Governance.” In Paper Delivered at the Conference on The Quality of Government and the Performance of Democracies, Gothenburg, 2015 .
   Google Scholar
• Kitschelt, Herbert. “Political Economy of Pure Programmatic Partisan Politics.” In Paper Delivered at the Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association, Philadelphia, PA, 2016 .
   Google Scholar
• Kitschelt, Herbert, and Kent E. Freeze. “Programmatic Party System Structuration: Developing and Comparing Cross-national and Cross-party Measures with a New Global Data Set.” In Paper Delivered at the Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association, Washington, DC, 2010 .
   Google Scholar
• Kitschelt, Herbert, and Daniel M. Kselman. “Economic Development, Democratic Experience, and Political Parties’ Linkage Strategies.” Comparative Political Studies 46, no. 11 (2013): 1453–1484. doi: 10.1177/0010414012453450
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kitschelt, Herbert, and Daniel M. Kselman. “Clientelistic Party Organization: Brokerage and Centralization.” In Paper Delivered at the European Political Science Association Annual Conference, Edinburgh, 2014 .
   Google Scholar
• Kitschelt, Herbert P., and Arturas Rozenas. “Contingent Exchange and Contractual Opportunism: Making Clientelistic Relationships Work.” In Paper Delivered at the Workshop on Democratic Accountability Strategies, May 18–19, Duke University, 2011 .
   Google Scholar
• Kitschelt, Herbert, and Matthew Singer. “Diversified Partisan Linkage Strategies. Comparative Argument and Post-communist Evidence.” In Paper Delivered at the 23rd Council of Europeanists Conference. Philadelphia, PA, 2016 .
   Google Scholar
• Kitschelt, Herbert, and Yi-Ting Wang. Research and Dialogue on Programmatic Parties and Party Systems: Main Report. International Institute for Democracy and Electoral Assistance (IDEA) – PO 134-01/2401, 2012 .
   Google Scholar
• Kitschelt, Herbert, Yi-Ting Wang, Kiril Kolev, Daniel M Kselman, Sandra Osterkatz, and Matthew Singer. Research and Dialogue on Programmatic Parties and Party Systems: Case Study Report. International Institute for Democracy and Electoral Assistance (IDEA) – PO 134-01/2401, 2012 .
   Google Scholar
• Kitschelt, Herbert, and Steven I Wilkinson. “Citizen-politician Linkages: An Introduction.” In Patrons, Clients, and Policies: Patterns of Democratic Accountability and Political Competition, edited by Herbert Kitschelt and Steven Wilkinson, 1–49. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2007.
   Google Scholar
• Kopecký, Petr, Peter Mair, and Maria Spirova. Party Patronage and Party Government in European Democracies. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2012.
   Google Scholar
• Kramon, Eric. “Electoral Handouts as Information.” World Politics 68, no. 3 (2016): 454–498. doi: 10.1017/S0043887115000453
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Larreguy, Horacio, John Marshall, and Pablo Querubin. “Parties, Brokers, and Voter Mobilization: How Turnout Buying Depends upon the Party’s Capacity to Monitor Brokers.” American Political Science Review 110, no. 1 (2016): 160–179. doi: 10.1017/S0003055415000593
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lawson, Chappell, and Kenneth Greene. “Making Clientelism Work: How Norms of Reciprocity Increase Voter Compliance.” Comparative Politics 47, no. 1 (2014): 61–77. doi: 10.5129/001041514813623173
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Magaloni, Beatriz, Alberto Diaz-Cayeros, and Federico Estévez. “Clientelism and Portfolio Diversification: A Model of Electoral Investment with Applications to Mexico.” In Patrons, Clients, and Policies: Patterns of Democratic Accountability and Political Competition, edited by Herbert Kitschelt and Steven Wilkinson, 182–205. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2007.
   Google Scholar
• Mares, Isabela. From Open Secrets to Secret Voting: Democratic Electoral Reforms and Voter Autonomy. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2015.
   Google Scholar
• Mares, Isabela, and Lauren Young. “Buying, Expropriating, and Stealing Votes.” Annual Review of Political Science 19 (2016): 267–288. doi: 10.1146/annurev-polisci-060514-120923
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mares, Isabela, and Lauren Young. Conditionality and Coercion: Electoral Clientelism in Eastern Europe. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2019.
   Google Scholar
• Muñoz, Paula. Buying Audiences: Clientelism and Electoral Campaigns When Parties Are Weak. Cambridge: Cambrdige University Press, 2019.
   Google Scholar
• Nichter, Simeon. “Conceptualizing Vote Buying.” Electoral Studies 35 (2014): 315–327. doi: 10.1016/j.electstud.2014.02.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nichter, Simeon. Politics and Poverty : Electoral Clientelism in Latin America. Berkeley: University of California, 2010.
   Google Scholar
• Nichter, Simeon. “Vote Buying or Turnout Buying? Machine Politics and the Secret Ballot.” American Political Science Review 102, no. 1 (2008): 19–31. doi: 10.1017/S0003055408080106
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nichter, Simeon. Votes for Survival: Relational Clientelism in Latin America. Cambrdige: Cambrdige University Press, 2018.
   Google Scholar
• Nooruddin, Irfan, and Nita Rudra. “Are Developing Countries Really Defying the Embedded Liberalism Compact?” World Politics 66, no. 4 (2014): 603–640. doi: 10.1017/S0043887114000203
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pellicer, Miquel, Eva Wegner, Markus Bayer, and Christian Tischmeier. “Clientelism from the Client‘s Perspective: A Framework Based on a Systematic Review of Ethnographic Literature.” In ECPR Workshop: Political Clientelism in the 21st Century: Theory and Practice, Nicosia, 2018 .
   Google Scholar
• Robinson, James A, and Thierry Verdier. “The Political Economy of Clientelism.” The Scandinavian Journal of Economics 115, no. 2 (2013): 260–291. doi: 10.1111/sjoe.12010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schaffer, Frederic Charles. Elections for Sale: The Causes and Consequences of Vote Buying. Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner Publishers, 2007.
   Google Scholar
• Scheiner, Ethan. Democracy Without Competition in Japan: Opposition Failure in a One-party Dominant State. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2006.
   Google Scholar
• Schmidt, Steffen W., James C. Scott, Carl H. Landé, and Laura Guasti. Friends, Followers, and Factions. A Reader in Political Clientelism. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1977.
   Google Scholar
• Scott, James C. “Corruption, Machine Politics, and Political Change.” American Political Science Review 63, no. 4 (1969): 1142–1158. doi: 10.1017/S0003055400263247
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shefter, Martin. “Party and Patronage: Germany, England, and Italy.” Politics & Society 7, no. 4 (1977): 403–451. doi: 10.1177/003232927700700402
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stokes, Susan C. “Political Clientelism.” In The Oxford Handbook of Comparative Politics, edited by Carles Boix and Susan Stokes, 604–627. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2009.
   Google Scholar
• Stokes, Susan C., Thad Dunning, Marcelo Nazareno, and Valeria Brusco. Brokers, Voters, and Clientelism: The Puzzle of Distributive Politics. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Szwarcberg, Mariela. Mobilizing Poor Voters: Machine Politics, Clientelism, and Social Networks in Argentina. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2015.
   Google Scholar
• Teorell, Jan, Daniel Ziblatt, and Fabrice Lehoucq. “An Introduction to Special Issue: The Causes and Consequences of Secret Ballot Reform.” Comparative Political Studies 50, no. 5 (2017): 531–554. doi: 10.1177/0010414016641977
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thachil, Tariq. “Elite Parties and Poor Voters: Theory and Evidence from India.” American Political Science Review 108, no. 2 (2014): 454–477. doi: 10.1017/S0003055414000069
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vicente, Pedro C. “Is Vote Buying Effective? Evidence from a Field Experiment in West Africa.” The Economic Journal 124, no. 574 (2014): 356–387. doi: 10.1111/ecoj.12086
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, Chin-Shou, and C. Kurzman. “Dilemmas of Electoral Clientelism: Taiwan, 1993.” International Political Science Review 28, no. 2 (2007): 225–245. doi: 10.1177/0192512107075408
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, Yi-ting, and Kiril Kolev. “Ethnic Group Inequality, Partisan Networks, and Political Clientelism.” Political Research Quarterly 72, no. 2 (2019): 329–341. doi: 10.1177/1065912918789283
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weghorst, Keith R., and Staffan I. Lindberg. “Effective Opposition Strategies: Collective Goods or Clientelism?” Democratization 18, no. 5 (2011): 1193–1214. doi: 10.1080/13510347.2011.603483
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weitz-Shapiro, Rebecca. Curbing Clientelism in Argentina: Politics, Poverty, and Social Policy. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Zarazaga, Rodrigo. “Party Machines and Voter-customized Rewards Strategies.” Journal of Theoretical Politics 28, no. 4 (2016): 678–701. doi: 10.1177/0951629815603496
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar