Amending legislatures in authoritarian regimes: power sharing in post-Soviet Eurasia

Bibliography

• Bader, Max. “Hegemonic Political Parties in Post-Soviet Eurasia: Towards Party-Based Authoritarianism?” Communist and Post-Communist Studies 44, no. 3 (September 2011): 189–197. doi:10.1016/j.postcomstud.2011.07.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baumgartner, Frank R., Marcello Carammia, Derek A. Epp, Ben Noble, Beatriz Rey, and Tevfik Murat Yildirim. “Budgetary Change in Authoritarian and Democratic Regimes.” Journal of European Public Policy 24, no. 6 (17 June 2017): 792–808. doi:10.1080/13501763.2017.1296482.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baumgartner, Frank R., Bryan D. Jones, and John Wilkerson. “Comparative Studies of Policy Dynamics.” Comparative Political Studies 44, no. 8 (1 August 2011): 947–972. doi:10.1177/0010414011405160.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Birch, S. “Ukraine: Presidential Power, Veto Strategies and Democratisation.” In Semi-Presidentialism in Central and Eastern Europe, edited by Robert Elgie and Sophia Moestrup, 219–238. Manchester: Manchester University Press, 2008.
   Google Scholar
• Boix, Carles, and Milan W. Svolik. “The Foundations of Limited Authoritarian Government: Institutions, Commitment, and Power-Sharing in Dictatorships.” The Journal of Politics 75, no. 2 (2013): 300–316.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brownlee, Jason. Authoritarianism in an Age of Democratization. 1st ed. Cambridge; New York: Cambridge University Press, 2007.
   Google Scholar
• Carroll, Royce, Gary W. Cox, and Mónica Pachón. “How Parties Create Electoral Democracy, Chapter 2.” Legislative Studies Quarterly 31, no. 2 (2006): 153–174.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chaisty, Paul. “Party Cohesion and Policy-Making in Russia.” Party Politics 11, no. 3 (1 May 2005): 299–318. doi:10.1177/1354068805051783.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chaisty, Paul, Nic Cheeseman, and Timothy Power. “Rethinking the “Presidentialism Debate”: Conceptualizing Coalitional Politics in Cross-Regional Perspective.” Democratization 21, no. 1 (2 January 2014): 72–94. doi:10.1080/13510347.2012.710604.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chaisty, Paul, and Svitlana Chernykh. “Coalitional Presidentialism and Legislative Control in Post-Soviet Ukraine.” Post-Soviet Affairs 31, no. 3 (4 May 2015): 177–200. doi:10.1080/1060586X.2014.994941.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cross, James P., and Henrik Hermansson. “Legislative Amendments and Informal Politics in the European Union: A Text Reuse Approach.” European Union Politics 18, no. 4 (December 2017): 581–602. doi:10.1177/1465116517717071.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Damgaard, Erik. “How Parties Control Committee Members.” In Parliaments and Majority Rule in Western Europe, edited by Herbert Döring, 249–307. Mannheim: Mannheim Centre for European Social Research, 1995.
   Google Scholar
• D’Anieri, Paul. Understanding Ukrainian Politics: Power, Politics, and Institutional Design. Armonk, NY: M.E. Sharpe, 2007.
   Google Scholar
• Davenport, Christian. “State Repression and Political Order.” Annual Review of Political Science 10, no. 1 (2007): 1–23. doi:10.1146/annurev.polisci.10.101405.143216.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elgie, Robert. “The Perils of Semi-Presidentialism. Are They Exaggerated?” Democratization 15, no. 1 (1 February 2008): 49–66. doi:10.1080/13510340701768125.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elgie, Robert. “The Politics of Semi-Presidentialism.” In Semi-Presidentialism in Europe, edited by Robert Elgie, 1–21. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1999.
   Google Scholar
• Fortin, Jessica. “Measuring Presidential Powers: Some Pitfalls of Aggregate Measurement.” International Political Science Review 34, no. 1 (2013): 91–112. doi:10.1177/0192512111421357.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frye, Timothy, Ora John Reuter, and David Szakonyi. “Political Machines at Work Voter Mobilization and Electoral Subversion in the Workplace.” World Politics 66, no. 2 (2014): 195–228. doi:10.1017/S004388711400001X.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fumagalli, Matteo. “Semi-Presidentialism in Kyrgyzstan.” In Semi-Presidentialism in the Caucasus and Central Asia, edited by Robert Elgie and Sophia Moestrup, 173–205. London: Palgrave Macmillan UK, 2016.
   Google Scholar
• Gandhi, Jennifer. Political Institutions Under Dictatorship. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2008.
   Google Scholar
• Gandhi, Jennifer, and Adam Przeworski. “Authoritarian Institutions and the Survival of Autocrats.” Comparative Political Studies (2007): 1279–1301. doi:10.1177/0010414007305817.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gandhi, Jennifer, Ben Noble, and Milan Svolik. “Legislatures and Legislative Politics Without Democracy.” Comparative Political Studies 53, no. 9 (2020): 1359–79. https://doi.org/10.1177/0010414020919930.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Geddes, Barbara, Joseph Wright, and Erica Frantz. “Autocratic Breakdown and Regime Transitions: A New Data Set.” Perspectives on Politics 12, no. 2 (2014): 313–331. doi:10.1017/S1537592714000851.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gel’man, Vladimir. Authoritarian Russia: Analyzing Post-Soviet Regime Changes. 1st ed. Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh Press, 2015.
   Google Scholar
• Gel’man, Vladimir. “Party Politics in Russia: From Competition to Hierarchy.” Europe-Asia Studies 60, no. 6 (1 August 2008): 913–930.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gerschewski, Johannes. “The Three Pillars of Stability: Legitimation, Repression, and Co-Optation in Autocratic Regimes.” Democratization 20, no. 1 (1 January 2013): 13–38. doi:10.1080/13510347.2013.738860.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Graham, Benjamin A. T., Michael K. Miller, and Kaare W. Strøm. “Safeguarding Democracy: Powersharing and Democratic Survival.” American Political Science Review 111, no. 4 (2017): 686–704.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haspel, Moshe. “Committees in the Russian State Duma: Continuity and Change in Comparative Perspective.” The Journal of Legislative Studies 4, no. 1 (1 March 1998): 188–205. doi:10.1080/13572339808420545.
   Google Scholar
• Huskey, Eugene. Presidential Power in Russia. Armonk, NY: M.E. Sharpe, 1999.
   Google Scholar
• Huskey, Eugene. “The Rise of Contested Politics in Central Asia: Elections in Kyrgyzstan, 1989–90.” Europe-Asia Studies 47, no. 5 (1 July 1995): 813–833. doi:10.1080/09668139508412289.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Isaacs, Rico. “Nur Otan, Informal Networks and the Countering of Elite Instability in Kazakhstan: Bringing the “Formal” Back In.” Europe-Asia Studies 65, no. 6 (1 August 2013): 1055–1079. doi:10.1080/09668136.2013.802547.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Isaacs, Rico. Party System Formation in Kazakhstan: Between Formal and Informal Politics. London and New York: Routledge, 2011.
   Google Scholar
• Juraev, Shairbek. “Kyrgyz Democracy? The Tulip Revolution and Beyond.” Central Asian Survey 27, no. 253–264 (1 December 2008): 253–64.
   Google Scholar
• Khmelko, Irina S., Charles R. Wise, and Trevor L. Brown. “Committees and Legislative Strengthening: The Growing Influence of Committees in Ukraine’s Legislative Process.” The Journal of Legislative Studies 16, no. 1 (2010): 73–95. doi:10.1080/13572330903542084.
   Google Scholar
• Köker, Philipp. “Why Dictators Veto: Legislation, Legitimation and Control in Kazakhstan and Russia.” Democratization 27, no. 2 (2020): 204–223. doi:10.1080/13510347.2019.1678029.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krol, Gerrit. “Legislative Performance of the Russian State Duma: The Role of Parliament in an Authoritarian Regime.” East European Politics 33, no. 4 (2017): 450–71. https://doi.org/10.1080/21599165.2017.1346504.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krol, Gerrit. “Parliamentary Initiative in Authoritarian Regimes: Power Sharing in Eurasian Legislatures.” The Journal of Legislative Studies 26, no. 2 (2020): 248–74. doi:10.1080/13572334.2020.1738671.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laakso, Markku, and Rein Taagepera. “The “Effective” Number of Parties: “A Measure with Application to West Europe”.” Comparative Political Studies 12, no. 1 (1979): 3–27.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lancaster, Thomas. “Electoral Structures and Pork Barrel Politics.” International Political Science Review 7, no. 1 (1986): 67–81.
   Google Scholar
• Levandowsky, Michael, and David Winter. “Distance Between Sets.” Nature 234, no. 5323 (5 November 1971): 34–35. doi:10.1038/234034a0.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levitsky, Steven, and Lucan A. Way. Competitive Authoritarianism: Hybrid Regimes After the Cold War. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2010.
   Google Scholar
• Lijphart, Arend. Parliamentary Versus Presidential Government. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1992.
   Google Scholar
• Linz, Juan J. “Presidential or Parliamentary Democracy: Does It Make a Difference?” In The Crisis of Presidential Democracy: The Latin American Evidence, edited by Juan J. Linz, and A. Valenzuela, 3–87. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1994.
   Google Scholar
• Linz, Juan J. “The Perils of Presidentialism.” Journal of Democracy 1, no. 1 (1990): 51–69.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Linz, Juan J. Totalitarian and Authoritarian Regimes. Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner Publishers, 2000.
   Google Scholar
• Loo, M.P.J. van der. “The Stringdist Package for Approximate String Matching.” The R Journal 6, no. 1 (2014): 111–122.
   Google Scholar
• Lü, Xiaobo, Mingxing Liu, and Feiyue Li. “Policy Coalition Building in an Authoritarian Legislature: Evidence From China’s National Assemblies (1983-2007).” Comparative Political Studies 53, no. 9 (2020): 1380–1416. https://doi.org/10.1177/0010414018797950.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Magaloni, Beatriz. “Credible Power-Sharing and the Longevity of Authoritarian Rule.” Comparative Political Studies 41, no. 715–741 (1 April 2008): 715–41.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Magaloni, Beatriz. Voting for Autocracy: Hegemonic Party Survival and Its Demise in Mexico. Cambridge Studies in Comparative Politics. Cambridge; New York: Cambridge University Press, 2006.
   Google Scholar
• Malesky, Edmund, and Paul Schuler. “Nodding or Needling: Analyzing Delegate Responsiveness in an Authoritarian Parliament.” American Political Science Review 104, no. 3 (2010): 482–502. doi:10.1017/S0003055410000250.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin, Shane. “Committees.” In The Oxford Handbook of Legislative Studies, edited by Shane Martin, Thomas Saalfeld, and Kaare Strøm, 352–368. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Mattson, Ingvar, and Kaare Strøm. “Parliamentary Committees.” In Parliaments and Majority Rule in Western Europe, edited by Herbert Döring, 249–307. Mannheim: Mannheim Centre for European Social Research, 1995.
   Google Scholar
• Melvin, Neil J. “Authoritarian Pathways in Central Asia: A Comparison of Kazakhstan, the Kyrgyz Republic and Uzbekistan.” In Democracy and Pluralism in Muslim Eurasia, edited by Ro’i Yaacov, 119–142. London: Frank Cass, 2004.
   Google Scholar
• Mickler, Tim A. “Who Gets What and Why? Committee Assignments in the German Bundestag.” West European Politics 41, no. 2 (4 March 2018): 517–539. doi:10.1080/01402382.2017.1359461.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Noble, Ben. “Amending Budget Bills in the Russian State Duma.” Post-Communist Economies 29, no. 4 (2 October 2017): 505–522. doi:10.1080/14631377.2017.1333791.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Noble, Ben. “Authoritarian Amendments: Legislative Institutions as Intraexecutive Constraints in Post-Soviet Russia.” Comparative Political Studies 53, no. 9 (2020): 1417–1454. doi:10.1177/0010414018797941.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nurumov, Dmitry, and Vasil Vashchanka. “Constitutional Development of Independent Kazakhstan.” In Semi-Presidentialism in the Caucasus and Central Asia, edited by Robert Elgie and Sophia Moestrup, 143–172. London: Palgrave Macmillan UK, 2016.
   Google Scholar
• O’Donnell, Guillermo A., and Philippe C. Schmitter. Transitions From Authoritarian Rule: Tentative Conclusions About Uncertain Democracies. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1986.
   Google Scholar
• Olcott, Martha Brill. Kazakhstan: Unfulfilled Promise. Washington, DC: Carnegie Endowment for International Peace, 2002.
   Google Scholar
• Pepinsky, Thomas. “The Institutional Turn in Comparative Authoritarianism.” British Journal of Political Science 44, no. 3 (2014): 631–653. doi:10.1017/S0007123413000021.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Popova, Maria. Politicized Justice in Emerging Democracies: A Study of Courts in Russia and Ukraine. 1st ed. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2012.
   Google Scholar
• Ramalho, Esmeralda A., Joaquim J.S. Ramalho, and José M.R. Murteira. “Alternative Estimating and Testing Empirical Strategies for Fractional Regression Models.” Journal of Economic Surveys 25, no. 1 (1 February 2011): 19–68. doi:10.1111/j.1467-6419.2009.00602.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Remington, Thomas F. Politics in Russia. 7th ed. Boston: Routledge, 2011.
   Google Scholar
• Remington, Thomas F., and Steven S. Smith. “The Development of Parliamentary Parties in Russia.” Legislative Studies Quarterly 20, no. 4 (1995): 457–489. doi:10.2307/440189.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reuter, Ora John. The Origins of Dominant Parties : Building Authoritarian Institutions in Post-Soviet Russia. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2017.
   Google Scholar
• Reuter, Ora John, and Jennifer Gandhi. “Economic Performance and Elite Defection From Hegemonic Parties.” British Journal of Political Science 41, no. 1 (January 2011): 83–110. doi:10.1017/S0007123410000293.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reuter, Ora John, and Graeme B. Robertson. “Legislatures, Cooptation, and Social Protest in Contemporary Authoritarian Regimes.” The Journal of Politics 77, no. 1 (2015): 235–248. doi:10.1086/678390.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reuter, Ora John, and Graeme B. Robertson. “Subnational Appointments in Authoritarian Regimes: Evidence From Russian Gubernatorial Appointments.” The Journal of Politics 74, no. 4 (2012): 1023–1037. doi:10.1017/s0022381612000631.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reuter, Ora John, and David Szakonyi. “Elite Defection Under Autocracy: Evidence From Russia.” American Political Science Review 113, no. 2 (May 2019): 552–568. doi:10.1017/S0003055419000030.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reuter, Ora John, and Rostislav Turovsky. “Dominant Party Rule and Legislative Leadership in Authoritarian Regimes.” Party Politics 20, no. 5 (2014): 663–674. doi:10.1177/1354068812448689.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rivera, Mauricio. “Authoritarian Institutions and State Repression: The Divergent Effects of Legislatures and Opposition Parties on Personal Integrity Rights.” Journal of Conflict Resolution 61, no. 10 (2017): 2183–2207. doi:10.1177/0022002716632301.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schedler, Andreas, ed. Electoral Authoritarianism: The Dynamics of Unfree Competition. Boulder, CO: L. Rienner Publishers, Inc, 2006.
   Google Scholar
• Schleiter, P., and E. Morgan-Jones. “Semi-Presidentialism in Russia.” In Semi-Presidentialism in Central and Eastern-Europe, edited by Robert Elgie, and S. Moestrup, 159–179. Manchester: Manchester University Press, 2008.
   Google Scholar
• Schuler, Paul. “Position Taking or Position Ducking? A Theory of Public Debate in Single-Party Legislatures.” Comparative Political Studies 53, no. 9 (2020): 1493–1524. https://doi.org/10.1177/0010414018758765.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sedelius, Thomas, and Sten Berglund. “Towards Presidential Rule in Ukraine: Hybrid Regime Dynamics Under Semi-Presidentialism.” Baltic Journal of Law and Politics 5, no. 1 (2012): 20–45.
   Google Scholar
• Sedelius, Thomas, and Jonas Linde. “Unravelling Semi-Presidentialism: Democracy and Government Performance in Four Distinct Regime Types.” Democratization 25, no. 1 (2 January 2018): 136–157. doi:10.1080/13510347.2017.1334643.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Selznick, Philip. TVA and the Grass Roots: A Study in the Sociology of Formal Organization. Berkeley, California: University of California Press, 1949.
   Google Scholar
• Semenova, Elena. “Patterns of Parliamentary Representation and Careers in Ukraine: 1990–2007.” East European Politics and Societies 26, no. 3 (2012): 538–560. doi:10.1177/0888325412439464.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shepsle, Kenneth A., and Barry R. Weingast. “The Institutional Foundations of Committee Power.” The American Political Science Review 81, no. 1 (1987): 85–104. doi:10.2307/1960780.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shugart, Matthew S., and John M. Carey. Presidents and Assemblies : Constitutional Design and Electoral Dynamics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1992.
   Google Scholar
• Siegler, Robert W. Standing Commissions of the Supreme Soviet: Effective Co-Optation. New York, NY: Praeger, 1982.
   Google Scholar
• Trochev, A. “Meddling with Justice: Competitive Politics, Impunity, and Distrusted Courts in Post-Orange Ukraine.” Demokratizatsiya: The Journal of Post-Soviet Democratization 18, no. 2 (2010): 122–146.
   Google Scholar
• Truex, Rory. “The Returns to Office in a “Rubber Stamp” Parliament.” American Political Science Review 108, no. 2 (2014): 235–251. doi:10.1017/S0003055414000112.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tsebelis, George, and Tatiana P. Rizova. “Presidential Conditional Agenda Setting in the Former Communist Countries.” Comparative Political Studies 40, no. 10 (1 October 2007): 1155–1182. doi:10.1177/0010414006288979.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Whitmore, Sarah. State Building in Ukraine: The Ukrainian Parliament, 1990–2003. 1st ed. London; New York: Routledge, 2004.
   Google Scholar
• Wilkerson, John, David Smith, and Nicholas Stramp. “Tracing the Flow of Policy Ideas in Legislatures: A Text Reuse Approach.” American Journal of Political Science 59, no. 4 (1 October 2015): 943–956.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williamson, Scott, and Beatriz Magaloni. “Legislatures and Policy Making in Authoritarian Regimes.” Comparative Political Studies 53, no. 9 (2020): 1525–43. https://doi.org/10.1177/0010414020912288.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wright, Joseph. “Do Authoritarian Institutions Constrain? How Legislatures Affect Economic Growth and Investment.” American Journal of Political Science 52, no. 2 (2008): 322–343.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wright, Joseph, and Abel Escriba-Folch. “Authoritarian Institutions and Regime Survival: Transitions to Democracy and Subsequent Autocracy.” British Journal of Political Science 42, no. 2 (2012): 283–309.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar