Branching out: Consequences of the dispersion of authoritarian elites across state and government in Latin America

Bibliography

• Albertus, Michael. “The Fate of Former Authoritarian Elites Under Democracy.” Journal of Conflict Resolution 63, no. 3 (2019): 727–759. doi:10.1177/0022002718761791.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Albertus, Michael, and Victor Menaldo. Authoritarianism and the Elite Origins of Democracy. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2018.
   Google Scholar
• Ang, Milena, and Monika Nalepa. “Can Transitional Justice Improve the Quality of Representation in New Democracies?” World Politics 71, no. 4 (2019): 631–666. doi:10.1017/S0043887119000066.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Banks, Arthur. Times Series Data Archive. Jerusalem: Databanks International, 2009.
   Google Scholar
• Bates, Genevieve, Ipek Cinar, and Monika Nalepa. “Accountability by Numbers: A New Global Transitional Justice Dataset (1946–2016).” Perspectives on Politics 18, no. 1 (2020): 161–184. doi:10.1017/S1537592719000756.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blom-Hansen, Jens, Kurt Houlberg, and Søren Serritzlew. “Size, Democracy, and the Economic Costs of Running the Political System.” American Journal of Political Science 58, no. 4 (2014): 790–803. doi:10.1111/ajps.12096.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boix, Carles, Michael Miller, and Sebastian Rosato. “A Complete Data Set of Political Regimes, 1800–2007.” Comparative Political Studies 46, no. 12 (2013): 1523–1554. doi:10.1177/0010414012463905.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cavallo, Ascanio. La historia oculta de la transición: Chile 1990–1998. Santiago: Grijalbo, 1998.
   Google Scholar
• Coppedge, Michael, John Gerring, Carl Henrik Knutsen, Staffan I. Lindberg, Jan Teorell, David Altman, Michael Bernhard, et al. “V-Dem [Country-Year/Country-Date] Dataset v9”, Varieties of Democracy (V-Dem) Project, 2019. https://doi.org/10.23696/vdemcy19.
   Google Scholar
• Díaz Cayeros, Alberto, Federico Estevez, and Beatriz Magaloni. The Political Logic of Poverty Relief: Electoral Strategies and Social Policy in Mexico. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2016.
   Google Scholar
• Garretón, Manuel Antonio. “Atavism and Democratic Ambiguity in the Chilean Right.” In Conservative Parties, the Right, and Democracy in Latin America, edited by Kevin J. Middlebrook, 53–79. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 2000.
   Google Scholar
• Geddes, Barbara, Joseph Wright, and Erica Frantz. “Autocratic Regimes and Transitions.” Perspectives on Politics 12, no. 2 (2014): 313–331. doi:10.1017/S1537592714000851.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gibson, Edward L. Boundary Control: Subnational Authoritarianism in Federal Democracies. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2012.
   Google Scholar
• Grzymala-Busse, Anna M. Redeeming the Communist Past: The Regeneration of Communist Parties in East Central Europe. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2002.
   Google Scholar
• Haber, Stephen, and Victor Menaldo. “Do Natural Resources Fuel Authoritarianism? A Reappraisal of the Resource Curse.” The American Political Science Review 105, no. 1 (2011): 1–26. doi:10.1017/S0003055410000584.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haggard, Stephan, and Robert Kaufman. The Political Economy of Democratic Transitions. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1995.
   Google Scholar
• Huneeus, Carlos. La democracia semisoberana: Chile después de Pinochet. Santiago: Taurus, 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Huneeus, Carlos. La Derecha En El Chile Después de Pinochet: El Caso de La Unión Demócrata Independiente. The Helen Kellogg Institute for International Studies, Working Paper #285, South Bend, IN, 2001.
   Google Scholar
• Huntington, Samuel P. The Third Wave: Democratization in the Late Twentieth Century. Norman: University of Oklahoma Press, 1991.
   Google Scholar
• Karl, Terry Lynn. “Dilemmas of Democratization in Latin America.” Comparative Politics 23, no. 1 (1990): 1–21. doi:10.2307/422302.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klein, Marcus. “The Unión Demócrata Independiente and the Poor (1983–1992): The Survival of Clientelistic Traditions in Chilean Politics.” Jahrbuch für Geschichte Lateinamerikas 41 (2004): 301–324. doi:10.7767/jbla.2004.41.1.301.
   Google Scholar
• Langston, Joy. Democratization and Authoritarian Party Survival: Mexico’s PRI. New York: Oxford University Press, 2017.
   Google Scholar
• Levitsky, Steven, and Maxwell A. Cameron. “Democracy Without Parties? Political Parties and Regime Change in Fujimori’s Peru.” Latin American Politics and Society 45, no. 3 (2003): 1–33.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Loxton, James. “Authoritarian Successor Parties.” Journal of Democracy 26, no. 3 (2015): 157–170. doi:10.1353/jod.2015.0052.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Loxton, James. “Introduction: Authoritarian Successor Parties Worldwide.” In Life After Dictatorship: Authoritarian Successor Parties Worldwide, edited by James Loxton, and Scott Mainwaring, 1–50. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2018.
   Google Scholar
• Loxton, James, and Scott Mainwaring. Life after Dictatorship: Authoritarian Successor Parties Worldwide. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2018.
   Google Scholar
• Luna, Juan Pablo. Segmented Representation: Political Party Strategies in Unequal Democracies. New York: Oxford University Press, 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Mainwaring, Scott, and Aníbal S. Pérez Liñan. Democracies and Dictatorships in Latin America: Emergence, Survival, and Fall. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Marshall, Monty G., Ted Robert Gurr, and Keith Jaggers. Polity IV Project: Dataset Users' Manual. Vienna, VA: Center for Systemic Peace, 2017.
   Google Scholar
• Muñoz, Heraldo. The Dictator’s Shadow: Life under Augusto Pinochet. New York: Basic Books, 2008.
   Google Scholar
• O’Donnell, Guillermo A., and Philippe C. Schmitter. Transitions from Authoritarian Rule: Tentative Conclusions About Uncertain Democracies. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1986.
   Google Scholar
• Olsen, Tricia D., Leigh A. Payne, and Andrew G. Reiter. Transitional Justice in Balance: Comparing Processes, Weighing Efficacy. Washington, DC: U.S. Institute of Peace, 2010.
   Google Scholar
• Pemstein, Daniel, Kyle L. Marquardt, Eitan Tzelgov, Yi-ting Wang, Juraj Medzihorsky, Joshua Krusell, Farhad Miri, and Johannes von Römer. “The V-Dem Measurement Model: Latent Variable Analysis for Cross-National and Cross-Temporal Expert-Coded Data”, V-Dem Working Paper No. 21. 4th edition. University of Gothenburg: Varieties of Democracy Institute, 2019.
   Google Scholar
• Pollack, Marcelo. The New Right in Chile, 1973–97. Basingstoke: Hampshire: Macmillan Press Ltd, 1999.
   Google Scholar
• Power, Timothy. The Political Right in Postauthoritarian Brazil: Elites, Institutions, and Democratization. University Park: Pennsylvania State University Press, 2000.
   Google Scholar
• Przeworski, Adam. Democracy and the Market: Political and Economic Reforms in Eastern Europe and Latin America. New York: Cambridge University Press, 1991.
   Google Scholar
• Przeworski, Adam, Michael E. Alvarez, Josê Antonio Cheibub, and Fernando Limongi. Democracy and Development: Political Institutions and Well-Being in the World, 1950-1990. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2000.
   Google Scholar
• Riedl, Rachel Beatty. Authoritarian Origins of Democratic Party Systems in Africa. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Ross, Michael. “The Politics of the Resource Curse: A Review.” In The Oxford Handbook of Politics of Development, edited by Carol Lancaster, and Nicolas Van de Walle, 200–223. New York: Oxford University Press, 2015.
   Google Scholar
• Sikkink, Kathryn, and Carrie Booth Walling. “The Impact of Human Rights Trials in Latin America.” Journal of Peace Research 44, no. 4 (2007): 427–445. doi:10.1177/0022343307078953.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Slater, Dan, and Joseph Wong. “The Strength to Concede: Ruling Parties and Democratization in Developmental Asia.” Perspectives on Politics 11, no. 03 (2013): 717–733. doi:10.1017/S1537592713002090.
   Google Scholar
• Tanaka, Martín. Democracia sin partidos, Perú, 2000–2005: los problemas de representación y las propuestas de reforma política. Vol. 57. Lima: Instituto de Estudios Peruanos, 2005.
   Google Scholar
• Teorell, Jan. Determinants of Democratization: Explaining Regime Change in the World, 1972–2006. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2010.
   Google Scholar
• Treisman, Daniel. “Income, Democracy, and Leader Turnover.” American Journal of Political Science 59, no. 4 (2015): 927–942. doi:10.1111/ajps.12135.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Valenzuela, Samuel. “Democratic Consolidation in Post-Transitional Settings.” In Issues in Democratic Consolidation: The New South American Democracies in Comparative Perspective, edited by Scott Mainwaring, Guillermo O’Donnell, and Samuel Valenzuela, 57–104. Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press, 1992.
   Google Scholar
• Weeks, Gregory Bart. The Military and Politics in Postauthoritarian Chile. Tuscaloosa: University of Alabama Press, 2003.
   Google Scholar
• Wright, Joseph, and Abel Escribà-Folch. “Authoritarian Institutions and Regime Survival: Transitions to Democracy and Subsequent Autocracy.” British Journal of Political Science 42, no. 2 (2012): 283–309. doi:10.1017/S0007123411000317.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ziblatt, Daniel. Conservative Parties and the Birth of Democracy in Europe. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2017.
   Google Scholar