Pernicious polarization, autocratization and opposition strategies

Bibliography

• Ashdown, Nick. “A Motorcycle-Riding Leftist Feminist Is Coming for Erdogan.” Foreign Policy, May 1.
   Google Scholar
• Bandeira, Luiza, Donara Barojan, Roberta Braga, Jose Luis Peñarredonda, and Maria Fernanda Pérez Argüello. Disinformation in Democracies: Strengthening Digital Resilience in Latin America. Washington, DC: The Atlantic Council, 2019.
   Google Scholar
• Bates, Robert H., Avner Greif, Margaret Levi, Jean-Laurent Rosenthal, and Barry R. Weingast. Analytic Narratives. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1998.
   Google Scholar
• Brumberg, Daniel, and Maryam Ben Salem. “Tunisia's Endless Transition?” Journal of Democracy 31, no. 2 (2020): 110–124.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bueno de Mesquita, Bruce, Alastair Smith, Randolph M. Siverson, and James D. Morrow. The Logic of Political Survival. Cambridge: MIT Press, 2003.
   Google Scholar
• Bunce, Valerie J., and Sharon L. Wolchik. “Defeating Dictators: Electoral Change and Stability in Competitive Authoritarian Regimes.” World Politics 62, no. 1 (2009): 43–86.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carothers, Thomas, and Andrew Donahue. Democracies Divided: The Global Challenge of Political Polarization. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press, 2019.
   Google Scholar
• Chenoweth, Erica, and Orion A. Lewis. “Unpacking Nonviolent Campaigns: Introducing the NAVCO 2.0 Dataset.” Journal of Peace Research 50, no. 3 (2013): 415–423.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coppedge, Michael, et al. “V-Dem [Country–Year/Country–Date] Dataset v10.” Varieties of Democracy (V-Dem) Project, 2020. https://www.v-dem.net/media/filer_public/28/14/28140582-43d6-4940-948f-a2df84a31893/v-dem_codebook_v10.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Croissant, Aurel. “Beating Backsliding? Episodes and Outcomes of Democratic Backsliding in Asia-Pacific in the Period 1950 to 2018.” Heidelberg University, 2019. https://www.uni- Eaton heidelberg.de/md/politik/personal/croissant/s/croissant__2020__beating_backsliding.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Esen, Berk, and Sebnem Gumuscu. “Killing Competitive Authoritarianism Softly: The 2019 Local Elections in Turkey.” South European Society and Politics 24, no. 3 (2019): 317–342.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fish, M. Steven, and Neil Abrams. “The Polarization Paradox.” Journal of Democracy 2 (2020): 182–185.
   Google Scholar
• Galston, William. “The Enduring Vulnerability of Liberal Democracy.” Journal of Democracy 3 (2020): 8–24.
   Google Scholar
• Gamboa, Laura. “Opposition at the Margins: Strategies Against the Erosion of Democracy in Colombia and Venezuela.” Comparative Politics 49, no. 4 (2017): 457–477.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Geddes, Barbara, Joseph Wright, and Erica Frantz. “Autocratic Breakdown and Regime Transitions: A New Data Set.” Perspectives on Politics 12, no. 2 (2014): 313–331.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ginsburg, Tom, and Aziz Huq. “Democracy’s Near Misses.” Journal of Democracy 29, no. 4 (2018): 16–30.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gorokhovskaia, Yana. “What It Takes to Win When the Game Is Rigged: The Evolution of Opposition Electoral Strategies in Moscow, 2012–2017.” Democratization 26, no. 6 (2019): 975–992.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Handlin, Samuel. State Crisis in Fragile Democracies: Polarization and Political Regimes in South America. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2017.
   Google Scholar
• Huntington, Samuel P. The Third Wave: Democratization in the Later 20th Century. Norman: University of Oklahoma Press, 1991.
   Google Scholar
• Iyengar, Shanto, Yphtach Lelkes, and Matthew Levendusky. “The Origins and Consequences of Affective Polarization in the United States.” Annual Review of Political Science 22, no. 1 (2019): 129–146.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Iyengar, Shanto, and Sean J. Westwood. “Fear and Loathing Across Party Lines: New Evidence on Group Polarization.” American Journal of Political Science 59, no. 3 (2015): 690.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khadiagala, Gilbert M. “Persistent Ethnic Polarization in Kenya.” In Democracies Divided: The Global Challenge of Political Polarization, edited by Tom Carothers, and Andrew O’Donohue, 38–64. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press, 2019.
   Google Scholar
• Kmenta, Jan. Elements of Econometrics. 2nd ed. New York: Macmillan, 1971.
   Google Scholar
• Kuisz, Jarosław, and Karolina Wigura. “The Pushback against Populism: Reclaiming the Politics of Emotion.” Journal of Democracy 31, no. 2 (2020): 41–53.
   Google Scholar
• Laebens, Melis G., and Anna Lührmann. "What Stops Democratic Erosion? The Role of Institutions of Accountability." Paper presented at “Berlin Democracy Conference,” Berlin. https://gupea.ub.gu.se/bitstream/2077/64508/1/gupea_2077_64508_1.pdf, 2019.
   Google Scholar
• LeBas, Adrienne, and Ngonidzashe Munemo. “Elite Conflict, Compromise, and Enduring Authoritarianism: Polarization in Zimbabwe, 1980–2008.” The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 681, no. 1 (2019): 209–226. doi:10.1177/0002716218813897.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levitsky, Steven, and Daniel Ziblatt. How Democracies Die. New York: Crown, 2018.
   Google Scholar
• Lührmann, Anna, and Staffan I. Lindberg. “A Third Wave of Autocratization Is Here: What Is New About It?” Democratization 26, no. 7 (2019): 1095–1113.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lührmann, Anna, et al. “Democracy Facing Global Challenges: V-Dem Annual Democracy Report 2019.” V-Dem Institute, May 2019. https://www.v-dem.net/media/filer_public/99/de/99dedd73-f8bc-484c-8b91-44ba601b6e6b/v-dem_democracy_report_2019.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• McAdam, Doug, and Sidney Tarrow. “Ballots and Barricades: On the Reciprocal Relationship between Elections and Social Movements.” Perspectives on Politics 8, no. 2 (2010): 529–42.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCoy, Jennifer, and Francisco Diez. International Mediation in Venezuela. Washington, D.C: United States Institute of Peace, 2011.
   Google Scholar
• McCoy, Jennifer, Tahmina Rahman, and Murat Somer. “Polarization and the Global Crisis of Democracy: Common Patterns, Dynamics, and Pernicious Consequences for Democratic Polities.” American Behavioral Scientist 62, no. 1 (2018): 16–42.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jennifer McCoy and Murat Somer, eds. “Polarizing Polities: A Global Threat to Democracy.” Special Volume in The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 61, no. 1 (2019).
   Google Scholar
• McCoy, Jennifer, and Murat Somer. “Toward a Theory of Pernicious Polarization and How It Harms Democracies: Comparative Evidence and Possible Remedies.” The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 681, no. 1 (2019): 234–71.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mietzner, Marcus. “Sources of Resistance to Democratic Decline: Indonesian Civil Society and Its Trials.” Democratization 0, no. 0 (July 24, 2020): 1–18.
   Google Scholar
• Pantoulas, Dimitris, and Jennifer McCoy. “Venezuela: an Unstable Equilibrium.” Revista de Ciencias Políticas 32, no. 2 (2019): 391–408.
   Google Scholar
• Partisi, Cumhuriyet Halk. Book of Radical Love (within-Party Educational Material), 2019. http://dijitalmecmua.chp.org.tr/CHPRadikal%20SevgiKitabiEng.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Pelke, Lars, and Aurel Croissant. “Conceptualizing and Measuring Autocratization Episodes.” Working Paper, 2020.
   Google Scholar
• Przeworski, Adam. Democracy and the Market: Political and Economic Reforms in Eastern Europe and Latin America. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1991.
   Google Scholar
• Selçuk, Orçun, and Dilara Hekimci. “The Rise of the Democracy – Authoritarianism Cleavage and Opposition Coordination in Turkey (2014–2019).” Democratization (2020): 1–19. doi:10.1080/13510347.2020.1803841.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shin, Gi-Wook. “South Korea's Democratic Decay.” Journal of Democracy 31, no. 3 (2020): 100–114.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Slater, Dan, and Aries A. Arugay. “Polarizing Figures: Executive Power and Institutional Conflict in Asian Democracies.” American Behavioral Scientist 62, no. 1 (2018): 92–106.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Somer, Murat. “Moderate Islam and Secularist Opposition in Turkey: Implications for the World, Muslims and Secular Democracy.” Third World Quarterly 28, no. 7 (2007): 1271–89.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Somer, Murat. “Turkey: The Slippery Slope from Reformist to Revolutionary Polarization and Democratic Breakdown.” The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 681, no. 1 (2019): 42–61.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sözen, Yunus. “Competition in a Populist Authoritarian Regime: The June 2018 Dual Elections in Turkey.” South European Society and Politics 24, no. 3 (2019): 287–315.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Svolik, Milan W. The Politics of Authoritarian Rule. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2012.
   Google Scholar
• Svolik, Milan W. “Polarization versus Democracy.” Journal of Democracy 30, no. 3 (2019): 20–32.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Teorell, Jan, and Michael Wahman. “Institutional Stepping Stones for Democracy: How and Why Multipartyism Enhances Democratic Change.” Democratization 25, no. 1 (2018): 78–97.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ufen, Andreas. “Opposition in Transition: Pre-Electoral Coalitions and the 2018 Electoral Breakthrough in Malaysia.” Democratization 27, no. 2 (2019): 167–84.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wuthrich, F. Michael, and Melvyn Ingleby. “The Pushback Against Populism: Running on ‘Radical Love’ in Turkey.” Journal of Democracy 31, no. 2 (2020): 24–40.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xiao, Jenny. “How to Defeat Populism: Three Lessons from Slovakia.” Social Science Research Council (blog), September 3, 2019. https://items.ssrc.org/democracy-papers/how-to-defeat-populism-three-lessons-from-slovakia/.
   Google Scholar
• Yarwood, Janette. “The Struggle Over Term Limits in Africa: The Power of Protest.” Journal of Democracy 27, no. 3 (2016): 51–60. https://muse.jhu.edu/article/623606/pdf.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar