Biometrics and the disciplining of democracy: technology, electoral politics, and liberal interventionism in Chad

References

• Abrahamsen, R. “African democracy – still disciplined after all these years?” International Relations 27, no. 2 (2013): 241–246.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Abrahamsen, R. Disciplining Democracy: Development Discourse and Good Governance in Africa. London: Zed Books, 2000.
   Google Scholar
• Abdelnour, S., and A. M. Saeed. “Technologizing Humanitarian Space: Darfur Advocacy and the Rape-Stove Panacea.” International Political Sociology 8, no. 2 (2014): 145–163.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• African Union. “Preliminary Declaration: African Union Electoral Observation Mission for the Presidential Election in Chad Republic.” N’Djamena, 12 April 2016.
   Google Scholar
• Ahmat Ali Hissein. Bureau Permanent des Elections, “Le recensement électoral biométrique de la population : une approche fondamentale dans le développement des registres électoraux permanents.” Communication at the Government Forum on Electronic Identity in Africa, ID4Africa, Kigali, 3 June 2016.
   Google Scholar
• Andreas, P. “A Tale of Two Borders: The U.S.-Mexico and U.S.-Canada Lines After 9-11.” In The Rebordering of North America: Integration and Exclusion in a New Security Context, edited by P. Andreas, and T. J. Biersteker, 1–23. New York: Routledge, 2003.
   Google Scholar
• Awenengo Dalberto, S. and R. Banégas. eds. Identification and Citizenship in Africa. Biometrics, the Documentary State and Bureaucratic Writings of the Self, New York: Routledge, 2021.
   Google Scholar
• Barma, A. Y. “Tchad : l’addition salée des 235 jours de restriction d’accès à Internet.” La Tribune Afrique (7 December 2016).
   Google Scholar
• Breckenridge, K. Biometric State: The Global Politics of Identification and Surveillance in South Africa, 1850 to the Present. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press, 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Bush, S. The Taming of Democracy Assistance: Why Democracy Promotion Does Not Confront Dictators. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press, 2015.
   Google Scholar
• Carapico, S. Political Aid and Arab Activism: Democracy Promotion, Justice, and Representation. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press, 2013.
   Google Scholar
• CENI (INEC). Guide méthodologique de sensibilisation électorale pour les organisations de la société civile tchadienne : élection présidentielle. N’Djamena, 2016.
   Google Scholar
• CENI (INEC), Rapport final sur le processus électoral 2013-2016. N’Djamena, 2016.
   Google Scholar
• Cheeseman, N., G. Lynch, and J. Willis. “Digital Dilemmas: The Unintended Consequences of Election Technology.” Democratization 25, no. 8 (2018): 1397–1418.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coordination des Partis Politiques pour la Défense de la Constitution (CPDC). Communiqué de presse n°001/CPDC/2016, 20 January 2016.
   Google Scholar
• de Bruijn, M. “The Impossibility of Civil Organizations in Post-war Chad.” In Alice Bellagamba, A and G. Klute eds, Beside the State: Emergent Powers in Contemporary Africa, 89–105. Cologne: Rüdiger Köppe Verlag, 2008.
   Google Scholar
• Debos, M. “Legible Bodies and Lives: How a Biometric Registration Campaign Reinvented the Chadian population.” In Identification and Citizenship in Africa: Biometrics, the Documentary State and Bureaucratic Writings of the Self, edited by S. Awenengo Dalberto, and R. Banégas, 65–75. New York: Routledge, 2021.
   Google Scholar
• Debos, M. “La biométrie électorale au Tchad: Controverses technopolitiques et imaginaires de la modernité.” Politique africaine 151 (2018): 101–120.
   Google Scholar
• Debos, M. Living by the Gun in Chad: Combatants, Impunity, and State Formation. London: Zed Books, 2016.
   Google Scholar
• Debrah, E., J. Effah, and I. Owusu-Mensah. “Does the Use of a Biometric System Guarantee an Acceptable Election’s Outcome? Evidence from Ghana’s 2012 Election.” African Studies 78, no. 3 (2018): 347–369.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Donovan, K. “The Biometric Imaginary: Bureaucratic Technopolitics in Post-Apartheid Welfare.” Journal of Southern African Studies 41, no. 4 (2015): 815–833.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Epstein, C. “Guilty bodies, productive bodies, destructive bodies: Crossing the biometric borders.” International Political Sociology 1, no. 2 (2007): 149–164.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• European Union, Electoral Observation Mission. Tchad: rapport final sur les élections législatives du 13 février 2011. 2011.
   Google Scholar
• Evrensel, A. ed., Voter Registration in Africa: A Comparative Analysis. EISA, 2010.
   Google Scholar
• Frowd, P. M. “The Promises and Pitfalls of Biometric Security Practices in Senegal.” International Political Sociology 11, no. 4 (2017): 343–359.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gelb, A., and A. Diofasi. “Biometric Elections in Poor Countries: Wasteful or a Worthwhile Investment?” Review of Policy Research 36, no. 3 (2019): 318–340.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Golden, M., E. Kramon, and G. Ofosu. “Electoral Fraud and Biometric Identification Machine Failure in a Competitive Democracy.” Working paper, 2015.
   Google Scholar
• Guilhot, N. The Democracy Makers: Human Rights and the Politics of Global Order. New York: Columbia University Press, 2005.
   Google Scholar
• Hagmann, T. and F. Reyntjens eds. Aid and Authoritarianism in Africa: Development without Democracy. London: Zed Books, 2016.
   Google Scholar
• Hersey, F. “Digital ID in Africa this Week: Data Protection in Togo, Biometrics Secure Welfare Payments in Zambia.” Biometricupdate.com, October 25, 2019. Accessed April 30, 2020. https://www.biometricupdate.com/201910/digital-id-in-africa-this-week-data-protection-in-togo-biometrics-secure-welfare-payments-in-zambia.
   Google Scholar
• ICG. Chad: A New Conflict Resolution Framework, Crisis Group Africa Report no. 144, September 24, 2008. Accessed December 12, 2020. https://www.crisisgroup.org/africa/central-africa/chad/chad-new-conflict-resolution-framework.
   Google Scholar
• International IDEA. ICTS in elections database, Accessed December 18, 2020. https://www.idea.int/data-tools/continent-view/Africa/61.
   Google Scholar
• Jacobsen, K. L. “Biometric Voter Registration: A New Modality of Democracy Assistance?” Cooperation and Conflict 55, no. 1 (2019): 1–22.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jacobsen, K. L. “Experimentation in Humanitarian Locations: UNHCR and Biometric Registration of Afghan Refugees.” Security Dialogue 46, no. 2 (2015): 144–164.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kurki, M. Democratic Futures: Revisioning Democracy Promotion. New York: Routledge, 2013.
   Google Scholar
• LTDH. Rapport sur la situation des droits de l’Homme du 1er janvier au 31 décembre 2016. N’Djamena: Ligue Tchadienne des Droits de l’Homme, 2017.
   Google Scholar
• Lyon, D. Identifying Citizens: ID Cards as Surveillance. Cambridge: Polity, 2009.
   Google Scholar
• Magnet, S. When biometrics fails: Gender, Race and the Technology of Identity. Durham: Duke University Press, 2011.
   Google Scholar
• Maguire, M., U. Rao, and N. Zurawski. eds. Bodies as Evidence: Security, Knowledge and Power, Durham: Duke University Press, 2018.
   Google Scholar
• Makulilo, A. “Rebooting democracy? Political data mining and biometric voter registration in Africa.” Information & Communications Technology Law 26, no. 2 (2017): 198–212.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Manatouma, K. Identifier les individus au Tchad: Politiques et pratiques des papiers d’identité. PhD thesis in Political Science. Paris: University Paris Nanterre, 2020.
   Google Scholar
• Marchal, R. “An Emerging Military Power in Central Africa? Chad Under Idriss Déby.” Sociétés politiques comparées, no. 40 (2016): 2–20.
   Google Scholar
• Markó, F. D. “’We Are not a Failed State, We Make the Best Passports’: South Sudan and Biometric Modernity.” African Studies Review 59, no. 2 (2016): 113–132.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morozov, E. To Save Everything, Click Here: The Folly of Technological Solutionism. New York: Public Affairs, 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Nyabola, N. Digital Democracy, Analog Politics: How the Internet Era is Transforming Politics in Kenya. London: Zed Books, 2018.
   Google Scholar
• Orji, N. “The 2015 Nigerian General Elections.” Africa Spectrum 50, no. 2 (2015): 73–85.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Passanti, C., and M.-E. Pommerolle. ““The Politics of Knowledge, Trust and Truth: Electoral Technology in Kenyan Elections,” communication at the “Empire of the digital” conference.” IFRA Nairobi (May 2018): 21–22.
   Google Scholar
• Peiffer, C., and P. Englebert. “Extraversion, Vulnerability to Donors, and Political Liberalization in Africa.” African Affairs 111, no. 444 (2012): 355–78.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Piccolino, G. “Infrastructural State Capacity for Democratization? Voter Registration and Identification in Côte d’Ivoire and Ghana Compared.” Democratization 23, no. 3 (2016): 498–519.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Privacy International. “Biometrics: Friend or Foe of Privacy?” 2013. Accessed August 20, 2020. https://www.privacyinternational.org/sites/default/files/Biome trics_Friend_or_foe.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Report of the Commission of Inquiry into the Events of 28 January to 8 February 2008 and its Consequences. N’Djamena, September 2008.
   Google Scholar
• RFI. “On ne peut pas renvoyer aux calendes grecques les législatives.” [online], RFI, 7 July 2020. Accessed December 14, 2020. https://www.rfi.fr/fr/podcasts/20200707-l%C3%A9gislatives-tchad-nous-demandons-que-le-pouvoir-arr%C3%AAte-s-ing%C3%A9rer.
   Google Scholar
• RFI. “Au Tchad, le président Déby annonce le report des législatives ‘sine die’.” [online], RFI, February 3, 2017. Accessed April 21, 2019. www.rfi.fr/afrique/20170203-tchad-le-president-annonce-le-report-legislatives-sine-die.
   Google Scholar
• Scott, J. Seeing Like a State: How Certain Schemes to Improve the Human Condition Have Failed. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1999.
   Google Scholar
• Themnér, A. ed, Warlord Democrats in Africa: Ex-Military Leaders and Electoral Politics. London: Zed Books, 2017.
   Google Scholar
• Tubiana, J., and M. Debos. Déby’s Chad: Political Manipulation at Home, Military Intervention Abroad, Challenging Times Ahead, Peaceworks no. 136, United States Institute of Peace, 2017.
   Google Scholar
• UNDP. Évaluation finale du Projet d’appui au cycle électoral au Tchad. New York: UNDP, 2017.
   Google Scholar
• Van der Ploeg, I. “Biometrics and the body as information: Normative issues of the socio-technical coding of the body.” In Playing the Identity Card: Surveillance, Security and Identification in Global Perspective, edited by C. J. Bennett, and D. Lyon, 57–73. New York: Routledge, 2008.
   Google Scholar
• Van der Straaten, J. “Of Democracy, and Elections—in Reverse”, 3rd Colloquium of the Bhalisa Identity Expert Group, University of Cambridge, 19-20 March 2019.
   Google Scholar
• Wang, T. Voter Identification Requirements and Public International Law: An Examination of Africa and Latin America. Atlanta: The Carter Center, 2012.
   Google Scholar
• Yard, M. ed. Civil and Voter Registries: Lessons Learned from Global Experiences. Washington, DC: IFES, 2011.
   Google Scholar