Weak agency and preferences for participatory democracy: discourses of Spanish people in positions of socioeconomic disadvantage

Bibliography

• Baiocchi, Gianpaolo, and Ernesto Ganuza. Popular Democracy. Standford, CA: Stanford University Press, 2017.
   Google Scholar
• Bedock, Camille. “Citizens’ Contrasting Aspirations About Their Political System: Entrustment, Participation, Identification and Control.” Frontiers in Political Science 2, no. 2 (2020): 563351.
   Google Scholar
• Bedock, Camille, and Jean-Benoit Pilet. “Enraged, Engaged, or Both? A Study of the Determinants of Support for Consultative vs. Binding Mini-Publics.” Representation (2020). doi:10.1080/00344893.2020.1778511.
   Google Scholar
• Bedock, Camille, and Jean-Benoit Pilet. “Who Supports Citizens Selected by Lot to be the Main Policymakers? A Study of French Citizens.” Government and Opposition 56, no. 3 (2020): 485–504.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bengtsson, Åsa. “Citizens’ Perceptions of Political Processes. A Critical Evaluation of Preference Consistency and Survey Items.” Revista Internacional de Sociología 70, no. 2 (2012): 45–64.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bengtsson, Åsa, and Mikko Mattila. “Direct Democracy and Its Critics: Support for Direct Democracy and ‘Stealth’ Democracy in Finland.” West European Politics 32, no. 5 (2009): 1031–1048.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bourdieu, Pierre. “La représentation politique.” Actes de la recherche en sciences sociales 36, no. 1 (1981): 3–24.
   Google Scholar
• Bowler, Shaun, and Tedd Donovan. “Democracy, Institutions and Attitudes About Citizen Influence on Government.” British Journal of Political Science 32, no. 2 (2002): 371–390.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bowler, Shaun, Tedd Donovan, and Jeffrey A. Karp. “Enraged or Engaged? Preferences for Direct Citizen Participation in Affluent Democracies.” Political Research Quarterly 60, no. 3 (2007): 356.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burawoy, Michael. “The Roots of Domination: Beyond Bourdieu and Gramsci.” Sociology 46, no. 2 (2012): 187–206.
   Google Scholar
• Canovan, Margaret. “Trust the People! Populism and the two Faces of Democracy.” Political Studies 47, no. 1 (1997): 2–16.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ceka, Besir, and Pedro C. Magalhaes. “Do the Rich and the Poor Have Different Conceptions of Democracy? Socioeconomic Status: Inequality, and the Political Status quo.” Comparative Politics 52, no. 3 (2020): 383–412.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coffé, Hilde, and Ank Michels. “Education and Support for Representative: Direct and Stealth Democracy.” Electoral Studies 35 (2014): 1–11.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Collingwood, Loren. “Levels of Education and Support for Direct Democracy.” American Politics Research 40, no. 4 (2012): 571–602.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dalton, Russell J., Wilhelm P. Burklin, and Andrew Drummond. “Public Opinion and Direct Democracy.” Journal of Democracy 12, no. 4 (2001): 141–153.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Del Río, Adrian, Clemente Navarro, and Joan Font. “Citizens, Politicians and Experts in Political Decision-Making: The Importance of Perceptions of the Qualities of Political Actors.” Revista Española de Investigaciones Sociológicas 154, no. 1 (2016): 83–120.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Díaz-Parra, Iban, and Jaime Jover. “Social Movements in Crisis? From the 15-M Movement to the Electoral Shift in Spain.” International Journal of Sociology and Social Policy 36, no. 9/10 (2016): 680–694.
   Google Scholar
• Fernández-Ballesteros, Rocío, Juan Díez-Nicolás, Gian Caprara, Claudio Barbaranelli, and Albert Bandura. “Determinants and Structural Relation of Personal Efficacy to Collective Efficacy.” Applied Psychology 51, no. 1 (2002): 107–125.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fernández-Martínez, José Luis, and Joan Font. “The Devil is in the Detail: What Do Citizens Mean When They Support Stealth or Participatory Democracy?” Politics 38, no. 4 (2018): 458–479.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fishman, Robert. Democratic Practice: Origins of the Iberian Divide in Political Inclusion. New York: Oxford University Press, 2019.
   Google Scholar
• Font, Joan, and Clemente Navarro. “Personal Experience and the Evaluation of Participatory Instruments in Spanish Cities.” Public Administration 91, no. 3 (2013): 616–631.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Font, Joan, Clemente Navarro, Magdalena Wojcieszak, and Pau Alarcón. ¿Democracia sigilosa en España? Preferencias de la ciudadanía española sobre las formas de decisión política y sus factores explicativos. Madrid: CIS, 2012.
   Google Scholar
• Fraile, Marta, Mariona Ferrer, and Irene Martín. Jóvenes, conocimiento político y participación. Madrid: CIS, 2007.
   Google Scholar
• Fung, Archon, and Erik O. Wright. “Deepening Democracy: Innovations in Empowered Participatory Governance.” Politics & Society 29, no. 1 (2012): 5–41.
   Google Scholar
• Gamson, William A. Talking Politics. New York: Cambridge University Press, 1992.
   Google Scholar
• García-Espín, Patricia, and Ernesto Ganuza. “Participatory Skepticism: Ambivalence and Conflict in Popular Discourses of Participatory Democracy.” Qualitative Sociology 40, no. 4 (2017): 425–446.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gherghina, Sergiu, and Brigitte Geissel. “Linking Democratic Preferences and Political Participation: Evidence from Germany.” Political Studies Review 65, no. 1 (2017): 24–42.
   Google Scholar
• Gherghina, Sergiu, and Brigitte Geissel. “Support for Direct and Deliberative Models of Democracy in the UK: Understanding the Difference.” Political Research Exchange 2, no. 1 (2020): 1809474.
   Google Scholar
• Hibbing, John R., and Elizabeth Theiss-Morse. Stealth Democracy: Americans’ Beliefs About how Government Should Work. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2002.
   Google Scholar
• Jacquet, Vincent, Christoph Niessen, and Min Reuchamps. “Sortition, Its Advocates and Its Critics: An Empirical Analysis of Citizens’ and MPs’ Support for Random Selection as a Democratic Reform Proposal.” International Political Science Review (2020). doi:10.1177/0192512120949958.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lupien, Pascal. “Participatory Democracy and Ethnic Minorities: Opening Inclusive New Spaces or Reproducing Inequalities?” Democratization 25, no. 7 (2018): 1251–1269.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McHugh, Declan. “Wanting to be Heard But Not Wanting to Act? Addressing Political Disengagement.” Parliamentary Affairs 59, no. 3 (2006): 546–552.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morgan, David L. “Focus Groups.” Annual Review of Sociology 22, no. 2 (1996): 129–152.
   Google Scholar
• Moscovici, Serge. Social Representations: Essays in Social Psychology. New York: NYU Press, 2001.
   Google Scholar
• Mudde, Cas. “The Populist Zeitgeist.” Government and Opposition 39, no. 4 (2004): 541–563.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Navarro, Clemente. “Procesos y confianza política: quiénes deben ser virtuosos.” In ¿“Democracia sigilosa” en España?, edited by Joan Font et al., 83–98. Madrid: CIS, 2012.
   Google Scholar
• Neblo, Michael A., Kevin M. Esterling, Ryan P. Kennedy, David M.J. Lazer, and Anand E. Sokhey “Who Wants to Deliberate—and why?” American Political Science Review 104, no. 3 (2010): 566–583.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pollock III, Philip H. “The Participatory Consequences of Internal and External Political Efficacy: A Research Note.” Western Political Quarterly 36, no. 3 (1983): 400–409.
   Google Scholar
• Shingles, Richard D. “Black Consciousness and Political Participation: The Missing Link.” The American Political Science Review 75 (1981): 76–91.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stoker, Gerry, and Colin Hay. “Understanding and Challenging Populist Negativity Towards Politics: The Perspectives of British Citizens.” Political Studies 65, no. 1 (2017): 4–23.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stoker, Gerry, Colin Hay, and Matthew Barr. “Fast Thinking: Implications for Democratic Politics.” European Journal of Political Research 55, no. 1 (2016): 3–21.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Torcal, Mariano. “The Decline of Political Trust in Spain and Portugal: Economic Performance or Political Responsiveness?” American Behavioral Scientist 58, no. 12 (2014): 1542–1567.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walsh, Katherine, Kent Jennings, and Laura Stoker. “The Effects of Social Class Identification on Participatory Orientations Towards Government.” British Journal of Political Science 34, no. 3 (2004): 469–495.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Webb, Paul. “Who is Willing to Participate? Dissatisfied Democrats, Stealth Democrats and Populists in the United Kingdom.” European Journal of Political Research 52 (2013): 747–772.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wright, Erik Olin. Comprender las clases sociales. Madrid: Ediciones Akal, 2018.
   Google Scholar
• Yanow, Dvora. “Interpretive Analysis and Comparative Research.” In Comparative Policy Studies, edited by Isabelle Engeli, and Christine Rothmayr Allison, 131–159. London: Palgrave Macmillan, 2014.
   Google Scholar