Regime types and winner-loser Gaps in support for democracy in East Asia

Bibliography

• Anderson, C. J., A. Blais, S. Bowler, T. Donovan, and O. Listhaug. Losers’ Consent: Elections and Democratic Legitimacy. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2005.
   Google Scholar
• Anderson, C. J., and A. J. LoTempio. “Winning, Losing and Political Trust in America.” British Journal of Political Science 32, no. 2 (2002): 335–51.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anderson, C. J., and C. A. Guillory. “Political Institutions and Satisfaction with Democracy: A Cross-National Analysis of Consensus and Majoritarian Systems.” The American Political Science Review 91, no. 1 (1997): 66–81.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anderson, C. J., and S. M. Mendes. “Learning to Lose: Election Outcomes,: Democratic Experience and Political Protest Potential.” British Journal of Political Science 36, no. 1 (2006): 91–111.
   Google Scholar
• Anderson, C. J., and Y. V. Tverdova. “Corruption,: Political Allegiances, and Attitudes Toward Government in Contemporary Democracies.” American Journal of Political Science 47, no. 1 (2003): 91–109.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anderson, C. J., and Y. V. Tverdova. “Winners,: Losers, and Attitudes About Government in Contemporary Democracies.” International Political Science Review 22, no. 4 (2001): 321–338.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aspinall, E., N. Rohman, A. Z. Hamdi, Rubaidi, and Z. E. Triantini. “Vote Buying in Indonesia: Candidate Strategies, Market Logic and Effectiveness.” Journal of East Asian Studies 17, no. 1 (2017): 1–27. https://doi.org/10.1017/jea.2016.31.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Banducci, S. A., and J. A. Karp. “How Elections Change the Way Citizens View the Political System: Campaigns,: Media Effects and Electoral Outcomes in Comparative Perspective.” British Journal of Political Science 33, no. 3 (2003): 443–467.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bartels, Larry M. “Ethnic Antagonism Erodes Republicans’ Commitment to Democracy.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 117, no. 37 (2020): 22752–22759.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bernauer, J., and A. Vatter. “Can't Get No Satisfaction with the Westminster Model? Winners,: Losers and the Effects of Consensual and Direct Democratic Institutions on Satisfaction with Democracy.” European Journal of Political Research 51, no. 4 (2012): 435–468.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bratton, Michael. “The Meanings of Democracy: Anchoring the “D-Word” in Africa.” Journal of Democracy 21, no. 4 (2010): 106–113. doi:10.1353/jod.2010.0006.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Callahan, W. A. “Social Capital and Corruption: Vote Buying and the Politics of Reform in Thailand.” Perspectives on Politics 3, no. 3 (2005): 495–508.
   Google Scholar
• Canare, T. A., R. U. Mendoza, and M. A. Lopez. “An Empirical Analysis of Vote Buying among the Poor: Evidence from Elections in the Philippines.” South East Asia Research 26, no. 1 (2018): 58–84.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carothers, T. “The End of the Transition Paradigm.” Journal of Democracy 13, no. 1 (2002): 5–21.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chang, Y. T., Y. H. Chu, and C. M. Park. “Authoritarian Nostalgia in Asia.” Journal of Democracy 18, no. 3 (2007): 66–80.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chu, Y. H., L. Diamond, A. J. Nathan, and D. C. Shin. “Introduction: Comparative Perspectives on Democratic Legitimacy in East Asia.” In How East Asians View Democracy, edited by Y. H. Chu, L. Diamond, A. J. Nathan, and D. C. Shin, 1–38. New York: Columbia University Press, 2008.
   Google Scholar
• Chu, Y. H., and M. H. Huang. “The Meanings of Democracy: Solving an Asian Puzzle.” Journal of Democracy 21, no. 4 (2010): 114–122.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Claassen, C. “Does Public Support Help Democracy Survive?” American Journal of Political Science 64, no. 1 (2020): 118–134.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coppedge, M., J. Gerring, C. H. Knutsen, S. I. Lindberg, J. Teorell, D. Altman, M. Bernhard, et al. V-Dem [Country–Year/Country–Date] Dataset v10. Varieties of Democracy (V-Dem) Project, 2020.
   Google Scholar
• Craig, S. C., M. D. Martinez, J. Gainous, and J. G. Kane. “Winners,: Losers, and Election Context: Voter Responses to the 2000 Presidential Election.” Political Research Quarterly 59, no. 4 (2006): 579–592.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Curini, L., W. Jou, and V. Memoli. “Satisfaction with Democracy and the Winner/Loser Debate: The Role of Policy Preferences and Past Experience.” British Journal of Political Science 42, no. 2 (2012): 241–261.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Curini, L., and W. Jou. “The Conditional Impact of Winner/Loser Status and Ideological Proximity on Citizen Participation.” European Journal of Political Research 55, no. 4 (2016): 767–788.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dahl, R. A. Polyarchy: Participation and Opposition. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1971.
   Google Scholar
• Dahlberg, S., and J. Linde. “The Dynamics of the Winner–Loser Gap in Satisfaction with Democracy: Evidence from a Swedish Citizen Panel.” International Political Science Review 38, no. 5 (2017): 625–641.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dahlum, S., and C. Knutsen. “Democracy by Demand? Reinvestigating the Effect of Self-Expression Values on Political Regime Type.” British Journal of Political Science 47, no. 2 (2017): 437–461.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dalton, R. J., D. C. Shin, and W. Jou. “Understanding Democracy: Data from Unlikely Places.” Journal of Democracy 18, no. 4 (2007): 142–156.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Jonge, C. P. K. “Should Researchers Abandon Questions About ‘Democracy’?” Public Opinion Quarterly 80, no. 3 (2016): 694–716.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Diamond, L. Developing Democracy: Toward Consolidation. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1999.
   Google Scholar
• Easton, D. A Systems Analysis of Political Life. New York: John Wiley & Sons, 1965.
   Google Scholar
• Freedom House. Freedom in the World 2018. Accessed 5 March 2020. https://freedomhouse.org/report/freedom-world/freedom-world-2018.
   Google Scholar
• Finkel, S. E., L. Sigelman, and S. Humphries. “Democratic Values and Political Tolerance.” In Measures of Political Attitudes (Revised Edition), edited by J. P. Robinson, P. R. Shaver, and L. S. Wrightsman, 203–296. New York: Academic Press, 1999.
   Google Scholar
• Fuchs, D., G. Guidorossi, and P. Svensson. “Support for the Democratic System.” In Citizens and the State, edited by H.-D. Klingemann, and D. Fuchs, 323–353. New York: Oxford University Press, 1995.
   Google Scholar
• Gandhi, J. Political Institutions Under Dictatorship. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2008.
   Google Scholar
• Greene, K. F. Why Dominant Parties Lose: Mexico's Democratization in Comparative Perspective. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2009.
   Google Scholar
• Goren, P. “Party Identification and Core Political Values.” American Journal of Political Science 49, no. 4 (2005): 881–896.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hansen, S. W., R. Klemmensen, and S. Serritzlew. “Losers Lose More Than Winners Win: Asymmetrical Effects of Winning and Losing in Elections.” European Journal of Political Research 58, no. 4 (2019): 1172–1190.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hsiao, H. H. “Social Foundations of Political Vitality.” In The Vitality of Taiwan: Politics, Economics, Society and Culture, edited by S. Tsang, 37–56. Basingstoke, Hampshire, U.K.: Palgrave Macmillan, 2012.
   Google Scholar
• Huebert, E. T., and A. H. Liu. “Ethnic Identity and Attitudes Toward State Institutions: Evidence of Judicial Legitimacy among the Indigenous in Latin America.” Politics, Groups, and Identities 5, no. 4 (2017): 561–579.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Inglehart, R. Modernization and Postmodernization: Cultural, Economic, and Political Change in 43 Societies. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press, 1997.
   Google Scholar
• Inglehart, R. “How Solid Is Mass Support for Democracy: And How Can We Measure It?” PS: Political Science and Politics 36, no. 1 (2003): 51–57.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Inglehart, R., and C. Welzel. Modernization, Cultural Change, and Democracy: The Human Development Sequence. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2005.
   Google Scholar
• Jou, W. “Political Support from Election Losers in Asian Democracies.” Taiwan Journal of Democracy 5, no. 2 (2009): 145–175.
   Google Scholar
• Kang, W. J. “Democratic Performance and Park Chung-hee Nostalgia in Korean Democracy.” Asian Perspective 40, no. 1 (2016): 51–78.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kingzette, Jon, James N Druckman, Samara Klar, Yanna Krupnikov, Matthew Levendusky, and John Barry Ryan. “How Affective Polarization Undermines Support for Democratic Norms.” Public Opinion Quarterly 85, no. 2 (2021): 663–677.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kirsch, H., and C. Welzel. “Democracy Misunderstood: Authoritarian Notions of Democracy Around the Globe.” Social Forces 98, no. 1 (2019): 59–92.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koo, H. “The Social and Political Character of the Korean Middle Classes.” In Discovery of the Middle Classes in East Asia, edited by H. H. Hsiao, 55–75. Taipei: Institute of Ethnology, Academia Sinica, 1993.
   Google Scholar
• Lee, S. J. “Democratization and Polarization in Korean Society.” Asian Perspective 29, no. 3 (2005): 99–125.
   Google Scholar
• Lelkes, Y. “Affective Polarization and Ideological Sorting: A Reciprocal,: Albeit Weak, Relationship.” The Forum 16, no. 1 (2018): 67–79.
   Google Scholar
• Levitsky, S., and L. Way. Competitive Authoritarianism: Hybrid Regimes After the Cold War. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2010.
   Google Scholar
• Lin, T. M., and Y. H. Chu. “The Structure of Taiwan’s Political Cleavages Toward the 2004 Presidential Election.” Taiwan Journal of Democracy 4, no. 2 (2008): 133–154.
   Google Scholar
• Linde, J., and J. Ekman. “Satisfaction with Democracy: A Note on a Frequently Used Indicator in Comparative Politics.” European Journal of Political Research 42, no. 3 (2003): 391–408.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lipset, S. M. “Some Social Requisites of Democracy: Economic Development and Political Legitimacy.” The American Political Science Review 53, no. 1 (1959): 69–105.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lührmann, A., M. Tannenberg, and S. I. Lindberg. “Regimes of the World (RoW): Opening New Avenues for the Comparative Study of Political Regimes.” Politics and Governance 6, no. 1 (2018): 1–18.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luke, D. Multilevel Modeling. California: Sage, 2004.
   Google Scholar
• Martini, S., and M. Quaranta. “Political Support among Winners and Losers: Within-and Between-Country Effects of Structure,: Process and Performance in Europe.” European Journal of Political Research 58, no. 1 (2019): 341–361.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maseland, R., and A. van Hoorn. “Why Muslims Like Democracy Yet Have So Little of It.” Public Choice 147 (2011): 481–496.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marquez, Xavier. Charismatic Authority and Democratic Legitimation (August 26, 2016). Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3099142 or. doi:10.2139/ssrn.3099142.
   Google Scholar
• Maškarinec, P. “The 2016 Electoral Reform in Mongolia: From Mixed System and Multiparty Competition to FPTP and One-Party Dominance.” Journal of Asian and African Studies 53, no. 4 (2018): 511–531.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moehler, D. C. “Critical Citizens and Submissive Subjects: Election Losers and Winners in Africa.” British Journal of Political Science 39, no. 2 (2009): 345–366.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moehler, D. C., and S. I. Lindberg. “Narrowing the Legitimacy Gap: Turnovers as a Cause of Democratic Consolidation.” Journal of Politics 71, no. 4 (2009): 1448–66.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nadeau, R., and A. Blais. “Accepting the Election Outcome: The Effect of Participation on Losers’ Consent.” British Journal of Political Science 23, no. 4 (1993): 553–563.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ng, M. “Hong Kong,: Singapore, and ‘Asian Values’: Why Asia Needs Democracy.” Journal of Democracy 8, no. 2 (1997): 10–23.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ng, H. Y. “What Drives Young People Into Opposition Parties Under Hybrid Regimes? A Comparison of Hong Kong and Singapore.” Asian Politics & Policy 8 (2016): 436–455. doi:10.1111/aspp.12261.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Norén-Nilsson, Astrid. “Good Gifts,: Bad Gifts, and Rights: Cambodian Popular Perceptions and the 2013 Elections.” Pacific Affairs 89, no. 4 (2016): 795–815. http://www.jstor.org/stable/44874327.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Dwyer, S. “Democracy and Confucian Values.” Philosophy East & West 53, no. 1 (2003): 39–63.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Neill, Daniel C. “Cambodia in 2016: A Tightening Authoritarian Grip.” Asian Survey 57, no. 1 (2017): 180–86. https://www.jstor.org/stable/26367739.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Park, Chong-Min, and Doh Chull Shin. “Do Asian Values Deter Popular Support for Democracy in South Korea?” Asian Survey 46, no. 3 (2006): 341–61. doi:10.1525/as.2006.46.3.341.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pemstein, D., K. L. Marquardt, E. Tzelgov, Y. T. Wang, J. Medzihorsky, J. Krusell, F. Miri, et al. The V-Dem Measurement Model: Latent Variable Analysis for Cross-National and Cross-Temporal Expert-Coded Data.” V-Dem Working Paper No. 21. 5th edition. University of Gothenburg: Varieties of Democracy Institute, 2020.
   Google Scholar
• Rivera-Batiz, F. L. “Democracy,: Governance, and Economic Growth: Theory and Evidence.” Review of Development Economics 6 (2002): 225–247.
   Google Scholar
• Sani, G., and G. Sartori. “Polarization, Fragmentation and Competition in Western Democracies.” In Western European Party Systems: Continuity and Change, edited by H. Daalder, P. Mair, and B. Hills, 307–40. California: Sage, 1983.
   Google Scholar
• Schedler, A., and R. Sarsfield. “Democrats with Adjectives: Linking Direct and Indirect Measures of Democratic Support.” European Journal of Political Research 46, no. 5 (2007): 637–659.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seligson, M. A. The Political Culture of Democracy in Mexico,: Central America and Colombia, 2004. Nashville, Latin American Public Opinion Project-United States Agency for International Development 236 (2004).
   Google Scholar
• Shin, D. C. “Democratization: Perspectives from Global Citizenries.” In The Oxford Handbook of Political Behavior, edited by R. J. Dalton, and H.-D. Klingemann, 259–282. New York: Oxford University Press, 2007.
   Google Scholar
• Shin, D. C., and J. Wells. “Is Democracy the Only Game in Town?” Journal of Democracy 16, no. 2 (2005): 88–101.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Solinger, D. J. “Ending One-Party Dominance: Korea,: Taiwan, Mexico.” Journal of Democracy 12, no. 1 (2001): 30–42.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Teorell, J., M. Coppedge, S.-E. Skaaning, and S. I. Lindberg. “Measuring Polyarchy Across the Globe, 1900–2017.” Studies in Comparative International Development 54, no. 1 (2019): 71–95.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thomassen, J. “Democratic Values.” In The Oxford Handbook of Political Behavior, edited by R. J. Dalton, and H.-D. Klingemann, 418–435. New York: Oxford University Press, 2007.
   Google Scholar
• Ulbricht, T. “Perceptions and Conceptions of Democracy: Applying Thick Concepts of Democracy to Reassess Desires for Democracy.” Comparative Political Studies 51, no. 11 (2018): 1387–1440.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Welzel, C., and A. M. Alvarez. “Enlightening People: The Spark of Emancipative Values.” In The Civic Culture Transformed: From Allegiant to Assertive Citizens, edited by R. J. Dalton, and C. Welzel, 59–89. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Yang, D. D. “Classing Ethnicity. Class, Ethnicity, and the Mass Politics of Taiwan's Democratic Transition.” World Politics 59, no. 4 (2007): 503–538.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar