Who’s to blame for democratic backsliding: populists, presidents or dominant executives?

Bibliography

• Abts, Koen, and Stefan Rummens. “Populism versus Democracy.” Political Studies 55, no. 2 (1 June 2007): 405–24.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Albertazzi, Daniele, and Duncan McDonnell. “Introduction: The Sceptre and the Spectre.” In Twenty-First Century Populism, edited by Daniele Albertazzi and Duncan McDonnell, 1–11. Springer, 2008.
   Google Scholar
• Albertazzi, Daniele, and Sean Mueller. “Populism and Liberal Democracy: Populists in Government in Austria, Italy, Poland and Switzerland.” Government and Opposition 48, no. 3 (July 2013): 343–71.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alemán, José, and David D. Yang. “A Duration Analysis of Democratic Transitions and Authoritarian Backslides.” Comparative Political Studies 44, no. 9 (September 2011): 1123–51.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Andersen, David. “Comparative Democratization and Democratic Backsliding: The Case for a Historical-Institutional Approach.” Comparative Politics 51, no. 4 (1 June 2019): 645–63.
   Google Scholar
• Arditi, Benjamin. “Populism, or, Politics at the Edges of Democracy.” Contemporary Politics 9, no. 1 (March 2003): 17–31.
   Google Scholar
• Bakke, Elisabeth, and Nick Sitter. “The EU’s Enfants Terribles : Democratic Backsliding in Central Europe Since 2010.” Perspectives on Politics 20, no. 1 (March 2022): 22–37.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bakker, Bert N., Gijs Schumacher, and Matthijs Rooduijn. “The Populist Appeal: Personality and Antiestablishment Communication.” The Journal of Politics 83, no. 2 (1 April 2021): 589–601.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bermeo, Nancy. “On Democratic Backsliding.” Journal of Democracy 27, no. 1 (2016): 5–19.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bolt, Jutta, and Jan Luiten van Zanden. “GDP per Capita.” IISH Dataverse, 2015. https://clio-infra.eu/Indicators/GDPperCapita.html.
   Google Scholar
• Canovan, Margaret. “Taking Politics to the People: Populism as the Ideology of Democracy.” In Democracies and the Populist Challenge, 25–44. London: Palgrave Macmillan, 2002.
   Google Scholar
• Canovan, Margaret. “Trust the People! Populism and the Two Faces of Democracy.” Political Studies 47, no. 1 (1 March 1999): 2–16.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carreras, Miguel. “The Evolution of the Study of Executive-Legislative Relations in Latin America: Or How Theory Slowly Catches up with Reality.” Revista Ibero-Americana de Estudos Legislativos 2 (2012): 20–6.
   Google Scholar
• Cheibub, José Antonio. Presidentialism, Parliamentarism, and Democracy. Cambridge: CUP, 2007.
   Google Scholar
• Conaghan, Catherine M. “Ecuador: Correa’s Plebiscitary Presidency.” Journal of Democracy 19, no. 2 (2008): 46–60.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cooper, Phillip J. By Order of the President: The Use and Abuse of Executive Direct Action. Second Edition, Revised and Expanded. Lawrence: University Press of Kansas, 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Corrales, Javier. “Can Anyone Stop the President? Power Asymmetries and Term Limits in Latin America, 1984–2016.” Latin American Politics and Society 58, no. 2 (1 June 2016): 3–25.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dahl, Robert A. “What Political Institutions Does Large-Scale Democracy Require?” Political Science Quarterly 120, no. 2 (2005): 187–97.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Diamond, Larry. “Democratic Regression in Comparative Perspective: Scope, Methods, and Causes.” Democratization 28, no. 1 (2 January 2021): 22–42.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Diamond, Larry. Ill Winds: Saving Democracy from Russian Rage, Chinese Ambition and American Complacency. New York: Penguin Press, 2019.
   Google Scholar
• Dresden, Jennifer Raymond, and Marc Morjé Howard. “Authoritarian Backsliding and the Concentration of Political Power.” Democratization 23, no. 7 (9 November 2016): 1122–43.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Edgell, Amanda B., Matthew C. Wilson, Vanessa A. Boese, and Sandra Grahn. “Democratic Legacies: Using Democratic Stock to Assess Norms, Growth, and Regime Trajectories.” SSRN Scholarly Paper. Rochester, NY: Social Science Research Network, 1 May 2020.
   Google Scholar
• Fariss, Christopher J., Therese Anders, Jonathan N. Markowitz, and Miriam Barnum. “New Estimates of Over 500 Years of Historic GDP and Population Data.” Journal of Conflict Resolution 66, no. 3 (1 April 2022): 553–91.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frantz, Erica, Andrea Kendall-Taylor, Jia Li, and Joseph Wright. “Personalist Ruling Parties in Democracies.” Democratization 29, no. 5 (4 July 2022): 918–38.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Galston, William A. “The Populist Challenge to Liberal Democracy.” Journal of Democracy 29, no. 2 (10 April 2018): 5–19.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gerring, John, Philip Bond, William T. Barndt, and Carola Moreno. “Democracy and Economic Growth: A Historical Perspective.” World Politics 57, no. 3 (April 2005): 323–64.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gerschewski, Johannes. “Erosion or Decay? Conceptualizing Causes and Mechanisms of Democratic Regression.” Democratization 28, no. 1 (2 January 2021): 43–62.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grzymala-Busse, Anna. “How Populists Rule: The Consequences for Democratic Governance.” Polity 51, no. 4 (October 2019): 707–17.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grzymala-Busse, Anna, and Michael McFaul. “Votes for Populists Codebook.” Global Populisms Project. Stanford University, 2020.
   Google Scholar
• Gygli, Savina, Florian Haelg, Niklas Potrafke, and Jan-Egbert Sturm. “The KOF Globalisation Index – Revisited.” The Review of International Organizations 14, no. 3 (1 September 2019): 543–74.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haggard, Stephan, and Robert Kaufman. Backsliding: Democratic Regress in the Contemporary World. 1st ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2021.
   Google Scholar
• Haggard, Stephan, and Robert Kaufman. “The Anatomy of Democratic Backsliding.” Journal of Democracy 32, no. 4 (2021): 27–41.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Helmke, Gretchen. Institutions on the Edge: The Origins and Consequences of Inter-Branch Crises in Latin America. Cambridge Studies in Comparative Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2017.
   Google Scholar
• Hochstetler, Kathryn. “Rethinking Presidentialism: Challenges and Presidential Falls in South America.” Comparative Politics 38, no. 4 (1 July 2006): 401–18.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Houle, Christian, and Paul D. Kenny. “The Political and Economic Consequences of Populist Rule in Latin America.” Government and Opposition 53, no. 2 (April 2018): 256–87.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huntington, Samuel P. “Democracy’s Third Wave.” Journal of Democracy 2, no. 2 (1991): 12.
   Google Scholar
• Jee, Haemin, Hans Lueders, and Rachel Myrick. “Towards a Unified Approach to Research on Democratic Backsliding.” Democratization 29, no. 4 (9 December 2021): 1–14.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Juon, Andreas, and Daniel Bochsler. “Hurricane or Fresh Breeze? Disentangling the Populist Effect on the Quality of Democracy.” European Political Science Review 12, no. 3 (August 2020): 391–408.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kelemen, R. Daniel. “Europe’s Other Democratic Deficit: National Authoritarianism in Europe’s Democratic Union.” Government and Opposition 52, no. 2 (April 2017): 211–38.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kellam, Marisa, and Elizabeth A. Stein. “Silencing Critics: Why and How Presidents Restrict Media Freedom in Democracies.” Comparative Political Studies 49 (2016): 36–77.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kenny, Paul D. ““The Enemy of the People”: Populists and Press Freedom.” Political Research Quarterly 73, no. 2 (1 June 2020): 261–75.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim, Young Hun, and Donna Bahry. “Interrupted Presidencies in Third Wave Democracies.” The Journal of Politics 70, no. 3 (July 2008): 807–22.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laclau, Ernesto. On Populist Reason. London: Verso, 2005.
   Google Scholar
• Levitsky, Steven, and Daniel Ziblatt. How Democracies Die. New York: Crown, 2018.
   Google Scholar
• Linz, Juan. “Presidential or Parliamentary: Does It Make a Difference?” In The Failure of Presidential Democracy, edited by Juan Linz, and Arturo Valenzuela. Baltimore: John Hopkins University Press, 1994.
   Google Scholar
• Linz, Juan. “The Perils of Presidentialism.” Journal of Democracy 1, no. 1 (1990): 51–69.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lueders, Hans, and Ellen Lust. “Multiple Measurements, Elusive Agreement, and Unstable Outcomes in the Study of Regime Change.” The Journal of Politics 80, no. 2 (April 2018): 736–41.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lührmann, Anna, and Staffan I. Lindberg. “A Third Wave of Autocratization Is Here: What Is New about It?” Democratization 26, no. 7 (3 October 2019): 1095–113.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maeda, Ko. “Two Modes of Democratic Breakdown: A Competing Risks Analysis of Democratic Durability.” The Journal of Politics 72, no. 4 (October 2010): 1129–43.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mainwaring, Scott, and Fernando Bizzarro. “The Fates of Third-Wave Democracies.” Journal of Democracy 30, no. 1 (2019): 99–113.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mainwaring, Scott, and Aníbal Pérez-Liñán. “Democratic Breakdown and Survival.” Journal of Democracy 24, no. 2 (2013): 123–37.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCoy, Jennifer, and Murat Somer. “Toward a Theory of Pernicious Polarization and How It Harms Democracies: Comparative Evidence and Possible Remedies.” The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 681, no. 1 (January 2019): 234–71.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mechkova, Valeriya, Anna Lührmann, and Staffan I. Lindberg. “How Much Democratic Backsliding?” Journal of Democracy 28, no. 4 (2017): 162–9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mudde, Cas. “The Populist Zeitgeist.” Government and Opposition 39, no. 4 (2004): 541–63.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mudde, Cas, and Cristóbal Rovira Kaltwasser. Populism in Europe and the Americas: Threat or Corrective for Democracy? New York: Cambridge University Press, 2012.
   Google Scholar
• Norris, Pippa, and Ronald Inglehart. Cultural Backlash: Trump, Brexit, and Authoritarian Populism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2019.
   Google Scholar
• Orhan, Yunus Emre. “The Relationship between Affective Polarization and Democratic Backsliding: Comparative Evidence.” Democratization 29, no. 4 (19 May 2022): 714–35.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pérez-Liñán, Aníbal, Nicolás Schmidt, and Daniela Vairo. “Presidential Hegemony and Democratic Backsliding in Latin America, 1925–2016.” Democratization 26, no. 4 (19 May 2019): 606–25.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Plattner, Marc F. “Democracy’s Past and Future: Populism, Pluralism, and Liberal Democracy.” Journal of Democracy 21, no. 1 (2010): 81–92.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pozsár-Szentmiklósy, Zoltán. “Supermajority in Parliamentary Systems – A Concept of Substantive Legislative Supermajority: Lessons from Hungary.” Hungarian Journal of Legal Studies 58, no. 3 (September 2017): 281–90.
   Google Scholar
• Rodrik, Dani. “Why Does Globalization Fuel Populism? Economics, Culture, and the Rise of Right-Wing Populism.” Annual Review of Economics 13, no. 1 (2021): 133–70.
   Google Scholar
• Rummens, Stefan. “Populism as a Threat to Liberal Democracy.” In The Oxford Handbook of Populism, edited by Cristóbal Rovira Kaltwasser, Paul Taggart, Paulina Ochoa Espejo, and Pierre Ostiguy, 554–70. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2017.
   Google Scholar
• Rummens, Stefan. “Populism as a Threat to Liberal Democracy”, 26 October 2017.
   Google Scholar
• Ruth, Saskia Pauline. “Populism and the Erosion of Horizontal Accountability in Latin America.” Political Studies 66, no. 2 (May 2018): 356–75.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ruth-Lovell, Saskia Pauline, and Sandra Grahn. “Threat or Corrective to Democracy? The Relationship between Populism and Different Models of Democracy.” European Journal of Political Research (2022): 1–22.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Samuels, David, and Matthew Shugart. Presidents, Parties, and Prime Ministers: How the Separation of Powers Affects Party Organization and Behavior. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2010.
   Google Scholar
• Sánchez-Sibony, Omar. “Competitive Authoritarianism in Morales’s Bolivia: Skewing Arenas of Competition.” Latin American Politics and Society 63, no. 1 (February 2021): 118–44.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sedelius, Thomas, and Jonas Linde. “Unravelling Semi-Presidentialism: Democracy and Government Performance in Four Distinct Regime Types.” Democratization 25, no. 1 (2 January 2018): 136–57.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shugart, Matthew S., and John M. Carey. Presidents and Assemblies: Constitutional Design and Electoral Dynamics. Cambridge, U.K: Cambridge University Press, 1992.
   Google Scholar
• Stuart, Elizabeth A. “Matching Methods for Causal Inference: A Review and a Look Forward.” Statistical Science 25, no. 1 (1 February 2010): 1–21.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Svolik, Milan W. “Which Democracies Will Last? Coups, Incumbent Takeovers, and the Dynamic of Democratic Consolidation.” British Journal of Political Science 45, no. 4 (October 2015): 715–38.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taggart, Paul. “Populism and the Pathology of Representative Politics.” In Democracies and the Populist Challenge, edited by Mény Yves and Surel Yves, 62–80. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2002.
   Google Scholar
• Tsebelis, George. “Decision Making in Political Systems: Veto Players in Presidentialism, Parliamentarism, Multicameralism and Multipartyism.” British Journal of Political Science 25, no. 03 (July 1995): 289.
   Google Scholar
• Urbinati, Nadia. “Democracy and Populism.” Constellations 5, no. 1 (1998): 110–24.
   Google Scholar
• Vittori, Davide. “Threat or Corrective? Assessing the Impact of Populist Parties in Government on the Qualities of Democracy: A 19-Country Comparison.” Government and Opposition (6 July 2021): 1–21. doi:10.1017/gov.2021.21.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Waldner, David, and Ellen Lust. “Unwelcome Change: Coming to Terms with Democratic Backsliding.” Annual Review of Political Science 21, no. 1 (11 May 2018): 93–113.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wunsch, Natasha, and Philippe Blanchard. “Patterns of Democratic Backsliding in Third-Wave Democracies: A Sequence Analysis Perspective.” Democratization (2 December 2022): 1–24. doi:10.1080/13510347.2022.2130260.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar