Supporting democracy when other democracies prosper?

Bibliography

• Abramson, S. F., and S. Montero. “Learning About Growth and Democracy.” American Political Science Review 114, no. 4 (2020): 1195–1212. doi:10.1017/S0003055420000325.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Acemoglu, D., N. Ajzenman, C. G. Aksoy, M. Fiszbein, and C. A. Molina. (Successful) Democracies Breed Their Own Support. NBER Working Paper 29167. Cambridge: National Bureau of Economic Research, 2021.
   Google Scholar
• Acemoglu, D., S. Naidu, P. Restrepo, and J. A. Robinson. “Democracy Does Cause Growth.” Journal of Political Economy 127, no. 1 (2019): 47–100. doi:10.1086/700936.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Almond, G., and S. Verba. Political Culture: Political Attitudes and Democracy in Five Nations. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1963.
   Google Scholar
• Anderson, C. J., and C. A. Guillory. “Political Institutions and Satisfaction with Democracy: A Cross-National Analysis of Consensus and Majoritarian Systems.” American Political Science Review 91, no. 1 (1997): 66–81. doi:10.2307/2952259.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Atkinson, C. “Does Soft Power Matter? A Comparative Analysis of Student Exchange Programs 1980-2006.” Foreign Policy Analysis 6, no. 1 (2010): 1–22. doi:10.1111/j.1743-8594.2009.00099.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aytaç, S. E. “Relative Economic Performance and the Incumbent Vote: A Reference Point Theory.” The Journal of Politics 80, no. 1 (2018): 16–29. doi:10.1086/693908.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barceló, J. “Are Western-Educated Leaders Less Prone to Initiate Militarized Disputes?” British Journal of Political Science 50, no. 2 (2020): 535–566. doi:10.1017/S0007123417000527.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beissinger, M. R. “Structure and Example in Modular Political Phenomena: The Diffusion of Bulldozer/Rose/Orange/Tulip Revolutions.” Perspectives on Politics 5, no. 2 (2007): 259–276. doi:10.1017/S1537592707070776.
   Google Scholar
• Bermeo, S. B. “Foreign Aid and Regime Change: A Role for Donor Intent.” World Development 39, no. 11 (2011): 2021–2031. doi:10.1016/j.worlddev.2011.07.019.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bilodeau, A. “Is Democracy the Only Game in Town? Tension Between Immigrants’ Democratic Desires and Authoritarian Imprints.” Democratization 21, no. 2 (2014): 359–381. doi:10.1080/13510347.2012.712515.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blais, A., A. Morin-Chassé, and S. P. Singh. “Election Outcomes, Legislative Representation, and Satisfaction with Democracy.” Party Politics 23, no. 2 (2017): 85–95. doi:10.1177/1354068815583200.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bolt, J., and J. L. V. Zanden. Maddison Style Estimates of the Evolution of the Worldeconomy, a New 2020 Update. Maddison-Project Working Paper 15. The Netherlands: University of Groningen, 2020.
   Google Scholar
• Bratton, M., and R. Mattes. “Support for Democracy in Africa: Intrinsic or Instrumental?” British Journal of Political Science 31, no. 3 (2001): 447–474. doi:10.1017/S0007123401000175.
   Google Scholar
• Brinks, D., and M. Coppedge. “Diffusion is No Illusion: Neighbor Emulation in the Third Wave of Democracy.” Comparative Political Studies 39, no. 4 (2006): 463–489. doi:10.1177/0010414005276666.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buera, F. J., A. Monge-Naranjo, and G. E. Primiceri. “Learning the Wealth of Nations.” Econometrica 79, no. 1 (2011): 1–45. doi:10.3982/ECTA8299.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bunce, V. J., and S. L. Wolchik. “International Diffusion and Postcommunist Electoral Revolutions.” Communist and Post-Communist Studies 39, no. 3 (2006): 283–304. doi:10.1016/j.postcomstud.2006.06.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Claassen, C. “Does Public Support Help Democracy Survive?” American Journal of Political Science 64, no. 1 (2020a): 118–134. doi:10.1111/ajps.12452.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Claassen, C. “Estimating Smooth Country–Year Panels of Public Opinion.” Political Analysis 27, no. 1 (2019): 1–20. doi:10.1017/pan.2018.32.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Claassen, C. “In the Mood for Democracy? Democratic Support as Thermostatic Opinion.” American Political Science Review 114, no. 1 (2020b): 36–53. doi:10.1017/S0003055419000558.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Claassen, C. “Measuring Democratic Mood: Methods.” http://www.chrisclaassen.com/data.html.
   Google Scholar
• Claassen, C., and P. C. Magalhães. “Effective Government and Evaluations of Democracy.” Comparative Political Studies 55, no. 5 (2022): 869–894. doi:10.1177/00104140211036042.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coppedge, M., B. Denison, P. Friesen, L. Tiscornia, and Y. Xu. “International Influence: The Hidden Dimension.” In Why Democracies Develop and Decline, edited by M. Coppedge, A. B. Edgell, C. H. Knutsen, and S. I. Lindberg, 80–118. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2022.
   Google Scholar
• Coppedge, M., J. Gerring, C. H. Knutsen, S. Lindberg, J. Teorell, D. Altman, M. Bernhard, A. Cornell, et al. V-Dem Codebook V11.1. Varieties of Democracy (V-Dem) Project. Sweden: University of Gothenburg, V-Dem Institute, 2021.
   Google Scholar
• Córdova, A., and J. Hiskey. “Shaping Politics at Home: Cross-Border Social Ties and Local-Level Political Engagement.” Comparative Political Studies 48, no. 11 (2015): 1454–1487. doi:10.1177/0010414015581683.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dahl, R. A. Polyarchy: Participation and Opposition. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1973.
   Google Scholar
• Dalton, R. J. “Communists and Democrats: Democratic Attitudes in the Two Germanies.” British Journal of Political Science 24, no. 4 (1994): 469–493. doi:10.1017/S0007123400006967.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dalton, R. J. “Political Support in Advanced Industrial Democracies.” In Critical Citizens: Global Support for Democratic Government, edited by P. Norris, 57–77. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1999.
   Google Scholar
• Diamond, L. “Democratic Regression in Comparative Perspective: Scope, Methods, and Causes.” Democratization 28, no. 1 (2021): 22–42. doi:10.1080/13510347.2020.1807517.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dietrich, S., and J. Wright. “Foreign Aid Allocation Tactics and Democratic Change in Africa.” The Journal of Politics 77, no. 1 (2014): 216–234. doi:10.1086/678976.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Driscoll, J. C., and A. C. Kraay. “Consistent Covariance Matrix Estimation with Spatially Dependent Panel Data.” Review of Economics and Statistics 80, no. 4 (1998): 549–560. doi:10.1162/003465398557825.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Easton, D. “A Re-Assessment of the Concept of Political Support.” British Journal of Political Science 5, no. 4 (1975): 435–457. doi:10.1017/S0007123400008309.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Evans, G., and S. Whitefield. “The Politics and Economics of Democratic Commitment: Support for Democracy in Transition Societies.” British Journal of Political Science 25, no. 4 (1995): 485–514. doi:10.1017/S0007123400007328.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Foa, R. S., and Y. Mounk. “The Danger of Deconsolidation: The Democratic Disconnect.” Journal of Democracy 27, no. 3 (2016): 5–17. doi:10.1353/jod.2016.0049.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Freyburg, T. “Transgovernmental Networks as an Apprenticeship in Democracy? Socialization Into Democratic Governance Through Cross-National Activities.” International Studies Quarterly 59, no. 1 (2015): 59–72. doi:10.1111/isqu.12141.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gapminder. “Data in Gapminder World.” https://www.gapminder.org/data/.
   Google Scholar
• Gleditsch, K. S., and M. D. Ward. “Diffusion and the International Context of Democratization.” International Organization 60, no. 4 (2006): 911–933. doi:10.1017/S0020818306060309.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gleditsch, K. S., and M. D. Ward. “Measuring Space: A Minimum-Distance Database and Applications to International Studies.” Journal of Peace Research 38, no. 6 (2001): 739–758. doi:10.1177/0022343301038006006.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goldring, E., and S. C. Greitens. “Rethinking Democratic Diffusion: Bringing Regime Type Back In.” Comparative Political Studies 53, no. 2 (2020): 319–353. doi:10.1177/0010414019852701.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goodliffe, J., and D. Hawkins. “Dependence Networks and the Diffusion of Domestic Political Institutions.” Journal of Conflict Resolution 61, no. 4 (2017): 903–929. doi:10.1177/0022002715596772.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Graham, M. H., and M. W. Svolik. “Democracy in America? Partisanship, Polarization, and the Robustness of Support for Democracy in the United States.” American Political Science Review 114, no. 2 (2020): 392–409. doi:10.1017/S0003055420000052.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grieg, J., and A. Enterline. National Material Capabilities Data Documentation, Version 6.0. Correlates of War Project, 2021.
   Google Scholar
• Hale, H. E. “Regime Change Cascades: What We Have Learned from the 1848 Revolutions to the 2011 Arab Uprisings.” Annual Review of Political Science 16, no. 1 (2013): 331–353. doi:10.1146/annurev-polisci-032211-212204.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hofferbert, R. I., and H.-D. Klingemann. “Remembering the Bad Old Days: Human Rights, Economic Conditions, and Democratic Performance in Transitional Regimes.” European Journal of Political Research 36, no. 2 (1999): 155–174. doi:10.1111/1475-6765.00466.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Houle, C., M. A. Kayser, and J. Xiang. “Diffusion or Confusion? Clustered Shocks and the Conditional Diffusion of Democracy.” International Organization 70, no. 4 (2016): 687–726. doi:10.1017/S002081831600028X.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huang, H. “International Knowledge and Domestic Evaluations in a Changing Society: The Case of China.” American Political Science Review 109, no. 3 (2015): 613–634. doi:10.1017/S000305541500026X.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huntington, S. P. The Third Wave: Democratization in the Late Twentieth. Norman: University of Oklahoma Press, 1993.
   Google Scholar
• Inglehart, R. “How Solid Is Mass Support for Democracy—and How Can We Measure It?” Political Science and Politics 36, no. 01 (2003): 51–57. doi:10.1017/S1049096503001689.
   Google Scholar
• Keele, L., and N. J. Kelly. “Dynamic Models for Dynamic Theories: The Ins and Outs of Lagged Dependent Variables.” Political Analysis 14, no. 2 (2006): 186–205. doi:10.1093/pan/mpj006.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kern, H. L., and J. Hainmueller. “Opium for the Masses: How Foreign Media Can Stabilize Authoritarian Regimes.” Political Analysis 17, no. 4 (2009): 377–399. doi:10.1093/pan/mpp017.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Knutsen, C. H. “A Business Case for Democracy: Regime Type, Growth, and Growth Volatility.” Democratization 28, no. 8 (2021): 1505–1524. doi:10.1080/13510347.2021.1940965.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krieckhaus, J., B. Son, N. M. Bellinger, and J. M. Wells. “Economic Inequality and Democratic Support.” The Journal of Politics 76, no. 1 (2014): 139–151. doi:10.1017/S0022381613001229.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leeson, P. T., and A. M. Dean. “The Democratic Domino Theory: An Empirical Investigation.” American Journal of Political Science 53, no. 3 (2009): 533–551. doi:10.1111/j.1540-5907.2009.00385.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levitsky, S., and L. Way. “International Linkage and Democratization.” Journal of Democracy 16, no. 3 (2005): 20–34. doi:10.1353/jod.2005.0048.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Linz, J. J., and A. Stepan. Problems of Democratic Transition and Consolidation: Southern Europe, South America, and Post-Communist Europe. Baltimore and London: JHU Press, 1996.
   Google Scholar
• Lipset, S. M. “Some Social Requisites of Democracy: Economic Development and Political Legitimacy.” American Political Science Review 53, no. 1 (1959): 69–105. doi:10.2307/1951731.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lührmann, A., and S. I. Lindberg. “A Third Wave of Autocratization is Here: What is New About it?” Democratization 26, no. 7 (2019): 1095–1113. doi:10.1080/13510347.2019.1582029.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lührmann, A., M. Tannenberg, and S. I. Lindberg. “Regimes of the World (Row): Opening New Avenues for the Comparative Study of Political Regimes.” Politics and Governance 6, no. 1 (2018): 60–77. doi:10.17645/pag.v6i1.1214.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Magalhães, P. C. “Government Effectiveness and Support for Democracy.” European Journal of Political Research 53, no. 1 (2014): 77–97. doi:10.1111/1475-6765.12024.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marshall, M., and T. Gurr. “Polity 5 Project: Political Regime Characteristics and Transitions, 1800-2018. Center for Systemic Peace.” http://www.systemicpeace.org/inscrdata.htm.
   Google Scholar
• Mattes, R., and M. Bratton. “Learning About Democracy in Africa: Awareness, Performance, and Experience.” American Journal of Political Science 51, no. 1 (2007): 192–217. doi:10.1111/j.1540-5907.2007.00245.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller, M. K. “Democracy by Example? Why Democracy Spreads When the World's Democracies Prosper.” Comparative Politics 49, no. 1 (2016): 83–116. doi:10.5129/001041516819582946.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mishler, W., and R. Rose. “Generation, Age, and Time: The Dynamics of Political Learning During Russia's Transformation.” American Journal of Political Science 51, no. 4 (2007): 822–834. doi:10.1111/j.1540-5907.2007.00283.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mishler, W., and R. Rose. “Political Support for Incomplete Democracies: Realist Vs. Idealist Theories and Measures.” International Political Science Review 22, no. 4 (2001a): 303–320. doi:10.1177/0192512101022004002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mishler, W., and R. Rose. “What Are the Origins of Political Trust? Testing Institutional and Cultural Theories in Post-Communist Societies.” Comparative Political Studies 34, no. 1 (2001b): 30–62. doi:10.1177/0010414001034001002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Montero, J. R., R. Gunther, and M. Torcal. “Democracy in Spain: Legitimacy, Discontent, and Disaffection.” Studies in Comparative International Development 32, no. 3 (1997): 124–160. doi:10.1007/BF02687334.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Neundorf, A., J. Gerschewski, and R.-G. Olar. “How Do Inclusionary and Exclusionary Autocracies Affect Ordinary People?” Comparative Political Studies 53, no. 12 (2020): 1890–1925. doi:10.1177/0010414019858958.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Norris, P. Critical Citizens: Global Support for Democratic Government. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1999.
   Google Scholar
• Perez-Armendáriz, C., and D. Crow. “Do Migrants Remit Democracy? International Migration, Political Beliefs, and Behavior in Mexico.” Comparative Political Studies 43, no. 1 (2010): 119–148. doi:10.1177/0010414009331733.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pevehouse, J. C. “With a Little Help from My Friends? Regional Organizations and the Consolidation of Democracy.” American Journal of Political Science 46, no. 3 (2002): 611–626. doi:10.2307/3088403.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pop-Eleches, G., and J. Tucker. Communism’s Shadow. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2017.
   Google Scholar
• Robinson, D., and M. Tannenberg. “Self-Censorship of Regime Support in Authoritarian States: Evidence from List Experiments in China.” Research & Politics 6, no. 3 (2019): 205316801985644. doi:10.1177/2053168019856449.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rothstein, B. The Quality of Government: Corruption, Social Trust, and Inequality in International Perspective. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2011.
   Google Scholar
• Schmotz, A., and O. Tansey. “Regional Autocratic Linkage and Regime Survival.” European Journal of Political Research 57, no. 3 (2018): 662–686. doi:10.1111/1475-6765.12243.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simmons, B. A., F. Dobbin, and G. Garrett. “Introduction: The International Diffusion of Liberalism.” International Organization 60, no. 4 (2006): 781–810. doi:10.1017/S0020818306060267.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Singer, J. D. “Reconstructing the Correlates of War Dataset on Material Capabilities of States, 1816–1985.” International Interactions 14, no. 2 (1988): 115–132. doi:10.1080/03050628808434695.
   Google Scholar
• Spolaore, E., and R. Wacziarg. “Ancestry and Development: New Evidence.” Journal of Applied Econometrics 33, no. 5 (2018): 748–762. doi:10.1002/jae.2633.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stinnett, D. M., J. Tir, P. F. Diehl, P. Schafer, and C. Gochman. “The Correlates of War (Cow) Project Direct Contiguity Data, Version 3.0.” Conflict Management and Peace Science 19, no. 2 (2002): 59–67. doi:10.1177/073889420201900203.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Svolik, M. W. “Learning to Love Democracy: Electoral Accountability and the Success of Democracy.” American Journal of Political Science 57, no. 3 (2013): 685–702. doi:10.1111/ajps.12005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Torfason, M. T., and P. Ingram. “The Global Rise of Democracy: A Network Account.” American Sociological Review 75, no. 3 (2010): 355–377. doi:10.1177/0003122410372230.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Voicu, M., and E. B. Peral. “Support for Democracy and Early Socialization in a Non-Democratic Country: Does the Regime Matter?” Democratization 21, no. 3 (2014): 554–573. doi:10.1080/13510347.2012.751974.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weyland, K. “The Diffusion of Revolution: ‘1848’ in Europe and Latin America.” International Organization 63, no. 3 (2009): 391–423. doi:10.1017/S0020818309090146.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wuttke, A., K. Gavras, and H. Schoen. “Have Europeans Grown Tired of Democracy? New Evidence from Eighteen Consolidated Democracies, 1981–2018.” British Journal of Political Science 52, no. 1 (2022): 416–428. doi:10.1017/S0007123420000149.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhukov, Y. M., and B. M. Stewart. “Choosing Your Neighbors: Networks of Diffusion in International Relations.” International Studies Quarterly 57, no. 2 (2013): 271–287. doi:10.1111/isqu.12008.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar