Sciences, politics, and associative democracy: democratizing science and expertizing democracy

References

• Bader, V. M. 1988. “Macht of waarheid? [Power or Truth?]” Kennis en Methode [Kowledge and Method] XII (2): 138–157.
   Google Scholar
• Bader, V. M. 1991. Kollektives Handeln [Collective Action]. Opladen: Leske & Budrich.
   Google Scholar
• Bader, V. M. 1992. “‘Grand Theories’, Empirismus oder Pro-Theorie? ['‘Grand Theories’, Empiricism or Proto-Theory?]” Forschungsjournal NSB 2: 9–21.
   Google Scholar
• Bader, V. M. 1994. “Eenheid van de communicatieve rede, recht en complexe maatschappijen [Unitiy of Communicative Reason, Law and Complex Societies].” Recht en kritiek (2): 111–144.
   Google Scholar
• Bader, V. M. 1997. “The Arts of Forecasting and Policy Making.” In Citizenship and Exclusion, edited by V. Bader, 155–174. Houndsmill: MacMillan.
   Google Scholar
• Bader, V. M. 2001a. “Introduction.” Critical Inquiries in Social and Political Philosophy (CRISPP) 4 (1): 1–14.
   Google Scholar
• Bader, V. M. 2001b. “Problems and Prospects of Associative Democracy.” In Associative Democracy – the Real Third Way?, edited by P. Hirst and V. Bader, Critical Inquiries in Social and Political Philosophy (CRISPP) 4 ( 1): 31–70.
   Google Scholar
• Bader, V. M. 2001c. “Cohesion, Unity and Stability in Modern Societies.” In The Many Faces of Individualism, edited by A. v. Harskamp and A. A. Musschenga, 107–132. Leuven: Peeters.
   Google Scholar
• Bader, V. M. 2003. “Democratic Institutional Pluralism and Cultural Diversity.” In The Social Construction of Diversity edited by D. Juteau and C. Harzig, 131–167. New York, Oxford: Berghahn.
   Google Scholar
• Bader, V. M. 2004. “Contextualized Morality and Ethno-religious Diversity. Introduction.” Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 7 (2): 107–115. doi:10.1023/B:ETTA.0000032758.77152.0a.
   Google Scholar
• Bader, V. M. 2007a. Secularism or Democracy? Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bader, V. M. 2007b. “Misrecognition, Power, and Democracy.” In Recognition and Power, edited by B. v. d. Brink and D. Owen, 238–269. New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bader, V. M. 2007c. “Building European Institutions. Beyond Strong Ties and Weak Commitments.” In Identities, Affiliations, and Allegiances, edited by S. Benhabib and I. Shapiro, 113–135. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bader, V. M. 2008a. “Secularism, Public Reason or Moderately Agonistic Democracy?” In Secularism, Religion, and Multicultural Citizenship, edited by G. Levey and T. Modood, Chap. 5; 110–135. Cambridge: Cambridge UP.
   Google Scholar
• Bader, V. M. 2008b. “Eurosphere(s)? Fragmented and Stratified or Integrated and Fair?” http://eurospheres.org/files/2010/08/Eurosphere_Working_Paper_9_Bader.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Bader, V. M. 2010. “Complex Legitimacy in Compound Polities. The EU as Example.” Representation 46 (3): 261–297. doi:10.1080/00344893.2010.499695.
   Google Scholar
• Bader, V. M. 2011. “Basic Tensions of Governance of Religious Diversity.” http://www.religareproject.eu/content/basic-tensions-governance-religious-diversity-item-list-socio-legal-research-wp7
   Google Scholar
• Bader, V. M. 2013a. “The End of Democratic Capitalism?” Krisis 2013 (2): 13–19. www.krisis.eu/content/2013-2/krisis-2013-2-04-bader.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Bader, V. M. 2013b. “Crisis of Political Parties and Representative Democracies. Rethinking Parties in Associational, Experimentalist Governance.” Under review for CRISPP.
   Google Scholar
• Bader, V. M., and A. Benschop. 1989. Ungleichheiten. Opladen: Leske & Budrich.
   Google Scholar
• Bader, V. M., and H. v. d. Berg. 1993. “Simulatiemodellen en de maakbare toekomst.” In Het Centraal Planbureau in Politieke Zaken, edited by H. Berg, and B. Both, 63–79. Amsterdam: Wetenschappelijk Bureau Groen Links.
   Google Scholar
• Bader, V., and E. R. Engelen. 2003. “Taking Pluralism Seriously. Arguing for an Institutional Turn in Political Philosophy.” Philosophy and Social Criticism, 29 (4): 375–406. doi:10.1177/0191453703294002.
   Google Scholar
• Barber, B. 1984. Strong Democracy. Berkeley, LA and London: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Barber, B. 1988. The Conquest of Politics. Princeton, NJ: Princeton UP.
   Google Scholar
• Berg, H. v. d. 2007. Marktonderzoek in de rechtszaal [Marketing Research in the Courtroom]. Amsterdam: Stichting voor Culturele Studies.
   Google Scholar
• Bhaskar, R. 1978. A Realist Theory of Science. Leeds: Leeds Books.
   Google Scholar
• Bhaskar, R. 1986. Scientific Realism and Human Emancipation. London: Verso.
   Google Scholar
• Black, J. 2001. “Proceduralizing Regulation: Part II.” Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 21: 33–58.
   Google Scholar
• Bohman, J. 1997. “Deliberative Democracy and Effective Social Freedom.” In Deliberative Democracy, edited by J. Bohman and W. Rehg, 321–348. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Boswell, C. 2009. “Knowledge, Legitimation and the Politics of Risk: The Functions of Research in Public Debates on Migration.” Political Studies 57 (1): 165–186. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9248.2008.00729.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bourdieu, P. 1990. The Logic of Practice. Cambridge: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Christis, J. 1993. “Stress and Well-being: An Environmental Risk Approach.” Unpublished Conference paper Tilburg26/12.
   Google Scholar
• Christis, J. 1998. Arbeid, Organisatie en Stress [Work, Organization and Stress]. Amsterdam: Spinhuis.
   Google Scholar
• Collins, H. M., and R. Evans. 2002. “The Third Wave of Science Studies: Studies of Expertise and Experience.” Social Studies of Science 32 (2): 235–296. doi:10.1177/0306312702032002003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Collins, H. M., and R. Evans. 2003. “King Canute Meets the Beach Boys: Responses to the Third Wave.” Social Studies of Science 33 (3): 435–452. doi:10.1177/03063127030333007.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• CPB 1992. Scanning the Future; and Nederland in Drievoud. Den Haag: Sdu Uitgeverij.
   Google Scholar
• Crouch, C. 2005. Post-Democracy. Cambridge: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Crouch, C. 2011. The Strange Non-Death of Neoliberalism. Cambridge: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Doubleday, R. 2004. “Institutionalising Non-governmental Organisation Dialogue at Unilever: Framing the Publics ‘Consumer-Citizens’.” Science and Public Policy 31 (2): 117–126. doi:10.3152/147154304781780109.
   Google Scholar
• EC. 2001. “Democratizing Expertise and Establishing Scientific Reference Systems.” White Paper on Governance, Work area 1, Report of the Working Group 1b), May.
   Google Scholar
• Elstub, S. 2008. “Weber's Dilemma and a Dualist Model of Deliberative and Associational Democracy.” Contemporary Political Theory 7 (2), 169–199. doi:10.1057/palgrave.cpt.2007.21.
   Google Scholar
• Engelen, E., I. Ertürk, J. Froud, S. Johal, A. Leaver, M. Moran, A. Nilsson, and K. Williams. 2011. After the Great Complacence. Financial Crisis and the Politics of Reform. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• EPISTO. 2013. “Why Not EPISTOcracy? Political Legitimacy and ‘the Fact of Expertise’.” http://www.sv.uio.no/arena/english/research/projects/episto/index.html
   Google Scholar
• Felt, U., and M. Fochler. 2008 “The Bottom-up Meanings of the Concept of Public Participation in Science and Technology.” Science and Public Policy 35 (7): 489–499. doi:10.3152/030234208X329086.
   Google Scholar
• Fjelland, R. 2002. “Facing the Problem of Uncertainty.” Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 15 (2): 155–169. doi:10.1023/A:1015001405816.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Foblets, M., and A. Renteln, ed. 2009. Multicultural Jurisprudence. Oxford, Portland: Hart.
   Google Scholar
• Garfinkel, A. 1981. Forms of Explanation. New Haven/London: Yale UP.
   Google Scholar
• Greenwood, J. 2007. Interest Representation in the European Union. Houndsmill etc.: Palgrave and McMillan.
   Google Scholar
• Harbers, H. 2002. “Wetenschap en Samenleving. Naar een nieuw contract [Science and Society. Towards a New Contract].” De Academische Boekengids 33, Juni, 4ff.
   Google Scholar
• Heritiér, A. 1999. Policy Making and Diversity in Europe. Cambridge: CUP.
   Google Scholar
• Heritiér, A., and M. Rhodes, eds. 2011. New Models of Governance in Europe. Houndsmill: Palgrave McMillan.
   Google Scholar
• Hirst, P. 1994. Associative Democracy. Cambridge: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Humphreys, P. 1989. The Chances of Explanation. New Jersey: Princeton UP.
   Google Scholar
• Jasanoff, S. 1995. Science at the Bar. Cambridge MA: Harvard UP.
   Google Scholar
• Jasanoff, S. 2003. “Breaking the Waves in Science Studies: Comment on H. M. Collins and Robert Evans, ‘The Third Wave of Science Studies’.” Social Studies of Science 33 (3): 389–400. doi:10.1177/03063127030333004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jasanoff, S. 2004. “Science and Citizenship: A New Synergy.” Science and Public Policy 31 (2): 90–94. doi:10.3152/147154304781780064.
   Google Scholar
• Joerges, C. 1999a. “Bureaucratic Nightmare, Technocratic Regime and the Dream of Good Transnational Governance.” In EU Committees: Social Regulation, Law and Politics, edited by C. Joerges and E. Vos, 3–18. Oxford: Hart.
   Google Scholar
• Joerges, C. 1999b. “Good Governance’ Through Comitology?” In EU Committees: Social Regulation, Law and Politics, edited by C. Jörges and E. Vos, 311–338. Oxford: Hart.
   Google Scholar
• Irwin, A., and B. Wynne, eds. 1996. Misunderstanding Science? Cambridge: Cambridge UP.
   Google Scholar
• Knorr, K. D. 1977. “Policy Makers’ Use of Social Science Knowledge.” In Using Social Research in Public Policy Making, edited by C. H. Weiss, 165–182. Lexington, MA: Lexington Books, DC. Heath & Comp.
   Google Scholar
• Latour, B. 2007. “Turning Around Politics: A Note on Gerard de Vries’ Paper.” Social Studies of Science 37 (5): 811–820. doi:10.1177/0306312707081222.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luhmann, N. 1990. Die Wissenschaft der Gesellschaft [The Science of Society]. Frankfurt: Suhrkamp.
   Google Scholar
• Marres, N. 2005. “No Issue, No Public.” PhD diss., University of Amsterdam.
   Google Scholar
• Marres, N. 2007. “The Issues Deserve More Credit: Pragmatist Contributions to the Study of Public Involvement in Controversy.” Social Studies of Science 37 (5): 759–780. doi:10.1177/0306312706077367.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mitchell, M. 2009. Complexity. A Guided Tour. Oxford: OUP.
   Google Scholar
• Mouffe, C. 2000. The Democratic Paradox. London: Verso.
   Google Scholar
• Nowotny, H., 1979. Kernenergie – Gefahr oder Notwendigkeit [Nuclear Power – Danger or Necessity]. Frankfurt/Main: Suhrkamp.
   Google Scholar
• Nowotny, H., P. Scott, and M. Gibbons. 2001. Re-Thinking Science. Knowledge and the Public in an Age of Uncertainty. Cambridge: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Nowotny, H., P. Scott, and M. Gibbons. 2005. “The Changing Nature of Public Science.” In The Public Nature of Science under Assault, edited by Nowotny H., D. Pestre, E. Schmidt-Aßmann, H. Schultze-Fielitz, and H.-H. Trutte, 1–27. Heidelberg and New York: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Nowotny, H., D. Pestre, E. Schmidt-Aßmann, H. Schultze-Fielitz, and H.-H. Trutte. 2005. The Public Nature of Science under Assault. Heidelberg and New York: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Neyer, J. 2004. “Explaining the Unexpected: Efficiency and Effectiveness in European Decision-Making.” Journal of European Public Policy 11 (1): 19–38. doi:10.1080/1350176042000164280.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Putnam, H. 2001. Enlightenment and Pragmatism. Assen: Van Gorcum.
   Google Scholar
• Rip, A. 2003. “Constructing Expertise: In a Third Wave of Science Studies?” Social Studies of Science 33 (3): 419–434. doi:10.1177/03063127030333006.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sabel, C., and J. Zeitlin, eds. 2012. Experimentalist Governance in the European Union. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sayer, A. 1992. Method in Social Science. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Schmitter, P. 2000. How to Democratize the European Union – and Why Bother? Oxford: Rowman & Littlefield.
   Google Scholar
• Schmitter, P. 2001. “What Is There to Legitimize in the European Union … And How Might This Be Accomplished?” In Mountain or Molehill (EUI Firenze), edited by C. Jörges, Y. Mény, and J. H. H. Weiler, 79–94. www.eui.eu/DepartmentsAndCentres/RobertSchumanCentre/Research/ArchivesInstitutionsGovernanceDemocracy/MountainorMolehill.aspx.
   Google Scholar
• Schmitter, P., and A. H. Trechsel. 2007. The Future of Democracy in Europe. EUI Firenze. Green Paper for the Council of Europe. www.eui.eu/Documents/DepartmentsCentres/SPS/Profiles/Schmitter/GreenPaper.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Scott, J. 1998. Seeing Like a State. New Haven and London: Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Streeck, W. 2012. “Citizens as Customers.” New Left Review (NLR) 76: 27–47.
   Google Scholar
• Trute, H. 2005. “Democratizing Science: Expertise and Participation in Administrative Decision Making.” In The Public Nature of Science under Assault. Politics, Markets, Science and the Law, edited by Nowotny H., D. Pestre, E. Schmidt-Aßmann, H. Schultze-Fielitz, and H.-H. Trutte, 85–139. Heidelberg: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• de Vries, G. 2007. ‘What is Political in Sub-Politics?” Social Studies of Science 37 (5): 781–808. doi:10.1177/0306312706070749.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wynne, B. 2003. “Seasick on the Third Wave?” Social Studies of Science 33 (3): 401–417. doi:10.1177/03063127030333005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zeitlin, J. 2010. Transnational Transformations of Governance. Amsterdam: Vossiuspers UvA.
   Google Scholar