Linking institutions and firm-level outcomes: the roles of diverse innovative capability profiles in Germany's economy

References

• Allen, Matthew. 2004. “The Varieties of Capitalism Paradigm: Not Enough Variety?” Socio-Economic Review 2 (1): 87–108. doi:10.1093/soceco/2.1.87.
   Google Scholar
• Allen, Matthew. 2006. The Varieties of Capitalism Paradigm. Explaining Germany's Comparative Advantage. Houndmills: Palgrave.
   Google Scholar
• Allen, Matthew M. C. 2013. “Comparative Capitalisms and the Institutional Embeddedness of Innovative Capabilities.” Socio-Economic Review 11 (4): 771–794. doi:10.1093/ser/mwt018.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Allen, Matthew M. C., Heinz-Josef Tüselmann, and Maria L. Aldred. 2011. “Institutional Frameworks and Radical Innovation: An Analysis of High- and Medium-High-Technology Industries in Germany.” International Journal of Public Policy 7 (4): 265–281. doi:10.1504/ijpp.2011.043558.
   Google Scholar
• Aschhoff, Birgit, Elisabeth Baier, Dirk Crass, Martin Hud, Paul Hünermund, Christian Köhler, Bettina Peters, et al. 2013. Innovation in Germany – Results of the German CIS 2006–2010. Dokumentation. Mannheim: Zentrum für Europäische Wirtschaftsforschung GmbH (ZEW). 13-01. ftp://ftp.zew.de/pub/zew-docs/docus/dokumentation1301.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Barry, Michael, and Werner Nienhueser. 2010. “Coordinated Market Economy/Liberal Employment Relations: Low Cost Competition in the German Aviation Industry.” The International Journal of Human Resource Management 21 (2): 214–229. doi:10.1080/09585190903509522.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bellmann, Lutz. 2013. “Kontinuität und Veränderung des IAB-Betriebspanels.” Journal for Labour Market Research 47 (1): 5–26.
   Google Scholar
• Burns, T., and G. M. Stalker. 1961. The Management of Innovation. London: Tavistock.
   Google Scholar
• Casper, Steven. 2009. “Can new Technology Firms Succeed in Coordinated Market Economies? A Response to Herrmann and Lange.” Socio-Economic Review 7 (2): 209–215. doi:10.1093/ser/mwn034.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Casper, Steven, and Richard Whitley. 2004. “Managing Competences in Entrepreneurial Technology Firms: A Comparative Institutional Analysis of Germany, Sweden and the UK.” Research Policy 33 (1): 89–106. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0048-7333(03)00100-8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Collins, Linda M., and Stephanie T. Lanza. 2010. Latent Class and Latent Transition Analysis: With Applications in the Social, Behavioral, and Health Sciences. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Crouch, Colin, Martin Schröder, and Helmut Voelzkow. 2009. “Regional and Sectoral Varieties of Capitalism.” Review of.” Economy and Society 38 (4): 654–678. doi: 10.1080/03085140903190383
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crouch, Colin, Wolfgang Streeck, Robert Boyer, Bruno Amable, Peter A. Hall, and Gregory Jackson. 2005. “Dialogue on ‘Institutional Complementarity and Political Economy’.” Socio-Economic Review 3 (2): 359–382. doi:10.1093/SER/mwi015.
   Google Scholar
• Damanpour, Fariborz, and Deepa Aravind. 2006. “Product and Process Innovations: A Review of Organizational and Environmental Determinants.” In Innovation, Science, and Institutional Change, edited by Jerald Hage & Marius Meeus, 38–66. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Eurostat. 2008. “NACE Rev. 2. Statistical classification of economic activities in the European Community.” Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities. http://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/documents/3859598/5902521/KS-RA-07-015-EN.PDF.
   Google Scholar
• Fagerberg, 2005. “Innovation. A Guide to the Literature.” In The Oxford Handbook of Innovation, edited by Jan Fagerberg, David C. Mowery and Richard R. Nelson, 1–27. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fiss, Peer C. 2007. “A Set-Theoretic Approach to Organizational Configurations.” Academy of Management Review 32 (4): 1180–1198. doi: 10.5465/AMR.2007.26586092
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Geiser, Christian, Wolfgang Lehmann, and Michael Eid. 2006. “Separating “Rotators” From “Nonrotators” in the Mental Rotations Test: A Multigroup Latent Class Analysis.” Multivariate Behavioral Research 41 (3): 261–293. doi: 10.1207/s15327906mbr4103_2
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hall, Peter A., and David Soskice. 2001. “An Introduction to Varieties of Capitalism.” In Varieties of Capitalism: the Institutional Foundations of Comparative Advantage, edited by Peter Hall & David Soskice, 1–68. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hassel, Anke. 1999. “The Erosion of the German System of Industrial Relations.” British Journal of Industrial Relations 37 (3): 483–505. doi: 10.1111/1467-8543.00138
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Herrigel, Gary. 1996. Industrial Constructions: The Sources of German Industrial Power. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Herrigel, Gary. 2010. Manufacturing Possibilities. Creative Action and Industrial Recomposition in the United States, Germany, and Japan. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Herrmann, Andrea M. 2008. “Rethinking the Link Between Labour Market Flexibility and Corporate Competitiveness: A Critique of the Institutionalist Literature.” Socio-Economic Review 6 (4): 637–669. doi:10.1093/ser/mwn013.
   Google Scholar
• Hirsch-Kreinsen, Hartmut. 2008. “Low-Tech” Innovations.” Industry & Innovation 15 (1): 19–43. doi: 10.1080/13662710701850691
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hirsch-Kreinsen, Hartmut. 2014. “Wandel von Produktionsarbeit – „Industrie 4.0″.” Review of. WSI Mitteilungen 67 (6): 421–429.
   Google Scholar
• Hirsch-Kreinsen, Hartmut, Peter Ittermann, and Jörg Abel. 2012. “Industrielle Einfacharbeit: Kern Eines Sektoralen Produktions- und Arbeitssystems.” Review of Industrielle Beziehungen 19 (2): 187–210.
   Google Scholar
• Hollenstein, Heinz. 2003. “Innovation Modes in the Swiss Service Sector: A Cluster Analysis Based on Firm-Level Data.” Research Policy 32 (5): 845–863. doi: 10.1016/S0048-7333(02)00091-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hollingsworth, J. Rogers, Philippe C. Schmitter, and Wolfgang Streeck. 1994. Governing Capitalist Economies. Governing Capitalist Economies. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Höpner, Martin. 2004. “Unternehmensmitbestimmung unter Beschuss. Die Mitbestimmungsdebatte im Licht der Sozialwissenschaftlichen Forschung.” Review of. Industrielle Beziehungen 11 (4): 347–379.
   Google Scholar
• Jackson, Gregory, and Richard Deeg. 2008. “From Comparing Capitalisms to the Politics of Institutional Change.” Review of International Political Economy 15 (4): 680–709. doi:10.1080/09692290802260704.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jackson, Gregory, and Richard Deeg. 2012. “The Long-Term Trajectories of Institutional Change in European Capitalism.” Journal of European Public Policy 19 (8): 1109–1125. doi:10.1080/13501763.2012.709001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jensen, Morten Berg, Björn Johnson, Edward Lorenz, and Bengt Åke Lundvall. 2007. “Forms of Knowledge and Modes of Innovation.” Research Policy 36 (5): 680–693. doi: 10.1016/j.respol.2007.01.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lam, Alice. 2005. “Organizational Innovation.” In The Oxford Handbook of Innovation, edited by Jan Fagerberg, David C. Mowery & Richard R. Nelson, 115–147. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lane, Christel, and Geoffrey T. Wood. 2012. Capitalist Diversity and Diversity Within Capitalism. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Lange, Knut. 2009. “Institutional Embeddedness and the Strategic Leeway of Actors: the Case of the German Therapeutical Biotech Industry.” Socio-Economic Review 7 (2): 181–207. doi:10.1093/ser/mwn029.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levinthal, Daniel, and James G. March. 1981. “A Model of Adaptive Organizational Search.” Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization 2 (4): 307–333. doi: 10.1016/0167-2681(81)90012-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lorenz, Edward, and Antoine Valeyre. 2005. “Organisational Innovation, Human Resource Management and Labour Market Structure: A Comparison of the EU-15.” Journal of Industrial Relations 47 (4): 424–442. doi: 10.1111/j.1472-9296.2005.00183.x
   Google Scholar
• Love, James H., and Stephen Roper. 2004. “The Organisation of Innovation: Collaboration, Cooperation and Multifunctional Groups in UK and German Manufacturing.” Cambridge Journal of Economics 28 (3): 379–395. doi:10.1093/cje/beh012.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Magidson, Jay, and Jeroen K. Vermunt. 2002. “Latent Class Models for Clustering: A Comparison with K-Means.” Review of. Canadian Journal of Marketing Research 20 (1): 36–43.
   Google Scholar
• Mintzberg, Henry. 1979. The Structuring of Organizations. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Nylund, K. L., T. Asparouhov, and B. Muthén. 2007. “Deciding on the Number of Classes in Latent Class Analysis and Growth Mixture Modeling. A Monte Carlo Simulation Study.” Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal 14 (4): 535–569. doi: 10.1080/10705510701575396
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• OECD. 1997. The Measurement of Scientific and Technological Activities Proposed Guidelines for Collecting and Interpreting Technological Innovation Data: Oslo Manual. Paris: OECD Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• OECD. 2005. Oslo Manual. Guidelines for Collecting and Interpreting Innovation Data. 3rd ed. Paris: Organisation for Economic Co-Operation and Development. Statistical Office of the European Communities.
   Google Scholar
• Pfeiffer, Sabine. 2014. “Innovation und Mitbestimmung.” Review of. Industrielle Beziehungen 21 (4): 390–404.
   Google Scholar
• Schwarz-Kocher, Martin, Eva Kirner, Jürgen Dispan, Angela Jäger, Ursula Richter, Bettina Seibold, and Ute Weißfloch. 2011. Interessenvertretungen im Innovationsprozess. Der Einfluss von Mitbestimmung und Beschäftigtenbeteiligung auf Betriebliche Innovationen. Berlin: edition sigma.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, Keith. 2005. “Measuring Innovation.” In The Oxford Handbook of Innovation, edited by Jan Fagerberg, David C. Mowery, & Richard R. Nelson, 148–177. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Streeck, Wolfgang. 1991. “On the Institutional Conditions of Diversified Quality Production.” In Beyond Keynesianism. The Socio-Economics of Production and Full Employment, edited by Egon Matzner & Wolfgang Streeck, 21–61. Aldershot: Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Streeck, Wolfgang, and Kathleen Thelen. 2005. “Introduction: Institutional Change in Advanced Political Economies.” In Beyond Continuity: Institutional Change in Advanced Political Economies, edited by Wolfgang Streeck & Kathleen Thelen, 1–39. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Teipen, Christina. 2008. “Work and Employment in Creative Industries: The Video Games Industry in Germany, Sweden and Poland.” Economic and Industrial Democracy 29 (3): 309–335. doi:10.1177/0143831×08092459.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Whitley, Richard. 1999. Divergent Capitalisms: the Social Structuring and Change of Business Systems. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Witt, Michael A., and Gordon Redding. 2013. “Asian Business Systems: Institutional Comparison, Clusters and Implications for Varieties of Capitalism and Business Systems Theory.” Socio-Economic Review 11 (2): 265–300. doi:10.1093/ser/mwt002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wood, Geoffrey, Christopher Brewster, and Michael Brookes. 2014. “Institutions and Firm Level HRM Practice.” In Human Resource Management and the Institutional Perspective, edited by Geoffrey Wood, Chris Brewster, & Michael Brookes, 1–14. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar