Transforming power/knowledge apparatuses: the smart grid in the German energy transition

References

• Adam, B., and C. Groves. 2007. Future Matters: Action, Knowledge, Ethics. Leiden: Brill.
   Google Scholar
• BAUM Consult GmbH. 2012. Smart Energy Made in Germany Zwischenergebnisse der E-Energy-Modellprojekte auf dem Weg zum Internet der Energie. M?: B.A.U.M. Consult GmbH.
   Google Scholar
• Beniger, J. [1986] 2009. The Control Revolution: Technological and Economic Origins of the Information Society. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Birnbaum, M. 2011. “Germany's’ Make-or-Break’ Energy Experiment.” The Washington Post, June 10. http://www.washingtonpost.com/world/germanys-make-or-break-energy-experiment/2011/06/06/AGr2RLOH_story.html.
   Google Scholar
• BMU/BMWi. 2011. The Federal Government's Energy Concept of 2010 and the Transformation of the Energy System of 2011. Munich: Federal Ministry of Economics and Technology and Federal Ministry for the Environment, Nature Conservation and Nuclear Safety.
   Google Scholar
• BMWi. 2014. Smart Energy Made in Germany. Erkenntnisse zum Aufbau und zur Nutzung intelligenter Energiesysteme im Rahmen der Energiewende. Berlin: Bundesministerium für Wirtschaft und Energie.
   Google Scholar
• Böhle, K., and K. Bopp. 2014. “What a Vision: The Artificial Companion; A Piece of Vision Assessment Including an Expert Survey.” Science, Technology & Innovation Studies 10 (1): 155–186.
   Google Scholar
• Borup, M., N. Brown, K. Konrad, and H. Van Lente. 2006. “The Sociology of Expectations in Science and Technology.” Technology Analysis & Strategic Management 18 (3–4): 285–298. doi: 10.1080/09537320600777002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown, N., B. Rappert, and A. Webster, eds. 2000. Contested Futures: A Sociology of Prospective Techno-Science. Farnham: Ashgate.
   Google Scholar
• Bührmann, A., and Schneider, W. 2008. Vom Diskurs zum Dispositiv. Eine Einführung in die Dispositivanalyse. Bielefeld: transcript.
   Google Scholar
• Büscher, C., and J. Schippl. 2013. “Die Transformation der Energieversorgung: Einheit und Differenz soziotechnischer Systeme.” Technikfolgenabschätzung - Theorie und Praxis 22 (2): 11–19.
   Google Scholar
• Büscher, C., and P. Sumpf. 2015. “‘Trust’ and ‘Confidence’ as Socio-Technical Problems in the Transformation of Energy Systems.” Energy, Sustainability and Society 5 (1): 34. doi:10.1186/s13705-015-0063-7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coats, D. 2014. “What Obama Could Learn from Germany's Failed Experiment with Green Energy.” FoxNews.com, June 5. http://www.foxnews.com/opinion/2014/06/05/what-obama-could-learn-from-germany-failed-experiment-with-green-energy.html.
   Google Scholar
• Covrig, C. F., M. Ardelean, J. Vasiljevska, A. Mengolini, G. Fulli, and E. Amoiralis. 2014. Smart Grid Projects Outlook 2014. EUR - Scientific and Technical Research Series. Luxembourg: Office of the European Union.
   Google Scholar
• Dierkes, M., U. Hoffman, and L. Marz. 1996. Visions of Technology. Social and Institutional Factors Shaping the Development of New Technologies. Frankfurt am Main: Campus.
   Google Scholar
• Engels, F., and A. V. Münch. 2015. “The Micro Smart Grid as a Materialised Imaginary Within the German Energy Transition.” Energy Research & Social Science 9: 35–42. doi:10.1016/j.erss.2015.08.024.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ferrari, A., C. Coenen, and A. Grunwald. 2012. “Visions and Ethics in Current Discourse on Human Enhancement.” Nanoethics 6 (3): 215–229. doi: 10.1007/s11569-012-0155-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Foucault, M. 1977. Discipline and Punish: The Birth of the Prison. New York: Pantheon.
   Google Scholar
• Foucault, M. 1978. The History of Sexuality: An Introduction. Vol. 1. New York: Vintage.
   Google Scholar
• Foucault, M. 1980. “Confession of Flesh.” In Power/Knowledge: Selected Interviews and Other Writings, 1972–1977, edited by C. Gordon, 194–228. New York: Pantheon.
   Google Scholar
• Geels, F. W. 2005. Technological Transitions and System Innovations. A Co-Evolutionary and Socio-Technical Analysis. Cheltenham: Eigar.
   Google Scholar
• Goulden, M., B. Bedwell, S. Rennick-Egglestone, T. Rodden, and A. Spence. 2014. “Smart Grids, Smart Users? The Role of the User in Demand Side Management.” Energy Research & Social Science 2: 21–29. doi:10.1016/j.erss.2014.04.008.
   Google Scholar
• Gross, M., and R. Mautz. 2015. Renewable Energies. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Grunwald, A. 2012. Technikzukünfte als Medium von Zukunftsdebatten und Technikgestaltung. Karlsruhe: KIT Scientific.
   Google Scholar
• Grunwald, A. 2014. “The Hermeneutic Side of Responsible Research and Innovation.” Journal of Responsible Innovation 1 (3): 274–291. doi: 10.1080/23299460.2014.968437
   Google Scholar
• Hörl, E. 2013. “The Artificial Intelligence of Sense: The History of Sense and Technology after Jean-Luc Nancy (By Way of Gilbert Simondon).” Parrhesia 17: 11–24.
   Google Scholar
• Hughes, T. P. 1983. Networks of Power: Electrification in Western Society, 1880–1930. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jasanoff, S., and S.-H. Kim. 2009. “Containing the Atom: Sociotechnical Imaginaries and Nuclear Power in the United States and South Korea.” Minerva 47 (2): 119–146.
   Google Scholar
• Katzeff, C., and J. Wangel. 2015. “Social Practices, Households, and Design in the Smart Grid.” In ICT Innovations for Sustainability. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, Vol. 310, edited by L. M. Hilty and B. Aebischer, 351–365. Berlin: Springer International. http://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-319-09228-7_21.
   Google Scholar
• Keller, R. 2011. “The Sociology of Knowledge Approach to Discourse (SKAD).” Human Studies 34: 43–65. doi: 10.1007/s10746-011-9175-z
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Konrad, K. 2006. “The Social Dynamics of Expectations: The Interaction of Collective and Actor-Specific Expectations on Electronic Commerce and Interactive Television.” Technology Analysis & Strategic Management 18 (3/4): 429–444. doi: 10.1080/09537320600777192
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kourtit, K., and P. Nijkamp. 2012. “Smart Cities in the Innovation Age.” Innovation: The European Journal of Social Science Research 25 (2): 93–95. doi:10.1080/13511610.2012.660331.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krohn, W. 2007a. “Nature, Technology, and the Acknowledgment of Waste.” Nature & Culture 2 (2): 139–160. doi: 10.3167/nc.2007.020203
   Google Scholar
• Krohn, W. 2007b. “Realexperimente–Die Modernisierung der ‘offenen Gesellschaft’ durch experimentelle Forschung.” Erwägen Wissen Ethik 18 (3): 419–421.
   Google Scholar
• Krohn, W., and J. Weyer. 1994. “Society as a Laboratory: The Social Risks of Experimental Research.” Science and Public Policy 21 (3): 173–183.
   Google Scholar
• Latour, B. 2011. “From Multiculturalism to Multinaturalism: What Rules of Method for the New Socio-Scientific Experiments?” Nature and Culture 6 (1): 1–17. doi: 10.3167/nc.2011.060101
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lösch, A. 2006a. “Anticipating the Futures of Nanotechnology: Visionary Images as Means of Communication.” Technology Analysis & Strategic Management 18 (3/4): 393–409. doi: 10.1080/09537320600777168
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lösch, A. 2006b. “Means of Communicating Innovations; a Case Study for the Analysis and Assessment of Nanotechnology's Futuristic Visions.” Science, Technology & Innovation Studies 2: 103–125.
   Google Scholar
• Lösch, A. 2010. “Visual Dynamics: The Defuturisation of the Popular “Nano-Discourse” as an Effect of Increasing Economisation.” In Governing Future Technologies: Nanotechnology and the Rise of an Assessment Regime, edited by M. Kaiser, M. Kurath, S. Maasen, and C. Rehmann-Sutter, 89–108. Berlin: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Lösch, A. 2013. “Vision Assessment zu Human-Enhancement-Technologien; Konzeptionelle Überlegungen zu einer Analytik von Visionen im Kontext gesellschaftlicher Kommunikationsprozesse.” Technikfolgenabschätzung – Theorie und Praxis 22 (1): 9–16.
   Google Scholar
• Manderscheid, K. 2014. “The Movement Problem, the Car and Future Mobility Regimes: Automobility as Dispositif and Mode of Regulation.” Mobilities 9 (4): 604–626. doi:10.1080/17450101.2014.961257.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCray, W. P. 2012. The Visioneers: How a Group of Elite Scientists Pursued Space Colonies, Nanotechnologies, and a Limitless Future. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Miller, C. A., A. Iles, and C. Jones. 2013. “The Social Dimensions of Energy Transitions.” Science as Culture 22 (2): 135–148. doi: 10.1080/09505431.2013.786989
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nordmann, A. 2013. “Visioneering Assessment: On the Construction of Tunnel Visions for Technovisionary Research and Policy.” Science, Technology & Innovation Studies 9 (2): 89–94.
   Google Scholar
• Nyborg, S., and I. Røpke. 2013. “Constructing Users in the Smart Grid—insights from the Danish eFlex Project.” Energy Efficiency 6 (4): 655–670. doi:10.1007/s12053-013-9210-1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nye, D. 1990. Consuming Power: A Social History of American Energies. Cambridge: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Orwat, C. 2011. “Systemic Risks in the Electric Power Infrastructure?” Technikfolgenabschätzung - Theorie und Praxis 20 (3): 47–55.
   Google Scholar
• Rabinow, P., and N. Rose. 2003. “Foucault Today.” In The Essential Foucault: Selections from the Essential Works of Foucault, 1954–1984, edited by P. Rabinow and N. Rose, vii–xxxvi. New York: New Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ramchurn, S. D., P. Vytelingum, A. Rogers, and N. R. Jennings. 2012. “Putting the ‘Smarts’ into the Smart Grid: A Grand Challenge for Artificial Intelligence.” Communications of the acm 55 (4): 86–97. doi:10.1145/2133806.2133825.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schick, L., and C. Gad. 2015. “Flexible and Inflexible Energy Engagements—A Study of the Danish Smart Grid Strategy.” Energy Research & Social Science, no. 9 (September): 51–59. doi:10.1016/j.erss.2015.08.013.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Schick, L., and B. R. Winthereik. 2013. “Innovating Relations - or Why Smart Grid is Not too Complex for the Public.” Science & Technology Studies 26 (3): 82–102.
   Google Scholar
• Schneider, C., and A. Lösch. 2015. “What About your Futures, Technology Assessment? An Essay on How to Take the Visions of TA Seriously, Motivated by the PACITA Conference.” Technikfolgenabschätzung - Theorie und Praxis 2. http://www.tatup-journal.de/downloads/2015/tatup152_sclo15a.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Skjølsvold, T. M., and M. Ryghaug. 2015. “Embedding Smart Energy Technology in Built Environments: A Comparative Study of Four Smart Grid Demonstration Projects.” Indoor and Built Environment 24 (7): 878–890. doi:10.1177/1420326X15596210.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Späth, P., and H. Rohracher. 2010. “‘Energy Regions’: The Transformative Power of Regional Discourses on Socio-Technical Futures.” Research Policy, Special Section on Innovation and Sustainability Transitions 39 (4): 449–458.
   Google Scholar
• Srnicek, N., and A. Williams. 2015. Inventing the Future: Postcapitalism and a World Without Work. London: Verso.
   Google Scholar
• Talbot, D. 2012. “The Great German Energy Experiment.” Technology Review 115 (4): 50–55.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thrift, N. J. 2011. “Lifeworld Inc.: and What to do About it.” Environment and Planning D: Society and Space 29 (1): 5–26. doi: 10.1068/d0310
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Throndsen, W., and M. Ryghaug. 2015. “Material Participation and the Smart Grid: Exploring Different Modes of Articulation.” Energy Research & Social Science, no, 9 (September): 157–165. doi:10.1016/j.erss.2015.08.012.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Tyfield, D. 2014. “Putting the Power in ‘Socio-Technical Regimes’ – E-Mobility Transition in China as Political Process.” Mobilities 9 (4): 585–603. doi:10.1080/17450101.2014.961262.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Lente, H. 1993. “ Promising Technology. The Dynamics of Expectations in Technological Developments.” PhD Thesis, University of Twente, Enschede.
   Google Scholar
• Verbong, G., and D. Loorbach. eds. 2012. Governing the Energy Transition. Reality, Illusion or Necessity? New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Vu, K., M. M. Begouic, and D. Novosel. 1997. “Grids get Smart Protection and Control.” Computer Applications in Power, IEEE 10 (4): 40–44. doi: 10.1109/67.625373
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weber, K. M. 2003. “Transforming Large Socio-technical Systems towards Sustainability: On the Role of Users and Future Visions for the Uptake of City Logistics and Combined Heat and Power Generation.” Innovation: The European Journal of Social Science Research 16 (2): 155–175.
   Google Scholar
• Quoted Interview-Partners (Anonymised).
   Google Scholar
• (All interviews were made in spring and summer 2013).
   Google Scholar
• Consumer Protection Association/NGO (2013) = Spokesperson of a German Consumer Protection Association.
   Google Scholar
• Economist/Academia (2013) = Economist from a German University Department.
   Google Scholar
• Energy Supply Company (2013) = Head of an Innovation Group of One of the Big German Energy Supply Companies.
   Google Scholar
• Environmental Association/NGO (2013) = Leading Expert for Renewable Energies from a German Environmental Association.
   Google Scholar
• Industry Association (2013) = Expert for Smart Grids, Smart Markets and Regulation from One of the Big Industry Associations in Germany in the Energy Sector.
   Google Scholar