The impact of ICT on systems biology and how to assess it

References

• Allen, J. F. 2001. “Hypothesis, Induction and Background Knowledge. Data Do Not Speak for Themselves. Replies to Donald A. Gillies, Lawrence A. Kelly and Michael Scott.” BioEssays 23: 861–862. doi: 10.1002/bies.1125
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ankeny, R. A., and S. Leonelli. 2011. “What Is So Special About Model Organisms?” Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 42 (2): 313–323. doi: 10.1016/j.shpsa.2010.11.039
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Auffray, C., S. Imbeaud, M. Roux-Rouquie, and L. Hood. 2003. “From Functional Genomics to Systems Biology: Concepts and Practices.” Comptes Rendus Biologies 326 (10 and 11): 879–892. doi: 10.1016/j.crvi.2003.09.033
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bensaude-Vincent, B., S. Loeve, A. Nordmann, and A. Schwarz. 2011. “Matters of Interest: The Objects of Research in Science and Technoscience.” Journal of General Philosophy of Science. doi:10.1007/s10838-011-9172-y.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brent, R., and J. Bruck. 2006. “2020 Computing: Can Computers Help to Explain Biology?” Nature 440 (7083): 416–417. doi: 10.1038/440416a
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bucur, A., S. Rüping, T. Sengstag, S. Sfakianakis, M. Tsiknakis, and D. Wegener. 2011. “The ACGT Project in Retrospect: Lessons Learned and Future Outlook.” Procedia Computer Science 4: 1119–1128. doi: 10.1016/j.procs.2011.04.119
   Google Scholar
• Burgoon, L. D. 2007. “Clearing the Standards Landscape: The Semantics of Terminology and Their Impact on Toxicogenomics.” Toxicological Sciences 99 (2): 403–412. doi: 10.1093/toxsci/kfm108
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burkhardt, H., and B. Smith. 1991. Handbook of Metaphysics and Ontology. Munich: Philosophia.
   Google Scholar
• Coebergh, J. W., E. B. van Veen, J. P. Vandenbroucke, P. van Diest, and W. Oosterhuis. 2006. “One-Time General Consent for Research on Biological Samples: Opt Out System for Patients is Optimal and Endorsed in Many Countries.” British Medical Journal 332 (7542): 665–665. doi: 10.1136/bmj.332.7542.665
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Edwards, P. N., M. S. Mayernik, A. L. Batcheller, G. C. Bowker, and C. L. Borgman. 2011. “Science Friction: Data, Metadata, and Collaboration.” Social Studies of Science 41 (5): 667–690. doi: 10.1177/0306312711413314
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Field, D., S. A. Sansone, A. Collis, T. Booth, P. Dukes, S. K. Gregurick, K. Kennedy, et al. 2009. “Megascience. ‘Omics’ Data Sharing.” Science 326 (5950): 234–236. doi: 10.1126/science.1180598
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Forgó, N., R. Kollek, M. Arning, T. Krügel, and I. Petersen. 2010. Ethical and Legal Requirements for Transnational Genetic Research. München: Beck.
   Google Scholar
• Forman, P. 2007. “The Primacy of Science in Modernity, of Technology in Postmodernity, and of Ideology in the History of Technology.” History and Technology 23 (1): 1–152. doi: 10.1080/07341510601092191
   Google Scholar
• Garcia-Sancho, M. 2012. “From the Genetic to the Computer Program: The Historicity of ‘Data’ and ‘Computation’ in the Investigations on the Nematode Worm C. Elegans (1963–1998).” Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C: Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences 43 (1): 16–28. doi: 10.1016/j.shpsc.2011.10.002
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ge, H., A. J. Walhout, and M. Vidal. 2003. “Integrating ‘Omic’ Information: A Bridge Between Genomics and Systems Biology.” Trends in Genetics 19 (10): 551–560. doi: 10.1016/j.tig.2003.08.009
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gill, B. 1994. “Die Vorverlegung der Folgenerkenntnis. Science Assessment als Selbstreflexion der Wissenschaft.” Soziale Welt 45 (4): 430–454.
   Google Scholar
• Green, S., and O. Wolkenhauer. 2012. “Integration in Action.” EMBO Reports 13 (9): 769–771. doi: 10.1038/embor.2012.121
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haraway, D. 1997. Modest_Witness@Second_Millenium. FemaleMan_Meets_OncoMouse. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Hottois, G. 1984. Le signe et la technique. La philosophie à l'épreuve de la technique. Paris: Aubier.
   Google Scholar
• Janes, K. A., and M. B. Yaffe. 2006. “Data-Driven Modelling of Signal-Transduction Networks.” Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology 7 (11): 820–828. doi: 10.1038/nrm2041
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kastenhofer, K. 2010. “Do We Need a Specific Kind of Technoscience Assessment? Taking the Convergence of Science and Technology Seriously.” Poiesis & Praxis 7 (1 and 2): 37–54. doi: 10.1007/s10202-010-0077-3
   Google Scholar
• Kelder, T., B. R. Conklin, C. T. Evelo, and A. R. Pico. 2010. “Finding the Right Questions: Exploratory Pathway Analysis to Enhance Biological Discovery in Large Datasets.” PLoS Biology 8 (8): e1000472. doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.1000472.
   Google Scholar
• Kell, D. B., and S. G. Oliver. 2004. “Here is the Evidence, now what is the Hypothesis? The Complementary Roles of Inductive and Hypothesis-Driven Science in the Post-Genomic Era.” BioEssays 26 (1): 99–105. doi: 10.1002/bies.10385
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kitano, H. 2002. “Computational Systems Biology.” Nature 420 (6912): 206–210. doi: 10.1038/nature01254
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krohs, U. 2012. “Convenience Experimentation.” Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C: Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences 43 (1): 52–57. doi: 10.1016/j.shpsc.2011.10.005
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Latour, B. 1987. Science in Action. How to Follow Scientists and Engineers Through Society. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Latour, B. 1996. “On Actor-Network Theory: A Few Clarifications.” Soziale Welt 47 (4): 369–382.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lenzerini, M. 2002. “Data Integration: A Theoretical Perspective.” In Proceedings of the twenty-first ACM SIGACT-SIGMOD-SIGART symposium on principles of database systems, 233–246. doi:10.1145/543613.543644.
   Google Scholar
• Leonelli, S. 2010. “Packaging Data for Re-Use: Databases in Model Organism Biology.” In How Well Do Facts Travel? The Dissemination of Reliable Knowledge, edited by P. Howlett and M. S. Morgan, 325–248. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Leonelli, S. 2012. “Introduction: Making Sense of Data-Driven Research in the Biological and Biomedical Sciences.” Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C: Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences 43 (1): 1–3. doi: 10.1016/j.shpsc.2011.10.001
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Leonelli, S. 2014. “What Difference Does Quantity Make? On the Epistemology of Big Data in Biology”. Big Data and Society 1 (1). doi:10.1177/2053951714534395.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Leonelli, S., and R. A. Ankeny. 2012. “Re-Thinking Organisms: The Impact of Databases on Model Organism Biology.” Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C: Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences 43 (1): 29–36. doi: 10.1016/j.shpsc.2011.10.003
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Leonelli, S., A. D. Diehl, K. R. Christie, M. A. Harris, and J. Lomax. 2011. “How the Gene Ontology Evolves.” BMC Bioinformatics 12: 325. doi: 10.1186/1471-2105-12-325
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meier, S., and C. Gehring. 2008. “A Guide to the Integrated Application of On-Line Data Mining Tools for the Inference of Gene Functions at the Systems Level.” Biotechnology Journal 3 (11): 1375–1387. doi: 10.1002/biot.200800142
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Morgan, M. S., and M. Morrison, eds. 1999. Models as Mediators: Perspectives on Natural and Social Science. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Nordmann, A. 2010. “Science in the Context of Technology.” In Science in the Context of Application, edited by M. Carrier and A. Nordmann, 467–482. Dordrecht: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Nordmann, A. 2014. “Synthetic Biology at the Limits of Science.” In Synthetic Biology: Character and Impact, edited by B. Giese, A. Gleich, C. Pade, and H. Wigger, 31–58. Berlin: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• O’Malley, M. A., and O. S. Soyer. 2012. “The Roles of Integration in Molecular Systems Biology.” Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C: Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences 43 (1): 58–68. doi: 10.1016/j.shpsc.2011.10.006
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Palsson, B. O. 2006. Systems Biology: Properties of Reconstructed Networks. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Philippi, S., and J. Kohler. 2006. “Addressing the Problems with Life-Science Databases for Traditional Uses and Systems Biology.” Nature Reviews Genetics 7 (6): 482–488. doi: 10.1038/nrg1872
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Popper, K. (1935 [1968]). The Logic of Scientific Discovery. New York: Harper and Row.
   Google Scholar
• Rakyan, V. K., T. A. Down, D. J. Balding, and S. Beck. 2011. “Epigenome-Wide Association Studies for Common Human Diseases.” Nature Reviews Genetics 12 (8): 529–541. doi: 10.1038/nrg3000
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roco, M. C., and W. S. Bainbridge. 2002. Converging Technologies for Improving Human Performance: Nanotechnology, Biotechnology, Information Technology and Cognitive Science. Washington, DC: U.S. National Science Foundation.
   Google Scholar
• Schmid, A., and L. M. Blank. 2010. “Systems Biology: Hypothesis-Driven Omics Integration.” Nature Chemical Biology 6 (7): 485–487. doi: 10.1038/nchembio.398
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sujanski, W. 2001. “Heterogeneous Database Integration in Biomedicine.” Journal of Biomedical Informatics 34 (4): 285–298. doi: 10.1006/jbin.2001.1024
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Swertz, M. A., and R. C. Jansen. 2007. “Beyond Standardization: Dynamic Software Infrastructures for Systems Biology.” Nature Reviews Genetics 8 (3): 235–243. doi: 10.1038/nrg2048
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taylor, C. F., D. Field, S. A. Sansone, J. Aerts, R. Apweiler, M. Ashburner, C. A. Ball, et al. 2008. “Promoting Coherent Minimum Reporting Guidelines for Biological and Biomedical Investigations: The MIBBI Project.” Nature Biotechnology 26 (8): 889–896. doi: 10.1038/nbt.1411
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tsiknakis, M., D. Kafetzopoulos, G. Potamias, A. Analyti, K. Marias, and A. Manganas. 2006. “Building a European Biomedical Grid on Cancer: The ACGT Integrated Project.” Studies Health Technology Information120: 247–258.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Valencia, A. 2002. “Search and Retrieve. Large-Scale Data Generation is Becoming Increasingly Important in Biological Research. But How Good are the Tools to Make Sense of the Data?” EMBO Reports 3 (5): 396–400. doi: 10.1093/embo-reports/kvf104
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Westerhoff, H. V., and D. B. Kell. 2007. The Methodologies of Systems Biology. Amsterdam: Elvesier.
   Google Scholar
• Weston, A. D., and L. Hood. 2004. “Systems Biology, Proteomics, and the Future of Health Care: Toward Predictive, Preventative, and Personalized Medicine.” Journal of Proteome Research 3 (2): 179–196. doi: 10.1021/pr0499693
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wierling, C., R. Herwig, and H. Lehrach. 2007. “Resources, Standards and Tools for Systems Biology.” Briefings in Functional Genomics and Proteomics 6 (3): 240–251. doi: 10.1093/bfgp/elm027
   PubMedGoogle Scholar