Transforming energy systems by transforming power relations. Insights from dispositive thinking and governmentality studies

References

• Agamben, Giorgio. 2006. Che cos’è un dispositivo? Roma: Nottetempo.
   Google Scholar
• Agrawal, Arun. 2005. Environmentality. Technologies of Government and the Making of Subjects. Durham: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Allen, John. 2003. Lost Geographies of Power. Malden: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Anderson, Ben, and Colin McFarlane. 2011. “Assemblage and Geography.” Area 43 (2): 124–127. doi:10.1111/j.1475-4762.2011.01004.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Avelino, Flor, and Jan Rotmans. 2009. “Power in Transition: An Interdisciplinary Framework to Study Power in Relation to Structural Change.” European Journal of Social Theory 12 (4): 543–569. doi:10.1177/1368431009349830.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barnett, Michael, and Raymond Duvall. 2005. “Power in International Politics.” International Organization 59 (1): 39–75. doi:10.1017/S0020818305050010.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Basu, Laura. 2010. “Memory Dispositifs and National Identities: The Case of Ned Kelly.” Memory Studies 4 (1): 33–41. doi:10.1177/1750698010382159.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bender, Thomas. 2010. “Postscript: Reassembling the City: Networks and Urban Imaginaries.” In Urban Assemblages. How Actor-network Theory Changes Urban Studies, edited by Ignacio Farías and Thomas Bender, 303–323. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Beveridge, Ross, and Kristine Kern. 2013. “The Energiewende in Germany: Background, Developments and Future Challenges.” Renewable Energy Law and Policy Review 1: 3–12.
   Google Scholar
• BMUB [Bundesministerium für Umwelt, Naturschutz, Bau und Reaktorsicherheit]. 2014. Klimaschutz in Zahlen: Fakten, Trends und Impulse deutscher Klimapolitik. Berlin: BMUB.
   Google Scholar
• Bosch, Stephan, and Gerd Peyke. 2011. “Gegenwind für die Erneuerbaren – Räumliche Neuorientierung der Wind-, Solar- und Bioenergie vor dem Hintergrund einer verringerten Akzeptanz sowie zunehmender Flächennutzungskonflikte im ländlichen Raum.” Raumforschung und Raumordnung 69 (2): 105–118. doi:10.1007/s13147-011-0082-6.
   Google Scholar
• Bues, Andrea, and Ludger Gailing. 2016. “Energy Transitions and Power: Between Governmentality and Depoliticization.” In Conceptualizing Germany’s Energy Transition: Institutions, Materiality, Power, Space, edited by Ludger Gailing and Timothy Moss, 69–91. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Bührmann, Andrea, and Werner Schneider. 2008. “Mehr als nur diskursive Praxis?: konzeptionelle Grundlagen und methodische Aspekte der Dispositivanalyse.” Historical Social Research 33 (1): 108–141.
   Google Scholar
• Bührmann, Andrea, and Werner Schneider. 2012. Vom Diskurs zum Dispositiv. Eine Einführung in die Dispositivanalyse. 2nd ed. Bielefeld: Transcript.
   Google Scholar
• Bulkeley, Harriet, Vanesa Castán Broto, and Gareth Edwards. 2015. An Urban Politics of Climate Change. Experimentation and the Governing of Socio-Technical Transitions. Abingdon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Bulkeley, Harriet, and Kristine Kern. 2006. “Local Government and the Governing of Climate Change in Germany and the UK.” Urban Studies 43 (12): 2237–2259. doi:10.1080/00420980600936491.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burrell, Gibson. 1988. “Modernism, Post Modernism and Organizational Analysis 2: The Contribution of Michel Foucault.” Organization Studies 9: 221–235. doi: 10.1177/017084068800900205
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bussolini, Jeffrey. 2010. “What Is a Dispositive?” Foucault Studies 10: 85–107.
   Google Scholar
• Caborn, Joannah. 2007. “On the Methodology of Dispositive Analysis.” Critical Approaches to Discourse Analysis Across Disciplines 1 (1): 115–123.
   Google Scholar
• Campbell, Elaine. 2010. “The Emotional Life of Governmental Power.” Foucault Studies 9: 35–53.
   Google Scholar
• Crampton, Jeremy W., and Stuart Elden, eds. 2010. Space, Knowledge and Power: Foucault and Geography. Farnham: Ashgate.
   Google Scholar
• Death, Carl. 2010. “Counter-conducts: A Foucauldian Analytics of Protest.” Social Movement Studies 9 (3): 235–251. doi:10.1080/14742837.2010.493655.
   Google Scholar
• DeLanda, Manuel. 2006. A New Philosophy of Society. Assemblage Theory and Social Complexity. London: Continuum.
   Google Scholar
• Deleuze, Gilles. 1992. “What Is a Dispositif?” In Michel Foucault Philosopher, edited by Timothy J. Armstrong, 159–168. New York: Harvester Wheatsheaf.
   Google Scholar
• Deutsche Gesellschaft für Sonnenenergie. 2015. “EnergyMap.” Accessed July 20, 2015. http://www.energymap.info.
   Google Scholar
• Ditrych, Ondrej. 2013. “From Discourse to Dispositif: States and Terrorism Between Marseille and 9/11.” Security Dialogue 44 (3): 223–240. doi:10.1177/0967010613484076.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duineveld, Martijn, Kristof Van Assche, and Raoul Beunen. 2013. “Making Things Irreversible. Object Stabilization in Urban Planning and Design.” Geoforum 46: 16–24. doi:10.1016/j.geoforum.2012.11.026.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Dyk, Silke. 2013. “Was die Welt zusammenhält: Das Dispositiv als Assoziation und performative Handlungsmacht.” Zeitschrift für Diskursforschung 1 (1): 46–66.
   Google Scholar
• Erlenbusch, Verena. 2013. “The Place of Sovereignty: Mapping Power with Agamben, Butler, and Foucault.” Critical Horizons 14 (1): 44–69. doi:10.1179/15685160X13A.0000000003.
   Google Scholar
• Foster, Emma Ann, Peter Kerr, and Christopher Byrne. 2014. “Rolling Back to Roll Forward: Depoliticisation and the Extension of Government.” Policy & Politics 42 (2): 225–241. doi:10.1332/030557312X655945.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Foucault, Michel. 1978. The History of Sexuality, Vol. 1: An Introduction. New York: Pantheon.
   Google Scholar
• Foucault, Michel. 1980. Power/Knowledge: Selected Interviews and Other Writings 1972–1977. New York: Pantheon.
   Google Scholar
• Foucault, Michel. 1982. “The Subject and Power, Afterword.” In Michel Foucault: Beyond Structuralism and Hermeneutics, edited by Hubert L. Dreyfus and Paul Rabinow, 208–226. London: Harvester Wheatsheaf.
   Google Scholar
• Foucault, Michel. 2009. Security, Territory, Population. Lectures at the Collège de France, 1977–78. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Gailing, Ludger, Frank Hüesker, Kristine Kern, and Andreas Röhring. 2013. Die räumliche Gestaltung der Energiewende zwischen Zentralität und Dezentralität: Explorative Anwendung einer Forschungsheuristik. Erkner: Leibniz-Institut für Regionalentwicklung und Strukturplanung.
   Google Scholar
• Gailing, Ludger, and Timothy Moss. 2016. Conceptualizing Germany’s Energy Transition: Institutions, Materiality, Power, Space. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Gailing, Ludger, and Andreas Röhring. 2015. “Was ist dezentral an der Energiewende? Infrastrukturen erneuerbarer Energien als Herausforderungen und Chancen für ländliche Räume.” Raumforschung und Raumordnung 73 (1): 31–43. doi:10.1007/s13147-014-0322-7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Geels, Frank W. 2002. “Technological Transitions as Evolutionary Reconfiguration Processes: A Multi-Level Perspective and a Case-study.” Research Policy 31: 1257–1274. doi: 10.1016/S0048-7333(02)00062-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gordon, Colin. 1991. “Governmental Rationality: An Introduction.” In The Foucault Effect. Studies in Governmentality, edited by Graham Burchell, Colin Gordon, and Peter Miller, 1–52. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Häkli, Jouni. 2009. “Governmentality.” In International Encyclopedia of Human Geography, Volume 4, edited by Rob Kitchin and Nigel Thrift, 628–633. Oxford: Elsevier.
   Google Scholar
• Hamann, Trent H. 2009. “Neoliberalism, Governmentality, and Ethics.” Foucault Studies 6: 37–59.
   Google Scholar
• Hay, Colin. 1997. “State of the Art: Divided by a Common Language: Political Theory and the Concept of Power.” Politics 17 (1): 45–52. doi:10.1111/1467-9256.00033.
   Google Scholar
• Healy, Stephen. 2005. “Toward a Vocabulary for Speaking of the Engagement of Things into Discourse.” Journal of Environmental Policy & Planning 7 (3): 239–256. doi:10.1080/15239080500339745.
   Google Scholar
• Heynen, Nik, Maria Kaika, and Erik Swyngedouw. 2006. “Urban Political Ecology. Politicizing the Production of Urban Natures.” In In the Nature of Cities. Urban Political Ecology and the Politics of Urban Metabolism, edited by Nik Heynen, Maria Kaika, and Erik Swyngedouw, 1–19. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Hillier, Jean. 2005. “Straddling the Post-structuralist Abyss: Between Transcendence and Immanence?” Planning Theory 4 (3): 271–299. doi:10.1177/14730952050.
   Google Scholar
• Huxley, Margo. 2010. “Geographies of Governmentality.” In Space, Knowledge and Power. Foucault and Geography, edited by Jeremy W. Crampton and Stuart Elden, 185–204. Farnham: Ashgate.
   Google Scholar
• Jäger, Siegfried, and Florentine Maier. 2009. “Theoretical and Methodological aspects of Foucauldian Critical Discourse Analysis and Dispositive Analysis.” In Methods of Critical Discourse Analysis, edited by Ruth Wodak and Michael Meyer, 34–61. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Jasanoff, Sheila, and Sang-Hyun Kim. 2013. “Sociotechnical Imaginaries and National Energy Policies.” Science as Culture 22 (2): 189–196. doi:10.1080/09505431.2013.786990.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jepson, Wendy, Christian Brannstrom, and Nicole Persons. 2012. “‘We Don’t Take the Pledge’: Environmentality and Environmental Skepticism at the Epicenter of US Wind Energy Development.” Geoforum 43: 851–863. doi:10.1016/j.geoforum.2012.02.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keskitalo, E. Carina H., Sirkku Juhola, and Lisa Westerhoff. 2012. “Climate Change as Governmentality: Technologies of Government for Adaptation in Three European Countries.” Journal of Environmental Planning and Management 55 (4): 435–452. doi:10.1080/09640568.2011.607994.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kooij, Henk-Jan. 2014. “Object Formation and Subject Formation: The Innovation Campus in the Netherlands.” Planning Theory 14 (4): 339–359. doi:10.1177/1473095214527278.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krause, Florentin, Hartmut Bossel, and Karl-Friedrich Müller-Reißmann. 1980. Energie-Wende. Wachstum und Wohlstand ohne Erdöl und Uran – ein Alternativ-Bericht des Öko-Instituts Freiburg. 2nd ed. Frankfurt am Main: S. Fischer.
   Google Scholar
• Lawhon, Mary, and Joseph Murphy. 2012. “Socio-technical Regimes and Sustainability Transitions: Insights from Political Ecology.” Progress in Human Geography 36 (3): 354–378. doi:10.1177/0309132511427960.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lemke, Thomas. 2008. Gouvernementalität und Biopolitik. 2nd ed. Wiesbaden: Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.
   Google Scholar
• MacKinnon, Danny. 2000. “Managerialism, Governmentality and the State: A Neo-Foucauldian Approach to Local Economic Governance.” Political Geography 19 (3): 293–314. doi:10.1016/S0962-6298(99)00086-4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Manderscheid, Katharina. 2012. “Automobilität als raumkonstituierendes Dispositiv der Moderne.” In Die Ordnung der Räume. Geographische Forschung im Anschluss an Michel Foucault, edited by Henning Füller and Boris Michel, 145–178. Münster: Westfälisches Dampfboot.
   Google Scholar
• Manderscheid, Katharina. 2014. “Formierung und Wandel hegemonialer Mobilitätsdispositive. Automobile Subjekte und urbane Nomaden.” Zeitschrift für Diskursforschung 2 (1): 5–31.
   Google Scholar
• McCann, Eugene, and Kevin Ward. 2012. “Assembling Urbanism: Following Policies and ‘Studying through’ the Sites and Situations of Policy Making.” Environment and Planning A 44 (1): 42–51. doi:10.1068/a44178.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McFarlane, Colin. 2011. “Assemblage and Critical Urbanism.” City 15 (2): 204–224. doi:10.1068/d4710.
   Google Scholar
• Mckee, Kim. 2009. “Post-Foucauldian Governmentality: What Does It Offer Critical Social Policy Analysis?” Critical Social Policy 29 (3): 465–486. doi:10.1177/0261018309105180.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller, Peter, and Nikolas S. Rose. 2008. Governing the Present. Administering Economic, Social and Personal Life. Cambridge: Polity.
   Google Scholar
• Moss, Timothy, Sören Becker, and Matthias Naumann. 2014. “Whose Energy Transition Is It, Anyway? Organisation and Ownership of the Energiewende in Villages, Cities and Regions.” Local Environment. doi:10.1080/13549839.2014.915799.
   Google Scholar
• Oels, Angela. 2005. “Rendering Climate Change Governable: From Biopower to Advanced Liberal Government?” Journal of Environmental Policy & Planning 7 (3): 185–207. doi:10.1080/15239080500339661.
   Google Scholar
• Pløger, John. 2008. “Foucault’s Dispositif and the City.” Planning Theory 7 (1): 51–70. doi:10.1177/1473095207085665.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raco, Mike. 2003. “Governmentality, Subject-building, and the Discourses and Practices of Devolution in the UK.” Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers 28 (1): 75–95. doi: 10.1111/1475-5661.00078
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rip, Arie, and R. Kemp. 1998. “Technological Change.” In Human Choice and Climate Change. Volume 2: Resources and Technology, edited by Steve Rayner, 327–399. Columbus: Battelle Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rotmans, Jan, and René Kemp. 2008. “Detour Ahead: A Response to Shove and Walker about the Perilous Road of Transition Management.” Environment and Planning A 40 (4): 1006–1011. doi:10.1068/a4004let.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rutherford, Jonathan, and Olivier Coutard. 2014. “Urban Energy Transitions: Places, Processes and Politics of Socio-technical Change.” Urban Studies 51 (7): 1353–1377. doi:10.1177/0042098013500090.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seier, Andrea. 1999. “Kategorien der Entzifferung: Macht und Diskurs als Analyseraster.” In Das Wuchern der Diskurse. Perspektiven der Diskursanalyse Foucaults, edited by Hannelore Bublitz, Andrea Bührmann, Christine Hanke, and Andrea Seier, 75–86. Frankfurt am Main: Campus.
   Google Scholar
• Shove, Elizabeth, and Gordon Walker. 2007. “CAUTION! Transitions Ahead: Politics, Practice, and Sustainable Transition Management. Commentary.” Environment and Planning A 39 (4): 763–770. doi:10.1068/a39310.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, Adrian, and Andy Stirling. 2010. “The Politics of Social-ecological Resilience and Sustainable Socio-technical Transitions.” Ecology and Society 15 (1): 11. http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol15/iss1/art11.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spilker, Niels. 2014. “Die Freiheit im Lichte der Kennzahl. Drohung und Verheißung in der gouvernementalen Programmatik ‘Bildungsautonomie’.” In Organisationsforschung nach Foucault. Macht – Diskurs – Widerstand, edited by Ronald Hartz and Matthias Rätzer, 169–189. Bielefeld: Transcript.
   Google Scholar
• Stäheli, Urs. 2000. Poststrukturalistische Soziologien. Bielefeld: Transcript.
   Google Scholar
• Strunz, Sebastian. 2014. “The German Energy Transition as a Regime Shift.” Ecological Economics 100: 150–158. doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2014.01.019.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tucker, Karen. 2014. “Participation and Subjectification in Global Governance: NGOs, Acceptable Subjectivities and the WTO.” Millennium: Journal of International Studies 42 (2): 376–396. doi:10.1177/0305829813518257.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vadrot, Alice B.M. 2010. “Sustainable Energy and Responses to Climate Change.” Innovation: The European Journal of Social Science Research 23 (4): 293–295. doi:10.180/13511610.2011.566496.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Assche, Kristof, Raoul Beunen, and Martijn Duineveld. 2014. Evolutionary Governance Theory: An Introduction. Cham: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Vanolo, Alberto. 2014. “Smartmentality: The Smart City as Disciplinary Strategy.” Urban Studies 51 (5): 883–898. doi:10.1177/0042098013494427.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ward, Lucas. 2013. “Eco-governmentality Revisited: Mapping Divergent Subjectivities among Integrated Water Resource Management Experts in Paraguay.” Geoforum 46: 91–102. doi:10.1016/j.geoforum.2012.12.004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar