Boundary dimensions of social innovation: negotiating conflicts and compatibilities when developing a national agenda

References

• Aagaard Nielsen, K., and Svensson, L. eds. 2006. Action Research and Interactive Research – Beyond Practice and Theory. Maastricht: Shaker.
   Google Scholar
• Andersson, S., Berglund, K., Gunnarsson, E., and Sundin, E. eds. 2012. Promoting Innovation – Policies, Practices and Procedures. Stockholm: VINNOVA.
   Google Scholar
• Buckland, H., and Murillo, D. eds. 2013. Antenna for Social Innovation: Pathways to Systemic Change: Inspiring Stories and a New Set of Variables for Understanding Social Innovation. Sheffield: Greenleaf.
   Google Scholar
• Cajaiba-Santana, G. 2014. “Social Innovation: Moving the Field Forward. A Conceptual Framework.” Technological Forecasting & Social Change 82: 42–51. doi: 10.1016/j.techfore.2013.05.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coghlan, D., and M Brydon-Miller. 2014. The SAGE Encyclopedia of Action Research. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Dawson, P., and L. Daniel. 2010. “Understanding Social Innovation: A Provisional Framework.” International Journal of Technology Management 51 (1): 9–21. doi: 10.1504/IJTM.2010.033125
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• European Commission. 2010. Europe 2020 – A European Strategy for Smart, Sustainable and Inclusive Growth. Brussels: European Commission.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. 2013. Social Innovation Research in the European Union: Approaches, Findings and Future Directions. Policy Review. Brussels: European Commission.
   Google Scholar
• EU (European Union), EC (European Commission), and BEPA (Bureau of European Policy Advisers). 2010. Empowering People, Driving Change, Social Innovation in the European Union. Luxembourg: EUR-OP.
   Google Scholar
• Gerometta, J., H. Häussermann, and G. Longo. 2005. “Social Innovation and Civil Society in Urban Governance: Strategies for an Inclusive City.” Urban Studies 42 (11): 2007–2021. doi:10.1080/00420980500279851.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Godin, B. 2012. Social Innovation: Utopias of Innovation from c.1830 to the Present. Working Paper No: Project on the Intellectual History of Innovation. 11.
   Google Scholar
• Grimm, R., C. Fox, S. Baines, and K Albertson. 2013. “Social Innovation, An Answer to Contemporary Societal Challenges? Locating the Concept in Theory and Practice.” Innovation: The European Journal of Social Sciences 26 (4): 436–455.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hansson, J., F. Björk, D. Lundborg, and L. E. Olofsson. eds. 2014. An Ecosystem for Social Innovation in Sweden – A Strategic Research and Innovation Agenda. Lund: Lund University.
   Google Scholar
• Herr, K., and G. L. Anderson. 2005. The Action Research Dissertation – A Guide for Students and Faculty. Thousand Oaks: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Hilb, M. 2013. “Corporate Social Innovation Discourse: Towards an Integration of Complementary Theoretical Perspectives.” International Journal of Sustainable Strategic Management 4 (2): 170–185. doi: 10.1504/IJSSM.2013.058593
   Google Scholar
• Ionescu, C. 2015. “About the Conceptualization of Social Innovation.” Theoretical & Applied Economics 22 (3): 53–62.
   Google Scholar
• Jenson, J. 2010a. Defining and Measuring Social Cohesion. London: Commonwealth Secretariat.
   Google Scholar
• Jenson, J. 2010b. “Diffusing Ideas for After Neo-liberalism: The Social Investment Perspective in Europe and Latin America.” Global Social Policy 10 (1): 59–84. doi: 10.1177/1468018109354813
   Google Scholar
• Jordan, T., P. Andersson, and H. Ringnér. 2013. “The Spectrum of Responses to Complex Societal Issues: Reflections on Seven Years of Empirical Inquiry.” Integral Review 9 (1): 34–70.
   Google Scholar
• Leadbeater, C. 1997. The Rise of the Social Entrepreneur. London: Demos.
   Google Scholar
• Lindberg, M. 2012. “A Striking Pattern – Co-construction of Innovation, Men and Masculinity in Sweden’s Innovation Policy.” In Promoting Innovation – Policies, Practices and Procedures, edited by S. Andersson, K. Berglund, E. Gunnarsson, and E. Sundin, 47–67. Stockholm: VINNOVA.
   Google Scholar
• Lindberg, M. 2014. “From Exclusion to Inclusion in Public Innovation Support? Innovative Practices in Bottom-up Networks.” Scandinavian Journal of Public Administration 18 (4): 91–107.
   Google Scholar
• Lindberg, M., L. Forsberg, and H. Karlberg. 2015. “Gendered Social Innovation – A Theoretical Lens for Analysing Structural Transformation in Organisations and Society.” International Journal of Social Entrepreneurship and Innovation 3 (6): 472–483. doi: 10.1504/IJSEI.2015.073540
   Google Scholar
• Mendes, A., A. Batista, L. Fernandes, P. Macedo, F. Pinto, L. Rebelo, M. Ribeiro, et al. 2012. Barriers to Social Innovation. A Deliverable of the Project: “The Theoretical, Empirical and Policy Foundations for Building Social Innovation in Europe” (TEPSIE), European Commission – 7th Framework Programme. Brussels: European Commission, DG Research.
   Google Scholar
• Moss Kanter, R. 1999. From Spare Change to Real Change: The Social Sector as Beta Site for Business Innovation. Boston: Harvard Business Review.
   Google Scholar
• Mulgan, G., S. Tucker, R. Ali, and B. Sanders. 2007. Social Innovation. What It Is, Why It Matters and How It can be Accelerated. London: The Young Foundation.
   Google Scholar
• Phillips, W., H. Lee, A. Ghobadian, N. O’Regan, and P. James. 2015. “Social Innovation and Social Entrepreneurship: A Systematic Review.” Group & Organization Management 40 (3): 428–461. doi: 10.1177/1059601114560063
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pol, E., and S. Ville. 2009. “Social Innovation: Buzz Word or Enduring Term?” The Journal of Socio-Economics 38 (6): 878–885. doi: 10.1016/j.socec.2009.02.011
   Google Scholar
• Reason, P. and Bradbury, H. eds. 2008. The Sage Handbook of Action Research. Participatory Inquiry and Practice. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Star, S. L. 1988. “The Structure of Ill-structured Solutions: Boundary Objects and Heterogeneous Distributed Problem Solving.” In Readings in Distributed Artificial Intelligence, edited by M. Huhns, and L. Gasser, 37–54. Menlo Park: Kaufman.
   Google Scholar
• Star, S. L. 2010. “This Is Not a Boundary Object: Reflections on the Origin of a Concept.” Science, Technology, & Human Values 35 (5): 601–617. doi: 10.1177/0162243910377624
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Star, S. L., and J. R. Griesemer. 1989. “Institutional Ecology, ‘Translations’ and Boundary Objects: Amateurs and Professionals in Berkeley’s Museum of Vertebrate Zoology, 1907-39.” Social Studies of Science 19 (3): 387–420. doi: 10.1177/030631289019003001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sveiby, K.-E., Gripenberg, P. and Segercrantz, B. eds. 2012. Challenging the Innovation Paradigm. New York: Taylor and Francis.
   Google Scholar
• The Young Foundation. 2012. Social Innovation Overview – Part I: Defining Social Innovation. A Deliverable of the Project: “The Theoretical, Empirical and Policy Foundations for Building Social Innovation in Europe” (TEPSIE), European Commission – 7th Framework Programme. Brussels: European Commission, DG Research.
   Google Scholar
• Van de Ven, A. H., and T. J. Hargrave. 2004. “Social, Technical and Institutional Change: A Literature Review and Synthesis.” In Handbook of Organizational Change and Innovation, edited by M.S. Poole, and A. H. Van de Ven, 259–304. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Westley, F., and N Antadze. 2010. “Making a Difference: Strategies for Scaling Social Innovation for Greater Impact.” Innovation Journal, 15 (2): 1–19.
   Google Scholar
• Yin, R. K. 2009/2013. Case Study Research: Design and Methods. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar