Energy transition on the rise: discourses on energy future in the German parliament

References

• Berchem, Andreas. 2006. “Das unterschätzte Gesetz.” ZEIT ONLINE. Accessed September 7, 2015. http://www.zeit.de/online/2006/39/EEG.
   Google Scholar
• BMWi (Bundesministerium für Wirtschaft und Technologie) and AGEE (Arbeitsgruppe Erneuerbare Energien-Statistik). 2015. Zeitreihen zur Entwicklung der erneuerbaren Energien in Deutschland. February 2015.
   Google Scholar
• BMWi (Bundesministerium für Wirtschaft und Technologie) and BMU (Bundesministerium für Umwelt Naturschutz und Reaktorsicherheit). 2010. Energiekonzept für eine umweltschonende, zuverlässige und bezahlbare Energieversorgung. Berlin: BMWi, BMU.
   Google Scholar
• Bosman, Rick, Derk Loorbach, Niki Frantzeskaki, and Till Pistorius. 2014. “Discursive Regime Dynamics in the Dutch Energy Transition.” Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions 13: 45–59. doi:10.1016/j.eist.2014.07.003.
   Google Scholar
• CDU/CSU, SPD, FDP and BÜNDNIS 90/DIE GRÜNEN. 2010. “Antrag der Fraktionen CDU/CSU, SPD, FDP und BÜNDNIS 90/DIE GRÜNEN: Einsetzung einer Enquete-Kommission, Wachstum, Wohlstand, Lebensqualität – Wege zu nachhaltigem Wirtschaften und gesellschaftlichem Fortschritt in der Sozialen Marktwirtschaft.” Accessed September 7, 2015. http://dip21.bundestag.de/dip21/btd/17/038/1703853.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Curran, Giorel. 2012. “Contested Energy Futures: Shaping Renewable Energy Narratives in Australia.” Global Environmental Change 22 (1): 236–244. doi:10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2011.11.009.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deutscher Bundestag. 1986. “ Parliamentary Record of Plenary Debate 10/222 of 19 June 1986.”
   Google Scholar
• Deutscher Bundestag. 1989. “Parliamentary Record of Plenary Debate 11/128 of 23 February 1989.” Agenda item 12.
   Google Scholar
• Deutscher Bundestag. 1990a. “Parliamentary Record of Plenary Debate 11/203 of 28 March 1990.” Agenda item 9.
   Google Scholar
• Deutscher Bundestag. 1990b. “Parliamentary Record of Plenary Debate 11/216 of 20 June 1990.” Agenda item 17.
   Google Scholar
• Deutscher Bundestag. 1990c. “Parliamentary Record of Plenary Debate 11/224 of 13 September 1990.” Agenda item 16.
   Google Scholar
• Deutscher Bundestag. 1991. “Parliamentary Record of Plenary Debate 12/67 of 13 December 1991.” Agenda item 8.
   Google Scholar
• Deutscher Bundestag. 1999. “Parliamentary Record of Plenary Debate 14/79 of 16 December 1999.” Agenda item 7.
   Google Scholar
• Deutscher Bundestag. 2000a. “Parliamentary Record of Plenary Debate 14/91 of 25 February 2000.” Agenda item 14.
   Google Scholar
• Deutscher Bundestag. 2000b. “Parliamentary Record of Plenary Debate 14/95 of 23 March 2000.” Agenda item 4.
   Google Scholar
• Deutscher Bundestag. 2001a. “Parliamentary Record of Plenary Debate 14/146 of 25 January 2001.” Agenda item 4.
   Google Scholar
• Deutscher Bundestag. 2001b. “Parliamentary Record of Plenary Debate 14/208 of 13 December 2001.” Agenda item 8.
   Google Scholar
• Deutscher Bundestag. 2010a. “Parliamentary Record of Plenary Debate 17/25 of 26 February 2010.” Agenda item 19.
   Google Scholar
• Deutscher Bundestag. 2010b. “Parliamentary Record of Plenary Debate 17/68 of 28 October 2010.” Agenda item 4.
   Google Scholar
• Deutscher Bundestag. 2011a. “Parliamentary Record of Plenary Debate 17/99 of 24 March 2011.” Agenda item 4.
   Google Scholar
• Deutscher Bundestag. 2011b. “Parliamentary Record of Plenary Debate 17/114 of 9 June 2011.” Agenda item 3.
   Google Scholar
• Deutscher Bundestag. 2011c. “Parliamentary Record of Plenary Debate 17/117 of 30 June 2011.” Agenda item 3.
   Google Scholar
• Deutscher Bundestag. 2014. Datenhandbuch zur Geschichte des Deutschen Bundestages seit 1990. Accessed September 7, 2015. https://www.bundestag.de/datenhandbuch.
   Google Scholar
• Die Grünen. 1987. “Bundestagswahlprogramm 1987.” Accessed September 7, 2015. http://www.boell.de/de/navigation/archiv-4289.html.
   Google Scholar
• Die Grünen. 1990a. “Antrag der Abgeordneten Dr. Daniels (Regensburg), Frau Teubner, Dr. Knabe, Stratmann und der Fraktion DIE GRÜNEN: Rekommunalisierung und Demokratisierung der Energieversorgung (Neuordnung der Energiewirtschaft und Novellierung des Energierechts).” Accessed September 8, 2015. http://dipbt.bundestag.de/doc/btd/11/064/1106484.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Die Grünen. 1990b. “Das Programm zur 1. gesamtdeutschen Wahl 1990.” Accessed September 7, 2015. http://www.boell.de/de/navigation/archiv-4289.html.
   Google Scholar
• Dryzek, John S. 2003. Green States and Social Movements. Environmentalism in the United States, United Kingdom, Germany, and Norway. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dryzek, John S. 2005. The Politics of the Earth. Environmental Discourses. 2nd ed. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Edenhofer, Ottmar, Christian Flachsland, Michael Jakob, and Kai Lessmann. 2015. “The Atmosphere as a Global Commons.” In The Oxford Handbook of the Macroeconomics of Global Warming, edited by Lucas Bernard and Willi Semmler, 260–296. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Feindt, Peter H., and Angela Oels. 2005. “Does Discourse Mattter? Discourse Analysis in Environmental Policy Making.” Journal of Environmental Policy & Planning 7 (3): 161–173. doi: 10.1080/15239080500339638
   Google Scholar
• Fischer, Frank. 2003. Reframing Public Policy. Discursive Politics and Deliberative Practices. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hajer, Maarten A. 1993. “Discourse Coalitions and the Institutionalization of Practice: The Case of Acid Rain in Britain.” In The Argumentative Turn, edited by Frank Fischer and John Forester, 43–76. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hajer, Maarten A. 1995. The Politics of Environmental Discourse. Ecological Modernization and the Policy Process. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hajer, Maarten A., and Wytske Versteeg. 2005. “A Decade of Discourse Analysis of Environmental Politics: Achievements, Challenges, Perspectives.” Journal of Environmental Policy & Planning 7 (3): 175–184. doi: 10.1080/15239080500339646
   Google Scholar
• Hake, Jürgen-Friedrich, Wolfgang Fischer, Sandra Venghaus, and Christoph Weckenbrock. 2015. “The German Energiewende – History and Status Quo.” Energy. In press, corrected proof. doi:10.1016/j.energy.2015.04.027.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hall, Peter A., and David Soskice. 2001. “An Introduction to Varieties of Capitalism.” In Varieties of Capitalism: The Institutional Foundations of Comparative Advantage, edited by Peter A. Hall and David Soskice, 1–68. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Haussmann, Helmut. 1990. “Die ökologische Marktwirtschaft – eine Chance für das ganze Deutschland.” Speech by the Federal Minister for Economic Affairs on 12 September 1990 in Cologne. Bulletin of the Federal Press Office (BPA Bulletin), 19.09.1990, Dok.-Nr. 111–90.
   Google Scholar
• Heikkila, Tanya, and Andrea K. Gerlak. 2013. “Building a Conceptual Approach to Collective Learning: Lessons for Public Policy Scholars.” Policy Studies Journal 41 (3): 484–512. doi: 10.1111/psj.12026
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hirschl, Bernd. 2007. Erneuerbare Energien-Politik. Eine Multi-Level Policy-Analyse mit Fokus auf den deutschen Strommarkt. Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.
   Google Scholar
• Hockenos, Paul. 2012. “The Energiewende.” ZEIT ONLINE. Accessed September 7, 2015. http://www.zeit.de/2012/47/Energiewende-Deutsche-Begriffe-Englisch.
   Google Scholar
• Huber, Joseph. 1982. Die verlorene Unschuld der Ökologie. Frankfurt am Main: Fischer Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Jacobsson, Staffan, and Volkmar Lauber. 2006. “The Politics and Policy of Energy System Transformation—Explaining the German Diffusion of Renewable Energy Technology.” Energy Policy 34 (3): 256–276. doi: 10.1016/j.enpol.2004.08.029
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jänicke, Martin. 1985. Preventive Environmental Policy as Ecological Modernization and Structural Policy. Berlin: Wissenschaftszentrum Berlin.
   Google Scholar
• Jänicke, Martin. 2010. “Die Umweltpolitik der Großen Koalition.” In Die Zweite Große Koalition. Eine Bilanz der Regierung Merkel 2005–2009, edited by Christoph Egle and Reimut Zohlnhöfer, 487–502. Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.
   Google Scholar
• Jenkins-Smith, Hank C., Daniel Nohrstedt, Christopher M. Weible, and Paul A. Sabatier. 2014. “The Advocacy Coalition Framework: Foundations, Evolution, and Ongoing Research.” In Theories of the Policy Process, edited by Paul A. Sabatier and Christopher M. Weible, 3rd ed, 183–223. Boulder: Westview Press.
   Google Scholar
• Joas, Amani N. 2013. “Policy Goals of the German ‘Energiewende’. An Application of the Advocacy Coalition Framework.” Master’s Thesis. Hertie School of Governance.
   Google Scholar
• Joas, Fabian, Michael Pahle, Christian Flachsland, and Amani N. Joas. 2016. “Which Goals are Driving the Energiewende? Making Sense of the German Energy Transformation.” Energy Policy 95: 42–51. doi: 10.1016/j.enpol.2016.04.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keller, Reiner. 2011. Diskursforschung. Eine Einführung Für SozialwissenschaftlerInnen. 4th ed. Wiesbaden: Springer VS.
   Google Scholar
• Kohl, Helmut. 1987. “Government Declaration by the Chancellor before the Federal Parliament on 19 March 1987 [in German].” Bulletin der Bundesregierung [online]. Accessed September 7, 2015. http://www.bundesregierung.de/Content/DE/Bulletin/1980-1989/1987/27-87_Kohl_1.html.
   Google Scholar
• Kowarsch, Martin. 2016. A Pragmatist Orientation for the Social Sciences in Climate Policy: How to Make Integrated Economic Assessments Serve Society. Boston Studies in the Philosophy and History of Science. Dordrecht: Springer Press.
   Google Scholar
• Krause, Florentin, Hartmut Bossel, and Karl-Friedrich Müller-Reißmann. 1980. Energiewende. Wachstum und Wohlstand ohne Erdöl und Uran. Frankfurt am Main: S. Fischer.
   Google Scholar
• Lauber, Volkmar, and Elisa Schenner. 2011. “The Struggle over Support Schemes for Renewable Electricity in the European Union: A Discursive-Institutionalist Analysis.” Environmental Politics 20 (4): 508–527. doi: 10.1080/09644016.2011.589578
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lijphart, Arend. 2012. Patterns of Democracy. Government Forms and Performance in Thirty-six Countries. 2nd ed. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lovell, Heather, Harriet Bulkeley, and Susan Owens. 2009. “Converging Agendas? Energy and Climate Change Policies in the UK.” Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy 27 (1): 90–109. doi: 10.1068/c0797j
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McBeth, Mark K., Michael D. Jones, and Elizabeth A. Shanahan. 2014. “The Narrative Policy Framework.” In Theories of the Policy Process, edited by Paul A. Sabatier and Christopher M. Weible, 3rd ed., 225–266. Boulder: Westview Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mez, Lutz. 2003. “Ökologische Modernisierung und Vorreiterrolle in der Energie- und Umweltpolitik? Eine vorläufige Bilanz.” In Das rot-grüne Projekt: eine Bilanz der Regierung Schröder 1998–2002, edited by Christoph Egle, Tobias Ostheim, and Reimut Zohlnhöfer, 329–350. Wiesbaden: Westdeutscher Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Pahle, Michael, Brigitte Knopf, and Ottmar Edenhofer. 2012. “Die deutsche Energiewende: gesellschaftliches Experiment und sozialer Lernprozess.” GAIA 21 (4): 284–287. doi: 10.14512/gaia.21.4.12
   Google Scholar
• Radkau, Joachim, and Lothar Hahn. 2013. Aufstieg und Fall der deutschen Atomwirtschaft. München: Oekom.
   Google Scholar
• Reiche, Danyel. 2004. Rahmenbedingungen für Erneuerbare Energien in Deutschland: Möglichkeiten und Grenzen einer Vorreiterpolitik. Frankfurt: Peter Lang.
   Google Scholar
• Rockström, Johan, Will Steffen, Kevin Noone, Åsa Persson, F. Stuart Chapin, Eric F. Lambin, Timothy M. Lenton, et al. 2009. “A Safe Operating Space for Humanity.” Nature 461: 472–475. doi: 10.1038/461472a
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roe, Emery. 1994. Narrative policy analysis. Durham: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Röttgen, Norbert. 2010. “Was bedeutet Fortschritt heute? Perspektiven einer zukunftsfähigen Umwelt- und Energiepolitik.” Speech of the Federal Minister for the Environment at Humboldt-Universität Berlin on 11 February 2010. Accessed September 7, 2015. http://fzu.rewi.hu-berlin.de/doc/Redemanuskript.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Scheer, Hermann. 1989. Das Solarzeitalter. Freiburg, Karlsruhe: Verlag C.F. Müller, Dreisam Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Scheer, Hermann. 1999. Solare Weltwirtschaft. 2nd ed. München: Verlag Antje Kunstmann.
   Google Scholar
• Schirrmeister, Mira. 2014. “Controversial Futures—Discourse Analysis on Utilizing the ‘Fracking’ Technology in Germany.” European Journal of Futures Research 2: 38. doi:10.1007/s40309-014-0038-5.
   Google Scholar
• Schmid, Eva, Brigitte Knopf, and Anna Pechan. 2016. “Putting an Energy System Transformation into Practice: The Case of the German Energiewende.” Energy Research & Social Science 11: 263–275. doi: 10.1016/j.erss.2015.11.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmitz, Kurt, and Alfred Voß. 1980. Energiewende? Analysen, Fragen und Anmerkungen zu dem vom ÖKO-Institut vorgelegten ‘Alternativ-Bericht’. Jülich: Kernforschungsanlage Jülich GmbH.
   Google Scholar
• Scrase, J. Ivan, and David G. Ockwell. 2010. “The Role of Discourse and Linguistic Framing Effects in Sustaining High Carbon Energy Policy—An Accessible Introduction.” Energy Policy 38 (5): 2225–2233. doi: 10.1016/j.enpol.2009.12.010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shaw, Christopher, and Brigitte Nerlich. 2015. “Metaphor as a Mechanism of Global Climate Change Governance: A Study of International Policies, 1992–2012.” Ecological Economics 109: 34–40. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2014.11.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Somanathan, Eswaran, Thomas Sterner, Taishi Sugiyama, Donald Chimanikire, Navroz K. Dubash, Joseph Kow Essandoh-Yeddu, Solomone Fifita, et al. 2014. “National and Sub-national Policies and Institutions.” In Climate Change 2014: Mitigation of Climate Change. Contribution of Working Group III to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, edited by O. Edenhofer, R. Pichs-Madruga, Y. Sokona, E. Farahani, S. Kadner, K. Seyboth, A. Adler, et al., 1141–1205. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Spruijt, Pita, Anne B. Knol, Eleftheria Vasileiadou, Jeroen Devilee, Erik Lebret, and Arthur C. Petersen. 2014. “Roles of Scientists as Policy Advisers on Complex Issues: A Literature Review.” Environmental Science and Policy 40: 16–25. doi: 10.1016/j.envsci.2014.03.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SRU (Sachverständigenrat für Umweltfragen). 2011. Wege zur 100% erneuerbaren Stromversorgung. Berlin: Erich Schmidt.
   Google Scholar
• Stone, Deborah. 1989. “Causal Stories and the Formation of Policy Agendas.” Political Science Quarterly 104 (2): 281–300. doi: 10.2307/2151585
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stone, Deborah. 2012. Policy Paradox. The Art of Political Decision Making. 3rd ed. New York, London: W.W. Norton and Company.
   Google Scholar
• Strunz, Sebastian. 2014. “The German Energy Transition as a Regime Shift.” Ecological Economics 100: 150–158. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2014.01.019
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sühlsen, Kathrin, and Matthijs Hisschemöller. 2014. “Lobbying the ‘Energiewende’. Assessing the effectiveness of strategies to promote the renewable energy business in Germany.” Energy Policy 69: 316–325. doi: 10.1016/j.enpol.2014.02.018
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SVR (Sachverständigenrat zur Begutachtung der gesamtwirtschaftlichen Entwicklung). 2011. “Energy Policy: Effective Energy Transition only in the European Context.” In Verantwortung für Europa Wahrnehmen, Jahresgutachten 2011/12, edited by SVR, 218–261. Wiesbaden: SVR.
   Google Scholar
• Thaker, Jagadish, and Anthony Leiserowitz. 2014. “Shifting Discourses of Climate Change in India.” Climatic Change 123 (2): 107–119. doi: 10.1007/s10584-014-1059-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Viehöfer, Willy. 2004. “Die Wissenschaft und die Wiederverzauberung des sublunaren Raumes. Der Klimadiskurs im Licht der narrativen Diskursanalyse.” In Handbuch Sozialwissenschaftliche Diskursanalyse. Band 2: Forschungspraxis, edited by Reiner Keller, Andreas Hirseland, Werner Schneider, and Willy Viehöfer, 233–269. Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.
   Google Scholar
• Winkel, Georg, Johanna Gleißner, Till Pistorius, and Sabine Storch. 2011. “The Sustainably Managed Forest Heats Up: Discursive Struggles over Forest Management and Climate Change in Germany.” Critical Policy Studies 5 (4): 361–390. doi: 10.1080/19460171.2011.628002
   Google Scholar
• Yanow, Dvora. 1995. “Practices of Policy Interpretation.” Policy Sciences 28: 111–126. doi: 10.1007/BF00999671
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar