The significance of meaning. Why IPBES needs the social sciences and humanities

References

• Adams, W. M., R. Aveling, D. Brockington, B. Dickson, J. Elliott, J. M. Hutton, D. Roe, B. Vira, and W. Wolmer. 2004. “Biodiversity Conservation and the Eradication of Poverty.” Science 306 (5699): 1146–1149. doi: 10.1126/science.1097920
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baranek, E., and B. Günther. 2005. “Erfolgsfaktoren von Partizipation in Naturschutzgroßprojekten. Das Beispiel: Moderationsverfahren im Gewässerrandstreifenprojekt Spreewald.” In Partizipation, Öffentlichkeitsbeteiligung, Nachhaltigkeit. Perspektiven der politischen Ökonomie, edited by P. H. Feindt and J. Newig, 299–319. Marburg: Metropolis.
   Google Scholar
• Berger, P. L., and T. Luckmann. 1966. The Social Construction of Reality: A Treatise in the Sociology of Knowledge. Garden City, NY: Anchor Books.
   Google Scholar
• Bernstein, R. J. (1983) 2011. Beyond Objectivism and Relativism: Science, Hermeneutics, and Praxis. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bourdieu, P., A. Accardo, G. Balazs, S. Beaud, F. Bonvin, E. Bourdieu, P. Bourgois, et al. 1999. The Weight of the World: Social Suffering in Contemporary Society. Translated by P. Parkhurst Ferguson, S. Emanuel, J. Johnson and S. T. Waryn. Cambridge: Polity.
   Google Scholar
• Brand, U., and A. B. M. Vadrot. 2013. “Epistemic Selectivities and the Valorisation of Nature: The Cases of the Nagoya Protocol and the Intergovernmental Science-Policy Platform for Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services (IPBES).” Law, Environment and Development Journal 9 (2): 204–220.
   Google Scholar
• Callon, M., and V. Rabeharisoa. 2008. “The Growing Engagement of Emergent Concerned Groups in Political and Economic Life: Lessons from the French Association of Neuromuscular Disease Patients.” Science, Technology, & Human Values 33: 230–261. doi: 10.1177/0162243907311264
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chan, K. M. A., T. Satterfield, and J. Goldstein. 2012. “Rethinking Ecosystem Services to Better Address and Navigate Cultural Values.” Ecological Economics 74: 8–18. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2011.11.011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coman, B. 2010. Tooth & Nail: The Story of the Rabbit in Australia. 2nd ed. Melbourne: Text.
   Google Scholar
• Delanty, G. 2005. Social Science. 2nd ed. Maidenhead: McGraw-Hill Education.
   Google Scholar
• Díaz, S., S. Demissew, J. Carabias, C. Joly, M. Lonsdale, N. Ash, A. Larigauderie, et al. 2015. “The IPBES Conceptual Framework – Connecting Nature and People.” Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability 14: 1–16. doi: 10.1016/j.cosust.2014.11.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dryzek, J. S. 2010. Foundations and Frontiers of Deliberative Governance. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dryzek, J. S., and S. Niemeyer. 2008. “Discursive Representation.” American Political Science Review 102: 481–493. doi: 10.1017/S0003055408080325
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Easteal, S. 1981. “The History of Introductions of Bufo marinus (Amphibia: Anura): A Natural Experiment in Evolution.” Biological Journal of the Linnean Society 16 (2): 93–113. doi: 10.1111/j.1095-8312.1981.tb01645.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ehrlich, P. R., and A. H. Ehrlich. 1981. Extinction: The Causes and Consequences of the Dissapearance of Species. New York: Random House.
   Google Scholar
• Ehrlich, P. R., and H. A. Mooney. 1983. “Extinction, Substitution, and the Ecosystem Services.” BioScience 33 (4): 248–254. doi: 10.2307/1309037
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elam, M., and G. Sundqvist. 2009. “The Swedish KBS Project: A Last Word in Nuclear Fuel Safety Prepares to Conquer the World?” Journal of Risk Research 12 (7–8): 969–988. doi: 10.1080/13669870903126077
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elam, M., and G. Sundqvist. 2011. “Meddling in Swedish Success in Nuclear Waste Management.” Environmental Politics 20 (2): 246–263. doi: 10.1080/09644016.2011.551030
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elster, J., ed. 1998. Deliberative Democracy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Esguerra, A., S. Beck, and R. Lidskog. 2017. “Stakeholder Engagement in the Making. IPBES and the Politics of Engagement.” Global Environmental Politics 17 (1): 59–76. doi: 10.1162/GLEP_a_00390
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Essl, F., S. Dullinger, W. Rabitsch, P. E. Hulme, K. Hülber, V. Jarošík, I. Kleinbauer, et al. 2011. “Socioeconomic Legacy Yields an Invasion Debt.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 108 (1): 203–207. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1011728108
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Faucheux, S., and C. Hue. 2001. “From Irreversibility to Participation: Towards a Participatory Foresight for the Governance of Collective Environmental Risks.” Journal of Hazardous Materials 86: 223–243. doi: 10.1016/S0304-3894(01)00260-6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fischer, M. L., A. Hochkirch, M. Heddergott, C. Schulze, H. E. Anheyer-Behmenburg, J. Lang, F.-U. Michler, et al. 2015. “Historical Invasion Records Can Be Misleading: Genetic Evidence for Multiple Introductions of Invasive Raccoons (Procyon lotor) in Germany.” PLoS ONE 10 (5): e0125441. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0125441.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fish, R. D. 2011. “Environmental Decision Making and an Ecosystems Approach: Some Challenges from the Perspective of Social Science.” Progress in Physical Geography 35: 671–680. doi: 10.1177/0309133311420941
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Foucault, M. 1970. The Order of Things: An Archaeology of the Human Sciences. Translated from the French. London: Tavistock.
   Google Scholar
• Fuller, S. 1997. Science. Buckingham: Open University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Giddens, A. 1993. New Rules of Sociological Method: A Positive Critique of Interpretative Sociologies. 2nd rev. ed. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gilbert, K., N. Hulst, and S. Rientjes. 2006. Social Science and Biodiversity – Why Is It Important? A Guide for Policymakers. Tilburg: European Centre for Nature Conservation.
   Google Scholar
• Gómez-Baggethun, E., R. de Groot, P. L. Lomas, and C. Montes. 2010. “The History of Ecosystem Services in Economic Theory and Practice: From Early Notions to Markets and Payment Schemes.” Ecological Economics 69 (6): 1209–1218.
   Google Scholar
• Gorke, M. 2003. The Death of Our Planet’s Species: A Challenge to Ecology and Ethics. Washington, DC: Island Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gross, M. 2016. “Risk as Zombie Category: Ulrich Beck’s Unfinished Project of the ‘Non-knowledge’ Society.” Security Dialogue 47 (5): 386–402. doi: 10.1177/0967010616645020
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grove, J. M., A. Troy, J. P. M. O’Neill-Dunne, W. R. Burch, M. L. Cadenasso, and S. T. A. Pickett. 2006. “Characterization of Households and Its Implications for the Vegetation of Urban Ecosystems.” Ecosystems, 9 (4): 578–597. doi: 10.1007/s10021-006-0116-z
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Habermas, J. 1981. Theorie des kommunikativen Handelns. 2 Bd. Frankfurt/Main: Suhrkamp.
   Google Scholar
• Habermas, J. 1988. On the Logic of the Social Sciences. Translated by S. W. Nicholsen. Cambridge: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Habermas, J. 1996. Between Facts and Norms: Contributions to a Discourse Theory of Law and Democracy. Translated by W. Rehg. Cambridge: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Habermas, J. 2003. Truth and Justification. Edited and translated by B. Fultner. Cambridge: Polity.
   Google Scholar
• Habermas, J. 2015. Moral Consciousness and Communicative Action. Translated by C. Lenhardt and S. W. Nicholsen. New York: John Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Hartz-Karp, J., and J. Pope. 2011. “Enhancing Effectiveness Through Deliberative Democracy.” In New Directions in Social Impact Assessment: Conceptual and Methodological Advances, edited by F. Vanclay and A. M. Esteves, 253–272. Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Hensel, A. 2015. Interview “Glyphosat wohl unbedenklich!” Accessed May 22, 2016. http://www.topagrar.com/news/Home-top-News-Interview-mit-Dr-Andreas-Hensel-BfR-Glyphosat-wohl-unbedenklich-2467835.html.
   Google Scholar
• Homewood, K., E. F. Lambin, E. Coast, A. Kariuki, I. Kikula, J. Kivelia, M. Said, S. Serneels, and M. Thompson. 2001. “Long-Term Changes in Serengeti-Mara Wildebeest and Land Cover: Pastoralism, Population, or Policies?” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 98 (22): 12544–12549. doi: 10.1073/pnas.221053998
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hönigswald, R. 1937. Philosophie und Sprache. Basel: Haus-zum-Falken.
   Google Scholar
• Hope, D., C. Gries, W. Zhu, W. F. Fagan, C. L. Redman, N. B. Grimm, A. L. Nelson, C. Martin, and A. Kinzig. 2003. “Socioeconomics Drive Urban Plant Diversity.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 100 (15): 8788–8792. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1537557100
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jax, K., and U. Heink. 2015. “Searching for the Place of Biodiversity in the Ecosystem Services Discourse.” Biological Conservation 191: 198–205. doi: 10.1016/j.biocon.2015.06.032
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jetzkowitz, J. 2011. “Ökosystemdienstleistungen in soziologischer Perspektive.” In Handbuch Umweltsoziologie, edited by M. Gross, 303–324. Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.
   Google Scholar
• Jetzkowitz, J., and J. Schneider. 2011. “How to Concretize Research on the Coupling of Ecosystems to Human Activities? From Socioeconomic Indicators to Styles of Living and Acting.” Nature and Culture 6 (3): 218–243. doi: 10.3167/nc.2011.060302
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kang’ara, S. W. 1999. “When the Pendulum Swings Too Far: Structural Adjustment Programs in Kenya.” Third World Legal Studies 15, Article 5: 109–151.
   Google Scholar
• Kasperson, J. X., and R. E. Kasperson. 2005. The Social Contours of Risk: Volume I: Publics, Risk Communication and the Social Amplification of Risk. London: Earthscan.
   Google Scholar
• Lever, C. 2001. The Cane Toad. The History and Ecology of a Successful Colonist. Otley, West Yorkshire: Westbury Academic & Scientific.
   Google Scholar
• Lockie, S. 2007. “Deliberation and Actor-Networks: The ‘Practical’ Implications of Social Theory for the Assessment of Large Dams and Other Interventions.” Society & Natural Resources 20: 785–799. doi: 10.1080/08941920701460317
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lockie, S., and C. M. L. Wong. 2017. “Risk, Sustainability and Time: Sociological Perspectives.” In Sustainability: Social Science Contributions, edited by H. Schandl and I. Walker, 187–198. Sydney: CSIRO.
   Google Scholar
• Löfmarck, E., and R. Lidskog. 2017. “Bumping Against the Boundary: IPBES and the Knowledge Divide.” Environmental Science and Policy 69: 22–28. doi: 10.1016/j.envsci.2016.12.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lövbrand, E., S. Beck, J. Chilvers, T. Forsyth, J. Hedrén, M. Hulme, R. Lidskog, and E. Vasileiadou. 2015. “Who Speaks for the Future of Earth? How Critical Social Science Can Extend the Conversation on the Anthropocene.” Global Environmental Change 32: 211–218. doi:10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2015.03.012.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luhmann, N. 1994. “The Modernity of Science (Translated by K. Behnke).” New German Critique 61: 9–23. doi: 10.2307/488618
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MA (Millennium Ecosystem Assessment). 2005. Ecosystems and Human Well-Being: A Framework for Assessment. Washington, DC: Island Press. http://www.millenniumassessment.org/documents/document.356.aspx.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• McShane, T. O., P. D. Hirsch, T. C. Trung, A. N. Songorwa, A. Kinzig, B. Monteferri, D. Mutekanga, et al. 2011. “Hard Choices: Making Trade-Offs Between Biodiversity Conservation and Human Well-Being.” Biological Conservation 144 (3): 966–972.
   Google Scholar
• Neumayer, E. 2010. Weak Versus Strong Sustainability. Exploring the Limits of Two Opposing Paradigms. 3rd ed. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Nicolaus, K. 2016. “Zahlungen für Ökosystemleistungen zwischen Marktprinzipien und Argumentationsprozessen. Eine diskurstheoretische Konfrontation ökonomischer Perspektiven und eine Analyse in Deutschland und Großbritannien.” PhD diss, FU Berlin.
   Google Scholar
• Nicolaus, K., and J. Jetzkowitz. 2014. “How Does Paying for Ecosystem Services Contribute to Sustainable Development? Evidence from Case Study Research in Germany and the UK.” Sustainability 6: 3019–3042. doi: 10.3390/su6053019
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Norgaard, R. B. 2007. “Deliberative Economics: Kenneth E. Boulding Lecture delivered at the 9th Biennial Meeting of ISEE, December 2006, Dehli India.” Ecological Economics 63 (2): 375–382.
   Google Scholar
• O’Faircheallaigh, C. 2009. “Public Participation and Environmental Impact Assessment: Purposes, Implications, and Lessons for Public Policy Making.” Environmental Impact Assessment Review 30 (1): 19–27. doi: 10.1016/j.eiar.2009.05.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ott, K. 1997. Ipso Facto: Zur ethischen Rekonstruktion normativer Implikate wissenschaftlicher Praxis. Frankfurt/Main: Suhrkamp.
   Google Scholar
• Ott, K. 2008. “Diskurs und Ethik.” In Kolleg Praktische Philosophie. Vol. 2, edited by V. Steenblock, 111–152. Stuttgart: Reclam.
   Google Scholar
• Ott, K. 2014. “Deliberative Zwischenreiche und Umweltpolitik.” Jahrbuch für Recht und Ethik 22: 289–312.
   Google Scholar
• Ott, K. 2015. “Zur ethischen Begründung des Schutzes von Biodiversität.” In Zur Dimension des Naturschutzes in einer Theorie starker Nachhaltigkeit, edited by K. Ott, 45–84. Marburg: Metropolis.
   Google Scholar
• Ott, K., and R. Döring. 2008. Theorie und Praxis starker Nachhaltigkeit. 2nd ed. Marburg: Metropolis.
   Google Scholar
• Parkinson, J., and J. Mansbridge, eds. 2012. Deliberative Systems: Deliberative Democracy at the Large Scale. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Parsons, T. 1969. Politics and Social Structure. New York: Free Press.
   Google Scholar
• Parsons, T. 1982. “Evolutionary Universals in Society.” In On Institutions and Social Evolution, edited by L. H. Mayhew, 296–326. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Parsons, T., and G. M. Platt. 1973. The American University. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pearce, D. 1990. “Economics and the Global Environmental Challenge.” Millennium – Journal of International Studies 19 (3): 365–387. doi:10.1177/03058298900190030501.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Potthast, T., ed. 2007. Biodiversität – Schlüsselbegriff des Naturschutzes im 21. Jahrhundert? Bonn: Bundesamt für Naturschutz.
   Google Scholar
• Punch, K. F. 2005. Introduction to Social Research: Quantitative and Qualitative Approaches. 2nd ed. Los Angeles: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Rask, M., and R. Worthington. 2015. Governing Biodiversity Through Democratic Deliberation. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Renn, O. 2008. Risk Governance: Coping with Uncertainty in a Complex World. London: Earthscan.
   Google Scholar
• Renn, O. 2014. “Towards a Socio-ecological Foundation for Environmental Risk Research.” In Routledge International Handbook of Social and Environmental Change, edited by S. Lockie, D. A. Sonnenfeld, and D. R. Fisher, 207–220. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Renn, O. 2015. “Stakeholder and Public Involvement in Risk Governance.” International Journal of Disaster Risk Science 6: 8–20. doi: 10.1007/s13753-015-0037-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rientjes, S. 1999. “Biodiversiteit: de introductie van een nieuw begrip in beleid en onderzoek.” Beleid en Maatschappij 26 (4): 252–261.
   Google Scholar
• Sandler, R. 2005. “Introduction.” In Environmental Virtue Ethics, edited by P. Cafaro and R. D. Sandler, 1–12. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
   Google Scholar
• Schütz, A. 1962. The Problem of Social Reality. Edited and introduced by M. Natanson. The Hague: Nijhoff.
   Google Scholar
• Schütz, A. 1966. Studies in Social Theory. Edited and introduced by A. Brodersen. The Hague: Nijhoff.
   Google Scholar
• Shetler, S. G. 1991. “Biological Diversity: Are We Asking the Right Questions?” In The Unity of Evolutionary Biology Vol. 1, edited by E. D. Dudley, 37–43. Portland, OR: Dioscorides Press.
   Google Scholar
• Snow, C. P. (1959) 2001. The Two Cultures. Reprint, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Soulé, M. E. 1985. “What Is Conservation Biology? A New Synthetic Discipline Addresses the Dynamics and Problems of Perturbed Species, Communities, and Ecosystems.” BioScience 35 (11): 727–734. doi: 10.2307/1310054
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stehr, N. 1994. Knowledge Societies. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Suplie, J. 1995. Streit auf Noahs Arche: Zur Genese der Biodiversitäts-Konvention. Berlin: WZB.
   Google Scholar
• Swanson, T. 1997. Global Action for Biodiversity. London: Earthscan.
   Google Scholar
• Takacs, D. 1996. The Idea of Biodiversity: Philosophies of Paradise. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Toepfer, G. 2011. “Diversität.” In Historisches Wörterbuch der Biologie, Vol: I, edited by G. Toepfer, 351–365. Stuttgart: J.B. Metzler.
   Google Scholar
• Vadrot, A. B. M. 2014. The Politics of Knowledge and Global Biodiversity. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Vanclay, F., and A. M. Esteves. 2011. New Directions in Social Impact Assessment: Conceptual and Methodological Advances. Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Van der Sluijs, J. P. 2012. “Uncertainty and Dissent in Climate Risk Assessment: A Post-Normal Perspective.” Nature & Culture 7: 174–195. doi: 10.3167/nc.2012.070204
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vane-Wright, R. I. 1996. “Identifying Priorities for the Conservation of Biodiversity: Systematic Biological Criteria Within a Socio-political Framework.” In Biodiversity: A Biology of Numbers and Difference, edited by K. J. Gaston, 309–344. Oxford: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• van Koppen, C. S. A. 2002. Echte natuur. Een sociaatheoretisch onderzoek naar natuurwaardering en natuurbescherming in de moderne samenleving. Wageningen: Dissertations Wageningen University.
   Google Scholar
• van Koppen, C. S. A. 2017. “Incorporating Nature in Environmental Sociology: A Critique of Bhaskar and Latour, and a Proposal.” Environmental Sociology. doi:10.1080/23251042.2016.1272180.
   Google Scholar
• Weber, M. 1980. Wirtschaft und Gesellschaft. Grundriss der verstehenden Soziologie. 5., rev. Aufl. Tübingen: J.C.B. Mohr.
   Google Scholar
• Weick, K. E., K. M. Sutcliffe, and D. Obstfeld. 2009. “Organizing and the Process of Sensemaking.” In Making Sense of the Organization: The Impermanent Organization, Vol. 2, edited by Karl E. Weick, 131–152. Chichester: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Westman, W. F. 1977. “How Much Are Nature’s Services Worth?” Science 197 (4307): 960–964. doi: 10.1126/science.197.4307.960
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilson, E. O. 1988. “Editor’s Foreword.” In Biodiversity, edited by E. O. Wilson and F. M. Peters, i–vii. Washington, DC: National Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wilson, E. O. 1989. “Threats to Biodiversity.” Scientific American 261 (3): 108–116. doi: 10.1038/scientificamerican0989-108
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilson, E. O. 1992. The Diversity of Life. London: Allen Lane/The Penguin Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wilson, E. O., and F. M. Peter, eds. 1988. Biodiversity. Washington, DC: National Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wong, C. M. L. 2015. “The Mutable Nature of Risk and Acceptability: A Hybrid Risk Governance Framework.” Risk Analysis 35: 1969–1982. doi: 10.1111/risa.12429
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wynne, B. 1996. “May the Sheep Safely Graze? A Reflexive View of the Expert-Lay Knowledge Divide.” In Risk, Environment and Modernity: Towards a New Ecology, edited by S. Lash, B. Szerszynski, and B. Wynne, 44–83. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Ziegler, R., and K. Ott. 2012. “The Quality of Sustainability Science: A Philosophical Perspective.” Sustainability: Science, Practice, & Policy 7 (1): 31–44.
   Google Scholar