Engaging diverse experts in a global environmental assessment: participation in the first work programme of IPBES and opportunities for improvement

References

• Amano, T., and W. J. Sutherland. 2013. “Four Barriers to the Global Understanding of Biodiversity Conservation: Wealth, Language, Geographical Location and Security.” Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 280 (1756): 20122649–20122649. doi:10.1098/rspb.2012.2649.
   Google Scholar
• Bennett, N. J., R. Roth, S. C. Klain, K. M. A. Chan, D. A. Clark, G. Cullman, G. Epstein, et al. 2017. “Mainstreaming the Social Sciences in Conservation.” Conservation Biology 31 (1): 56–66.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Biermann, F. 2006. “Whose Experts? The Role of Geographic Representation in Global Environmental Assessments.” In Global Environmental Assessments: Information and Influence, edited by R. Mitchel, et al., 87–112. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Blackstock, K. L., G. J. Kelly, and B. L. Horsey. 2007. “Developing and Applying a Framework to Evaluate Participatory Research for Sustainability.” Ecological Economics 60 (4): 726–742.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Borie, M., and M. Hulme. 2015. “Framing Global Biodiversity: IPBES between Mother Earth and Ecosystem Services.” Environmental Science & Policy 54, 487–496.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brooks, T. M., John F. Lamoreux, and Jorge Soberón. 2014. “IPBES ≠ IPCC.” Trends in Ecology & Evolution 29 (10): 543–545.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown, M. 2009. Science in Democracy: Expertise, Institutions, and Representation. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Castree, N., W. M. Adams, J. Barry, D. Brockington, B. Buscher, E. Corbera, D. Demeritt, R. Duffy, et al. 2014. “Changing the Intellectual Climate.” Nature Climate Change 4: 763–768.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• CBD (Convention on Biological Diversity). 2008. UNEP/CBD/COP/9/INF/37/Rev.1 – On Intergovernmental and Multi-stakeholder Approach to Strengthening the Science-Policy Interface on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services. Note by the Executive Secretary. 23 May 2008.
   Google Scholar
• CBD (Convention on Biological Diversity). 2015. UNEP/CBD/COP/12/29, p.181/, Full Decision Report - Twelfth Meeting of the Conference of the Parties to the Convention on Biological Diversity, 6–17 October 2014 - Pyeongchang, Republic of Korea.
   Google Scholar
• DFG (Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft). 2016. Structure of the Review Boards, on www.dfg.de. http://www.dfg.de/en/dfg_profile/statutory_bodies/review_boards/subject_areas/index.jsp.
   Google Scholar
• Díaz, S., S. Demissew, J. Carabias, C. Joly, M. Lonsdale, N. Ash, A. Larigauderie, et al. 2015. “The IPBES Conceptual Framework — Connecting Nature and People.” Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability 14: 1–16.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ford, J. D., W. Vanderbilt, and L. Berrang-Ford. 2012. “Authorship in IPCC AR5 and Its Implications for Content: Climate Change and Indigenous Populations in WGII.” Climatic Change 113 (2): 201–213.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Granjou, C., and I. Arpin. 2015. “Epistemic Commitments: Making Relevant Science in Biodiversity Studies.” Science, Technology & Human Values 40 (6): 1022–1046.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heffernan, O. 2016. “Major Biodiversity Panel Desperately Seeks Social Scientists- Intergovernmental Body That Tracks World Ecosystems Is Criticized for Its Own Lack of Diversity.” Nature 531: 173. http://www.nature.com/news/major-biodiversity-panel-desperately-seeks-social-scientists-1.19778.
   Google Scholar
• Hotes, S., and L. Opgenoorth. 2014. “Trust and Control at the Science-policy Interface in IPBES.” BioScience 64 (4): 277–278.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hulme, M., and M. Mahony. 2010. “Climate Change: What Do We Know About the IPCC?” Progress in Physical Geography 34: 705–718.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• IISD (International Institute for Sustainable Development). 2007. Earth Negotiations Bulletin, Volume 132, No.6, A Summary Report of the Final Meeting of the International Steering Committee of the Consultative Process Towards an IMoSEB, 20 November 2007. http://www.iisd.ca/download/pdf/sd/ymbvol132num6e.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• IISD (International Institute for Sustainable Development). 2013. Earth Negotiations Bulletin, Vol. 31 No. 6, IPBES-1 Final, 29 January 2013.
   Google Scholar
• IPBES (Intergovernmental Science-Policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services). 2013. IPBES/2/INF/9 - Supporting Documentation On The Prioritization Of Requests, Inputs And Suggestions Put to the Platform.
   Google Scholar
• IPBES (Intergovernmental Science-Policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services). 2014a. IPBES/2/17; Decision IPBES-2/3, p17ff. Procedures for the preparation of the Platform’s deliverables.
   Google Scholar
• IPBES (Intergovernmental Science-Policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services). 2014b. IPBES/2/17; Decision IPBES-2/4, p.39ff, Conceptual Framework for the Intergovernmental Science Policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services.
   Google Scholar
• IPBES (Intergovernmental Science-Policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services). 2014c. IPBES/2/17, Decision IPBES-2/5 - Work Programme for the period 2014–2018.
   Google Scholar
• IPBES (Intergovernmental Science-Policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services). 2014d. Letter from the Chair, following IPBES first call. 7 January 2014.
   Google Scholar
• IPBES (Intergovernmental Science-Policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services). 2014e. Letter from the Chair, following IPBES second call. 2 April 2014.
   Google Scholar
• IPBES (Intergovernmental Science-Policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services). 2015a. IPBES/3/2, Report of the Executive Secretary on the Implementation of the Work Programme 2014–2018.
   Google Scholar
• IPBES (Intergovernmental Science-Policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services). 2015b. IPBES/3/18 - Report of the Plenary of the Intergovernmental Science-Policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services on the work of its third session, Decision IPBES-3/4: Communications, stakeholder engagement and strategic partnership.
   Google Scholar
• IPBES (Intergovernmental Science-Policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services). 2015c. Letter from the Chair, following IPBES third call. 5 February 2015.
   Google Scholar
• IPBES (Intergovernmental Science-Policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services). 2016a. IPBES/4/19, Annex I to Decision IPBES-4/3 - Procedure for Filling Gaps in the Availability of Experts.
   Google Scholar
• IPBES (Intergovernmental Science-Policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services). 2016b. Letter from the Chair, following IPBES fourth call. 11 March 2016.
   Google Scholar
• IPBES (Intergovernmental Science-Policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services). 2017a. IPBES/5/2, Report of the Executive Secretary on the Implementation of the Work Programme for the Period 2014–2018.
   Google Scholar
• IPBES (Intergovernmental Science-Policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services). 2017b. IPBES/5/15, Report of the Plenary of the Intergovernmental Science Policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services on the work of its fifth session.
   Google Scholar
• Kates, R. W., W. C. Clark, R. Corell, J. M. Hall, C. C. Jaeger, I. Lowe, J. J. McCarthy, et al. 2001. “Environment and Development: Sustainability Science.” Science 292: 641.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koetz, T., P. Bridgewater, S. van den Hove, and B. Siebenhüner. 2008. “The Role of the Subsidiary Body on Scientific, Technical and Technological Advice to the Convention on Biological Diversity as Science–policy Interface.” Environmental Science and Policy 11: 505–516.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koetz, T., K. N. Farrell, and P. Bridgewater. 2011. “Building Better Science-policy Interfaces for International Environmental Governance: Assessing Potential Within the Intergovernmental Platform for Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services.” International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics 12: 1–21.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kovács, E. K., and G. Pataki. 2016. “The Participation of Experts and Knowledges in the Intergovernmental Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services (IPBES).” Environmental Science & Policy 57: 131–139.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laikre, L., B. Jonsson, M. Ihse, M. Marissink, A. M. Gustavsson, T. Ebenhard, L. Hagberg, et al. 2008. Wanted: Scientists in the CBD Process. Conservation Biology, 22 (4), 814–815.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Larigauderie, A. 2015. “The Intergovernmental Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services (IPBES): A Call to Action.” GAIA - Ecological Perspectives for Science and Society 24 (2): 73–73.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Larigauderie, A., and H. A. Mooney. 2010. “The Intergovernmental Science-Policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services: Moving a Step Closer to an IPCC-like Mechanism for Biodiversity.” Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability 2: 1–6.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Larigauderie, A., M. Stenseke, and R. T. Watson. 2016. “Biodiversity Assessments: IPBES Reaches Out to Social Scientists.” Nature 532: 313.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marquard, E., E. Balian, H. Eggermont, P. E. Guillain, A. Hallosserie, K. Heubach, P. Huybrechts, et al. 2016. European National Biodiversity Platforms as Partners for the Implementation of the IPBES Work Programme – Opportunities and Challenges. Report edited by the German Network-Forum for Biodiversity Research (NeFo).
   Google Scholar
• Miller, C. A. 2007. “Democratization, International Knowledge Institutions and Global Governance.” Governance 20: 325–357.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Montana, J. 2017. “Accommodating Consensus and Diversity in Environmental Knowledge Production: Achieving Closure Through Typologies in IPBES.” Environmental Science and Policy 68: 20–27.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Montana, J., and M. Borie. 2016. “IPBES and Biodiversity Expertise: Regional, Gender and Disciplinary Balance in the Composition of the Interim and 2015 Multidisciplinary Expert Panel.” Conservation Letters 9 (2): 138–142.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Obermeister, N. 2017. “From Dichotomy to Duality: Addressing Interdisciplinary Epistemological Barriers to Inclusive Knowledge Governance in Global Environmental Assessments.” Environmental Science & Policy 68: 80–86.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rankovic, Aleksandar, Pierre-Marie Aubert, Renaud Lapeyre, Yann Laurans, and Sébastien Treyer. 2016. IPBES after Kuala Lumpur: Assessing Knowledge on Underlying Causes of Biodiversity Loss Is Needed. IDDRI Policy Brief No.5, June 16 2016.
   Google Scholar
• Reid, W. V., and G. M. Mace. 2003. “Taking Conservation Biology to New Levels in Environmental Decision-Making.” Conservation Biology 17 (4): 943–945.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reuter, K., M. Timpte, and C. Nesshöver. 2016. Disciplinary Balance: How to Engage Social Scientists in IPBES, in Nature 531, 173 (10 March 2016). http://www.nature.com/nature/journal/v531/n7593/full/531173c.html.
   Google Scholar
• Stenseke, M. 2016. “The Intergovernmental Science-policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services and the Challenge of Integrating Social Sciences and Humanities.” Bulletin of Geography. Socio-Economic Series 33 (33): 5–129.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sutherland, William J., Toby A. Gardner, L. Jamila Haider, and Lynn V. Dicks. 2013. “How Can Local and Traditional Knowledge Be Effectively Incorporated into International Assessments?” Oryx 48 (01): 1–2. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/263528888_How_can_local_and_traditional_knowledge_be_effectively_incorporated_into_international_assessments.
   Google Scholar
• Tengö, M., E. S. Brondizio, T. Elmqvis, M. Pernilla, and M. Spierenburg. 2014. “Connecting Diverse Knowledge Systems for Enhanced Ecosystem Governance: The Multiple Evidence Base Approach.” Ambio 43 (5): 579–591.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Turnhout, E., B. Bloomfield, M. Hulme, J. Vogel, and B. Wynne. 2012. “Conservation Policy: Listen to the Voices of Experience.” Nature 488: 454–455.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Turnhout, E., C. Waterton, K. Neves, and M. Buizer. 2013. “Rethinking Biodiversity: From Goods and Services to “Living with”.” Conservation Letters 6: 154–161.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• UNEP (United Nations Environment Programme). 2010. UNEP/IPBES/3/3, Report of the Third Ad Hoc Intergovernmental and Multi-stakeholder Meeting on an Intergovernmental Science-policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services.
   Google Scholar
• UNEP (United Nations Environment Programme). 2014. Guidance Document on the Nomination and Selection Process for Members of the IPBES Multidisciplinary Expert Panel (MEP).
   Google Scholar
• Vadrot, A. B. M. 2014. The Politics of Knowledge and Global Biodiversity. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Vadrot, A. B. M., J. Jetzkowitz, and L. C. Stringer. 2016. “Social Sciences: IPBES Disciplinary Gaps Still Gaping.” Nature 530: 160. (11 February 2016) Published online 10 February 2016. http://www.nature.com/nature/journal/v530/n7589/full/530160b.html.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar