International comparative explorations of prostitution policies: lessons from two European projects

References

• Armstrong, S., J. Blaustein, and A. Henry. 2017. “Impact and the Reflexive Imperative in Criminal Justice Policy, Practice and Research.” In Reflexivity and Criminal Justice: Intersections of Policy, Practice & Research, edited by S. Armstrong, J. Blaustein, and A. Henry, 1–30. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Benoit, C., B. McCarthy, and M. Jansson. 2015. “Stigma, sex Work, and Substance use: A Comparative Analysis.” Sociology of Health and Illness 37 (3): 437–451. doi: 10.1111/1467-9566.12201
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bernstein, E. 1999. “What’s Wrong with Prostitution? What’s Right with sex Work? Comparing Markets in Female Sexual Labour.” Hastings Women’s LJ 10 (1): 91–117.
   Google Scholar
• Brand, U., and A. B. M. Vadrot. 2013. “Epistemic Selectivities Towards the Valorization of Nature in the Nagoya Protocol and the Making of the Intergovernmental Science-Policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services (IPBES).” LEAD – Law, Environment and Development Journal 9 (2): 202–222.
   Google Scholar
• Cho, S. Y., A. Dreher, and E. Neumayer. 2012. “Does Legalized Prostitution Increase Human Trafficking?” World Development 41 (1): 67–82.
   Google Scholar
• Crowhurst, I. 2017. “Troubling Unknowns and Certainties in Prostitution Policy Claims-Making.” In Prostitution Research in Context, edited by Spanger Marlene and Skilbrei May-Len. Abingdon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Crowhurst, Isabel, Joyce Outshoorn, and May-Len Skilbrei. 2012. “Introduction: Prostitution policies in Europe.” Sexuality Research and Social Policy 9 (3): 187–191. doi: 10.1007/s13178-012-0100-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crowhurst, I., J. Outshoorn, and M.-L. Skilbrei. 2010. “Exploring and comparing prostitution policy regimes in Europe”. Scientific Report available at: http://archives.esf.org/index.php?eID=tx_nawsecuredl&u=0&g=0&t=1514553903&hash=89b30dbbb843acb41031a37e81efa29100923e72&file=/fileadmin/be_user/ew_docs/09-249_Report.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Danna, D. 2004. Visioni e Politiche Sulla Prostituzione. Working Paper del Dipartimento di Studi Sociali e Politici. Milano: Universita’ di Milano.
   Google Scholar
• Della Giusta, M., and V. Munro. 2008. Demanding sex: Critical Reflections on the Regulation of Prostitution. Abingdon, Oxon: Ashgate.
   Google Scholar
• Florin, O. 2012. “A Particular Kind of Violence: Swedish Social Policy Puzzles of a Multipurpose Criminal Law.” Sexuality Research and Social Policy 9 (3): 269–278. doi: 10.1007/s13178-012-0086-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gangoli, G., and N. Westmarland. 2006. International Approaches to Prostitution: Law and Policy in Europe and Asia. Bristol: Policy Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gibson, M. 1999. Prostitution and the State in Italy. Columbus: Ohio State University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hammond, N., and S. Kingston. 2014. “Experiencing Stigma as sex Work Researchers in Professional and Personal Lives.” Sexualities 17 (3): 329–347. doi: 10.1177/1363460713516333
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hantrais, L. 1999. “Contextualization in Cross-National Comparative Research.” International Journal of Social Research Methodology 2 (2): 93–108. doi: 10.1080/136455799295078
   Google Scholar
• Hantrais, L. 2005a. “Combining Methods: A key to Understanding Complexity in European Societies?” European Societies 7 (3): 399–421. doi: 10.1080/14616690500194035
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hantrais, L. 2005b. “Policy Learning From Cross-National Comparisons of European Social Policies.” Cross-National Research Papers 7 (6): 7–14.
   Google Scholar
• Hantrais, L. 2009. International Comparative Research. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Harrington, C. 2012. “Prostitution Policy Models and Feminist Knowledge Politics in New Zealand and Sweden.” Sexuality Research and Social Policy 9 (4): 337–349. doi: 10.1007/s13178-012-0083-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoang, K. K. 2015. Dealing in Desire. Oakland: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hrzenjak, M., V. Jalusic, B. Sauer, and K. Tertinegg. 2005. “Framing Prostitution Policy: A Comparison of Slovenia and Austria.” The Greek Review of Social Research 117b: 93–118.
   Google Scholar
• Hubbard, P., R. Matthews, and J. Scoular. 2008. “Regulating sex Work in the EU: Prostitute Women and the new Spaces of Exclusion.” Gender, Place and Culture 15 (2): 137–152. doi: 10.1080/09663690701863232
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jahnsen, S., and H. Wagenaar, eds. 2017. Assessing Prostitution Policies in Europe. Abingdon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Jakobsson, N., and A. Kotsadam. 2013. “The law and Economics of International sex Slavery: Prostitution Laws and Trafficking for Sexual Exploitation.” European Journal of Law and Economics 35 (1): 87–107. doi: 10.1007/s10657-011-9232-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson, G. F. 2015. “Governing Sex Work: An Agonistic Policy Community and its Relational Dynamics.” Critical Policy Studies 9 (3): 259–277. doi: 10.1080/19460171.2014.968602
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kelly, L., M. Coy, and R. Davenport. 2008. Shifting Sands: A Comparison of Prostitution Regimes Across Nine Countries. London: London Metropolitan University.
   Google Scholar
• Kilvington, J., S. Day, and H. Ward. 2001. “Prostitution Policy in Europe: A Time of Change?” Feminist Review 67: 78–93. doi: 10.1080/01417780150514510
   Google Scholar
• Kohn, M. L. 1987. “Cross-national Research as an Analytical Strategy.” American Sociological Review 52 (6): 713–731. doi: 10.2307/2095831
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Landman, T. 2007. Issues and Methods in Comparative Politics. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Livingstone, S. 2003. “On the Challenges of Cross-National Comparative Media Research.” European Journal of Communication 18 (4): 477–500. doi: 10.1177/0267323103184003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Matthews, R. 2008. Prostitution, Politics and Policy. Abingdon: Routledge-Cavendish.
   Google Scholar
• Mattson, G. 2016. The Cultural Politics of European Prostitution Reform. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Mills, M., G. G. van de Bunt, and J. de Brujin. 2006. “Comparative Research. Persistent Problems and Promising Solutions.” International Sociology 21 (5): 619–663. doi: 10.1177/0268580906067833
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MoU (Memorandum of Understanding). 2013. http://prospol.eu/is1209/about/memorandum-of-understanding
   Google Scholar
• Nelken, D. 1995. “Disclosing/Invoking Legal Culture: an Introduction.” Social & Legal Studies 4 (4): 435–452. doi: 10.1177/096466399500400401
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nelken, D. 2009. “Comparative Criminal Justice.” European Journal of Criminology 6 (4): 291–311. doi: 10.1177/1477370809104684
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nelken, D. 2010. Comparative Criminal Justice. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Outshoorn, J. 2004. The Politics of Prostitution: Women’s Movements, Democratic States and the Globalisation of Sex Commerce. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pajnik, M., N. Kambouri, M. Renault, and I. Sori. 2016. “Digitalising sex Commerce and sex Work: A Comparative Analysis of French, Greek and Slovenian Websites.” Gender, Place and Culture 23 (3): 345–364. doi: 10.1080/0966369X.2015.1013449
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Phoenix, J. 2009. Regulating Sex for Sale. Bristol: Policy Press.
   Google Scholar
• Phua, V. C., and A. Caras. 2008. “Personal Brand in Online Advertisements: Comparing White and Brazilian Male sex Workers.” Sociological Focus 41 (3): 238–255. doi: 10.1080/00380237.2008.10571333
   Google Scholar
• Pitcher, J., and M. Wijers. 2014. “The Impact of Different Regulatory Models on the Labour Conditions, Safety and Welfare of Indoor-Based sex Workers.” Criminology and Criminal Justice 14 (5): 549–564. doi: 10.1177/1748895814531967
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pohoryles, R. J., and A. Sors. 2017. “On the Future of Social Sciences and Humanities – a Pragmatic Perspective.” Innovation: The European Journal of Social Science Research 30 (1): 1–4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rigby, J., and J. Edler. 2005. “Peering Inside Research Networks: Some Observations on the Effect of the Intensity of Collaboration on the Variability of Research Quality.” Research Policy 34 (6): 784–794. doi: 10.1016/j.respol.2005.02.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rodríguez García, M., L. Heerma van Voss, and E. van Nederveen Meerkerk. 2017. Selling Sex in World Cities, A Global History of Prostitution, 1600s-2000s. Leiden and Boston: Brill.
   Google Scholar
• Sanders, T., and R. Campbell. 2007. “Designing out Vulnerability, Building in Respect: Violence, Safety and sex Work Policy.” The British Journal of Sociology 58 (1): 1–19. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-4446.2007.00136.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sanderson, I. 2003. “Is it ‘What Works’ That Matters? Evaluation and Evidence-Based Policy-Making.” Research Papers in Education 18 (1): 331–345. doi: 10.1080/0267152032000176846
   Google Scholar
• Scoular, J. 2010. “What’s law got to do with it? How and why law Matters in the Regulation of sex Work.” Journal of Law and Society 37 (1): 12–39. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-6478.2010.00493.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Skilbrei, M.-L., and C. Holmström. 2013. Prostitution Policy in the Nordic Region: Ambiguous Sympathies. Farnham: Ashgate Publishing Limited.
   Google Scholar
• Sullivan, B. 2010. “When (Some) Prostitution is Legal: The Impact of law Reform on sex Work in Australia.” Journal of Law and Society 37 (1): 85–104. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-6478.2010.00496.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vadrot, A. B. M. 2017. “Knowledge, International Relations and the Structure–Agency Debate: Towards the Concept of ‘Epistemic Selectivities.’ Innovation: The European Journal of Social Science Research 30 (1): 61–72.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wagenaar, H., and S. Altink. 2012. “Prostitution as Morality Policy or why it is Exceedingly Difficult to Design and Sustain Effective Prostitution Policy.” Sexuality Research and Social Policy 9 (3): 279–292. doi: 10.1007/s13178-012-0095-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wagenaar, H., S. Altink, and H. Amesberger. 2013. Final Report of the International Comparative Study of Prostitution Policy: Austria and the Netherlands. The Hague: Platform 31.
   Google Scholar
• Weir, M. 2010. “Collaborative Governance and Civic Empowerment: A Discussion of Investing in Democracy: Engaging Citizens in Collaborative Governance.” Perspectives on Politics 8 (2): 595–598. doi: 10.1017/S1537592710000411
   Google Scholar
• Weitzer, R. 2015. “Researching Prostitution and sex Trafficking Comparatively.” Sexuality Research and Social Policy 12 (2): 81–91. doi: 10.1007/s13178-014-0168-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weitzer, R., and D. Boels. 2015. “Ghent’s red-Light District in Comparative Perspective.” Sexuality Research and Social Policy 12 (3): 248–260. doi: 10.1007/s13178-015-0181-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• West, J. 2000. “Prostitution: Collectives and the Politics of Regulation.” Gender, Work and Organization 7 (2): 106–118. doi: 10.1111/1468-0432.00098
   Google Scholar
• Zhang, T. 2009. “Beyond the ‘Natasha’ Story: A Review and Critique of Current Research on sex Trafficking.” Global Crime 10 (3): 178–195. doi: 10.1080/17440570903079899
   Google Scholar