1,912
Views
1
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Editorial

The social sciences and the humanities in the intergovernmental science-policy platform on biodiversity and ecosystem services (IPBES)

ORCID Icon, &

References

  • Díaz, S. 2015. “The IPBES Conceptual Framework - Connecting Nature and People.” Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability 14: 1–16. doi: 10.1016/j.cosust.2014.11.002
  • Díaz, S., et al. 2018. “Assessing Nature's Contributions to People.” Science 359: 270–272. doi: 10.1126/science.aap8826
  • Biodiversity Policy. 2016. The Closing Window of Opportunity for Embedding the Social Sciences and Humanities in the IPBES Process. Results from an Expert Workshop Held by the German IPBES Coordination Office in Cooperation with the German Federal Ministry for the Environment, Nature Conservation, Building and Nuclear Safety and the German Federal Ministry of Education and Research on 12 November 2015 in Bonn/Germany. Accessed 2 January 2018. http://www.de-ipbes.de/media/content/IPBES%202016%20Biodiversity%20Policy.pdf.
  • CBD. 2016. Decision Adopted by the Conference of the Parties to the Convention on Biological Diversity at its Thirteenth Meeting. XIII/1. 2016. Progress in the Implementation of the Convention and the Strategic Plan for Biodiversity 2011–2020 and Towards the Achievement of the Aichi Biodiversity Targets. (CBD/COP/DEC/XIII/1). Accessed 2 January 2018. https://www.cbd.int/doc/decisions/cop-13/cop-13-dec-01-en.pdf.
  • Heffernan, O. 2016. “Major Biodiversity Panel Desperately Seeks Social Scientists. Intergovernmental Body That Tracks World Ecosystems is Criticized for its Own Lack of Diversity.” Nature, News. Accessed 2 January 2018. http://www.nature.com/news/major-biodiversity-panel-desperately-seeks-social-scientists-1.19778.
  • Heubach, K., and C. K. Lambini. 2017. Distribution and selection of experts in the intergovernmental science-policy platform on biodiversity and ecosystem services (IPBES): the case of the regional assessment for Africa. Innovation: The European Journal of Social Science Research. doi: 10.1080/13511610.2017.1377601
  • IPBES. 2016. Summary for Policymakers of the Methodological Assessment of Scenarios and Models of Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services of the Intergovernmental Science-Policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services. S. Ferrier, K. N. Ninan, P. Leadley, R. Alkemade, L.A. Acosta, H. R. Akçakaya, L. Brotons, W. Cheung, V. Christensen, K. A. Harhash, J. Kabubo-Mariara, C. Lundquist, M. Obersteiner, H. Pereira, G. Peterson, R. Pichs-Madruga, N. H. Ravindranath, C. Rondinini, B. Wintle (eds.). Secretariat of the Intergovernmental Science-Policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services, Bonn, Germany. Accessed 2 January 2018. https://www.ipbes.net/sites/default/files/downloads/pdf/spm_deliverable_3c_scenarios_20161124_0.pdf.
  • Jetzkowitz, J., C. S. A. van Koppen (Kris), R. Lidskog, K. Ott, L. Voget-Kleschin, and C. M. Ling Wong. 2017. The significance of meaning. Why IPBES needs the social sciences and humanities. Innovation: The European Journal of Social Science Research. doi:10.1080/13511610.2017.1348933.2017.
  • Keller, R., H. Keune, and S. Maynard. 2017. Where do IPBES delegates in Europe see challenges, needs, gaps and opportunities in policy uptake of “Nature’s contributions to people”?. Innovation: The European Journal of Social Science Research. doi: 10.1080/13511610.2017.1361814
  • Kovács, E., and G. Pataki. 2016. “The Participation of Experts and Knowledges in the Intergovernmental Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services (IPBES).” Environmental Science & Policy 57: 131–139. doi: 10.1016/j.envsci.2015.12.007
  • Larigauderie, A., M. Stenseke, and R. T. Watson. 2016. Nature, Vol. 532: 313. Accessed 2 January 2018. http://www.nature.com/nature/journal/v532/n7599/full/532313c.html.
  • Laurans, Y. 2017. Borrowing trouble. Finding ways out of value systems discord for biodiversity policy-making. Innovation: The European Journal of Social Science Research. doi: 10.1080/13511610.2017.1418302
  • Montana, J., and M. Borie. 2016. “IPBES and Biodiversity Expertise: Regional, Gender, and Disciplinary Balance in the Composition of the Interim and 2015 Multidisciplinary Expert Panel.” Conservation Letters 9: 138–142. doi: 10.1111/conl.12192
  • Opgenoorth, L., S. Hotes, and H. Mooney. 2014. “IPBES: Biodiversity Panel Should Play by Rules.” Nature 506: 159. Accessed 2 January 2018. http://www.nature.com/nature/journal/v506/n7487/full/506159a.html. doi: 10.1038/506159a
  • Ostrom, E. 2010. “Polycentric Systems for Coping with Collective Action and Global Environmental Change.” Global Environmental Change 20: 550–557. doi: 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2010.07.004
  • Reuter, K., M. Timpte, and C. Nesshöver. 2016. “Disciplinary Balance: How to Engage Social Scientists in IPBES.” Nature 531: 173. Accessed 2 January 2018. http://www.nature.com/nature/journal/v531/n7593/full/531173c.html. doi: 10.1038/531173c
  • Stenseke, M., and A. Larigauderie. 2017. The role, importance and challenges of social sciences and humanities in the work of the intergovernmental science-policy platform on biodiversity and ecosystem services (IPBES). Innovation: The European Journal of Social Science Research. doi: 10.1080/13511610.2017.1398076
  • Timpte M., J. Montana, K. Reuter, M. Borie, and J. Apkes. 2017. Engaging diverse experts in a global environmental assessment: participation in the first work programme of IPBES and opportunities for improvement. Innovation: The European Journal of Social Science Research. doi: 10.1080/13511610.2017.1383149
  • Vadrot, A. B. M., J. Jetzkowitz, and L. C. Stringer. 2016. “IPBES Disciplinary Gaps Still Gaping.” Nature 530: 160. Accessed 2 January, 2018. http://www.nature.com/nature/journal/v530/n7589/pdf/530160b.pdf. doi: 10.1038/530160b
  • Vadrot, A. B. M., A. Rankovic, R. Lapeyre, P-M. Aubert, and Y. Laurans. 2018. Why are social sciences and humanities needed in the works of IPBES? A systematic review of the literature. Innovation: The European Journal of Social Science Research. doi: 10.1080/13511610.2018.1443799

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.