When citizens met politicians – the process and outcomes of mixed deliberation according to participant status and gender

References

• Afsahi, A. 2020. “Gender Difference in Willingness and Capacity for Deliberation.” Social Politics: International Studies in Gender, State & Society jxaa003: 1–27.
   Google Scholar
• Andersen, V. N., and K. M. Hansen. 2007. “How Deliberation Makes Better Citizens: The Danish Deliberative Poll on the Euro.” European Journal of Political Research 46 (4): 531–556.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bächtiger, A. 2014. Debate and Deliberation in Legislatures. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bächtiger, A., and S. Beste. 2017. “Deliberative Citizens, (non) Deliberative Politicians: A Rejoinder.” Daedalus 146 (3): 106–118.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bächtiger, A., M. Setälä, and K. Grönlund. 2014. “Towards a New Era of Deliberative Mini-Publics.” In Deliberative Mini-Publics: Involving Citizens in the Democratic Process, edited by K. Grönlund, A. Bächtiger, and M. Setälä, 225–246. Essex: ECPR Press.
   Google Scholar
• Beauvais, E. 2020. “The Gender Gap in Political Discussion Group Attendance.” Politics & Gender 16 (2): 315–338.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beauvais, E., and A. Bächtiger. 2016. “Taking the Goals of Deliberation Seriously: A Differentiated View on Equality and Equity in Deliberative Designs and Processes.” Journal of Public Deliberation 12 (2): 1–18.
   Google Scholar
• Bohman, J. 2000. ““When Water Chokes”: Ideology, Communication, and Practical Rationality.” Constellations (oxford, England) 7 (3): 382–392.
   Google Scholar
• Boulianne, S. 2019. “Building Faith in Democracy: Deliberative Events, Political Trust and Efficacy.” Political Studies 67 (1): 4–30.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Button, M., and K. Mattson. 1999. “Deliberative Democracy in Practice: Challenges and Prospects for Civic Deliberation.” Polity 31 (4): 609–637.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Caluwaerts, D. 2012. Confrontation and Communication: Deliberative Democracy in Divided Belgium. Brussels: Peter Lang.
   Google Scholar
• Caluwaerts, D. 2013. “Is There a Gender Gap in Democratic Deliberation?” Paper Presented at the 3rd European Conference on Politics and Gender, Barcelona, March 21–23, Barcelona.
   Google Scholar
• Curato, N., J. Sass, S. A. Ercan, and S. Niemeyer. 2020. “Deliberative Democracy in the Age of Serial Crisis.” International Political Science Review 1–12.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dillard, K. N. 2011. “Assessing the Problem of Gender Inequality in Deliberative Democracy.” PhD diss. Kansas State University.
   Google Scholar
• Elster, J. 2012. “Clearing and Strengthening the Channels of Constitution Making.” In Comparative Constitutional Design, edited by T. Ginsburg, 15–30. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Elstub, S., and P. McLaverty. 2014. Deliberative Democracy: Issues and Cases. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ergenc, C. 2014. “Political Efficacy Through Deliberative Participation in Urban China: A Case Study on Public Hearings.” Journal of Chinese Political Science 19 (2): 191–213.
   Google Scholar
• Farrar, C., J. S. Fishkin, D. P. Green, C. List, R. C. Luskin, and E. L. Paluck. 2009. “Disaggregating Deliberation’s Effects: An Experiment Within a Deliberative Poll.” British Journal of Political Science 40 (2): 333–347.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Farrell, D. M., J. Suiter, C. Harris, and K. Cunningham. 2020. “The Effects of Mixed Membership in a Deliberative Forum: The Irish Constitutional Convention of 2012–2014.” Political Studies 68 (1): 54–73.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fishkin, J. S. 2009. “Virtual Public Consultation: Prospects for Internet Deliberative Democracy.” In: T. Davies and S.P. Gangadharan, eds. 2009. Online deliberation: Design, research, and practice. CSLI Publications. https://philpapers.org/archive/DAVODD.pdf/.
   Google Scholar
• Fishkin, J. S., and R. C. Luskin. 2005. “Experimenting with a Democratic Ideal: Deliberative Polling and Public Opinion.” Acta Politica 40 (3): 284–298.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flinders, M., K. Ghose, W. Jennings, E. Molloy, B. Prosser, A. Renwick, G. Smith, and P. Spada. 2016. Democracy Matters: Lessons from the 2015 Citizens’ Assemblies on English Devolution. Sheffield: University of Sheffield. http://citizensassembly.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2016/04/Democracy-Matters-2015-Citizens-Assemblies-Report.pdf/.
   Google Scholar
• Fournier, P., M. Turgeon, A. Blais, J. Everitt, E. Gidengil, and N. Nevitte. 2011. “Deliberation from Within: Changing One’s Mind During an Interview.” Political Psychology 32 (5): 885–919.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gastil, J. 1993. “Identifying Obstacles to Small Group Democracy.” Small Group Research 24 (1): 5–27.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gastil, J. 2000. “Is Face-to-Face Citizen Deliberation a Luxury or a Necessity?” Political Communication 17 (4): 357–361.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gastil, J. 2008. Political Communication and Deliberation. Los Angeles: Sage publications.
   Google Scholar
• Gastil, J. 2009. The Group in Society. Los Angeles: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Gastil, J., R. C. Richards, M. Ryan, and G. Smith. 2017. “Testing Assumptions in Deliberative Democratic Design: A Preliminary Assessment of the Efficacy of the Participedia Data Archive as an Analytic Tool.” Journal of Public Deliberation 13: 2.
   Google Scholar
• Geissel, B., and P. Hess. 2017. “Explaining Political Efficacy in Deliberative Procedures – A Novel Methodological Approach.” Journal of Public Deliberation 13 (2): 1–25.
   Google Scholar
• Gerber, M. 2015. “Equal Partners in Dialogue? Participation Equality in a Transnational Deliberative Poll (Europolis).” Political Studies 63: 110–130.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gerber, M., A. Bächtiger, S. Shikano, S. Reber, and S. Rohr. 2018. “Deliberative Abilities and Influence in a Transnational Deliberative Poll (EuroPolis).” British Journal of Political Science 48 (4): 1093–1118.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gerber, M., and S. Mueller. 2018. “When the People Speak–and Decide: Deliberation and Direct Democracy in the Citizen Assembly of Glarus, Switzerland.” Policy & Politics 46 (3): 371–390.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gerber, M., H. P. Schaub, and S. Mueller. 2019. “O Sister, Where Art Thou? Theory and Evidence on Female Participation at Citizen Assemblies.” European Journal of Politics and Gender 2 (2): 173–195.
   Google Scholar
• Graham, T. 2009. “What’s Wife Swap Got to do With it? Talking Politics in the Net-based Public Sphere.” PhD diss., Universiteit van Amsterdam.
   Google Scholar
• Gribbons, B., and J. Herman. 1997. “True and Quasi-experimental Designs.” Practical Assessment, Research & Evaluation 5 (14): 1–3. http://pareonline.net/getvn.asp?v=5&n=14/.
   Google Scholar
• Grönlund, K., M. Setälä, and K. Herne. 2010. “Deliberation and Civic Virtue: Lessons from a Citizen Deliberation Experiment.” European Political Science Review 2 (1): 95–117.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grunenfelder, R., and A. Bächtiger. 2007. Gendered Deliberation? How Men and Women Deliberate in Legislatures. Helsinki: European Consortium for Political Research Joint Sessions.
   Google Scholar
• Gutmann, A., and D. Thompson. 2004. Why Deliberative Democracy? Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Habermas, J. 1998. Between Facts and Norms: Contributions to a Discourse Theory of law and Democracy. Cambridge: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Han, S. H., W. Schenck-Hamlin, and D. Schenck-Hamlin. 2015. “Inclusion, Equality, and Discourse Quality in Citizen Deliberations on Broadband.” Journal of Public Deliberation 11 (1): 1–24.
   Google Scholar
• Harris, C., D. M. Farrell, J. Suiter, and M. Brennan. 2020. “Women’s Voices in a Deliberative Assembly: An Analysis of Gender Rates of Participation in Ireland’s Convention on the Constitution 2012–2014.” The British Journal of Politics and International Relations, doi:1369148120951021.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Himmelroos, S. 2011. “Democratically speaking – Can citizen deliberation be considered fair and equal?” In ECPR Joint Sessions, Workshop Frontiers of Deliberation. 12–17. University of St. Gallen.
   Google Scholar
• Himmelroos, S. 2017. “Discourse Quality in Deliberative Citizen Forums – A Comparison of Four Deliberative Mini-publics.” Journal of Public Deliberation 13 (1): 1–28.
   Google Scholar
• Himmelroos, S., L. Rapeli, and K. Grönlund. 2017. “Talking with Like-minded People – Equality and Efficacy in Enclave Deliberation.” The Social Science Journal 54 (2): 148–158.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jacquet, V. 2017. “Explaining Non-participation in Deliberative Mini-publics.” European Journal of Political Research 56 (3): 640–659.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jaramillo, M. C., and J. Steiner. 2019. “From Discourse Quality Index to Deliberative Transformative Moments.” In Handbook of Democratic Innovation and Governance, edited by S. Elstub and O. Escobar, 527–539. Edward Elgar Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Jennstål, J. 2019. “Deliberation and Complexity of Thinking: Using the Integrative Complexity Scale to Assess the Deliberative Quality of Minipublics.” Swiss Political Science Review 25 (1): 64–83.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jensen, J. L. 2003. “Public Spheres on the Internet: Anarchic or Government-sponsored – A Comparison.” Scandinavian Political Studies 26 (4): 349–374.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson, G. F. 2015. Democratic Illusion: Deliberative Democracy in Canadian Public Policy. Vol. 49. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
   Google Scholar
• Karjalainen, M., and L. Rapeli. 2015. “Who Will Not Deliberate? Attrition in a Multi-stage Citizen Deliberation Experiment.” Quality & Quantity 49 (1): 407–422.
   Google Scholar
• Karpowitz, C. F., and T. Mendelberg. 2014. The Silent Sex: Gender, Deliberation, and Institutions. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Karpowitz, C. F., T. Mendelberg, and L. Shaker. 2012. “Gender Inequality in Deliberative Participation.” The American Political Science Review 106 (3): 533–547.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kies, R. 2010. Promises and Limits of Web-deliberation. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• King, M. 2009. “A Critical Assessment of Steenbergen et al.’s Discourse Quality Index.” Roundhouse: A Journal of Critical Theory and Practice 1 (1): 1–8.
   Google Scholar
• Klinger, U., and U. Russmann. 2015. “The Sociodemographics of Political Public Deliberation: Measuring Deliberative Quality in Different User Groups.” Communications 40 (4): 471–484.
   Google Scholar
• Knobloch, K. R., and J. Gastil. 2015. “Civic (re) Socialisation: The Educative Effects of Deliberative Participation.” Politics 35 (2): 183–200.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Landwehr, C. 2014. “Facilitating Deliberation: The Role of Impartial Intermediaries in Deliberative Mini-publics.” In 2014. Deliberative Mini-publics: Involving Citizens in the Democratic Process, edited by K. Grönlund, A. Bächtiger, and M. Setälä, 77–92. Colchester: ECPR Press.
   Google Scholar
• Levine, P., A. Fung, and J. Gastil. 2005. “Future Directions for Public Deliberation.” Journal of Public Deliberation 1 (1): 1–13.
   Google Scholar
• Levy, B. 2013. “An Empirical Exploration of Factors Related to Adolescents’ Political Efficacy.” Educational Psychology 33 (3): 357–390.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levy, H. I., and S. Sakaiya. 2020. “Effect of Deliberation Style on the Gender Gap in Deliberative Participation.” Japanese Journal of Political Science 21 (3): 1–18.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lupia, A., and A. Norton. 2017. “Inequality is Always in the Room: Language & Power in Deliberative Democracy.” Daedalus 146 (3): 64–76.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luskin, R. C., G. Sood, J. S. Fishkin, and K. S. Hahn. 2017. Deliberative Distortions? Homogenization, Polarization, and Domination in Small Group Deliberations. Unpublished manuscript from the Center for Deliberative Democracy. Available at https://cdd.stanford.edu/mm/2017/07/luskin-deliberative-distortions.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Mansbridge, J. 1999. “Everyday Talk in the Deliberative System.” In Deliberative Politics: Essays on Democracy and Disagreement, edited by S. Macedo, 211–239. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mendelberg, T., C. F. Karpowitz, and J. B. Oliphant. 2014. “Gender Inequality in Deliberation: Unpacking the Black Box of Interaction.” Perspectives on Politics 12 (1): 18–44.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Minozzi, W., M. A. Neblo, K. M. Esterling, and D. M. Lazer. 2015. “Field Experiment Evidence of Substantive, Attributional, and Behavioral Persuasion by Members of Congress in Online Town Halls.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 112 (13): 3937–3942.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moore, A. 2012. “Following from the Front: Theorizing Deliberative Facilitation.” Critical Policy Studies 6 (2): 146–162.
   Google Scholar
• Morrell, M. E. 2005. “Deliberation, Democratic Decision-Making and Internal Political Efficacy.” Political Behavior 27 (1): 49–69.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mutz, D. C. 2006. Hearing the Other Side: Deliberative Versus Participatory Democracy. New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Nabatchi, T. 2010. “Deliberative Democracy and Citizenship: In Search of the Efficacy Effect.” Journal of Public Deliberation 6 (2): 1–47.
   Google Scholar
• Niemi, R. G., S. C. Craig, and F. Mattei. 1991. “Measuring Internal Political Efficacy in the 1988 National Election Study.” The American Political Science Review 85 (4): 1407–1413.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Flynn, I., G. Sood, J. Mistaffa, and N. Saeed. 2019. “What Future for Kirkuk? Evidence from a Deliberative Intervention.” Democratization 26 (7): 1299–1317.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Papacharissi, Z. 2004. “Democracy Online: Civility, Politeness, and the Democratic Potential of Online Political Discussion Groups.” New Media & Society 6 (2): 259–283.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parkinson, J. 2006. Deliberating in the Real World: Problems of Legitimacy in Deliberative Democracy. Oxford: Oxford University Press on Demand.
   Google Scholar
• Pedrini, S. 2014. “Deliberative Capacity in the Political and Civic Sphere.” Swiss Political Science Review 20 (2): 263–286.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Polletta, F., and J. Lee. 2006. “Is Telling Stories Good for Democracy? Rhetoric in Public Deliberation After 9/11.” American Sociological Review 71 (5): 699–721.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosenberg, S. W. 2007. “Rethinking Democratic Deliberation: The Limits and Potential of Citizen Participation.” Polity 39 (3): 335–360.
   Google Scholar
• Rosenberg, S. W. 2014. “Citizen Competence and the Psychology of Deliberation.” In Deliberative Democracy: Issues and Cases, edited by S. Elstub and P. McLaverty, 98–117. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ryan, M. 2014. “Advancing Comparison of Democratic Innovations: A Medium-N fuzzy-set Qualitative Comparative Analysis of Participatory Budgeting.” PhD diss. University of Southampton.
   Google Scholar
• Setälä, M. 2017. “Connecting Deliberative Mini-publics to Representative Decision Making.” European Journal of Political Research 56 (4): 846–863.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Setälä, M., H. R. Christensen, M. Leino, K. Strandberg, M. Bäck, and M. Jäske. 2020. “Deliberative Mini-publics Facilitating Voter Knowledge and Judgement: Experience from a Finnish Local Referendum.” Representation: Journal of Representative Democracy 1–19.
   Google Scholar
• Showers, E., N. Tindall, and T. Davies. 2015. “Equality of Participation Online Versus Face to Face: Condensed Analysis of the Community Forum Deliberative Methods Demonstration.” In Tambouris E. et al., eds. 2015. Electronic Participation. ePart 2015. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 9249. Springer, Cham. Doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-22500-5_5.
   Google Scholar
• Siu, A. 2009. Look Who's Talking: Examining Social Influence, Opinion Change, and Argument Quality in Deliberation. Stanford: Stanford University.
   Google Scholar
• Steenberger, M., A. Bächtiger, M. Spröndli, and J. Steiner. 2003. “Measuring Political Deliberation: A Discourse Quality Index.” Comparative European Politics 1: 21–48.
   Google Scholar
• Strandberg, K., and J. Berg. 2013. “Online Readers’ Comments – Democratic Conversation Platforms or Virtual Soapboxes?” Comunicao e Sociedade – Communication & Society 23: 132–152.
   Google Scholar
• Strandberg, K., and J. Berg. 2015. “Stretching the Boundaries of on–Line Deliberation – An Experimental Study Evaluating the Impact of Temporality and Identifiability on Discussion Quality in On–Line Deliberations.” Javnost – The Public 22 (2): 164–180.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Strandberg, K., and J. Berg. 2019. “When Reality Strikes – Opinion Changes among Citizens and Politicians During a Deliberation on a Local-level Wicked Problem.” International Political Science Review 41 (4): 567–583..
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Strandberg, K., and M. Lindell. 2020. “Citizens’ Attitudes Towards Municipal Mergers – Individual-level Explanations.” Scandinavian Political Studies 43 (4): 296–316.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stromer-Galley, J. 2007. “Measuring Deliberation’s Content: A Coding Scheme.” Journal of Public Deliberation 3 (1): 1–35.
   Google Scholar
• Suiter, J., D. M. Farrell, and E. O’Malley. 2016. “When Do Deliberative Citizens Change Their Opinions? Evidence from the Irish Citizens’ Assembly.” International Political Science Review 37 (2): 198–212.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sunstein, C. R. 2002. “The Law of Group Polarization.” Journal of Political Philosophy 10 (2): 175–195.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ugarriza, J. E., and E. Nussio. 2016. “There is No Pill for Deliberation: Explaining Discourse Quality in Post-conflict Communities.” Swiss Political Science Review 22 (1): 145–166.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Young, I. M. 2000. Inclusion and Democracy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar