Poorly designed deliberation: explaining the banlieues’ non-involvement in the Great Debate

References

• Ahmed, et al. 2019. “Gilets jaunes: regards de jeunes de banlieue.” Métropolitiques, May 23. https://metropolitiques.eu/Gilets-jaunes-regards-de-jeunes-de-banlieue.html.
   Google Scholar
• Avenel, C. 2009. “La construction du “problème des banlieues” entre ségrégation et stigmatisation.” Journal français de psychiatrie 34 (3): 36–44.
   Google Scholar
• Bächtiger, A., et al. 2018. The Oxford Handbook of Deliberative Democracy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Baudin, G., and P. Genestier. 2002. Banlieues à problèmes: La construction d’un problème social et d’un thème d’action publique. Paris: La Documentation Française.
   Google Scholar
• Bedock, C., and J.-B. Pilet. 2020. “Enraged, Engaged, or Both? A Study of the Determinants of Support for Consultative vs. Binding Mini-Publics.” Representation, (online first).
   Google Scholar
• Bennani, H., P. Gandré, and B. Monnery. 2020. “Les déterminants locaux de la participation numérique au grand débat national : une analyse économétrique.” Revue économique 71 (4): 715–737.
   Google Scholar
• Buge, É, and C. Morio. 2019. “Le Grand débat national, apports et limites pour la participation citoyenne.” Revue du droit public 5: 1205.
   Google Scholar
• Chamorel, P. 2019. “Macron Versus the Yellow Vests.” Journal of Democracy 30 (4): 48–62.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Christensen, H. S., and Å von Schoultz. 2019. “Ideology and Deliberation: An Analysis of Public Support for Deliberative Practices in Finland.” International Journal of Public Opinion Research 31 (1): 178–194.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Creswell, J. W., and J. D. Creswell. 2017. Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches. 5th ed. London: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• de Feraudy, T. 2019. “France’s Great Debate: Civic Washing or Real Engagement?” Civicist. https://civichall.org/civicist/frances-great-debate-civic-washing-or-real-engagement/.
   Google Scholar
• Deléage, J.-P. 2019. “L’insurrection des “gilets jaunes”, et après?” Écologie & politique 58 (1): 5–8.
   Google Scholar
• Dobler, C. 2019. “The 2019 Grand Débat National in France: A Participatory Experiment with Limited Legitimacy.” Democracy International.
   Google Scholar
• Dryzek, J. S. 2001. “Legitimacy and Economy in Deliberative Democracy.” Political Theory 29 (5): 651–669.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ehs, T., and M. Mokre. 2020. “Deliberation Against Participation? Yellow Vests and Grand Débat: A Perspective from Deliberative Theory.” Political Studies Review, (online first).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Euvé, F. 2019. “Le “grand débat”: un moment possible de vitalité démocratique.” Études 3: 5–6.
   Google Scholar
• Felicetti, A., S. Niemeyer, and N. Curato. 2016. “Improving Deliberative Participation: Connecting Mini-Publics to Deliberative Systems.” European Political Science Review 8 (3): 427–448.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fishkin, J. S. 2011. When the People Speak: Deliberative Democracy and Public Consultation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fleury, M., and B. Morel. 2019. “Le Grand débat, vrai symptôme et fausse solution au malaise démocratique.” JP Blog. http://blog.juspoliticum.com/2019/04/03/le-grand-debat-vrai-symptome-et-fausse-solution-au-malaise-democratique-par-marine-fleury-et-benjamin-morel/.
   Google Scholar
• Geissel, B., and S. Gherghina. 2016. “Constitutional Deliberative Democracy and Democratic Innovations.” In Constitutional Deliberative Democracy in Europe, edited by M. Reuchamps and J. Suiter, 75–92. Colchester: ECPR Press.
   Google Scholar
• Geisser, V. 2019. “Les gilets jaunes et le triptyque “islam, banlieues, immigration”: une machine à produire des fantasmes identitaires.” Migrations Société 175 (1): 5–16.
   Google Scholar
• Gherghina, S., and B. Geissel. 2020. “Support for Direct and Deliberative Models of Democracy in the UK: Understanding the Difference.” Political Research Exchange 2 (1), online first.
   Google Scholar
• Grossman, E. 2019. “France’s Yellow Vests – Symptom of a Chronic Disease.” Political Insight 10 (1): 30–34.
   Google Scholar
• Grunberg, G. 2019. “Les “Gilets Jaunes” et la crise de la démocratie représentative.” Le Débat 204 (2): 95–103.
   Google Scholar
• Haddad, Y. Y., and M. J. Balz. 2006. “The October Riots in France: A Failed Immigration Policy or the Empire Strikes Back?” International Migration 44 (2): 23–34.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hibbing, J. R., and E. Theiss-Morse. 2002. Stealth Democracy : Americans’ Beliefs About How Government Should Work. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jacquet, V. 2017. “Explaining non-Participation in Deliberative Mini-Publics.” European Journal of Political Research 56 (3): 640–659.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lambert, S. D., and C. G. Loiselle. 2008. “Combining Individual Interviews and Focus Groups to Enhance Data Richness.” Journal of Advanced Nursing 62 (2): 228–237.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lapeyronnie, D. 2006. “Révolte primitive dans les banlieues françaises.” Déviance et Société 30 (4): 431–448.
   Google Scholar
• Macron, E. 2019. “Letter from M. Emmanuel Macron to the French People.” Elysée. https://www.elysee.fr/emmanuel-macron/2019/01/13/letter-to-the-french-people-from-emmanuel-macron.en.
   Google Scholar
• Maurin, É. 2004. Le Ghetto français. Enquête sur le séparatisme social. Paris: Le Seuil.
   Google Scholar
• McAuley, J. 2019. “France’s Minorities Are Angry, Too. But They’re Mostly Sitting Out the Yellow Vest Protests.” The Washington Post, March 1.
   Google Scholar
• Mișcoiu, S. 2005. Le Front National et ses répercussions sur l’échiquier politique français 1972–2002. Cluj-Napoca: EFES.
   Google Scholar
• Mișcoiu, S. 2007. “Citoyenneté et identité nationale : les limites du retour au clivage gauche/droite en France lors de l’élection presidentielle de 2007.” In Identités politiques et dynamiques partisanes en France, edited by S. Mișcoiu, C. Delsol, and B. Alliot, 184–200. Cluj-Napoca: EFES.
   Google Scholar
• Mișcoiu, S. 2020. “Back on Track: the French Far Right’s (Narrow) Win in the 2019 European Elections.” In 2019 European Elections: The EU Party Democracy and the Challenge of National Populism, edited by Carp Radu and Matiuța Cristina , 99–112. Leiden: Brill.
   Google Scholar
• Mutz, D. C. 2006. Hearing the Other Side: Deliberative Versus Participatory Democracy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Neblo, M. A., et al. 2010. “Who Wants to Deliberate – And Why?” American Political Science Review 104 (3): 566–583.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parkinson, J. 2006. Deliberating in the Real World: Problems of Legitimacy in Deliberative Democracy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Perrineau, P. 1988. “Front national: l’écho politique de l’anomie urbaine.” Esprit (3–4): 22–38.
   Google Scholar
• Reuchamps, M., and D. Caluwaerts. 2018. The Legitimacy of Citizen-led Deliberative Democracy. The G1000 in Belgium. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Sanders, L. M. 1997. “Against Deliberation.” Political Theory 25 (3): 347–376.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Setälä, M. 2017. “Connecting Deliberative Mini-Publics to Representative Decision Making.” European Journal of Political Research 56 (4): 846–863.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Silverman, D. 2015. Interpreting Qualitative Data. 5th ed. London: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, G. 2009. Democratic Innovations. Designing Institutions for Citizen Participation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Vermeren, P. 2019. “Le dévoilement d’une France méconnue.” Le Débat 204 (2): 4–15.
   Google Scholar
• Vieillard-Baron, H. 2000. “De l’effroi technique à la peur des banlieues.” Histoire Urbaine 2 (2): 171–187.
   Google Scholar
• Vieillard-Baron, H. 2011. Banlieues et périphéries: Des singularités françaises aux réalités mondiales. Paris: Hachette.
   Google Scholar
• Warren, C. A. B., and T. X. Karner. 2014. Discovering Qualitative Methods. Ethnography, Interviews, Documents, and Images. 3rd edn. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Warren, M. E., and H. Pearse. 2008. Designing Deliberative Democracy: The British Columbia Citizens’ Assembly. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Webb, P. 2013. “Who Is Willing to Participate? Dissatisfied Democrats, Stealth Democrats and Populists in the United Kingdom.” European Journal of Political Research 52 (6): 747–772.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Website Great Debate. 2019. “The Great National Debate.” granddebat.fr. https://granddebat.fr/.
   Google Scholar