Public support for deliberative democracy. A specific look at the attitudes of citizens from disadvantaged groups

Bibliography

• Almond, G., and S. Verba. 1963. The Civic Culture. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bartels, Larry M. 2008. Unequal Democracy. STU-Student ed. Princeton University Press. doi:https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctt7t9ks.
   Google Scholar
• Bedock, Camille, and Jean-Benoit Pilet. 2020a. “Who Supports Citizens Selected by Lot to Be the Main Policymakers? A Study of French Citizens.” Government and Opposition 56: 485–504.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bedock, Camille, and Jean-Benoit Pilet. 2020b. “Enraged, Engaged, or Both? A Study of the Determinants of Support for Consultative vs. Binding Mini-Publics.” Representation June: 1–21. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/00344893.2020.1778511.
   Google Scholar
• Bègue, Murielle. 2007. ‘Le Rapport Au Politique Des Personnes En Situation Défavorisée : Une Comparaison Européenne : France, Grande-Bretagne, Espagne’. PhD Thesis. http://www.theses.fr/2007IEPP0047/document.
   Google Scholar
• Bengtsson, Åsa, and Henrik Christensen. 2016. “Ideals and Actions: Do Citizens’ Patterns of Political Participation Correspond to Their Conceptions of Democracy?” Government and Opposition 51 (2): 234–260. doi:https://doi.org/10.1017/gov.2014.29.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bengtsson, Åsa, and Mikko Mattila. 2009. “Direct Democracy and Its Critics: Support for Direct Democracy and “Stealth” Democracy in Finland.” West European Politics 32 (5): 1031–1048. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/01402380903065256.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bennett, Linda LM, and Stephen Earl Bennett. 1989. “Enduring Gender Differences in Political Interest: The Impact of Socialization and Political Dispositions.” American Politics Quarterly 17 (1): 105–122.
   Google Scholar
• Bohman, James. 1998. “Survey Article: The Coming of Age of Deliberative Democracy.” Journal of Political Philosophy 6 (4): 400–425.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bowler, Shaun, Todd Donovan, and Jeffrey A. Karp. 2007. “Enraged or Engaged? Preferences for Direct Citizen Participation in Affluent Democracies.” Political Research Quarterly 60 (3): 351–362. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/1065912907304108.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brady, Henry E., Sydney Verba, and Kay Lehman Scholzman. 1995. “Beyond Ses: A Resource Model of Political Participation.” American Political Science Review 89 (2): 271–294.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Caluwaerts, Didier, Benjamin Biard, Vincent Jacquet, and Min Reuchamps. 2018. “‘What Is a Good Democracy? Citizens’ Support for New Modes of Governing’.” In Mind the Gap. Political Participation and Representation in Belgium, edited by Kris Deschouwer, 75–90. Colchester: ECPR Press.
   Google Scholar
• Campbell, Angus, Philip E. Converse, Warren E. Miller, and Donald E. Strokes. 1960. The American Voter. New York: John Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Carnes, Nicholas. 2016. “Why Are There so Few Working-Class People in Political Office? Evidence from State Legislatures.” Politics, Groups, and Identities 4 (1): 84–109. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/21565503.2015.1066689.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ceka, Besir, and Pedro C Magalhaes. 2020. “Do the Rich and the Poor Have Different Conceptions of Democracy? Socioeconomic Status, Inequality, and the Political Status Quo.” Comparative Politics 52 (3): 383–412.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Celis, Karen, Petra Meier, and Bram Wauters. 2010. “Diversiteit, vertegenwoordiging en onderzoek in België.” In: Karen Celis, Petra Meier and Bram Wauters. Ghent Academia Press. http://lib.ugent.be/catalog/pug01:901284.
   Google Scholar
• Dalton, Russell J. 2004. Democratic Challenges, Democratic Choices : The Erosion of Political Support in Advanced Industrial Democracies. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Easton, David. 1965. A Systems Analysis of Political Life. New York: John Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Font, Joan, Magdalena Wojcieszak, and Clemente J. Navarro. 2015. “Participation, Representation and Expertise: Citizen Preferences for Political Decision-Making Processes.” Political Studies 63 (S1): 153–172. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9248.12191.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• García-Espín, Patricia, and Ernesto Ganuza. 2017. “Participatory Skepticism: Ambivalence and Conflict in Popular Discourses of Participatory Democracy.” Qualitative Sociology 40 (4): 425–446.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Geißel, Brigitte, and Marko Joas. 2013. Participatory Democratic Innovations in Europe: Improving the Quality of Democracy? Verlag Barbara Budrich.
   Google Scholar
• Gherghina, Sergiu, and Brigitte Geissel. 2017. “Linking Democratic Preferences and Political Participation: Evidence from Germany.” Political Studies 65 (1_suppl): 24–42. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/0032321716672224.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gherghina, Sergiu, and Brigitte Geissel. 2019. “An Alternative to Representation: Explaining Preferences for Citizens as Political Decision-Makers.” Political Studies Review 17 (3): 224–238.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gherghina, Sergiu, and Brigitte Geissel. 2020. “Support for Direct and Deliberative Models of Democracy in the UK: Understanding the Difference.” Political Research Exchange 2 (1): 1809474.
   Google Scholar
• Gherghina, Sergiu, Monika Mokre, and Sergiu Miscoiu. 2020. “Introduction: Democratic Deliberation and Under-Represented Groups.” Political Studies Review, doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/1478929920950931.
   Google Scholar
• Giger, Nathalie, Jan Rosset, and Julian Bernauer. 2012. “The Poor Political Representation of the Poor in a Comparative Perspective.” Representation 48 (1): 47–61.
   Google Scholar
• Gilens, Martin. 2005. “Inequality and Democratic Responsiveness.” Public Opinion Quarterly 69 (5): 778–796.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hayes, Bernadette C, and Clive S Bean. 1993. “Political Efficacy: A Comparative Study of the United States, West Germany, Great Britain and Australia.” European Journal of Political Research 23 (3): 261–280.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Inglehart, Ronald. 1990. Culture Shift in Advanced Industrial Society. Political Science : Sociology. Princeton University Press. https://books.google.be/books?id=ztYnOnSgs1EC.
   Google Scholar
• Inglehart, Ronald. 1997. “Postmaterialist Values and the Erosion of Institutional Authority.” In Why People Don’t Trust Government, edited by Joseph S. Nye and David C. King. Cambridge, MA/London: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jacobs, Lawrence R, Fay Lomax Cook, and Michael X Delli Carpini. 2009. Talking Together: Public Deliberation and Political Participation in America. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jacobs, Lawrence R., and Benjamin I. Page. 2005. “. ‘Who Influences U.S. Foreign Policy?” ’ The American Political Science Review 99 (1): 107–123.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Landwehr, Claudia, and Thorsten Faas. 2016. ‘Who Wants Democratic Innovations, and Why’. Mainz: Universität Mainz.
   Google Scholar
• Lefkofridi, Zoe, Nathalie Giger, and Kathrin Kissau. 2012. ‘Inequality and Representation in Europe’.
   Google Scholar
• Lesschaeve, Christophe. 2017. ‘Whose Democracy Is It? A Study of Inequality in Policy Opinion Congruence Between Privileged and Underprivileged Voters in Belgium’.
   Google Scholar
• Lijphart, Arend. 1997. “‘Unequal Participation: Democracy’s Unresolved Dilemma’.” The American Political Science Review 91 (1): 1–14. doi:https://doi.org/10.2307/2952255.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marx, Paul, and Christoph Nguyen. 2016. “Are the Unemployed Less Politically Involved? A Comparative Study of Internal Political Efficacy.” European Sociological Review 32 (5): 634–648.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Niessen, Christoph, and Min Reuchamps. 2019. ‘Designing a Permanent Deliberative Citizens’ Assembly’. Centre for Deliberative Democracy and Global Governance Working Paper Series 6.
   Google Scholar
• Norris, Pippa. 2011. Democratic Deficit: Critical Citizens Revisited. Cambridge University Press. https://books.google.be/books?id=slFcAQAACAAJ.
   Google Scholar
• Paugam, Serge. 2006. “L’épreuve Du Chômage: Une Rupture Cumulative Des Liens Sociaux?” Revue Européenne Des Sciences Sociales. European Journal of Social Sciences XLIV–135: 11–27.
   Google Scholar
• Paulis, Emilien, Jean-Benoit Pilet, Sophie Panel, Davide Vittori, and Caroline Close. 2020. “The Politicize Dataset: An Inventory of Deliberative Mini-Publics (DMPs) in Europe.” European Political Science 20: 521–542.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pilet, Jean-Benoit, David Talukder, Maria Jimena Sanhueza, and Jeremy Dodeigne. 2020a. La Représentation Politique Des Femmes Au Niveau Communal En Wallonie Après Les Élections de 2018’. In Les Élections Locales Du 14 Octobre 2018 En Wallonie et à Bruxelles: Une Offre Politique Renouvelée?, 193–216. Vanden Broele.
   Google Scholar
• Pilet, Jean-Benoit, David Talukder, Maria Jimena Sanhueza, and Sacha Rangoni. 2020b. “Do Citizens Perceive Elected Politicians, Experts and Citizens as Alternative or Complementary Policy-Makers? A Study of Belgian Citizens.” Frontiers in Political Science 2: 10.
   Google Scholar
• Pow, James, Lisa van Dijk, and Sofie Marien. 2020. “‘It’s Not Just the Taking Part That Counts:‘Like Me’Perceptions Connect the Wider Public to Minipublics’.” Journal of Deliberative Democracy 16 (2): 43–55.
   Google Scholar
• Rangoni, Sacha, Camille Bedock, and David Talukder. 2021. “More Competent Thus More Legitimate? MPs’ Discourses on Deliberative Mini-Publics.” Acta Politica June. doi:https://doi.org/10.1057/s41269-021-00209-4.
   Google Scholar
• Río, Adrián del, Clemente J Navarro, and Joan Font. 2016. “Citizens, Politicians and Experts in Political Decision-Making: The Importance of Perceptions of the Qualities of Political Actors.” Revista Española de Investigaciones Sociológicas (REIS) 154 (1): 83–120.
   Google Scholar
• Rosset, Jan. 2016. Economic Inequality and Political Representation in Switzerland. Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Schlozman, Kay Lehman, Sidney Verba, and Nancy Burns. 2001. The Private Roots of Public Action: Gender, Equality, and Political Participation. London: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Schuck, Andreas R. T., and Claes H. de Vreese. 2015. “Public Support for Referendums in Europe: A Cross-National Comparison in 21 Countries.” Electoral Studies 38: 149–158.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, Graham. 2009. Democratic Innovations: Designing Institutions for Citizen Participation. New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Stockemer, Daniel, and Aksel Sundström. 2019. “Young Deputies in the European Parliament: A Starkly Underrepresented Age Group.” Acta Politica 54 (1): 124–144.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Talukder, David. 2021. ‘Do Underrepresented Citizens Perceive That They Are Underrepresented?: An Inquiry into Belgian Disadvantaged Groups’ Satisfaction with Policies Implemented by the Government.’ In ECPR Joint Sessions of Workshops, 1–20.
   Google Scholar
• Thomassen, Jacques. 2015. “What’s Gone Wrong with Democracy, or with Theories Explaining Why It Has?” In Citizenship and Democracy in an Era of Crisis, edited by Thomas Pogunkte, Sigrid Rossteutscher, Rüdiger Schmitt-Beck, and Sonja Zmerli, 56–74. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Traber, Denise, Miriam Hänni, Nathalie Giger, and Christian Breunig. 2021. “Social Status, Political Priorities and Unequal Representation.” European Journal of Political Research 1–23.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vandamme, Pierre-Etienne, and Antoine Verret-Hamelin. 2017. “A Randomly Selected Chamber: Promises and Challenges.” Journal of Public Deliberation 13 (1): 1–24.
   Google Scholar
• Vrydagh, Julien, Jehan Bottin, Min Reuchamps, Frédéric Bouhon, and Sophie Devillers. 2021. “Les Commissions Délibératives Entre Parlementaires et Citoyens Tirés Au Sort Au Sein Des Assemblées Bruxelloises.” Courrier Hebdomadaire Du CRISP 7: 5–68.
   Google Scholar
• Vrydagh, Julien, Sophie Devillers, David Talukder, Vincent Jacquet, and Jehan Bottin. 2020. “Les mini-publics en Belgique (2001-2018) : expériences de panels citoyens délibératifs.” Courrier hebdomadaire du CRISP 2477–2478 (32–33): 5–72. doi:https://doi.org/10.3917/cris.2477.0005.
   Google Scholar
• Vrydagh, Julien, Sophie Devillers, Vincent Jacquet, David Talukder, and Jehan Bottin. Forthcoming. “Thriving in an Unfriendly Territory: The Peculiar Rise of Minipublics in Consociational Belgium.” In Belgian Exceptionalism. Belgian Politics between Realism and Surrealism. London: Routledge. https://www.routledge.com/Belgian-Exceptionalism-Belgian-Politics-between-Realism-and-Surrealism/Caluwaerts-Reuchamps/p/book/9780367610241#sup.
   Google Scholar
• Webb, Paul. 2013. “Who Is Willing to Participate? Dissatisfied Democrats, Stealth Democrats and Populists in the United Kingdom: Who Is Willing to Participate?” European Journal of Political Research 52 (6): 747–772. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-6765.12021.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar