Using deliberation for partisan purposes: evidence from the Hungarian National Consultation

References

• Andersen, V. N., and K. M. Hansen. 2007. “How Deliberation Makes Better Citizens: The Danish Deliberative Poll on the Euro.” European Journal OfPolitical Research 46 (4): 531–556.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anduiza, E., M. Guinjoan, and G. Rico. 2019. “Populism, Participation, and Political Equality.” European Political Science Review 11 (1): 109–124.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baiocchi, G., and E. Ganuza. 2014. “Participatory Budgeting as if Emancipation Mattered.” Politics & Society 42 (1): 29–50.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bartha, A., Z. Boda, and D. Szikra. 2020. “When Populist Leaders Govern: Conceptualising Populism in Policy Making.” Politics and Governance 8 (3): 71–81.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Batory, A. 2016. “‘Populists in Government? Hungary’s “System of National Cooperation”’.” Democratization 23 (2): 283–303.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Batory, A., and S. Svensson. 2019. “The use and Abuse of Participatory Governance by Populist Governments.” Policy & Politics 47 (2): 227–244.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bennett, W. L., A. Segerberg, and C. B. Knüpfer. 2017. “The Democratic Interface: Technology, Political Organization, and Diverging Patterns of Electoral Representation.” Information, Communication & Society 28 (11): 1655–1680.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Biezen, I. van, and D. R. Piccio. 2013. “Shaping Intra-Party Democracy: On the Legal Regulation of Internal Party Organizations.” In The Challenges of Intra-Party Democracy, edited by W. P. Cross, and R. S. Katz, 27–48. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bogaards, M. 2018. “De-democratization in Hungary: Diffusely Defective Democracy.” Democratization. Taylor & Francis 25 (8): 1481–1499.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Borge, R., and E. Santamarina. 2016. “From Protest to Political Parties: Online Deliberation in New Parties in Spain.” Media Studies 7 (14): 104–122.
   Google Scholar
• Braun, V., and V. Clarke. 2006. “Using Thematic Analysis in Psychology.” Qualitative Research in Psychology 3 (2): 77–101.
   Google Scholar
• Caluwaerts, D., and M. Reuchamps. 2016. “Generating Democratic Legitimacy Through Deliberative Innovations: The Role of Embeddedness and Disruptiveness.” Representation. Taylor & Francis 52 (1): 13–27.
   Google Scholar
• Canovan, M. 1999. “Trust the People! Populism and the Two Faces of Democracy.” Political Studies 47 (1): 2–16.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chambers, S. 2003. “Deliberative Democratic Theory.” Annual Review of Political Science 6 (1): 307–326.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chaney, P. 2006. “‘Critical Mass, Deliberation and the Substantive Representation of Women: Evidence from the UK’s Devolution Programme’.” Political Studies 54 (4): 691–714.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cooke, M. 2000. “Five Arguments for Deliberative Democracy.” Political Studies 48 (5): 947–969.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Croissant, A., and P. Chambers. 2010. “Unravelling Intra-Party Democracy in Thailand.” Asian Journal of Political Science 18 (2): 195–223.
   Google Scholar
• Dahlberg, S., J. Linde, and S. Holmberg. 2015. “Democratic Discontent in Old and New Democracies: Assessing the Importance of Democratic Input and Governmental Output.” Political Studies 63 (S1): 18–37.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davidson, S., and A. Stark. 2011. “Institutionalising Public Deliberation: Insights from the Scottish Parliament.” British Politics 6 (2): 155–186.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dryzek, J. S. 2004. “Legitimacy and Economy in Deliberative Democracy.” Contemporary Political Theory: A Reader 29 (5): 242–260.
   Google Scholar
• Dryzek, J. S., et al. 2019. “The Crisis of Democracy and the Science of Deliberation.” Science 363 (6432): 1144–1146.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dutwin, D. 2003. “The Character of Deliberation: Equality, Argument, and the Formation of Public Opinion.” International Journal of Public Opinion Research 15 (3): 239–264.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dzur, A. W., and C. M. Hendriks. 2018. “Thick Populism: Democracy-Enhancing Popular Participation.” Policy Studies. Taylor & Francis 39 (3): 334–351.
   Google Scholar
• Eerola, A., and M. Reuchamps. 2016. “Constitutional Modernisation and Deliberative Democracy: A Political Science Assessment of Four Cases.” Revue Interdisciplinaire D’études Juridiques 77 (2): 319–336.
   Google Scholar
• Enyedi, Z. 2016a. “Paternalist Populism and Illiberal Elitism in Central Europe.” Journal of Political Ideologies 21 (1): 9–25.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Enyedi, Z. 2016b. “Populist Polarization and Party System Institutionalization: The Role of Party Politics in De-Democratization.” Problems of Post-Communism 63 (4): 210–220.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fishkin, J. S. 2009. When the People Speak. Deliberative Democracy & Public Consultation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fishkin, J. S., et al. 2010. “Deliberative Democracy in an Unlikely Place: Deliberative Polling in China.” British Journal of Political Science 40 (2): 435–448.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fishkin, J. S., and R. C. Luskin. 2005. “Experimenting with a Democratic Ideal: Deliberative Polling and Public Opinion.” Acta Politica 40 (3): 284–298.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fishkin, J. S., R. C. Luskin, and R. Jowell. 2000. “Deliberative Polling and Public Consultation.” Parliamentary Affairs 53 (4): 657–666.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flinders, M., and D. Curry. 2008. “Deliberative Democracy, Elite Politics and Electoral Reform.” Policy Studies 29 (4): 371–392.
   Google Scholar
• Fournier, P., et al. 2011. When Citizens Decide: Lessons from Citizen Assemblies on Electoral Reform. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gad, N. 2020. “A “new Political Culture”: the Challenges of Deliberation in Alternativet.” European Political Science 19 (2): 190–199.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gherghina, S. 2017. “Direct Democracy and Subjective Regime Legitimacy in Europe.” Democratization 24 (4): 613–631.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gherghina, S. 2019a. “Hijacked Direct Democracy: The Instrumental Use of Referendums in Romania.” East European Politics and Societies 33 (3): 778–797.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gherghina, S. 2019b. “How Political Parties use Referendums: An Analytical Framework.” East European Politics and Societies 33 (3): 677–690.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gherghina, S., and V. Jacquet. 2021. “How and why Political Parties use Deliberation: A Framework for Analysis.” Acta Politica. Forthcomin.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gherghina, S., S. Soare, and V. Jacquet. 2020. “Deliberative Democracy and Political Parties: Functions and Consequences.” European Political Science 19 (2): 200–211.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gherghina, S., and V. Stoiciu. 2020. “Selecting Candidates Through Deliberation: The Effects for Demos in Romania.” European Political Science 19 (2): 171–180.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hartliński, M. 2019. “The Effect of Political Parties on Nationwide Referendums in Poland After 1989.” East European Politics and Societies 33 (3): 733–754.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• He, B., and M. E. Warren. 2011. “Authoritarian Deliberation: The Deliberative Turn in Chinese Political Development.” Perspectives on Politics 9 (2): 269–289.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Herman, L. E. 2016. “Re-evaluating the Post-Communist Success Story: Party Elite Loyalty, Citizen Mobilization and the Erosion of Hungarian Democracy.” European Political Science Review 8 (2): 251–284.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hollander, S. 2019. The Politics of Referendum use in European Democracies. Nijmegen: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Illonszki, G., and R. Várnagy. 2014. “Stable Leadership in the Context of Party Change: The Hungarian Case.” In The Selection of Political Party Leaders in Contemporary Parliamentary Democracies: A Comparative Study, edited by J.-B. Pilet, and W. P. Cross, 156–171. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Jacquet, V., and R. Van Der Does. 2020. “The Consequences of Deliberative Minipublics : Systematic Overview, Conceptual Gaps, and New Directions.” Representation. Taylor & Francis 0 (0): 1–11.
   Google Scholar
• Jiang, M. 2010. “Authoritarian Deliberation on Chinese Internet.” Electronic Journal of Communication 20 (3&4): 1–22.
   Google Scholar
• Katz, R. S., and P. Mair. 1993. “The Evolution of Party Organizations in Europe: The Three Faces of Party Organization.” The American Review of Politics 14 (Winter): 593–617.
   Google Scholar
• Körösényi, A., G. Illés, and A. Gyulai. 2020. The Orbán Regime: Plebiscitary Leader Democracy in the Making, Routledge advances in European politics. London: Routledge/Taylor & Francis Group.
   Google Scholar
• Lehrer, R. 2012. “Intra-Party Democracy and Party Responsiveness.” West European Politics 35 (6): 1295–1319.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levi, M., and L. Stoker. 2000. “Political Trust and Trustworthiness.” Annual Review of Political Science 3 (1): 475–507.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Linde, J., and S. Holmberg. 2013. Dissatisfied Democrats: A Matter of Representation or Performance? 8. Gothenburg.
   Google Scholar
• Loxbo, K. 2013. “The Fate of Intra-Party Democracy: Leadership Autonomy and Activist Influence in the Mass Party and the Cartel Party.” Party Politics 19 (4): 537–554.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meghallgattuk Magyarországot, M. 2005. Nemzeti Konzultáció. Budapest: Nemzeti Konzultációért Alapítvány.
   Google Scholar
• Mudde, C. 2007. Populist Radical Right Parties in Europe. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Nemčok, M., and P. Spáč. 2019. “Referendum as a Party Tool: The Case of Slovakia.” East European Politics and Societies 33 (3): 755–777.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Norris, P. 1999. Critical Citizens: Global Support for Democratic Government. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Oross, D., and P. Tap. 2021. “Moving Online: Political Parties and the Internal use of Digital Tools in Hungary.” European Societies. (online first).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pascolo, L. 2020. “Do Political Parties Support Participatory Democracy? A Comparative Analysis of Party Manifestos in Belgium.” ConstDelib Working Paper Series 1 (9): 1–26.
   Google Scholar
• Paxon, M. 2020. Agonistic Democracy. Rethinking Political Institutions in Pluralist Times. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Pállinger, Z. T. 2016. The Uses of Direct Democracy in Hungary. Paper presented at the ECPR 2016 Generals Conference.
   Google Scholar
• Phelan, C. 2006. “Public Trust and Government Betrayal.” Journal of Economic Theory 130 (1): 27–43.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pirro, A. L. P. 2015. “The Populist Radical Right in the Political Process: Assessing Party Impact in Central and Eastern Europe.” In Transforming the Transformation? The East European Radical Right in the Political Process, edited by M. Minkenberg, 80–105. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Pirro, A. L. P., and M. Portos. 2021. “Populism Between Voting and non-Electoral Participation.” West European Politics. Routledge 44 (3): 558–584.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reuchamps, M., and J. Suiter. 2016. Constitutional Deliberative Democracy in Europe. Colchester: ECPR Press.
   Google Scholar
• Scherz, A. 2019. “Tying Legitimacy to Political Power: Graded Legitimacy Standards for International Institutions.” European Journal of Political Theory 0 (0): 1–23.
   Google Scholar
• Scoggins, B. 2020. “Identity Politics or Economics? Explaining Voter Support for Hungary’s Illiberal FIDESZ:.” East European Politics and Societies, and Cultures. (online first).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Setälä, M., and G. Smith. 2018. “Mini-Publics and Deliberative Democracy.” In The Oxford Handbook of Deliberative Democracy, edited by A. Bächtiger, J. S. Dryzek, J. Mansbridge, and M. E. Warren, 300–314. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sharon, A. 2019. “Populism and Democracy: The Challenge for Deliberative Democracy.” European Journal of Philosophy 27 (2): 359–376.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stoychev, S. P., and G. Tomova. 2019. “Campaigning Outside the Campaign: Political Parties and Referendums in Bulgaria.” East European Politics and Societies and Cultures 33 (3): 691–704.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Suteu, S. 2019. “The Populist Turn in Central and Eastern Europe: Is Deliberative Democracy Part of the Solution?” European Constitutional Law Review 15 (3): 488–518.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Teorell, J. 1999. “A Deliberative Defence of Intra-Party Democracy.” Party Politics 5 (3): 363–382.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Eeden, P. 2019. “‘Discover, Instrumentalize, Monopolize: Fidesz’s Three-Step Blueprint for a Populist Take-Over of Referendums’.” East European Politics and Societies 33 (3): 705–732.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vittori, D. 2017. “Podemos and the Five Stars Movement: Divergent Trajectories in a Similar Crisis.” Constellations (oxford, England) 24 (3): 324–338.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vittori, D. 2019. “‘Membership and Members’ Participation in new Digital Parties: Bring Back the People?’.” Comparative European Politics 18 (4): 609–629.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vodová, P., and P. Voda. 2020. “The Effects of Deliberation in Czech Pirate Party: the Case of Coalition Formation in Brno (2018).” European Political Science 19 (2): 181–189.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wampler, B. 2008. “When Does Participatory Democracy Deepen the Quality of Democracy? Brazil Lessons from.” Comparative Politics 41 (1): 61–81.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Warren, M. E., and H. Pearse. 2008. Designing Deliberative Democracy: The British Columbia Citizens’ Assembly. New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Whiteley, P., et al. 2016. “Why do Voters Lose Trust in Governments? Public Perceptions of Government Honesty and Trustworthiness in Britain 2000-2013.” British Journal of Politics and International Relations 18 (1): 234–254.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wolkenstein, F. 2016. “A Deliberative Model of Intra-Party Democracy.” Journal of Political Philosophy 24 (3): 297–320.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wolkenstein, F. 2018. “Intra-party Democracy Beyond Aggregation.” Party Politics 24 (4): 323–334.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zaslove, A., et al. 2021. “‘Power to the People? Populism, Democracy, and Political Participation: a Citizen’s Perspective’.” West European Politics. Routledge 44 (4): 727–751.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zulianello, M. 2020. “Varieties of Populist Parties and Party Systems in Europe: From State-of-the-Art to the Application of a Novel Classification Scheme to 66 Parties in 33 Countries.” Government and Opposition 55: 327–347.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar