How to frame the governance dimension of social innovation: theoretical considerations and empirical evidence

References

• Abad, A. G., and A. G. Ezponda. 2021. “Controversies in Social Innovation Research.” Innovation: The European Journal of Social Science Research. doi:10.1080/13511610.2021.1964348.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aucoin, P. 2012. “New Political Governance in Westminster Systems: Impartial Public Administration and Management Performance at Risk.” Governance 25 (2): 177–199.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ayob, N., S. Teasdale, and K. Fagan. 2016. “How Social Innovation ‘Came to Be’: Tracing the Evolution of a Contested Concept.” Journal of Social Policy 45 (4): 635–653.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bardach, E. 2003. “Creating a Compendia of Best Practice.” Journal of Policy Analysis and Management 22 (4): 661–665.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bardach, E. 2008. A Practical Guide for Policy Analysis: The Eightfold Path to More Effective Problem Solving. Washington, DC: CQ Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bazurli, R., F. Campomori, and M. Casula. 2020. “Shelter from the Storm: «Virtuous» Systems of Urban Asylum Governance Coping with Italy’s Immigration Crackdown.” Politiche Sociali, Social Policies 2: 201–224.
   Google Scholar
• Benneworth, P., and J. Cunha. 2015. “Universities’ Contributions to Social Innovation: Reflections in Theory & Practice.” European Journal of Innovation Management 18 (4): 508–527.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brock, K. L. 2020. “Government and Non-Profit Collaboration in Times of Deliverology, Policy Innovation Laboratories and Hubs, and New Public Governance.” Voluntas 31: 257–270.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Broekema, P. M., L. G. Horlings, and E. Bulder. 2021. “Tackling Societal Challenges Together Co-Creation Strategies and Social Innovation in EU Policy and Funded Projects.” European Policy Analysis, 1–19. doi:10.1002/epa2.1133.
   Google Scholar
• Bund, E., U. Gerhard, M. Hoelscher, and G. Mildenberger. 2015. “A Methodological Framework for Measuring Social Innovation.” Historical Social Research 49 (3): 48–78.
   Google Scholar
• Campomori, F., and M. Ambrosini. 2020. “Multilevel Governance in Trouble: The Implementation of Asylum Seekers’ Reception in Italy as a Battleground.” Comparative Migration Studies 8: 22. doi:10.1186/s40878-020-00178-1.
   Google Scholar
• Campomori, F., and M. Casula. 2021. “Institutionalizing Innovation in Welfare Local Services through Co-Production: Towards a Neo-Weberian State?” Italian Political Science Review, 1–29. doi:10.1017/ipo.2021.43.
   Google Scholar
• Castelli Gattinara, P., C. Froio, and A. L. P. Pirro. 2021. “Far-Right Protest Mobilisation in Europe: Grievances, Opportunities and Resources.” European Journal of Political Research. doi:10.1111/1475-6765.12484.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Castro-Spila, J., A. Luna, and A. Unceta. 2016. “Social Innovation Regime. An Exploratoy Framework to Measure Social Innovation.” SIMPACT Working Paper 2016(1), Gelsenkirschen: Institute for Work and Technology.
   Google Scholar
• Casula, M. 2015. “Opportunity Structures for Citizens’ Participation in Italian Regions: A Case Study.” Journal of Public Deliberation 11: Article 6.
   Google Scholar
• Casula, M. 2017. “Who Governs in (Local) Governance? Theoretical Considerations and Empirical Evidence.” Revista de Administracao Publica-Brazilian Journal of Public Administration 51: 1121–1138.
   Google Scholar
• Casula, M. 2020. “A Contextual Explanation of Regional Governance in Europe: Insights from Inter-Municipal Cooperation.” Public Management Review 22 (12): 1819–1851. doi:10.1080/14719037.2019.1665700.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Casula, M. 2022. “Implementing the Transformative Innovation Policy in the European Union: How Does Transformative Change Occur in Member States?” European Planning Studies. doi:10.1080/09654313.2021.2025345.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Casula, M., C. Leonardi, and M. Zancanaro. 2022. “How Does Digital Technology Impact on the Co-Production of Local Services? Evidence from a Childcare Experience.” Public Money & Management 42 (2): 87–97. doi:10.1080/09540962.2020.1728066.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheng, Y. D. 2018. “Exploring the Role of Non-Profits in Public Service Provision: Moving from Coproduction to Cogovernance.” Public Administration Review 79: 203–214.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coletti, Paola. 2013. Evidence for Public Policy Design: How to Learn from Best Practice. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Cunha, J., and P. Benneworth. 2020. “How to Measure the Impact of Social Innovation Initiatives?” International Review on Public and Nonprofit Marketing 17: 59–75. doi:10.1007/s12208-019-00240-4.
   Google Scholar
• Feiock, R. C. 2007. “Rational Choice and Regional Governance.” Journal of Urban Affairs 29 (1): 47–63. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9906.2007.00322.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feiock, R. C. 2009. “Metropolitan Governance and Institutional Collective Action.” Urban Affairs Review 44 (3): 356–377. doi:10.1177/1078087408324000.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garkisch, Michael, Jens Heidingsfelder, and Markus Beckmann. 2017. “Third Sector Organizations and Migration: A Systematic Literature Review on the Contribution of Third Sector Organizations in View of Flight, Migration and Refugee Crises.” Voluntas 28 (5): 1839–1880.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gastil, J., and P. Levine, eds. 2005. The Deliberative Democracy Handbook. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Gerometta, J., H. Haussermann, and G. Longo. 2005. “Social Innovation and Civil Society in Urban Governance: Strategies for an Inclusive City.” Urban Studies 42 (11): 2007–2021.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hartley, J. 2005. “Innovation in Governance and Public Services: Past and Present.” Public Money & Management 7 (1): 27–34.
   Google Scholar
• King D., P. Le Galès, and T. Vitale. 2017. “Assimilation, Security, and Borders in the Member States.” In Reconfiguring European States in Crisis, edited by D. King and P. Le Galès, 428–450. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Krlev, G., E. Bund, and G. Mildenberger. 2014. “Measuring What Matters—Indicators of Social Innovativeness on the National Level.” Information Systems Management 31 (2): 200–224.
   Google Scholar
• Lane, D., S. Van Der Leeuw, D. Pumain, and G. West. 2009. Complexity Perspectives in Innovation and Social Change. Berlin: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Lévesque, B. 2013. “Social Innovation in Governance and Public Management Systems: Toward a New Paradigm?” In The International Handbook of Social Innovation. Collective Action, Social Learning and Transdisciplinarity Research, edited by F. Moulaert, D. MacCallum, A. Mehmood, and A. Hamdouch, 25–39. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Lodge, M., and K. Wegrich. 2014. The Problem-Solving Capacity of the Modern State: Governance Challenges and Administrative Capacities. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mihci, H. 2020. “Is Measuring Social Innovation a Mission Impossible?” Innovation: The European Journal of Social Science Research 33 (3): 337–367. doi:10.1080/13511610.2019.1705149.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miquel, M. P., M. G. Cabeza, and S. E. Anglada. 2013. “Theorizing Multi-Level Governance in Social Dynamics.” In The International Handbook of Social Innovation. Collective Action, Social Learning and Transdisciplinarity Research, edited by F. Moulaert, D. MacCallum, A. Mehmood, and A. Hamdouch, 155–168. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Moulaert, F., D. MacCallum, A. Mehmood, and A. Hamdouch. 2013. The International Handbook of Social Innovation. Collective Action, Social Learning and Transdisciplinarity Research. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Moulaert, G., F. Martinelli, E. Swyngedouw, and S. Gonzàles. 2005. “Towards Alternative Model(s) of Local Innovation.” Urban Studies 42 (11): 1969–1990.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nesti, G. 2018. “Co-production for Innovation: The Urban Living lab Experience.” Policy and Society 37 (3): 310–325.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oosterlynkck, S., Y. Kazepov, A. Nnovy, P. Cools, E. Barberis, F. Wukovitsch, T. Saruis, and B. Leubolt. 2013. The Butterfly and the Elephant: Local Social Innovation, the Welfare State and New Poverty Dynamics. Improve Discussion Paper, n.13/03.
   Google Scholar
• Ostrom, E. 1996. “Crossing the Great Divide: Coproduction, Synergy and Development.” World Development 24 (6): 1073–1087.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O'Toole, L. J. 1986. “Policy Recommendations for Multi-Actor Implementation: An Assessment of the Field.” Journal of Public Policy 6(2): 181–210.
   Google Scholar
• O’Toole, L J. 2012. “Interorganizational Relations and Policy Implementation.” In The SAGE Handbook of Public Administration, edited by G. Peters, and J. Pierre, 292–304. SAGE Publications Ltd.
   Google Scholar
• Pais, I., E. Polizzi, and T. Vitale. 2019. “Governare l’economia collaborativa per produrre inclusione: attori, strumenti, stili di relazione e problemi di implementazione.” In Governare Milano nel nuovo millennio, edited by A. Andreotti, 215–237. Bologna: Il Mulino.
   Google Scholar
• Pestoff, V. 2012. “Co-Production and Third Sector Social Services in Europe: Some Concepts and Evidence.” Voluntas 23: 1102–1118.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pestoff, V., T. Brandsen, and B. Verschuere. 2012. New Public Governance, the Third Sector and Co-Production. Abingdon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Peters, B. 2015. Advanced Introduction to Public Policy. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Polany, M. 1966. The Tacit Dimension. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
   Google Scholar
• Pollitt, C., and P. Hupe. 2011. “Talking About Government.” Public Management Review 13 (5): 641–658. doi:10.1080/14719037.2010.532963.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Profeti, S., and V. Tarditi. 2021. “Whatever Works? Varieties of Local Public Service Delivery Between Instrumentality and Legitimacy.” Stato e mercato, Rivista quadrimestrale 2/2021: 201–233. doi:10.1425/102023.
   Google Scholar
• Reeder, N., C. O’Sullivan, S. Tucker, P. Ramsden, and G. Mulgan. 2012. Strengthening Social Innovation in Europe - Journey to Effective Assessment and Metrics. European Commission: Directorate-General for Enterprise and Industry.
   Google Scholar
• Rose, R. 1991. “What Is Lesson-Drawing?” Journal of Public Policy 11 (1): 3–30.
   Google Scholar
• Rose, R. 1993. Lesson Drawing in Public Policy: A Guide to Learning Across Time and Space. Chatham, NJ: Chatham House Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Rose, R. 2004. Learning from Comparative Public Policy: A Practical Guide. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Saruis, T., F. Colombo, E. Barberis, and Y. Kazepov. 2019. “Istituzioni del welfare e innovazione sociale: un rapporto conflittuale?” La Rivista delle Politiche Sociali/Journal of Social Policy 1: 23–38.
   Google Scholar
• Schmitter, P. 2002. “Participation in Governance Arrangements: Is There any Reason to Expect it Will Achieve ‘Sustainable and Innovative Policies in a Multi-Level Context’?” In Participatory Governance: Political and Societal Implications, edited by J. R. Grote, and B. Gbikpi, 51–69. Opladen: Leske and Budrich.
   Google Scholar
• Schon, D. A., and M. Rein. 1994. Frame Reflection: Toward the Resolution of Intractable Policy Controversies. New York: Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Sicilia, M., E. Guarini, A. Sancino, M. Andreani, and R. Ruffini, 2016. “Public Services Management and Co-Production in Multi-Level Governance Settings.” International Review of Administrative Sciences 82 (1): 8–27.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sorrentino, M., M. De Marco, and C. Rossignoli. 2016. “Health Care co-Production: Co-Creation of Value in Flexible Boundary Spheres.” In Exploring Services Science: 7th International Conference, IESS 2016, edited by T. Borangiu, M. Dragoice, and H. Nóvoa, 649–659. Heidelberg: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Sorrentino, M., M. Sicilia, and M. Howlett. 2018. “Understanding Co-Production as a New Public Governance Tool.” Policy and Society 37 (3): 277–293.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steinebach, Y. 2022. “Instrument Choice, Implementation Structures, and the Effectiveness of Environmental Policies: A Cross-National Analysis.” Regulation & Governance 16: 225–242.
   Google Scholar
• Steinebach, Y., and C. Knill. 2017. “Social Policy in Hard Times: Crisis-Coping Strategies in Europe from 1976 to 2013.” International Journal of Public Administration 40: 1164–1174.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Swyngedouw, E. 2005. “Governance Innovation and the Citizen: The Janus Face of Governance-Beyond-the-State.” Urban Studies 42 (11): 1991–2006.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thomann, E., P. Hupe, and F. Sager. 2018. “Serving Many Masters: Public Accountability in Private Policy Implementation.” Governance 31 (2): 299–319.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vicari Haddock, S. 2013. “Introduction: The Pillars of Social Innovation Research and Practice.” In The International Handbook of Social Innovation, edited by F. Moulaert, D. MacCallum, A. Mehmood, and A. Hamdouch, 427–429. https://www.e-elgar.com/shop/usd/the-international-handbook-on-social-innovation-9781782545590.html.
   Google Scholar
• Vitale, T. 2009. “L’impatto istituzionale dell’innovazione sociale.” In Rigenerare la città. Pratiche di innovazione sociale nelle città europee, edited by S. Vicari Haddock, and F. Moulaert, 163–198. Bologna: Il Mulino.
   Google Scholar
• Voorberg, W. H., Viktor Bekkers, and L. G. Tummers. 2015. “A Systematic Review of Co-Creation and Co-Production: Embarking on the Social Innovation Journey.” Public Management Review 17 (9): 1333–1357.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weber, M. 1968. Economy and Society: An Outline of Interpretative Sociology. New York: Bedminster Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wollman, H. 2007. “Policy Evaluation and Evaluation Research.” In Public Policy Analysis. Theory, Politics and Methods, edited by F. Fischer, G. J. Miller, and M. S. Sidney, 393–402. Boca Raton, FL: CRC, Press.
   Google Scholar
• Young Foundation. 2010. Study on Social Innovation. Bruxelles: European Union/Young Foundation.
   Google Scholar