Up-scaling social innovation in asylum adjudication: the case of the Migrantes project in Sicily

References

• Amabile, Teresa M. 1988. “A model of creativity and innovation in organizations.” In Research in Organizational Behavior, edited by Barry L. Staw, and Larry L. Cummings, 123–167. Greenwich: JAI Press.
   Google Scholar
• Amabile, Teresa M., Regina Conti, Heather Coon, Jeffrey Lazenby, and Michael Herron. 1996. “Assessing the Work Environment for Creativity.” Academy of Management Journal 39 (5): 1154–1184. doi:10.2307/256995.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anderson, Tara, Andrew Curtis, and Claudia Wittig. 2014. Definition and theory in social innovation. Krems: Danube University. http://www.transitsocialinnovation.eu/resource-hub/definition-and-theory-in-social-innovation.
   Google Scholar
• Bakker, Linda, Sin Yi Cheung, and Jenny Phillimore. 2016. “The Asylum-Integration Paradox: Comparing Asylum Support Systems and Refugee Integration in The Netherlands and the UK.” International Migration 54 (4): 118–132. doi:10.1111/imig.12251.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bell, John. 2006. Judiciaries within Europe: a comparative review. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• BEPA. 2010. Empowering People, Driving Change. Social Innovation in the European Union. Brussels: Bureau of European Policy Advisers and European Commission. https://ec.europa.eu/migrant-integration/librarydoc/empowering-people-driving-change-social-innovation-in-the-european-union.
   Google Scholar
• Bitencourt, Claudia, Diego Antonio Bittencourt Marconatto, Luciano Barin Cruz, and Emmanuel Raufflet. 2016. “Introduction to special edition social innovation: researching, defining and theorizing social innovation.” RAM. Revista de Administração Mackenzie 17: 14–19. doi:10.1590/1678-69712016/administracao.v17n6p14-19.
   Google Scholar
• Blackler, Frank. 1995. “Knowledge, knowledge work and organizations: An overview and interpretation.” Organization Studies 16 (6): 1021–1046. doi:10.1177/017084069501600605.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bolzan, Larissa Medianeira, Cláudia Cristina Bitencourt, and Bibiana Volkmer Martins. 2019. “Exploring the scalability process of social innovation.” Innovation & Management Review 16 (3): 218–234. doi:10.1108/INMR-05-2018-0029.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bovens, Mark. 2005. “The concept of public accountability.” In The Oxford Handbook of Public Management, edited by Ewan Ferlie, Laurence E. Lynn Jr, and Christopher Pollitt, 182–208. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bradach, Jeffrey. 2010. “Scaling impact: How to get 100x the results with 2x the organization.” Stanford Social Innovation Review 6 (3): 27–28.
   Google Scholar
• Braga, Joana C., Teresa Proença, and Marisa R. Ferreira. 2014. “Motivations for social entrepreneurship – Evidences from Portugal.” Tékhne 12 (1): 11–21. doi: 10.1016/j.tekhne.2015.01.002.
   Google Scholar
• Campomori, Francesca, and Mattia Casula. 2021. “Institutionalizing innovation in welfare local services through co-production: toward a Neo-Weberian State?” Rivista Italiana di Scienza Politica, 1–15. doi: 10.1017/ipo.2021.43.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Campomori, Francesca, and Mattia Casula. 2022. “How to frame the governance dimension of social innovation: theoretical considerations and empirical evidence.” Innovation: The European Journal of Social Science Research: 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1080/13511610.2022.2036952.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Castelli, Claudio, Pasquale Liccardo, Giovanni Melillo, Daniela Piana, and Luca Verzelloni. 2014. Giustizia, territori e governo dell’innovazione. Rome: Carocci.
   Google Scholar
• Court of Catania. 2016. Progetto ‘E-Migrantes’- Percorsi. L’esperienza del Tribunale di Catania nell’ambito della semplificazione delle procedure di ricorso avverso il diniego della protezione internazionale. 22 September 2016. Catania: Court of Catania.
   Google Scholar
• CSM. 2017a. Risoluzione sulle linee guida in tema di organizzazione e buone prassi per la trattazione dei procedimenti relativi alla protezione internazionale. 15th March 2017. Rome: CSM.
   Google Scholar
• CSM. 2017b. Protocollo d’intesa tra il Ministero dell'Interno ed il Consiglio Superiore della Magistratura per il miglioramento dell'efficienza nella gestione degli scambi informativi-documentali nelle controversie ex art. 35 e 35-bis del D.lgs. n. 25/2008, così come modificato dal D.L. n. 13/2017, 23rd March 2017. Rome: CSM.
   Google Scholar
• CSM. 2017c. Protocollo Consiglio Superiore della Magistratura-CNF contenente ‘Linee Guida in materia di patrocinio a spese dello Stato nei procedimenti di protezione internazionale. 7th July 2017. Rome: CSM.
   Google Scholar
• Dallara, Cristina, and Alice Lacchei. 2021. “Street-level bureaucrats and coping mechanisms. The unexpected role of Italian judges in Asylum policy implementation.” South European Society & Politics 26 (1): 83–108. doi: 10.1080/13608746.2021.1956161.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Di Marco, Bruno, Mariano Sciacca, and Raffaella Finocchiaro. 2017. “E-Migrantes. L’esperienza del Tribunale di Catania nell’ambito della semplificazione delle procedure di ricorso contro il diniego alla protezione internazionale.” La magistratura LXVI (1-2): 130–137.
   Google Scholar
• Evans, Susan H., and Peter Clarke. 2011. “Disseminating orphan innovations.” Stanford Social Innovation Review 9 (1): 42–47. doi: 10.48558/PX5H-VC28.
   Google Scholar
• Fassin, D., and C. Kobelinsky. 2012. “Comment on juge l'asile.” Revue française de sociologie 53 (4): 657–688. doi: 10.3917/rfs.534.0657.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fontana, I. 2019. “The implementation of Italian asylum policy and the recognition of protection in times of crisis: between external and internal constraints.” Contemporary Italian Politics 11 (4): 429–445. doi: 10.1080/23248823.2019.1680027.
   Google Scholar
• Franz, Hans-Werner, Josef Hochgerner, and Jürgen Howaldt. 2012. “Final observations.” In Challenge Social Innovation, edited by Hans-Werner Franz, Josef Hochgerner, and Jürgen Howaldt, 379–384. Verlag: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Galego, Diego, Frank Moulaert, Marleen Brans, and Gonçalo Santinha. 2021. “Social innovation & governance: a scoping review.” Innovation: The European Journal of Social Science Research, doi: 10.1080/13511610.2021.1879630.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Giovannetti, Monia. 2018. “Riconosciuti e diniegati dietro i numeri le persone.” Questione Giustizia 2: 44–66.
   Google Scholar
• Guarnieri, Carlo, Patrizia Pederzoli, and Cheryl A. Thomas. 2002. The power of judges: A comparative study of courts and democracy. Oxford-New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Guarnieri, Carlo, and Daniela Piana. 2011. “Judicial independence and the rule of law: Exploring the European experience.” In The culture of judicial independence: Conceptual foundations and practical challenges, edited by Shimon Shetreet, and Christopher Forsyth, 111–124. Leiden: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Hainmueller, Jens, Dominik Hangartner, and Duncan Lawrence. 2016. “When Lives Are Put on Hold: Lengthy Asylum Processes Decrease Employment among Refugees.” Science Advances 2 (8): 1–7. doi: 10.1126/sciadv.1600432.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harrison, Denis. 2012. “Social Innovation: What Is Coming Apart and What Is Being Rebuilt?” In Challenge Social Innovation, edited by Hans-Werner Franz, Josef Hochgerner, and Jürgen Howaldt, 73–86. Verlag: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Heuts, Eva, and Alexis Versele. 2016. “RenoseeC: Renovating with a social, ecological and economic benefit through a collective approach.” Energy Procedia 96: 540–550. doi: 10.1016/j.egypro.2016.09.097.
   Google Scholar
• Italian Parliament. 2017. Documentazione per l’esame di Progetti di Legge. Disposizioni urgenti in materia di protezione internazionale e di contrasto della immigrazione illegale. Schede di lettura D.L. 13/2017 – A.C. 4394, n. 558, 30 March 2017.
   Google Scholar
• Kazepov, Yuri, Tatiana Saruis, and Fabio Colombo. 2020a. “Consolidating social innovation.” In Local Social Innovation to Combat Poverty and Exclusion: A Critical Appraisal, edited by Stijn Oosterlynck, Andreas Novy, and Yuri Kazepov, 189–216. Bristol: Policy Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kazepov, Yuri, Tatiana Saruis, and Fabio Colombo. 2020b. “The multi-scalar puzzle of social innovation.” In Local Social Innovation to Combat Poverty and Exclusion: A Critical Appraisal, edited by Stijn Oosterlynck, Andreas Novy, and Yuri Kazepov, 91–112. Bristol: Policy Press.
   Google Scholar
• Latour, Bruno. 2002. La fabrique du droit. Paris: La Decouverte.
   Google Scholar
• McPhedran Waitzer, John, and Roshan Paul. 2011. “Scaling social impact: When everybody contributes, everybody wins.” Innovations: Technology, Governance, Globalization 6 (2): 143–155.
   Google Scholar
• Ministry of Justice. 2020. Giustizia Civile. Flussi. Rome: Ministry of Justice. https://webstat.giustizia.it/StatisticheGiudiziarie/civile/Procedimenti%20Civili%20-%20flussi.aspx.
   Google Scholar
• Ministry of the Interior. . 2020. Quaderno statistico 1990-2020. Rome: Ministry of the Interior. http://www.libertaciviliimmigrazione.dlci.interno.gov.it/sites/default/files/allegati/quaderno_statistico_per_gli_anni_1990_2020.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Moulaert, Frank, Diana MacCallum, and Jean Hillier. 2013. “Social innovation: intuition, precept, concept.” In The international handbook on social innovation: collective action, social learning and transdisciplinary research, edited by Frank Moulaert, Diana MacCallum, Abid Mehmood, and Abdelillah Hamdouch, 13–24. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Moulaert, Frank, Flavia Martinelli, Erik Swyngedouw, and Sara Gonzalez. 2005. “Towards alternative model(s) of local innovation.” Urban studies 42 (11): 1969–1990. doi: 10.1080/00420980500279893.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mulgan, Geoff, Simon Tucker, Rushanara Ali, and Ben Sanders. 2008. Social innovation: What it is, why it matters, and how it can be accelerated. London: The Basingstoke Press.
   Google Scholar
• Phillimore, Jenny. 2020. “Refugee-Integration-Opportunity Structures: Shifting the Focus from Refugees to Context.” Journal of Refugee Studies 34 (2): 1946–1966. doi: 10.1093/jrs/feaa012.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Piana, Daniela. 2010. Judicial accountabilities in new Europe: From rule of law to quality of justice. Burlington: Ashgate.
   Google Scholar
• Piana, Daniela, and Francesco Raniolo. 2015. State unbounded. Extra legal professionalism and goal oriented interventions in the Italian judicial system. Rome: Luiss University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Russell, Peter H. 2001. “Toward a general theory of judicial independence.” In Judicial independence in the age of democracy: Critical perspectives from around the world, edited by Peter H. Russell, and David O’Brien, 1–25. Charlottesville: University Press of Virginia.
   Google Scholar
• Sabato, Sebastiano, and Gert Verschraegen. 2019. “The multi-level governance of social innovation: How the EU supports socially innovative initiatives.” Rivista Italiana di Politiche Pubbliche 14 (1): 35–66. doi: 10.1483/92869.
   Google Scholar
• Van de Ven, Andrew, Douglas Polley, Raghu Garud, and Sankaran Venkataraman. 1999. The innovation journey. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Verzelloni, Luca. 2020. Paradossi dell’innovazione: I sistemi giustizia del Sud Europa. Rome: Carocci.
   Google Scholar
• Vitale, Tommaso. 2009. “L’impatto istituzionale dell’innovazione sociale.” In Rigenerare la città: Pratiche di innovazione sociale nelle città europee, edited by Serena Vicari Haddock, and Frank Moulaert, 163–198. Bologna: Il Mulino.
   Google Scholar
• Voltan, Annika, and Claudia De Fuentes. 2016. “Managing multiple logics in partnerships for scaling social innovation.” European Journal of Innovation Management 19 (4): 446–467. doi: 10.1108/EJIM-01-2016-0010.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• V.V.A.A. 2015. Accordo di Collaborazione [Memorandum of Understanding]. 30th October 2015. Catania: Court of Catania.
   Google Scholar
• Weick, Karl. 1976. “Educational Organizations as Loosely Coupled Systems.” Administrative Science Quarterly 21 (1): 1–19. doi: 10.2307/2391875.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ziegler, Rafael. 2017. “Social innovation as a collaborative concept.” Innovation. The European Journal of Social Science Research 30 (4): 388–405. doi:10.1080/13511610.2017.1348935.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar