Social relationships with nature: elements of a framework for socio-ecological structure analysis

References

• Adorno, Theodor W., R. Nevitt Sanford, Else Frenkel-Brunswik, and Daniel Levinson. 1950. The Authoritarian Personality. New York, NY: Harper.
   Google Scholar
• Barca, Stefania. 2011. “Energy, Property, and the Industrial Revolution Narrative.” Ecological Economics 70 (7): 1309–1315.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bauhardt, Christine. 2015. “Gesellschaftliche Naturverhältnisse und Ressourcenpolitik - Eine globale Perspektive.” In Nachhaltigkeit anders denken: Veränderungspotenziale durch Geschlechterperspektiven, edited by Christine Katz, 115–125. Wiesbaden: Springer Fachmedien.
   Google Scholar
• Becker, Egon, and Thomas Jahn. 2006. Soziale Ökologie: Grundzüge einer Wissenschaft von den Gesellschaftlichen Naturverhältnissen. Frankfurt/M: Campus.
   Google Scholar
• Bennett, Tony, Mike Savage, Silva Elizabeth, Alan Warde, Modesto Gayo-Cal, and David Wright. 2009. Culture, Class, Distinction. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Berghöfer, Uta, Ricardo Rozzi, and Kurt Jax. 2010. “Many Eyes on Nature: Diverse Perspectives in the Cape Horn Biosphere Reserve and Their Relevance for Conservation.” Ecology and Society 15 (1): 18.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bernhard, Stefan, and Christian Schmidt-Wellenburg. 2012. Feldanalyse Als Forschungsprogramm. Wiesbaden: Springer VS.
   Google Scholar
• Biesecker, Adelheid, and Sabine Hofmeister. 2010. “Focus: (Re)Productivity: Sustainable Relations Both Between Society and Nature and Between the Genders.” Ecological Economics 69 (8): 1703–1711.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Birch, Kean, Les Levidow, and Theo Papaioannou. 2010. “. “Sustainable Capital? The Neoliberalization of Nature and Knowledge in the European ‘Knowledge-Based Bio-Economy.’.” Sustainability 2 (9): 2898–2918.
   Google Scholar
• BMUB and UBA. 2017. Umweltbewusstsein in Deutschland 2016. Ergebnisse einer repräsentativen Bevölkerungsumfrage. Berlin: BMUB.
   Google Scholar
• BMUV and UBA. 2020. Umweltbewusstsein in Deutschland 2020. Ergebnisse einer repräsentativen Bevölkerungsumfrage. Berlin: BMUV.
   Google Scholar
• Bourdieu, Pierre. 1962. The Algerians. Boston: Beacon Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bourdieu, Pierre. 1977. Outline of a Theory of Practice. Cambridge: Cambridge Univ. Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bourdieu, Pierre. 1984. Distinction. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bourdieu, Pierre. 1990. The Logic of Practice. London [et al.]: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bourdieu, Pierre. 2003. “Unite and Rule.” In Firing Back: Against the Tyranny of the Market 2, 82–96. London: Verso.
   Google Scholar
• Bourdieu, Pierre. 2008. The Bachelors’ Ball: The Crisis of Peasant Society in Bearn. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bourdieu, Pierre. 2014. On the State: Lectures at the Collège de France, 1989 - 1992. Cambridge: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Brand, Ulrich. 2016. “How to Get Out of the Multiple Crisis? Contours of a Critical Theory of Social-Ecological Transformation.” Environmental Values 25 (5): 503–525. doi:10.3197/096327116X14703858759017.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brand, Ulrich, and Christoph Görg. 2001. “The Regulation of the Market and the Transformation of the Societal Relationships with Nature.” Capitalism Nature Socialism 12 (4): 67–94.
   Google Scholar
• Brand, Karl-Werner, Angelika Poferl, and Karin Schilling. 1998. “Umweltmentalitäten. Wie wir die Umweltthematik in unser Alltagsleben integrieren.” In Umweltbildung und Umweltbewußtsein: Forschungsperspektiven im Kontext Nachhaltiger Entwicklung, edited by Gerhard de Haan and Udo Kuckartz, 39–68. Opladen: Leske Budrich.
   Google Scholar
• Brand, Ulrich, and Markus Wissen. 2011. “Die Regulation der ökologischen Krise.” Österreichische Zeitschrift für Soziologie 36 (2): 12–34. doi:10.1007/s11614-011-0031-1.
   Google Scholar
• Brand, Ulrich, and Markus Wissen. 2013. “Crisis and Continuity of Capitalist Society-Nature Relationships: The Imperial Mode of Living and the Limits to Environmental Governance.” Review of International Political Economy : RIPE 20 (4): 687–711.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Breit, Heiko, and Lutz H. Eckensberger. 1998. “Moral, Alltag Und Umwelt.” In Umweltbildung Und Umweltbewußtsein: Forschungsperspektiven Im Kontext Nachhaltiger Entwicklung, edited by Gerhard de Haan, and Udo Kuckartz, 69–90. Opladen: Budrich.
   Google Scholar
• Bremer, Helmut, and Christel Teiwes-Kügler. 2013. “Zur Theorie und Praxis der ‘Habitus-Hermeneutik.” In Empirisch arbeiten mit Bourdieu. Theoretische und methodische Überlegungen, Konzeptionen und Erfahrungen, edited by Anna Brake, Helmut Bremer, and Andrea Lange-Vester, 93–129. Weinheim: Beltz Juventa.
   Google Scholar
• Bremer, Helmut, and Christel Teiwes-Kügler. 2014. “Habitusanalyse als Habitus-Hermeneutik.” ZQF – Zeitschrift für Qualitative Forschung 14 (2): 199–219.
   Google Scholar
• Bremer, Helmut, and Christel Teiwes-Kügler. 2020. “Typenbildung in der Habitus- und Milieuforschung: Das soziale Spiel durchschaubar machen.” In Typenbildung und Theoriegenerierung: Methoden und Methodologien qualitativer Bildungs- und Biographieforschung, edited by Jutta Ecarius, and Burkhard Schäffer, 323–352. Opladen: Budrich.
   Google Scholar
• Bugge, Markus M., Teis Hansen, and Antje Klitkou. 2016. “What Is the Bioeconomy? A Review of the Literature.” Sustainability 8 (7): 691.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carfagna, Lindsey B, Emilie A Dubois, Connor Fitzmaurice, Monique Y Ouimette, Juliet B Schor, Margaret Willis, and Thomas Laidley. 2014. “An Emerging Eco-Habitus: The Reconfiguration of High Cultural Capital Practices among Ethical Consumers.” Journal of Consumer Culture 14 (2): 158–178. doi:10.1177/1469540514526227.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chakrabarty, Dipesh. 2020. The Climate of History in a Planetary Age. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cleaver, Harry M. 1972. “The Contradictions of the Green Revolution.” The American Economic Review 62 (1/2): 177–186.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Collins, Rebecca. 2018. “A Sustainable Future in the Making? The Maker Movement, the Maker-Habitus and Sustainability.” In Geographies of Making, Craft and Creativity, edited by Laura Price, and Harriet Hawkins, 174–194. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Dath, Dietmar, and Barbara Kirchner. 2012. Der Implex: Sozialer Fortschritt, Geschichte und Idee. Berlin: Suhrkamp.
   Google Scholar
• Denord, François, Johs Hjellbrekke, Olav Korsnes, Frédéric Lebaron, and Brigitte Le Roux. 2011. “Social Capital in the Field of Power: The Case of Norway.” The Sociological Review 59 (1): 86–108. doi:10.1111/j.1467-954X.2010.01994.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Descola, Philippe. 2013. Beyond Nature and Culture. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Diekmann, Andreas, and Peter Preisendörfer. 2003. “Green and Greenback: The Behavioral Effects of Environmental Attitudes in Low-Cost and High-Cost Situations.” Rationality and Society 15 (4): 441–472.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dörre, Klaus, Stephan Lessenich, and Hartmut Rosa. 2015. Sociology, Capitalism, Critique. London/New York: Verso.
   Google Scholar
• Douglas, Mary. 1999. “Four Cultures: The Evolution of a Parsimonious Model.” GeoJournal 47 (3): 411–415.
   Google Scholar
• Elhacham, Emily, Liad Ben-Uri, Jonathan Grozovski, Yinon M. Bar-On, and Ron Milo. 2020. “Global Human-Made Mass Exceeds All Living Biomass.” Nature 588 (7838): 442–444.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• European Commission. 2018. A Sustainable Bioeconomy for Europe: Strengthening the Connection Between Economy, Society and the Environment. Brussels: European Commission.
   Google Scholar
• Eversberg, Dennis. 2020a. Bioökonomie als Einsatz polarisierter sozialer Konflikte? Zur Verteilung sozial-ökologischer Mentalitäten in der deutschen Bevölkerung 2018 und ihren Unterstützungs- und Widerstandspotentialen gegenüber Bioökonomie als gesellschaftlichem Wandel. Working Paper of the BMBF junior research group “flumen.” Jena: Friedrich-Schiller-Universität.
   Google Scholar
• Eversberg, Dennis. 2020b. “Who Can Challenge the Imperial Mode of Living? The Terrain of Struggles for Social-Ecological Transformation in the German Population.” Innovation: The European Journal of Social Science Research 33 (2): 233–256. doi:10.1080/13511610.2019.1674129.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eversberg, Dennis. 2021a. “From Democracy at Others’ Expense to Externalization at Democracy’s Expense: Property-Based Personhood and Citizenship Struggles in Organized and Flexible Capitalism.” Anthropological Theory, January. SAGE Publications. doi:10.1177/1463499620977995.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eversberg, Dennis. 2021b. “The Social Specificity of Societal Nature Relations in a Flexible Capitalist Society.” Environmental Values 30 (3): 319–343. doi:10.3197/096327120X15916910310581.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eversberg, Dennis, Martin Fritz, Jana Holz, Philip Koch, Lilian Pungas, and Matthias Schmelzer. 2021. Mentalities Matter: Sozial-ökologische Mentalitäten und ihre Bedeutung in post-fossilen Transformationen. 5. Working Paper of the BMBF junior research group “Flumen.” Jena: Friedrich-Schiller-Universität. https://www.flumen.uni-jena.de/wp-content/uploads/2021/08/Working-Paper-Nr.5-final.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Flemmen, Magne, Vegard Jarness, and Lennart Rosenlund. 2017. “Social Space and Cultural Class Divisions: The Forms of Capital and Contemporary Lifestyle Differentiation.” The British Journal of Sociology, doi:10.1111/1468-4446.12295.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frankfurt Institute for Social Research. 1972. Aspects of Sociology. Boston: Beacon Pr.
   Google Scholar
• Franzen, Axel, and Reto Meyer. 2004. “Klimawandel des Umweltbewusstseins?/Climate Change in Environmental Attitudes? Eine Analyse des ISSP 2000/An Analysis of the ISSP 2000.” Zeitschrift für Soziologie 33 (2): 119–137.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gäbler, Karsten. 2015. “Green Capitalism, Sustainability, and Everyday Practice.” In Global Sustainability, 63–86. Springer. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-16477-9_4.
   Google Scholar
• Görg, Christoph. 1999. Gesellschaftliche Naturverhältnisse. Münster: Westfälisches Dampfboot.
   Google Scholar
• Görg, Christoph. 2003. Regulation der Naturverhältnisse: Zu einer kritischen Regulation der ökologischen Krise. Münster: Westfälisches Dampfboot.
   Google Scholar
• Görg, Christoph, and Ulrich Brand. 2003. “Post-Fordist Societal Relationships with Nature: The Role of NGOs and the State in Biodiversity Politics.” Rethinking Marxism 15 (2): 263–288.
   Google Scholar
• Gottschlich, Daniela, Tanja Mölders, and Martina Padmanbhan. 2017. “Introduction to the Symposium on Feminist Perspectives on Human–Nature Relations.” Agriculture and Human Values 34 (4): 933–940.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Graeber, David. 2007a. “Manners, Deference, and Private Property: Or, Elements for a General Theory of Hierarchy.” In Possibilities: Essays on Hierarchy, Rebellion and Desire, 13–56. Oakland: AK Press.
   Google Scholar
• Graeber, David. 2007b. “Debt, Violence, and Impersonal Markets: Polanyian Meditations.” In Market and Society: The Great Transformation Today, edited by Chris Hann, and Keith Hart, 106–132. Cambridge: Cambridge Univ. Press.
   Google Scholar
• Haberl, Helmut, Marina Fischer-Kowalski, Fridolin Krausmann, and Verena Winiwarter. 2016. Social Ecology: Society-Nature Relations Across Time and Space. Cham: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Haluza-DeLay, Randolph. 2008. “A Theory of Practice for Social Movements: Environmentalism and Ecological Habitus*.” Mobilization: An International Quarterly 13 (2): 205–218. doi:10.17813/maiq.13.2.k5015r82j2q35148.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hausknost, Daniel, Ernst Schriefl, Christian Lauk, and Gerald Kalt. 2017. “A Transition to Which Bioeconomy? An Exploration of Diverging Techno-Political Choices.” Sustainability 9 (4): 669.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hedlund-de Witt, Annick. 2012. “Exploring Worldviews and Their Relationships to Sustainable Lifestyles: Towards a New Conceptual and Methodological Approach.” Ecological Economics 84 (December): 74–83.
   Google Scholar
• Hedlund-de Witt, Annick, Joop de Boer, and Jan J. Boersema. 2014. “Exploring Inner and Outer Worlds: A Quantitative Study of Worldviews, Environmental Attitudes, and Sustainable Lifestyles.” Journal of Environmental Psychology 37 (March): 40–54.
   Google Scholar
• Hofmeister, Sabine, and Tanja Mölders. 2021. Für Natur sorgen? Dilemmata feministischer Positionierungen zwischen Sorge- und Herrschaftsverhältnissen. Opladen: Verlag Babara Budrich.
   Google Scholar
• Horkheimer, Max. 2004. Eclipse of Reason. Rev. ed. London/New York: Continuum.
   Google Scholar
• Horkheimer, Max, and Theodor W. Adorno. 2002. Dialectic of Enlightenment: Philosophical Fragments. Stanford, CA: Stanford Univ. Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hornborg, Alf. 2001. The Power of the Machine: Global Inequalities of Economy, Technology, and Environment. Lanham: Altamira Press.
   Google Scholar
• Høyen, Marianne. 2013. View on Nature – a Field? Conference Paper for ESA Conference. Turin.
   Google Scholar
• Inglehart, R. 1982. “Changing Values and the Rise of Environmentalism in Western Societies”, Working Paper, Berlin: Wissenschaftszentrum Berlin.
   Google Scholar
• Iosifidi, Maria. 2016. “Environmental Awareness, Consumption, and Labor Supply: Empirical Evidence from Household Survey Data.” Ecological Economics 129 (September): 1–11.
   Google Scholar
• Jahn, Thomas. 1991. Krise als gesellschaftliche Erfahrungsform: Umrisse eines sozial-ökologischen Gesellschaftskonzepts. Frankfurt/M.: Verl. für Interkulturelle Kommunikation.
   Google Scholar
• Jahn, Thomas, and Peter Wehling. 1998. “Gesellschaftliche Naturverhältnisse — Konturen eines theoretischen Konzepts.” In Soziologie und Natur: Theoretische Perspektiven, edited by Karl-Werner Brand, 75–93. Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.
   Google Scholar
• Karol, Justin, and Trevor Gale. 2004. “Bourdieu’s Social Theory and Sustainability: What Is ‘Environmental Capital.’” Conference Paper for the Australian Association for Research in Education. Melbourne.
   Google Scholar
• Klain, Sarah C., Paige Olmsted, Kai M. A. Chan, and Terre Satterfield. 2017. “Relational Values Resonate Broadly and Differently Than Intrinsic or Instrumental Values, or the New Ecological Paradigm.” PLOS ONE 12 (8): e0183962.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Knight, Kyle W. 2016. “Public Awareness and Perception of Climate Change: A Quantitative Cross-National Study.” Environmental Sociology 2 (1): 101–113.
   Google Scholar
• Koch, Max. 2020. “Structure, Action and Change: A Bourdieusian Perspective on the Preconditions for a Degrowth Transition.” Sustainability: Science, Practice and Policy 16 (1): 4–14. doi:10.1080/15487733.2020.1754693.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Korzeniewicz, Roberto Patricio, and Timothy Patrick Moran. 2009. Unveiling Inequality: A World-Historical Perspective. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
   Google Scholar
• Krausmann, Fridolin, and Marina Fischer-Kowalski. 2010. Gesellschaftliche Naturverhältnisse: Energiequellen und die globale Transformation des gesellschaftlichen Stoffwechsels. Social Ecology Working Paper 117. Vienna: Inst. of Social Ecology, IFF-Fac. for Interdisciplinary Studies, Klagenfurt Univ.
   Google Scholar
• Krausmann, Fridolin, Dominik Wiedenhofer, Christian Lauk, Willi Haas, Hiroki Tanikawa, Tomer Fishman, Alessio Miatto, Heinz Schandl, and Helmut Haberl. 2017. “Global Socioeconomic Material Stocks Rise 23-Fold Over the 20th Century and Require Half of Annual Resource Use.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 114 (8): 1880–1885.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuthe, Alina, Lars Keller, Annemarie Körfgen, Hans Stötter, Anna Oberrauch, and Karl-Michael Höferl. 2019. “How Many Young Generations Are There? – A Typology of Teenagers’ Climate Change Awareness in Germany and Austria.” The Journal of Environmental Education 50 (3): 172–182. doi:10.1080/00958964.2019.1598927.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lahire, Bernard. 2010. The Plural Actor. Cambridge: Polity.
   Google Scholar
• Lange-Vester, Andrea, and Christel Teiwes-Kügler. 2013. “Das Konzept der Habitushermeneutik in der Milieuforschung.” In Pierre Bourdieus Konzeption des Habitus: Grundlagen, Zugänge, Forschungsperspektiven, edited by Alexander Lenger, Christian Schneickert, and Florian Schumacher, 149–174. Wiesbaden: Springer VS.
   Google Scholar
• Lebaron, Frédéric. 2008. “Central Bankers in the Contemporary Global Field of Power: A ‘Social Space’ Approach.” The Sociological Review 56 (May): 121–144. doi:10.1111/j.1467-954X.2008.00765.x.
   Google Scholar
• Lessenich, Stephan. 2019. Living Well at Others’ Expense. Cambridge: Polity.
   Google Scholar
• Luxemburg, Rosa. 1913. Die Akkumulation des Kapitals: Ein Beitrag zur ökonomischen Erklärung des Imperialismus. Berlin: Singer.
   Google Scholar
• Malm, Andreas. 2016. Fossil Capital: The Rise of Steam Power and the Roots of Global Warming. London: Verso.
   Google Scholar
• Malm, Andreas. 2018. The Progress of This Storm: Nature and Society in a Warming World. Paperback First Published. London: Verso.
   Google Scholar
• Malm, Andreas, and The Zetkin Collective. 2021. White Skin, Black Fuel: On the Danger of Fossil Fascism. London: Verso.
   Google Scholar
• Marx, Karl. 1967. Grundrisse der Kritik der Politischen Ökonomie. Frankfurt/M.: Europ. Verl.-Anst.
   Google Scholar
• McCormick, Kes, and Niina Kautto. 2013. “The Bioeconomy in Europe: An Overview.” Sustainability 5 (6): 2589–2608.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mitchell, Timothy. 2011. Carbon Democracy: Political Power in the Age of Oil. London: Verso.
   Google Scholar
• Moore, Jason W. 2015. Capitalism in the Web of Life: Ecology and the Accumulation of Capital. London: Verso.
   Google Scholar
• Moore, Jason W. 2017. “The Capitalocene, Part I: On the Nature and Origins of Our Ecological Crisis.” The Journal of Peasant Studies : Critical Perspectives on Rural Politics and Development 44 (3): 594.
   Google Scholar
• Muradian, Roldan, and Unai Pascual. 2018. “A Typology of Elementary Forms of Human-Nature Relations: A Contribution to the Valuation Debate.” Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, Sustainability Challenges: Relational Values 35 (December): 8–14.
   Google Scholar
• Neckel, Sighard.. 2018. “Ökologische Distinktion. Soziale Grenzziehung Im Zeichen von Nachhaltigkeit.” In Die Gesellschaft Der Nachhaltigkeit. Umrisse Eines Forschungsprogramms, edited by Sighard Neckel, Besedovsky Natalia, Boddenberg Moritz, Hasenfratz Martina, Pritz Sarah, and Wiegand Timo, 59–76.
   Google Scholar
• Pini, Barbara, and Josephine Previte. 2013. “Bourdieu, the Boom and Cashed-up Bogans.” Journal of Sociology 49 (2–3): 256–271. doi:10.1177/1440783313481742.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Poferl, Angelika, Karin Schilling, and Karl-Werner Brand. 1997. Umweltbewußtsein und Alltagshandeln: Eine empirische Untersuchung sozial-kultureller Orientierungen. Opladen: Leske & Budrich.
   Google Scholar
• Preisendörfer, Peter, and Andreas Diekmann. 2021. “Environmental Behavior: Measurement Approaches and Determining Factors.” In Handbook of Environmental Sociology, edited by Axel Franzen, and Sebastian Mäder, 140–156. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Pungas, Lilian. 2019. “Food Self-Provisioning as an Answer to the Metabolic Rift: The Case of ‘Dacha Resilience’ in Estonia.” Journal of Rural Studies 68: 75–86.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosa, Hartmut. 2019. Resonance: A Sociology of Our Relationship to the World. Medford, MA: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Savage, Mike, Fiona Devine, Niall Cunningham, Sam Friedman, Daniel Laurison, Andrew Miles, Helene Snee, and Mark Taylor. 2014. “On Social Class, Anno 2014.” Sociology 49 (6), doi:10.1177/0038038514536635.
   Google Scholar
• Scerri, Andy. 2016. “Deep Ecology, the Holistic Critique of Enlightenment Dualism, and the Irony of History.” Environmental Values 25 (5): 527–551.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmid Noerr, Gunzelin. 1990. Das Eingedenken Der Natur Im Subjekt: Zur Dialektik von Vernunft Und Natur in Der Kritischen Theorie Horkheimers, Adornos Und Marcuses. Darmstadt: Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft.
   Google Scholar
• Schmidt, Volker H. 2020. “Eight Theories of Societalization: Toward a Theoretically Sustainable Concept of Society.” European Journal of Social Theory 23 (3): 411–430.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shafer, Elwood L. 1969. “Perception of Natural Environments.” Environment and Behavior 1 (1): 71–82.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simmel, Georg. 1908. Soziologie: Untersuchungen über die Formen der Vergesellschaftung. Leipzig: Duncker & Humblot.
   Google Scholar
• Spash, Clive L. 2021. “Conceptualising Nature: From Dasgupta to Degrowth.” Environmental Values 30 (3): 265–275.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steffen, Will, Wendy Broadgate, Lisa Deutsch, Owen Gaffney, and Cornelia Ludwig. 2015. “The Trajectory of the Anthropocene: The Great Acceleration.” The Anthropocene Review 2 (1): 81–98.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stern, Paul C., and Thomas Dietz. 1994. “The Value Basis of Environmental Concern.” Journal of Social Issues 50 (3): 65–84.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tittor, Anne. 2020. “Contested Understandings of Nature in Nicaraguás South-East.” Revista Científica Foz 3 (1): 8–27.
   Google Scholar
• Vester, Michael. 2004. “Die Illusion der Bildungsexpansion. Bildungsöffnungen und soziale Segregation in der Bundesrepublik Deutschland.” In Das kulturelle Kapital und die Macht der Klassenstrukturen. Sozialstrukturelle Verschiebungen und Wandlungsprozesse des Habitus, edited by Steffani Engler, and Beate Krais, 13–54. Weinheim: Juventa.
   Google Scholar
• Vester, Michael, Peter von Oertzen, Heiko Geiling, Thomas Herrmann, and Dagmar Müller. 2001. Soziale Milieus im gesellschaftlichen Strukturwandel. Zwischen Integration und Ausgrenzung. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.
   Google Scholar
• Weber, Max. 1922. Wirtschaft Und Gesellschaft. Grundriß der Sozialökonomik, vol. 3. Tübingen: Mohr.
   Google Scholar
• Welzer, Harald. 2011. Mental Infrastructures: How Growth Entered the World and Our Souls. 14. Publication Series on Ecology. Berlin: Heinrich-Böll-Stiftung.
   Google Scholar
• Wissen, Markus. 2011. Gesellschaftliche Naturverhältnisse in der Internationalisierung des Staates: Konflikte um die Räumlichkeit staatlicher Politik und die Kontrolle natürlicher Ressourcen. Münster: Westfälisches Dampfboot.
   Google Scholar
• Wissen, Markus. 2014. “The Political Ecology of Agrofuels: Conceptual Remarks.” In The Political Ecology of Agrofuels, edited by Kristina Dietz, Bettina Engels, Oliver Pye, and Achim Brunnengräber, 16–33. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Wullweber, Joscha. 2004. “Umkämpfte Natur: Genetische Ressourcen als Medium der Kapitalakkumulation.” PROKLA. Zeitschrift für kritische Sozialwissenschaft 34 (135): 245–261. doi:10.32387/prokla.v34i135.632.
   Google Scholar