Narratives of fungal-based materials for a new bioeconomy era

References

• Aguilar, A., T. Twardowski, and R. Wohlgemuth. 2019. “Bioeconomy for Sustainable Development.” Biotechnology Journal 14: 1800638. doi:10.1002/biot.201800638.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Almpani-Lekka, D., S. Pfeiffer, C. Schmidts, and S. I. Seo. 2021. “A Review on Architecture with Fungal Biomaterials: The Desired and the Feasible.” Fungal Biology and Biotechnology 8 (17). doi:10.1186/s40694-021-00124-5.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Anderson, E. N., D. Pearsall, E. Hunn, and N. Turner, eds. 2012. Ethnobiology. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Bächtold-Stäubli, H., ed. 1987. Handwörterbuch des deutschen Aberglaubens. 10 vols. Berlin: Photomechanical Reprint of the Berlin 1927 Edition.
   Google Scholar
• Betz, H. D., ed. 1998ff. Religion in Geschichte und Gegenwart. Handwörterbuch für Theologie und Religionswissenschaft. 4th completely revised ed. Tübingen: pn.
   Google Scholar
• Bilandzic, H., S. Kinnebrock, and M. Klingler. 2020. “The Emotional Effects of Science Narratives: A Theoretical Framework.” Media and Communication 8 (1): 151–163.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boa, E. R. 2004. Wild Edible Fungi: A Global Overview of Their Use and Importance to People. Rom (Italien): Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations.
   Google Scholar
• Boeijinga, A., H. Hoeken, and J. Sanders. 2017. “Storybridging: Four Steps for Constructing Effective Health Narratives.” Health Education Journal 76 (8): 923–935.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Braddock, K., and J. P. Dillard. 2016. “Meta-Analytic Evidence for the Persuasive Effect of Narratives on Beliefs, Attitudes, Intentions, and Behaviors.” Communication Monographs 83 (4): 446–467.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cancik, H., H. Schneider, and A. Pauly, eds. 2003. Der neue Pauly. Stuttgart: Enzyklopädie der Antike.
   Google Scholar
• Cavalier-Smith, T. 1998. “A Revised Six-Kingdom System of Life.” Biological Reviews 73 (3): 203–266.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cerimi, K., K. C. Akkaya, C. Pohl, B. Schmidt, and P. Neubauer. 2019. “Fungi as Source for New Bio-Based Materials: A Patent Review.” Fungal Biology and Biotechnology 6: 17. doi:10.1186/s40694-019-0080-y.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Charyton, C., ed. 2015. Creativity and Innovation among Science and Art : A Discussion of the Two Cultures. London: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Comandini, O., and A. C. Rinaldi. 2020. “Ethnomycology in Europe: The Past, the Present, and the Future.” In Mushrooms, Humans and Nature in a Changing World, edited by J. Perez-Moreno, A. Guerin-Laguette, R. Flores Arzu, and F. Q. Yu, 341–364. Cham: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Daly, D. 2020. “A Storied Perspective on Climate Change: The Effects of Narrative Transportation and Mortality Salience on Pro-Environmental Behavior.” Doctoral diss., University of Colorado at Boulder.
   Google Scholar
• De Graaf, A., H. Hoeken, J. Sanders, and J. W. Beentjes. 2012. “Identification as a Mechanism of Narrative Persuasion.” Communication Research 39 (6): 802–823.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Graaf, A., J. Sanders, and H. Hoeken. 2016. “Characteristics of Narrative Interventions and Health Effects: A Review of the Content, Form, and Context of Narratives in Health-Related Narrative Persuasion Research.” Review of Communication Research 4: 88–131.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deacon, J. W. 2013. Fungal Biology. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• DelConte, A. 2008. Großes Handbuch der Pilze. Munich: Coventgarden.
   Google Scholar
• Dienel, Hans-Liudger, ed. 2013. Die Bürgerausstellung. Die Perspektive von Bürgern und Bürgerinnen als Gegenstand qualitativer Sozialforschung und praktischer Beteiligung. München: Ökom.
   Google Scholar
• Dienel, H. L., B. Böhm, and Manthey. 2015. “Technologie Salon. Best-case-Szenario 2025.” Methode, Ablauf, Ergebnisse. Under. http://www.technik.tu-berlin.de/fileadmin/fg301/Projekte/EUREF-Campus/EUREF_M2G_Technologiesalon_2015.pdf, retrieved at 08.01.2021.
   Google Scholar
• ElShafie, S. J. 2018. “Making Science Meaningful for Broad Audiences Through Stories.” Integrative and Comparative Biology 58 (6): 1213–1223.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grimm, J., and W. Grimm, eds. 1999. Deutsches Wörterbuch. Individual Volumes in New Edition. Stuttgart 1983ff. Photomechanical Reprint of the First Edition Leipzig 1854-1971. Munich: DTV.
   Google Scholar
• Hadhrat, Mirza Masroor Ahmad, ed. 2021. KORAN. DER HEILIGE QUR'AN Arabisch mit deutscher Übersetzung. Vollständig überarbeitete und verbesserte Auflage. Osterreich: Ahmadiyya Muslim Jamaat in der Bundesrepublik Deutschland. https://www.alislam.org/quran/Holy-Quran-German.pdf, S. 881.
   Google Scholar
• Hagen, Joel. 2012. “Five Kingdoms, More or Less: Robert Whittaker and the Broad Classification of Organisms.” BioScience 62: 67–74. doi:10.1525/bio.2012.62.1.11.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hamby, A., K. Daniloski, and D. Brinberg. 2015. “How Consumer Reviews Persuade Through Narratives.” Journal of Business Research 68 (6): 1242–1250.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harris, C. 1999. Art and Innovation: The Xerox PARC Artist-in-Residence Program. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Heimann, T. 2019. “Bioeconomy and SDGs: Does the Bioeconomy Support the Achievement of the SDGs?” Earth's Future 7 (1): 43–57.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holbrook, A. L., M. K. Berent, J. A. Krosnick, P. S. Visser, and D. S. Boninger. 2005. “Attitude Importance and the Accumulation of Attitude-Relevant Knowledge in Memory.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 88 (5): 749.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Houts, P. S., C. C. Doak, L. G. Doak, and M. J. Loscalzo. 2006. “The Role of Pictures in Improving Health Communication: A Review of Research on Attention, Comprehension, Recall, and Adherence.” Patient Education and Counseling 61 (2): 173–190.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Janßen, D., and N. Langen. 2017. “The Bunch of Sustainability Labels–Do Consumers Differentiate?” Journal of Cleaner Production 143: 1233–1245.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jüttemann, Andreas, and Martin Schlecht. 2021. Kernkraftwerk Rheinsberg. Geschichte und Zukunft einer Technik. 1. Auflage. Orte der Geschichte e. V.
   Google Scholar
• Kang, J. A., S. Hong, and G. T. Hubbard. 2020. “The Role of Storytelling in Advertising: Consumer Emotion, Narrative Engagement Level, and Word-of-Mouth Intention.” Journal of Consumer Behaviour 19 (1): 47–56.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kluge, F. 2011. Etymologisches Wörterbuch der Deutschen Sprache. 25th, revised and expanded ed. Berlin: De Gruyter.
   Google Scholar
• Kreisel, H. 2002. “Berühmte Persönlichkeiten als Pilzliebhaber.” Zeitschrift für Mykologie 68: 3–30.
   Google Scholar
• Kück, U., S. Bloemendal, and I. Teichert. 2014. “Putting Fungi to Work: Harvesting a Cornucopia of Drugs, Toxins, and Antibiotics.” PLoS Pathogens 10 (3): e1003950.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lawton, R., M. Conner, and D. Parker. 2007. “Beyond Cognition: Predicting Health Risk Behaviors from Instrumental and Affective Beliefs.” Health Psychology 26 (3): 259.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lehnert. 2020. “Darum könnten Pilze die Rohstoffe der Zukunft sein.” Quarks (Science Programme of the WDR). Accessed January 8, 2022. https://www.quarks.de/umwelt/darum-koennten-pilze-die-rohstoffe-der-zukunft-sein/.
   Google Scholar
• Lelley, J. I. 2018. No Fungi No Future: Wie Pilze die Welt retten können. Berlin: Springer-Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Lhoste, E. F. 2020. “Can Do-it-Yourself Laboratories Open Up the Science, Technology, and Innovation Research System to Civil Society?” Technological Forecasting and Social Change 161: 120226. ISSN 0040-1625. Bspw. “DIY & Mechatronics Lab” am FG Dienel. doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2020.120226.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meyer, V. 2022. “Connecting Materials Sciences with Fungal Biology: A Sea of Possibilities.” Fungal Biology and Biotechnology 9: 5. doi:10.1186/s40694-022-00137-8.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Meyer, V., M. R. Andersen, A. A. Brakhage, G. H. Braus, M. X. Caddick, T. C. Cairns, R. P. de Vries, T. Haarmann, K. Hansen, and C. Hertz-Fowler. 2016. “Current Challenges of Research on Filamentous Fungi in Relation to Human Welfare and a Sustainable Bio-Economy: A White Paper.” Fungal Biology and Biotechnology 3: 6. doi:10.1186/s40694-016-0024-8.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Meyer, V., E. Y. Basenko, J. P. Benz, G. H. Braus, M. X. Caddick, M. Csukai, R. P. De Vries, D. Endy, and J. C. Frisvad. 2020. “Growing a Circular Economy with Fungal Biotechnology: A White Paper.” Fungal Biology and Biotechnology 7: 5. doi:10.1186/s40694-020-00095-z.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Meyer, V., B. Schmidt, C. Pohl, K. Cerimi, B. Schubert, B. Weber, P. Neubauer, et al. 2020. Mind the Fungi (p. 151). Berlin: Universitätsverlag der Technischen Universität.
   Google Scholar
• Morris, B. S., P. Chrysochou, J. D. Christensen, J. L. Orquin, J. Barraza, P. J. Zak, and P. Mitkidis. 2019. “Stories vs. Facts: Triggering Emotion and Action-Taking on Climate Change.” Climatic Change 154 (1): 19–36.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nai, C., and V. Meyer. 2016. “The Beauty and the Morbid: Fungi as Source of Inspiration in Contemporary art.” Fungal Biology and Biotechnology 3: 10. doi:10.1186/s40694-016-0028-4.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Newman, K. 2005. “The Case for the Narrative Brain.” ACM International Conference Proceeding Series, November, vol. 123, 145–149.
   Google Scholar
• Nyberg, Harri. 1992. “Religious Use of Hallucinogenic Fungi: A Comparison Between Siberian and Mesoamerican Cultures.” Karstenia 32 (2): 71–80.
   Google Scholar
• Patel, S., A. Rauf, H. Khan, S. Khalid, and M. S. Mubarak. 2017. “Potential Health Benefits of Natural Products Derived from Truffles: A Review.” Trends in Food Science & Technology 70: 1–8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Patermann, C., and A. Aguilar. 2018. “The Origins of the Bioeconomy in the European Union.” New Biotechnology 40(Part A): 20–24. doi:10.1016/j.nbt.2017.04.002. ISSN 1871-6784.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Peintner, U., S. Schwarz, A. Mešić, P. A. Moreau, G. Moreno, and P. Saviuc. 2013. “Mycophilic or Mycophobic? Legislation and Guidelines on Wild Mushroom Commerce Reveal Different Consumption Behaviour in European Countries.” PloS one 8 (5): e63926.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rapp, R. 2019. “On Mycohuman Performances: Fungi in Current Artistic Research.” Fungal Biology and Biotechnology 6: 22. doi:10.1186/s40694-019-0085-6.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Rillig, M. C., K. Bonneval, C. de Lutz, J. Lehmann, I. Mansour, R. Rapp, S. Spačal, and V. Meyer. 2021. “Ten Simple Rules for Hosting Artists in a Scientific lab.” PLoS Computational Biology 17 (2): e1008675. doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1008675.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rowan, N. J., C. M. Johnstone, R. C. McLean, J. G. Anderson, and J. A. Clarke. 1999. “Prediction of Toxigenic Fungal Growth in Buildings by Using a Novel Modelling System.” Applied and Environmental Microbiology 65 (11): 4814–4821.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schlecht, M., and I. Säumel. 2015. “Wild Growing Mushrooms for the Edible City? Cadmium and Lead Content in Edible Mushrooms Harvested Within the Urban Agglomeration of Berlin, Germany.” Environmental Pollution 204: 298–305. doi:10.1016/j.envpol.2015.05.018. ISSN 0269-7491.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmeck!. 2021. “How Can We Study Taste as It Happens? With Antoine Hennion.” In Taste! Discussions About Investigating Aesthetic Practices [Video]. Discussion Series, March 3. www.vimeo.com/schmeck
   Google Scholar
• Sharma, S., and V. Meyer. 2022. “The Colors of Life: An Interdisciplinary Artist-in-Residence Project to Research Fungal Pigments as a Gateway to Empathy and Understanding of Microbial Life.” Fungal Biology and Biotechnology 9: 1. doi:10.1186/s40694-021-00130-7.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Strasser, B. J., J. Baudry, D. Mahr, G. Sanchez, and E. Tancoigne. 2019. “Citizen Science’? Rethinking Science and Public Participation.” Science & Technology Studies 32 (2): 52–76. doi:10.23987/sts.60425.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Streller, S., and K. Roth. 2009. “Der gehörnte Roggen. Ein chemischer Blick auf den Isenheimer Altar.” Chemie in unserer Zeit 43 (5): 272–287.
   Google Scholar
• Tsing, A. L. 2015. “The Mushroom at the End of the World.” In The Mushroom at the End of the World, p. 331. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• van den Brandhof, J. G., and H. A. B. Wösten. 2022. “Risk Assessment of Fungal Materials.” Fungal Biology and Biotechnology 9: 3. doi:10.1186/s40694-022-00134-x.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Van Laer, T., K. De Ruyter, L. M. Visconti, and M. Wetzels. 2014. “The Extended Transportation-Imagery Model: A Meta-Analysis of the Antecedents and Consequences of Consumers’ Narrative Transportation.” Journal of Consumer Research 40 (5): 797–817.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vandelook, S., E. Elsacker, A. Van Wylick, L. De Laet, and E. Peeters. 2021. “Current State and Future Prospects of Pure Mycelium Materials.” Fungal Biology and Biotechnology 8: 20. doi:10.1186/s40694-021-00128-1.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Veland, S., M. Scoville-Simonds, I. Gram-Hanssen, A. K. Schorre, A. El Khoury, M. J. Nordbø, A. H. Lynch, G. Hochachka, and M. Bjørkan. 2018. “Narrative Matters for Sustainability: The Transformative Role of Storytelling in Realizing 1.5 C Futures.” Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability 31: 41–47.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Woodside, A. G., S. Sood, and K. E. Miller. 2008. “When Consumers and Brands Talk: Storytelling Theory and Research in Psychology and Marketing.” Psychology & Marketing 25 (2): 97–145.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yarkoni, T., N. K. Speer, and J. M. Zacks. 2008. “Neural Substrates of Narrative Comprehension and Memory.” Neuroimage 41 (4): 1408–1425.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang-Kennedy, L., S. Chiasson, and R. Biddle. 2016. “The Role of Instructional Design in Persuasion: A Comics Approach for Improving Cybersecurity.” International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction 32 (3): 215–257.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar